logo
In Cash-At-Home Case, Justice Varma's 5 Reasons Why He Shouldn't Be Impeached

In Cash-At-Home Case, Justice Varma's 5 Reasons Why He Shouldn't Be Impeached

NDTV6 days ago
New Delhi:
Justice Yashwant Varma - the ex-Delhi High Court judge likely to be impeached after "piles of burnt Rs 500 notes" were found at his home - has offered the Supreme Court five reasons why he must not be sacked. These include questions over the jurisdiction and authority of an in-house committee - set up by ex-Chief Justice Sanjiv Kumar - to investigate a sitting judge.
Justice Varma argued the committee ignored questions he had raised, and that could speak to his innocence, and denied him a fair hearing. He also argued that neither the Chief Justice nor the Supreme Court had 'power of superintendence', i.e., they cannot take disciplinary action against High Court judges, because their tenure is protected by the Constitution.
The in-house committee red-flagged by Justice Varma consisted of Sheel Nagu, the Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court; GS Sandhawalia, the Chief Justice of the Himachal Pradesh High Court; and Karnataka High Court judge Justice Anu Sivaraman.
Justice Varma's Objections
In-house procedure lacked legal sanction -
Justice Varma has argued the three-member committee that investigated him and the recovered burnt piles of cash lacked authority to recommend his removal from office.
In-house panels - a procedure adopted by the Supreme Court in 1999 - are 'administrative in nature', he said, and have a limited function, i.e., they can only act in a fact-finding capacity.
He argued that allowing such committees power to recommend impeachment risks creating an extra-constitutional framework that breaks from Articles 124 and 218 of the Constitution, which outline procedure to remove a judge of the Supreme Court or any High Court.
The Judges (Inquiry) Act, he argued, would have been a better balanced option in this case.
Improper investigative procedure -
Justice Varma further argued the investigation process was flawed from the outset because it began without a formal complaint of wrongdoing against him, and made "sweeping conclusions without concrete evidence'" It relied on the "presumption", he said, that the cash was his.
He said the committee also ignored key questions - 'who placed the cash', 'was the money genuine', and 'what caused the fire' - that are central to establishing his guilt or innocence.
Scraps of burnt Rs 500 notes allegedly found at Justice Yashwant Varma's home.
Finally, Justice Varma also argued the committee had failed to offer him a fair hearing to respond to the allegations and explain the money found on the grounds of his bungalow.
The committee, he said, denied him access to evidence it collected and examined key witnesses in his absence, all of which violate the principle of natural justice.
In earlier and comparable situations judges were granted personal hearings - to explain themselves - before action was taken against them, he said.
Media trial caused damage to reputation -
The discovery of the burnt cash at his home - the money was found on Holi by firefighters trying to put out a blaze that had spread to the outhouse - made national headlines for weeks.
NDTV Explains | How Do You Remove A Sitting Judge? Impeachment Explained
Questions were raised over the sanctity of the judiciary and the possible erosion of public trust, prompting the release of a (partly redacted) initial report into the finding of the money.
Justice Varma has argued the release of that report, and a Supreme Court press release on March 22 that made public the allegations against him, caused irreparable damage to his reputation and career as a judicial officer, and violated his right to dignity.
Visuals from the burnt outhouse on Justice Varma's bungalow grounds.
He also noted that sections of the final report, i.e., the in-house Supreme Court committee, which was meant to be confidential, had been leaked and "misrepresented" by the press.
This aggravated potential damage to his reputation and undermined the sanctity of the investigative process, Justice Varma told the Supreme Court.
Impeachment recommendation is unconstitutional -
Justice Varma also questioned the letter sent by then-Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, recommending he be impeached.
Justice Varma - who was transferred back to the Allahabad High Court after the cash was found - has argued the former Chief Justice did not have the power to seek his removal, and that this can only be done by the President of India, as outlined in the above articles of the Constitution.
Not given time to read report -
Finally, Justice Varma also argued then-Chief Justice Khanna did not give sufficient time for him to review the final report. He claimed impeachment was recommended to President Murmu and Prime Minister Modi "within hours" of Chief Justice Khanna getting that report.
Government To Seek Impeachment?
Last week sources told NDTV the government may introduce an impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma during the monsoon session of Parliament, which begins Monday.
The government has been assured of support from the opposition on this topic, sources said.
This was days after the Supreme Court-appointed panel recommended Justice Varma be removed. The panel's 64-page report was accessed by NDTV and these are the operative bits.
The first is on page 60 - "... this committee holds the money/cash was found in the storeroom located within the premises of 30 Tughlaq Crescent... officially occupied by Justice Varma".
The second is on page 59 - "... access to the storeroom was with Justice Varma and his family members, and (was) well-monitored without any outsiders getting access without permission".
No judge in independent India has been impeached, although there have been five it was a possibility. The most recent case was in 2018 and involved ex-Chief Justice of India Deepak Misra, who was accused of administrative misconduct and arbitrary allocation of cases.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

