"Clerical Error": Delhi University After Muslim Listed Under 'Language' On Admission Form
Delhi University on Saturday clarified that the listing of "Muslim" as a 'mother tongue' and the omission of Urdu from its undergraduate admission form was a "clerical error", after the move triggered widespread criticism from academics and civil society.
In a statement, the university said, "The University of Delhi sincerely regrets the inadvertent error in its admission form. We acknowledge your concerns and are committed to addressing them. However, attributing ulterior motives to this entirely unintentional oversight is unwarranted. We request all not to vitiate the University's diverse and harmonious environment."
The clarification came after screenshots of the application portal began circulating online, showing "Muslim" in the list of languages under the 'mother tongue' section, while Urdu -- a constitutionally recognised language under the Eighth Schedule -- was missing.
The university's admission portal was briefly taken down and restored later. While DU has not yet released a detailed explanation on how the error occurred, officials claimed that the form has since been corrected and Urdu reinstated.
However, the issue has sparked strong academic and political pushback, with several teachers' groups calling it more than just a technical oversight.
"This is not an innocent mistake," said Abha Dev Habib, former member of DU's Executive Council. "The error reflects deep-seated biases -- conflating religion with language is not just ignorant, it's communal."
Faculty members across departments echoed concerns that the incident reflects a "slippage in institutional integrity". Dr Mithuraaj Dhusiya, a member of DU's Executive Council, said, "Mistakes like these damage the university's inclusive image. Urdu is not just a language -- it is an essential part of India's cultural and literary legacy."
The issue has also prompted a wider discussion about linguistic representation in higher education institutions. Rudrashish Chakraborty, a professor at Kirori Mal College, said, "The portrayal of 'Muslim' as a language suggests a worrying attempt to misrepresent India's largest minority community. Urdu is a secular language spoken by people of all faiths."
Teachers also questioned the language used in the form itself. "The term 'mother tongue' is colloquial. Academic institutions should instead be using 'native language' or 'first language' for clarity," said a professor from DU's English department.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Institutions advised against observing Partition horror day
The Kerala government has informed universities and affiliated colleges that observing 'Partition horror day' on Thursday, as directed by Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar, was not mandatory. Higher Education Minister R. Bindu told mediapersons on Wednesday that official instructions have been issued through the Directorate of Collegiate Education and the Directorate of Technical Education. Raj Bhavan had issued a directive asking all universities to observe the day, which falls on August 14, the eve of Independence Day. However, the Minister said the State government does not support conducting such programmes on university campuses. 'It is the view of the Kerala government that such programmes need not be conducted on our campuses. Such events run the risk of being transformed into platforms for religious hatred and social division, which contradict the principles upheld by the State's educational policy,' Dr. Bindu said. Independence Day is marked in Kerala every year with the focus on positive values to celebrate the unmatched contributions of freedom fighters and the inclusive ideals enshrined in the Constitution. 'To suddenly introduce a programme under the label of 'partition horrors' would inevitably lead to communal polarisation,' the Minister cautioned. Leader of the Opposition V.D. Satheesan reiterated his strong criticism of the Governor's directive, calling it a serious mistake and part of a larger agenda by the Sangh Parivar to divide the nation. He accused the Governor of attempting to implement a divisive agenda in line with the ideology of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. 'They have now introduced a new tool, the fear of partition, to create communal divides among the people. The BJP's earlier attempts to pit Christian and Muslim communities against each other have already been exposed. When that failed, they came out with this new narrative,' the Congress leader alleged. Meanwhile, the Students Federation of India (SFI) held demonstrations across the State against the efforts to observe the 'Partition horror day.' The effigies of both the Governor and the Vice-Chancellor were burnt on the Kerala University campus. The BJP-backed Syndicate members condemned the incident.
