UAE and Türkiye discuss parliamentary cooperation
UAE Thanks Türkiye for hosting pro-Palestine parliamentary gathering
During the meeting, Ghobash expressed gratitude to Kurtulmuş for hosting the inaugural gathering and for extending an invitation to the FNC. He reiterated the UAE's unwavering commitment to the Palestinian cause, highlighting it as a central pillar of the nation's foreign policy.
Emphasis on regional peace and Palestinian rights
Ghobash affirmed the UAE's support for the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people and its dedication to promoting regional and international efforts to achieve peace, security, and stability.
Türkiye highlights growing parliamentary solidarity
Kurtulmuş welcomed the FNC delegation and noted the importance of the participation of 12 parliaments in this first-of-its-kind meeting. He voiced hope that future gatherings will include broader international representation.
Vision for joint action and political support for Palestine
Kurtulmuş also expressed optimism that the meeting would lead to a joint declaration supporting Palestine and help establish a political bloc to advocate for Palestinian rights in international forums, furthering global peace and stability.
Strengthening bilateral parliamentary cooperation
The two sides discussed ways to deepen parliamentary cooperation and coordination on shared concerns. They also underscored the importance of continued active engagement in multilateral parliamentary platforms.
FNC delegation attends high-level meeting
Several members of the FNC joined the meeting, which highlighted mutual aspirations to address pressing global challenges through parliamentary diplomacy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
38 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
War on Gaza: How the BBC sanitises Israel's genocide
The BBC, Britain's most powerful media institution, has played a pivotal role in shaping public understanding of Israel's war on Gaza - and in doing so, has repeatedly chosen to obscure, minimise and sanitise one of the most brutal military campaigns of the 21st century. A comprehensive new report by the Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM) reveals a damning pattern in the BBC's coverage of the war: a relentless privileging of Israeli voices, a dehumanisation of Palestinian suffering, and a willful refusal to name - let alone interrogate - the context of occupation, siege and apartheid that underpins this catastrophe. This is not about minor editorial missteps. It is about a systematic failure to treat Palestinians as fully human - as people whose lives and deaths deserve to be represented with the same dignity, gravity and moral clarity afforded to Israelis. It is about a publicly funded broadcaster abandoning its duty of impartiality in favour of a deeply politicised, one-sided narrative. From the outset of Israel's assault on Gaza following Hamas's 7 October 2023 attack, the BBC framed the war not as a continuation of decades of colonisation, blockade and dispossession, but as a symmetrical clash between two sides. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Articles that failed to mention the word 'occupation' were not the exception but the rule. Terms like 'settlements', 'blockade' and 'apartheid' - used by the UN and Amnesty International - were almost entirely absent. Instead, the conflict was flattened into a series of tit-for-tat exchanges, with Palestinian resistance divorced from any historical or legal context. Grotesque distortion The result? A grotesque distortion of reality in which the structural violence inflicted by one of the most technologically advanced militaries in the world, against a besieged population of two million people, is erased in favour of empty euphemisms and passive constructions. The death toll of Palestinians in Gaza now exceeds 55,000, most of them women and children. But in BBC coverage, the CfMM report shows, Palestinians were most often described as having 'died' or been 'killed' in air strikes, with no mention of who launched them. Israeli victims, by contrast, were described using more emotive language, such as 'slaughtered', 'massacred' and 'butchered'. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war The CfMM report, published this week, examined more than 35,000 pieces of BBC content related to Israel's war on Gaza between 7 October 2023 and 6 October 2024. The BBC used the word 'massacre' 18 times more often to describe Israeli deaths than Palestinian ones. It offered almost equal numbers of victim profiles for both populations - even though a vastly higher number of Palestinians have been killed. This is not a neutral editorial choice; it is a devaluation of Palestinian lives. And it doesn't stop there. Palestinian guests on BBC programmes were routinely interrogated, interrupted, and pushed to condemn Hamas - as if that were the price of being allowed to speak. Israeli spokespeople, many of whom defended war crimes on air, were treated with deference. Not one Israeli guest was asked to condemn the deliberate bombing of hospitals, refugee camps or schools - despite mountains of evidence and international outrage. This type of editorial blindness is not accidental. It flows from a deeper institutional culture that refuses to see Palestinians as people The asymmetry extends to reporting on hostages and prisoners. Israeli hostages were the subject of intense coverage, complete with emotional interviews, wall-to-wall updates, and sombre, humanising details. Palestinian prisoners - thousands of whom have been held without charge or trial - barely registered. Even in cases of prisoner exchanges, BBC coverage focused almost exclusively on Israeli returnees. Who were the Palestinian prisoners? How long had they been imprisoned? Were they tortured, abused, or denied due process? These questions were largely left unasked and unanswered. This type of editorial blindness is not accidental. It flows from a deeper institutional culture that refuses to see Palestinians as people with legitimate grievances, aspirations and rights; a culture that demands Palestinians speak only as victims or terrorists, never as human beings resisting subjugation. Nowhere is this clearer than in the BBC's treatment of language. The report documents more than 100 instances in which presenters interrupted or challenged guests for using the term 'genocide' to describe Israel's actions in Gaza - even as the International Court of Justice ruled that South Africa's case accusing Israel of genocide could proceed. Profound betrayal When it comes to Ukraine, the BBC has no problem platforming such language, with journalists freely invoking allegations of 'war crimes' when describing Russian aggression. But on Israel, the BBC ties itself into rhetorical knots to avoid saying what millions around the world