Strange Radio Signals Detected Emanating From Deep Under Antarctic Ice
Nearly two decades ago, an experiment floating high above Antarctica caught a weird signal.
Designed to capture the radio spurts of cosmic rays falling from above, in 2006 the Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) recorded a short pulse of radio waves from below – an event that looked like an upside-down shower of cosmic rays, not bouncing off the surface, but emanating from under the ice sheet.
The balloon-borne suite of instruments recorded a similar event in 2014, and scientists have been scratching their heads ever since. No explanation quite fits, suggesting that the culprit could be a particle unknown to science.
"The radio waves that we detected were at really steep angles, like 30 degrees below the surface of the ice," explains astrophysicist Stephanie Wissel of Pennsylvania State University.
"It's an interesting problem because we still don't actually have an explanation for what those anomalies are, but what we do know is that they're most likely not representing neutrinos."
The signal itself, a very brief pulse of radio waves, is very similar to what we might see from an elusive tau neutrino, but there are several reasons neutrino interpretation of the signal is difficult to resolve.
Scientists thought that such a neutrino may come from a supernova that then tunnels its way right through Earth and comes out the other side. However, only the 2014 detection coincided with a supernova that could be responsible – no such event was found for the 2006 detection.
In addition, the steep angle of the detection means that the neutrino would have had to tunnel through rock before emerging from the ice. Neutrinos stream through matter all the time; it's what they do, and why we call them 'ghost particles'. That's not the problem.
"You have a billion neutrinos passing through your thumbnail at any moment, but neutrinos don't really interact," Wissel says. "So, this is the double-edged sword problem. If we detect them, it means they have traveled all this way without interacting with anything else. We could be detecting a neutrino coming from the edge of the observable Universe."
To help solve the mystery of the upward-propagating radio pulses, a large international team of researchers made a careful study of data collected by the Pierre Auger Observatory in Argentina, designed to study high-energy cosmic rays. They conducted simulations to determine how the ANITA events might appear in the Pierre Auger Observatory data, and combed through the observations from 2004 to 2018, looking for similar signals.
They found nothing that explains the ANITA detections. However, in science, finding nothing often means finding something – even if that something is a narrower set of options.
In this case, it means that the scientists could confidently rule out neutrinos as an explanation for the signals. However, that doesn't automatically mean we're looking at a new particle, either. We're going to need further observations, and hopefully new detections, to determine what it is that ANITA saw coming from the Antarctic ice.
ANITA is retired; its last flight took place in 2016. A new Antarctic balloon experiment called the Payload for Ultrahigh Energy Observations (PUEO), the successor to ANITA, is due to commence operations soon.
"My guess is that some interesting radio propagation effect occurs near ice and also near the horizon that I don't fully understand, but we certainly explored several of those, and we haven't been able to find any of those yet either," Wissel says.
"So, right now, it's one of these long-standing mysteries, and I'm excited that when we fly PUEO, we'll have better sensitivity. In principle, we should pick up more anomalies, and maybe we'll actually understand what they are. We also might detect neutrinos, which would in some ways be a lot more exciting."
The latest results were published in Physical Review Letters.