News18
34 minutes ago
- News18
Forgotten Betrayal: Partition's Dalit Victims Warn Against ‘Jai Meem Jai Bheem' Politics
The architect of history's first systematic Dalit-Muslim political alliance was Jogendra Nath Mandal, who became Pakistan's inaugural Law and Labour Minister As India observes Partition Horrors Remembrance Day on August 14, the nation must confront an uncomfortable truth long buried beneath conventional narratives of Hindu-Muslim discord: the systematic betrayal and persecution of India's Scheduled Castes during the traumatic division of 1947. This overlooked tragedy offers profound lessons for contemporary politics, particularly regarding the dangerous revival of the 'Jai Meem Jai Bheem' formula, a slogan that embodies the very alliance politics that led to catastrophic suffering for Dalits nearly eight decades ago. The architect of history's first systematic Dalit-Muslim political alliance was Jogendra Nath Mandal, who became Pakistan's inaugural Law and Labour Minister. A prominent advocate for Scheduled Castes, Mandal made what would prove to be a catastrophic miscalculation: believing that Muslims and Dalits, both perceived as oppressed minorities, could forge a natural partnership against Hindu social dominance. This ideological foundation that shared minority status automatically translates into mutual solidarity forms the conceptual bedrock of today's 'Jai Meem Jai Bheem' movement. During the tumultuous partition period, Mandal emerged as a key Muslim League leader, instructing his Scheduled Caste followers to vote for Pakistan's creation. When communal violence erupted across Bengal, Mandal toured extensively, urging Dalits to refrain from retaliating against Muslims, arguing that both communities were equally victimized by oppression. His rhetoric of unity and brotherhood convinced hundreds of thousands of Dalit Hindus to remain in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), trusting in the Muslim League's promises of equality and protection. The Muslim League's courting of Dalit support was strategically calculated. Recognizing that Scheduled Castes comprised significant voting blocs in Bengal and other regions, Muslim leaders crafted elaborate promises of social equality, economic opportunity, and political representation. They painted Pakistan as a progressive state where caste hierarchies would dissolve and merit would triumph over birth-based discrimination. These assurances proved to be sophisticated political deceptions designed exclusively for electoral gain. The Brutal Reality of Betrayal The promised land of equality swiftly transformed into a nightmare of persecution. By 1950, Mandal found himself compelled to resign from his ministerial position and flee to India. His resignation letter to Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan, dated October 8, 1950, documents horrors that constitute one of the 20th century's most underreported genocides.2 The systematic nature of the atrocities was particularly chilling. In Sylhet district alone, Mandal reported that of 350 Dalit settlements, merely three survived intact, the remainder had been reduced to ash. Armed police and military personnel perpetrated calculated brutalities against Innocent Hindus, particularly Scheduled Castes. Men faced torture, women endured mass rape, homes were plundered, and hundreds of temples and gurdwaras were desecrated before being converted into slaughterhouses, meat shops, and hotels serving non-vegetarian food, a calculated assault on Hindu religious sensibilities. Specific incidents revealed the organized nature of persecution: in Gopalganj's Digharkul, armed police destroyed an entire Namasudra village on fabricated charges; in Parisal's Gournadi, Scheduled Caste settlements faced assault under political pretexts; during Dhaka riots, jewelry shops were looted and burned while police officials watched passively. The violence wasn't spontaneous communal frenzy but systematic ethnic cleansing targeting those who had trusted Muslim League assurances. Mandal's documentation reveals the psychological torture accompanying physical violence. Dalits who had supported Pakistan's creation found themselves branded as traitors by fellow Hindus while simultaneously facing persecution as 'kafirs" 'jimmi" by Muslims. This double alienation created profound identity crises within communities that had genuinely believed in secular, inclusive Pakistani nationalism. Between 1947 and 1950, approximately 2.5 million refugees fled East Pakistan for India, with Scheduled Castes comprising a disproportionate majority. These statistics represent more than mere displacement; they constitute evidence that the Muslim League's pledges of security and equality for Scheduled Castes were calculated deceptions designed solely to secure electoral support before partition. Ambedkar's Prescient Warnings Dr. B.R. Ambedkar had anticipated this catastrophe with remarkable clarity. In seminal works including 'Pakistan or the Partition of India" and 'Thoughts on Pakistan," he explicitly warned that Muslim politics was fundamentally communal in character, willing to accommodate Scheduled Castes only as long as they provided political advantage. Ambedkar's analysis proved tragically prescient, aligning perfectly with Mandal's eventual experiences. Ambedkar understood what Mandal fatally overlooked: the religious and cultural values of Dalit and Muslim communities were so fundamentally divergent that genuine equality and coexistence represented nothing more than dangerous political illusion. He cautioned Hindu Dalits that regardless of how extensively Muslim leadership performed brotherhood theatrics, they would ultimately treat Dalits as 'kafirs" or 'jimmi" (infidels) deserving no consideration in an Islamic political framework. The constitutional architect's warnings extended beyond religious incompatibility to structural political analysis. Ambedkar recognized that Muslim communalism, disguised as minority solidarity, would inevitably prioritize religious identity