North-eastern Railway projects faced losses of over Rs 200 crore from natural disasters in 5 years: Railway Minister Vaishnaw
North-eastern Railway projects faced losses of over Rs 200 crore from natural disasters in 5 years: Railway Minister Vaishnaw

Indian Express

time20 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

North-eastern Railway projects faced losses of over Rs 200 crore from natural disasters in 5 years: Railway Minister Vaishnaw

The Indian Railways has incurred losses worth over Rs 200 crore in the last five years due to the relentless impact of natural disasters such as floods and landslides on the projects in the Northeast. In a written response in Lok Sabha on Wednesday, Minister for Railways Ashwini Vaishnaw said that the geological weakness of the Northeast is always accounted for at the stage of design and implementation of Railway projects. These projects are being carried out by the Northeast Frontier Railway (NFR) zone of the Indian Railways. 'Due to floods, landslides etc. in the last five years, some damage to railway tracks and structures took place in Northeast Frontier Railway which was assessed to be over Rs 200 crore. Geology of the North Eastern Region is such that it is prone to landslides,' said Vaishnaw. He added that for all major Railway projects in the hilly terrain (those in Manipur, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland), detailed geo-technical investigations and environmental impact assessments are carried out before going ahead with construction. 'These studies specifically assess slope stability, rock and soil characteristics, vegetation cover and hydrological patterns. Findings of these studies are used to anticipate the risk of landslides that can result from construction activities,' said the minister. According to Railway Ministry data, as of April 1, 2025, 12 railway projects (eight new lines and four doubling), totaling 777 km in length and costing Rs 69,342 crore, have been sanctioned for the region. Out of this, 278 km of length has already been commissioned at an expenditure of Rs 41,676 crore incurred up to March 2025. While the Bairabi-Sairang line, which connects Mizoram's capital Aizawl for the first time, is set to be operational, some of the key ongoing projects in the Northeast are the Dimapur-Kohima New Line (Dhansiri-Zubza) to connect Nagaland's capital Kohima, the Murkongselek-Pasighat new line, the Sivok-Rangpo new line to connect Sikkim to the national network for the first time and the Jiribam-Imphal new line. Dheeraj Mishra is a Principal correspondent with The Indian Express, Business Bureau. He covers India's two key ministries- Ministry of Railways and Ministry of Road Transport & Highways. He frequently uses the Right to Information (RTI) Act for his stories, which have resulted in many impactful reports. ... Read More

IIT Guwahati cites ‘student welfare' in first fee hike in 7 years; protestors call it unjustified, sudden
IIT Guwahati cites ‘student welfare' in first fee hike in 7 years; protestors call it unjustified, sudden

Indian Express

time20 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

IIT Guwahati cites ‘student welfare' in first fee hike in 7 years; protestors call it unjustified, sudden