Light Squeezed Out of Darkness in Surprising Quantum Simulation
Physicists Actually Made The 'World's Smallest Violin' For a Serious Reason
Spiral Magnetism Seen in Synthetic Crystal For The First Time
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mysterious radio pulses detected high above Antarctica may be evidence of an exotic new particle, scientists say
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A cosmic particle detector has spotted a burst of strange radio signals from the ice of Antarctica that currently defy explanation. The results could hint at the existence of new particles, or interactions between particles currently unknown to physics, scientists say. The mystery radio pulses were picked up about 25 miles (40 kilometers) above Earth by the Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) experiment. ANITA is a series of instruments that float over Antarctica, carried by balloons with the aim of detecting ultra-high-energy (UHE) cosmic neutrinos and other cosmic rays as they pelt Earth from space. ANITA usually picks up signals when they are reflected off the ice of Antarctica, but these pulses were different, coming from below the horizon at an orientation that currently can't be explained by particle physics. "It's an interesting problem, because we still don't actually have an explanation for what those anomalies are," ANITA team member and Penn State University researcher Stephanie Wissel said in a statement. "What we do know is that they're most likely not representing neutrinos." The radio waves detected by ANITA were oriented at very steep angles, 30 degrees below the surface of the ice. This means that the signal had to pass through thousands of miles of rock before reaching ANITA. This should have led to interactions that left the radio pulses too faint to be detectable, but clearly that didn't happen here. The immediately obvious suspect for this signal is neutrinos. After all, it is the signature of these particles that ANITA is designed to pick up. Neutrinos are unofficially known as "ghost particles" due to the fact that they carry no charge and are virtually massless. Thus, as neutrinos — also the most abundant particles in the universe — stream through the cosmos at near-light speeds after being launched by powerful cosmic events, they can "phase" through matter, barely interacting. That means they remain unchanged after traversing many light-years, making them incredible "messengers" that can teach scientists about the events that launched them. However, this ghostly nature also makes neutrinos incredibly tough to detect. "You have a billion neutrinos passing through your thumbnail at any moment, but neutrinos don't really interact," Wissel said. "So, this is the double-edged sword problem. If we detect them, it means they have traveled all this way without interacting with anything else. We could be detecting a neutrino coming from the edge of the observable universe." Fortunately, even catching one neutrino as it passes through Earth can reveal a wealth of information. So, designing sophisticated experiments and taking them to remote regions of Earth or placing them deep underground in the hope of busting a cosmic ghost is well worth the effort for scientists like Wissel. "We use radio detectors to try to build really, really large neutrino telescopes so that we can go after a pretty low expected event rate," Wissel said. Just such an instrument, ANITA floats 25 miles over the ice of Antarctica, away from the possibility of other interfering signals, hunting for so-called "ice showers." "We point our antennas down at the ice and look for neutrinos that interact in the ice, producing radio emissions that we can then sense on our detectors," Wissel continued. These ice showers are caused by a particular "flavor" of neutrino called tau neutrinos, which strike the ice and interact to create a daughter particle called a tau lepton. This rapidly decays into an "air shower" containing even smaller constituent particles. Distinguishing between air showers and ice showers reveals the characteristics of the initial interacting particle and the origin of this particle. Wissel compares the strategy to using the angle of a bounced ball to trace it back to its initial path. However, because the angle of these newly detected signals is sharper than current models of physics allow, the backtracking process isn't possible in this case. Even more confusingly, other neutrino detectors like the IceCube Experiment and the Pierre Auger Observatory didn't detect anything that could explain these signals and the upward-oriented air shower. Thus, the ANITA researchers have declared the signals as "anomalous," determining they weren't the result of neutrinos. The signals could therefore be indicative of something new, perhaps even a hint of dark matter, the mysterious cosmic "stuff" that accounts for around 85% of the universe's matter content. Related Stories: — Scientists detect highest-energy ghost particle ever seen — where did it come from? — Elusive neutrinos caught streaming from a black hole hidden in dust — The greatest astronomical discoveries of the past 25 years Further answers may have to wait for the "next big thing" in neutrino detection, the larger and more sensitive Payload for Ultrahigh Energy Observations (PUEO) instrument, currently being developed by Penn State. "My guess is that some interesting radio propagation effect occurs near ice and also near the horizon that I don't fully understand, but we certainly explored several of those, and we haven't been able to find any of those yet either,' Wissel said. "So, right now, it's one of these long-standing mysteries, and I'm excited that when we fly PUEO, we'll have better sensitivity. "In principle, we should pick up more anomalies, and maybe we'll actually understand what they are. We also might detect neutrinos, which would in some ways be a lot more exciting."The team's research was published online in March in the journal Physical Review Letters.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
They Found Something Strange Under Antarctic Ice, But No One Has Seen Anything Like It Since