over social justice concerns central to Dalit aspirations. Contemporary Echoes of Historical Folly Today's resurrection of this failed formula demands urgent scrutiny. The 'Jal Meem Jal Bheem" slogan, combining Muslim solidarity ('Meem" referencing the Urdu letter) with Dalit empowerment ('Bheem" honoring Dr. Ambedkar), represents the precise ideological framework that Mandal employed during partition. Though this exact phraseology wasn't popular then, its conceptual foundation permeated the Muslim League-Mandal alliance, the belief that Muslims and Scheduled Castes, both minorities, could become natural collaborators. Unfortunately, contemporary Indian politics witnesses several parties attempting to revive this demonstrably failed strategy. Maharashtra sees growing proximity between Asaduddin Owaisi and Prakash Ambedkar; Uttar Pradesh experienced the Bahujan Samaj Party's unsuccessful attempts at forging alliances between Scheduled Castes and Muslims; the Samajwadi Party's PDA (Pichda-Dalit-Alpsankhyak) formula seeks to harness both communities merely as vote banks. Recent electoral evidence reinforces historical patterns. The 2019 BSP-SP alliance in Uttar Pradesh collapsed primarily due to asymmetrical vote transfers. While Dalit voters supported Muslim candidates, reciprocal support proved largely illusory. Similarly, the Owaisi-Prakash Ambedkar partnership in Maharashtra fractured over seat-sharing disputes, revealing the same power dynamics that characterized Muslim League treatment of Mandal. These examples echo historical mistakes, demonstrating that when politics abandons public welfare for narrow caste and communal calculations, the inevitable result is betrayal and social disintegration. Structural Incompatibilities Persist The fundamental contradictions that destroyed Mandal's experiment remain unresolved. Power dynamics in every attempted alliance consistently favor Muslim parties, reducing Dalit partners to subordinate positions. Vote transfer patterns reveal systematic asymmetry: while Dalit voters may support Muslim candidates, reciprocal support rarely materializes. Religious identity-based Muslim political consciousness conflicts with caste-focused Dalit aspirations for social justice within Hindu civilizational frameworks. Moreover, ideological contradictions create insurmountable barriers. Muslim parties' emphasis on religious orthodoxy clashes with Dalit movements' goals of social reform, gender equality, and educational modernization. These philosophical differences, rooted in fundamentally different worldviews about individual rights, social progress, and cultural values, make genuine partnership impossible. The Path Forward Contemporary India must acknowledge that sustainable Dalit progress and security will emerge through self-reliance, education, political awareness, and organizational power, not through alliances that history has repeatedly proven catastrophic. The 'Jal Meem Jal Bheem" concept and its practical applications have historically manifested as Scheduled Caste humiliation, identity destruction, and existential annihilation. Therefore, as we commemorate partition's suffering, let us resolve to make decisions based on historical facts and collective experiences, remaining free from emotional sloganeering and vote bank-driven narrow politics. Jogendra Nath Mandal's experiences and Dr. Ambedkar's warnings teach us that Scheduled Castes will never achieve security, social justice, and dignity from hands that have historically deceived them through religious fanaticism, appeasement, and vote bank politics. top videos View all This represents not merely historical interpretation but guidance for present and future generations. Those who ignore history's lessons are condemned to repeat its most tragic chapters. Dharampal Singh is state general secretary, organisation, of the BJP Uttar Pradesh. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google. view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 13, 2025, 19:44 IST News opinion Opinion | Forgotten Betrayal: Partition's Dalit Victims Warn Against 'Jai Meem Jai Bheem' Politics Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Independence Day 2025: When And Where To Watch President Droupadi Murmu's Address To Nation?
Last Updated: India will celebrate its 79th Independence Day on August 15, 2025. President Murmu will address the nation on August 14, and PM Modi will speak on August 15. Independence Day 2025: As India is gearing up to celebrate its 79th Independence Day on Friday, August 15, 2025, President Droupadi Murmu will deliver her address to the nation on Thursday evening. This will be President Murmu's fourth address on Independence Day eve, and will be streamed live across the nation. The address will be broadcast live in Hindi, followed by the English version. For those who prefer to listen in regional languages, the address will be broadcast in various regional languages starting at 9:30 pm on Doordarshan's regional channels and Akashvani's regional networks. Where To Watch the President's Speech? Similar to the previous year, the President's address to the nation will be broadcast in Hindi and English on Doordarshan channels from 7pm. The speech will be available across regional Doordarshan channels and will also be aired on All India Radio (AIR). The speech will also be live-streamed on Doordarshan's YouTube channel. Every year, Independence Day is celebrated with flag-hoisting ceremonies across the nation. People sing the national anthem and participate in drills and cultural programmes. After Prime Minister Narendra Modi participates in the flag-raising ceremony at Old Delhi's Red Fort, a parade featuring the police personnel and the military is organised. Some people fly kites as a symbol of freedom. The Prime Minister delivers a speech to the nation where he recounts some of India's milestone accomplishments in the last year. He also highlights future challenges and sets objectives for a better future. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