The postgraduate and PhD students at IIT Guwahati have started a peaceful protest against a recent fee hike announced by the institute on Tuesday. The protest, currently in its third day, centres around what students describe as a sudden and significant increase in semester fees, with many claiming it was implemented without 'prior communication.' According to protesting students, the semester fee for the regular PhD scholars has risen from approximately Rs 34,000 to Rs 48,000, a sum they say exceeds the monthly stipend of Junior and Senior Research Fellows (Rs 37,000 and Rs 42,000 respectively). The incoming batch of PhD students is expected to pay Rs 91,000 per semester, up from Rs 58,000 last year. Students have raised concerns that this increase comes despite no visible improvements in campus infrastructure or fellowship amounts. Many allege that the hike includes new components like fest fees and welfare fund and an increased hostel fund, hostel rent and hostel maintenance fee, which they argue are unjustified. There are also increments in the student brotherhood fund, medical fees, an IIT Guwahati student said. 'Only one component of the fee structure has seen a marginal adjustment. All other increments remain well above 50 per cent, with some more than tripling,' another student seeking anonymity claimed. Another added, 'The hostel fund has skyrocketed from Rs 600 to Rs 2,200. Are students really expected to bear the financial burden of events they neither requested nor uniformly benefit from?' The administration maintains that the fee revision — the first in seven years — amounts to Rs 8,900 per semester for continuing students. 'This has been made to support enhanced student welfare and activities, including increased allocations for hostel-level events, cultural and sports festivals, and Gymkhana-led initiatives beyond just Inter-IIT participation,' stated a media statement issued by the institute on Wednesday evening. The statement added that an open-house meeting was held on July 17, lasting four hours, where detailed clarifications were shared. 'The student body was asked to submit their representation if they had any further concerns. No submission has been received so far,' the institute noted. However, students say that discussions so far have 'yielded no concrete results.' One protestor alleged that although the administration initially assured students that non-payment of fees would not impact registration, 'it later did not allow students with pending fees to register.' Tensions reportedly escalated when the director declined to meet protesting students on July 23. The protest has involved fee boycotts and the suspension of some teaching assistant duties. Students have also highlighted the weather conditions, saying many fell ill during the demonstrations in the humid Guwahati heat. 'The fact that no one is addressing this is making everyone angry, disappointed, agitated and upset,' one student remarked. 'There are also complaints that when some basic facilities in hostels are compromised, like hygiene in bathrooms, dilapidated condition of bathrooms, AC issues in departments, etc., how can the administration decide on increasing the fee for the amenities provided?' The institute emphasised that the protest group is 'small' and that 'the majority of the 8,400-strong student body is not participating.' It also stated that the group has 'bypassed the elected student body,' which is working on a formal proposal regarding the fee revision. 'The elected student body is not part of this protest and is also working through the proper channel for an amicable solution to the increased components of the fee,' the IIT Guwahati statement read. The administration concluded, 'The Institute remains committed to student welfare and encourages engagement through constructive and formal channels.' Mridusmita Deka covers education and has worked with the Careers360 previously. She is an alumnus of Gauhati University and Dibrugarh University. ... Read More

ED raids 50 sites linked to Anil Ambani in Rs 3,000 cr Yes Bank loan fraud probe
ED raids 50 sites linked to Anil Ambani in Rs 3,000 cr Yes Bank loan fraud probe

Time of India

time20 minutes ago

  • Time of India

ED raids 50 sites linked to Anil Ambani in Rs 3,000 cr Yes Bank loan fraud probe

The Enforcement Directorate on Thursday raided 40–50 locations linked to Anil Ambani in a money laundering probe tied to the Yes Bank loan fraud case. The ED suspects ₹3,000 crore in loans were diverted to shell firms between 2017 and 2019, with evidence pointing to bribery and major procedural lapses. Over 50 companies and 25 individuals are under investigation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Thursday raided 40 to 50 locations linked to businessman Anil Ambani in connection with the Yes Bank loan fraud searches follow two FIRs registered by the CBI and inputs shared by agencies including SEBI, the National Housing Bank, Bank of Baroda, and the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA).According to the ED, preliminary investigations show that loans worth around Rs 3,000 crore, sanctioned by Yes Bank between 2017 and 2019, were allegedly diverted to shell firms and other group entities. Investigators have also found evidence suggesting possible bribery of Yes Bank officials, including its agency flagged serious lapses in Yes Bank's approval process, including back-dated credit documents, absence of due diligence, and loans given to firms with weak financials and common directors. It also found violations of loan terms, evergreening of accounts, and instances where disbursal occurred on the same day as or before loan ED said over 50 companies and 25 individuals are under the scanner. SEBI has also submitted findings related to Reliance Home Finance Ltd (RHFL), which saw its corporate loan book more than double within a year, raising concerns about irregularities and process searches are being conducted under Section 17 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store