An international team of researchers using a high-flying balloon experiment known as ANITA (Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna) has been stumped by a series of strange and unexplained radio signals that seemingly came from miles beneath the ice. The ANITA experiment's primary goal was to track neutrinos - tiny particles that travel through Earth's atmosphere after extreme cosmic events like exploding stars. Neutrinos have almost no mass and rarely interact with anything, which makes them hard to detect but packed with valuable information about space. The signals usually follow predictable paths—just like a ball bouncing off the ground. But some of the strange signals ANITA picked up didn't follow those paths. They came in at much sharper angles as if they were rising from deep underground. The problem? To get to ANITA from below the Antarctic ice, any particle would have to travel through thousands of miles of solid rock. Experts say that kind of journey should have stopped the signal cold. But it didn't. To dig deeper, researchers recently reviewed 15 years' worth of data from other major observatories, including IceCube in Antarctica and the Pierre Auger Observatory in Argentina. These instruments are designed to detect similar signals, but none recorded anything that matches what ANITA found. This lack of confirmation makes the original detection even more baffling. If the signal were caused by a known type of particle, scientists expected it would have shown up in other detectors by now. Instead, ANITA's discovery remains a one-of-a-kind mystery. Some researchers think these strange signals might be signs of particles we haven't discovered yet. Others wonder if they could be hints of dark matter, an invisible substance that may make up much of the universe but has never been detected before. Some fans of the discovery have gone on to suggest the waves are signs of alien life. But without more data, no one can say for sure. To get closer to the truth, scientists are now working on a new and more advanced version of ANITA. It's called PUEO, and it will be bigger, better, and hopefully capable of catching more of these mysterious signals. The hope is that PUEO will help unravel all of these new clues. Until then, the mystery remains (potentially) buried in the ice, waiting to be solved. lead editor Jenn Jordan explores how weather and climate weave through our daily lives, shape our routines and leave lasting impacts on our communities. MORE ON New Map Reveals Hidden World Beneath Antarctica's Ice Melting Ice Uncovers Hidden Cold War Base In Greenland Did Prehistoric Sunscreen Save Some Cavemen?
Newsweek
17 hours ago
- Newsweek
Millions in Pennsylvania May Be Drinking Contaminated Water
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Millions of people in Pennsylvania may be drinking water contaminated with forever chemicals. This is the conclusion of a study from the Pennsylvania State University, which sampled water from 167 private wells across the state looking for so-called 'forever chemicals.' These manmade chemicals—properly known as per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—get their nickname from how they don't break down easily either in the environment, or in the body, risking a dangerous build up. The team found that 65 percent of the wells they tested had detectable levels of PFAS—with 18 percent exceeding the maximum contaminant levels for drinking water set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). According to the researchers, some 3.5 million people in Pennsylvania rely on private wells to supply drinking water. A stock image of a man pouring a glass of water. A stock image of a man pouring a glass of highest concentrations of PFAS were detected in private wells in southeast Pennsylvania; PFAS were not detected in many of the wells sampled in the central or western regions. Paper author and Penn State civil engineer professor Heather Preisendanz said that her immediate reaction was "a little bit of relief" upon seeing the data. "We were happy that most of the numbers we saw were within the drinking water standards," Preisendanz said. "Only 18 percent of the wells had levels that were higher than the federal standards, but they weren't thousands of times higher than the drinking water standards, as we have seen in other places." Previous studies have found forever chemicals in soil, food, food packaging, household products, and personal care products. While most Americans have a relatively low exposure to PFAS, high enough levels could lead to decreased fertility, high blood pressure, increased risk of cancer, reduced immune system and increased cholesterol levels, according to the EPA. While the data reveals a possible link between PFAS levels and socio-economic status, the nature of this correlation may not be what one might expect. The team found that lower income areas—with both higher levels of poverty and exposure to industrial sites—did not show higher PFAS contamination levels, but wealthier areas did. The study was conceived to monitor whether the use of sewage sludge, or "biosolids," as fertilizers and soil additives might be increasing PFAS contamination in drinking water. However, the team did not find higher PFAS levels in wells near agricultural areas that made use of such treated wastewater. Conversely, developed land with "constructed materials and impervious surfaces" was also more likely to contain PFAS. Much PFAS contamination can be treated with at-home technologies, Preisendanz noted. Concerned Pennsylvanians, she added, are recommended to test their water supply, however, as the results are not certain to be representative of all the private wells across the state. The EPA has established legally enforceable levels (known as "Maximum Contaminant Levels") for six PFAS found in drinking water. Public water systems have five years to implement solutions to reduce the PFAS, and by 2029, they will be required to notify the public of any violations. Newsweek has contacted Preisendanz for comment via email. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about PFAS? Let us know via science@ Reference Kosiarski, K., Veith, T. L., Kibuye, F. A., Fetter, J., Boser, S., Vanden Heuvel, J. P., Thompson, C. L., & Preisendanz, H. E. (2025). Geospatial and socioeconomic factors of PFAS contamination in private drinking water wells: Insights for monitoring and management. Journal of Environmental Management, 388.