can see with their own eyes: a systematic, unrelenting campaign of annihilation. This is not balance. This is censorship - one that shields the powerful and silences the oppressed. The betrayal is perhaps most profound when it comes to journalists themselves. More than 170 journalists have been killed in Gaza over the course of the war - the deadliest period for media workers in living memory. Yet the BBC saw fit to report on just six percent of those deaths. The graver Israel's atrocities in Gaza, the quieter the BBC grows Read More » These were not nameless casualties. They were mothers, fathers, sons and daughters, documenting their people's suffering with extraordinary courage. Many died with their cameras still in hand. Their deaths should have been a central part of any newsroom's self-reflection. Instead, they were treated as background noise. Compare this with Ukraine, where 62 percent of journalist deaths were covered by the BBC. The disparity speaks volumes. In Gaza, even the deaths of journalists - the people through whom we see the world - are deemed unworthy of sustained attention. Late last year, more than 100 BBC staff signed an open letter warning that the broadcaster was failing in its duty to report fairly on Gaza. They pointed to a culture of fear, editorial double standards, and an unwillingness to allow Palestinian voices and perspectives to be aired without hostility. The BBC defended its coverage of Gaza, saying it was 'transparent' when mistakes were made and 'clear with our audiences on the limitations' of its work due to access restrictions on reporting from the ground. The concerns raised by BBC staff echo those raised in the CfMM's report - and they demand more than a defensive PR response. What's at stake here is not just the BBC's credibility, but the role of media in times of mass violence. The BBC likes to position itself as a global gold standard for journalism. But when its coverage consistently amplifies the voices of the powerful while muting those facing obliteration, it ceases to be a neutral observer. Silence in the face of injustice is not impartiality. The public deserves better. So do the dead Palestinians - and those still living. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
'No war on Iran': New Yorkers rally against US and Israeli regime change plans
On a sweltering summer evening in New York City on Wednesday, hundreds of protesters assembled on the steps of the New York Public Library in Manhattan to convey what they said was a clear message to the city and country's elected officials: 'No War on Iran'. The emergency protest, organised by a coalition of advocacy groups in New York and in several cities across the country, came as rumours swirled of a possible announcement of direct US military intervention in Israel's attacks on Iran. More than 585 Iranians have been killed since Israel launched its aerial strikes on 13 June over claims Iran was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Though Israel said it would exclusively targeting Iran's nuclear programme and military sites, Israel has struck residential buildings, hospitals, civilian infrastructure and the Iranian state television headquarters, killing hundreds of civilians in what is largely being seen as a operation geared towards regime change in Iran. Hospitals in Iran are reportedly overwhelmed with the injured and thousands have been searching for ways to evacuate the capital city, Tehran. Protesters held up Palestinian flags, as well as signs urging for the bombardment to end. Several people waved placards that read: 'Money for people's needs. Not War with Iran'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Ahmad Shirazi, an Iranian-American film-maker based in New York City, told Middle East Eye that it would be a major catastrophe for the U.S and its allies if it attacked Iran. "They tried in 1980. They were not successful. They cannot, and will not be able to get rid of one of the oldest countries in the world, like Iran," Shirazi said. He said that both Israel and the U.S have been peddling lies for as long as he could remember. Another protester, Philip, said that he had family currently in Iran and he was terrified for their safety. "They are targetting civilians, water infrastructure. These are not precision [strikes]. I have family in Iran. They are afraid every night, he said. Protesters carried placards calling for the U.S to deescalate tensions in the region (Azad Essa/MEE) Spectre of US involvement Though the US has denied direct involvement in Israel's strikes on Gaza, several reports indicated that not only has the US assisted Israel, it has also encouraged Israel to continue bombarding Tehran. On Wednesday, three officials at the Arms Control Association, said American involvement in Israel's "illegal attacks" on Iran would "set back efforts to reach an effective nuclear agreement to block Iran's pathways to the Bomb". The statement, released on Wednesday, said that a "consensus view among US intelligence agencies before Israel's bombing campaign was that Iran had not made a decision to move forward on building a bomb, and was several months away, if not longer, from being able to assemble a crude device. "There was no imminent threat that Iran was weaponising its nuclear program before Israel's attack began." For more than 20 months, hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers have taken to the streets to protest the ongoing war in Gaza. Many at the protest on Tuesday said the impunity had allowed Israel to expand the war to Iran. More than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed in Israel's war on Gaza;, which both human rights groups and genocide scholars have labelled a genocide. On Friday, the UN Security Council will convene for a meeting to discuss the hostilities between Israel and Iran.
TAG 91.1
7 hours ago
- TAG 91.1
UAE sends food aid to Gaza amid continued humanitarian crisis
The UAE has sent aid to a camp in the Gaza Strip, providing food to thousands of people in the latest dispatch under Operation Chivalrous Knight 3, an initiative aimed at alleviating the humanitarian crisis facing Palestinians in the enclave. The UAE in late May had reached a deal with Israeli to allow the delivery of humanitarian aid, which is expected to address the food needs of around 15,000 people in Gaza. The Gulf country had earlier rejected Israel's request to fund the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a newly established initiative that has been marked with controversy and violence at aid distribution centres. At least 397 Palestinian aid seekers have been killed and 3,000 others have been wounded since late May, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, reaffirmed the UAE's support for the people of Palestine and its commitment to helping meet their humanitarian needs.
