Russia's Putin joins mourners to pay respects to ex-classmate and top judge
MOSCOW (Reuters) -President Vladimir Putin joined mourners on Thursday to say farewell to his former classmate Irina Podnosova, the head of Russia's Supreme Court, who died earlier this week aged 71.
Putin looked sad and pensive as he sat alongside members of Podnosova's family in a Moscow hospital where her open casket was placed on display, flanked by an honour guard, for people to pay their final respects.
Putin placed a bouquet of red flowers at the foot of her coffin, crossed himself, and bowed his head over the open casket before talking to her family.
Putin, 72, and Podnosova were fellow law students in the 1970s in Leningrad, now St Petersburg, where the future president launched his career in the KGB security service. Podnosova was one of several trusted associates from that period who took on senior roles in politics and the judiciary after he became president.
Podnosova had been chair of the Supreme Court for little more than a year. She died of cancer, Russian media reported.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump could meet Putin as soon as next week, White House official says
US President Donald Trump could meet in person with Russian President Vladimir Putin as soon as next week as he seeks to broker an end to the Russia-Ukraine war, a White House official said. The official cautioned that a meeting has not been scheduled yet and no location has been determined. The official was not authorised to speak publicly and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss internal plans. The White House said Mr Trump was also open to a meeting with both Mr Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. A meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Trump would be their first since Mr Trump returned to office this year. It would be a significant milestone in the three-year-old war, though there is no promise such a meeting would lead to the end of the fighting since Russia and Ukraine remain far apart on their demands. News of a potential meeting with Mr Putin, which was first reported by The New York Times, came hours after Mr Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff met Mr Putin in Moscow. Mr Trump had posted earlier on Truth Social that Mr Witkoff 'had a highly productive meeting' with Mr Putin in which 'great progress was made'. It was not immediately clear if Mr Putin or Mr Zelensky had agreed to any meetings with Mr Trump. Mr Zelensky has been willing to meet face-to-face with Mr Putin to end the conflict, but Russia has repeatedly rejected the idea. Mr Trump has met Mr Zelensky several times this year, including a contentious February meeting in Washington. Though he has not yet met Mr Putin this year, Mr Trump met with him five times during his first term. Mr Trump said earlier on Wednesday that he updated America's allies in Europe and that they will work toward an end to the Russia-Ukraine war 'in the days and weeks to come'. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'The Russians expressed their desire to meet with President Trump, and the President is open to meeting with both President Putin and President Zelensky.' Her statement did not address the potential timing of any meeting. Mr Witkoff met Mr Putin days before the White House's deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine or potentially face severe economic penalties that could also hit countries buying its oil. The meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Witkoff lasted about three hours, the Kremlin said. Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said Mr Putin and Mr Witkoff had a 'useful and constructive conversation' that focused on the Ukrainian crisis and, in a nod toward improving relations between Washington and Moscow, 'prospects for possible development of strategic co-operation' between the United States and Russia.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump could meet Putin as early as next week to discuss Ukraine ceasefire
Donald Trump could meet Vladimir Putin in person as early as next week to discuss a ceasefire in Ukraine, a White House official has said. They said the meeting would be conditional on the Russian president meeting his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Sky News's US partner network NBC News reported. It came days before the White House's deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine or face severe economic penalties, which could also target countries buying its oil. Ukraine war latest: Trump could meet with Putin as early as next week Earlier in the day, Mr Putin held talks with Mr Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow, with the meeting lasting around three hours. In a post on Truth Social, Mr Trump said Mr Witkoff "had a highly productive meeting" with Mr Putin in which "great progress was made". He said he had updated America's European allies and they will work towards an end to the Russia-Ukraine war "in the days and weeks to come". Mr Zelenskyy later said he and Mr Trump spoke on the phone after the meeting. He said "European leaders also participated in the conversation" and "we discussed what was said in Moscow". He added: "Our common position with our partners is absolutely clear: The war must end. We all need lasting and reliable peace. Russia must end the war that it started." He later said: "It seems that Russia is now more inclined to agree to a ceasefire." He added that the pressure on Moscow "is working", without elaborating, and stressed it was important to make sure Russia does not "deceive us or the United States" when it comes to "the details" of a potential agreement. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version. You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.
Politico
28 minutes ago
- Politico
About that Jack Smith investigation
Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government, your guide to Donald Trump's unprecedented overhaul of the federal government — the key decisions, the critical characters and the power dynamics that are upending Washington and beyond. Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben JACK SMITH's time has finally come. The U.S. Office of Special Counsel last week launched an investigation into the man who brought two federal criminal cases against DONALD TRUMP in 2023. But the investigation appears to be a thinly veiled political stunt aimed at placating the president, who has promised to seek retribution against the former Justice Department special counsel. The probe focuses on whether Smith used his position as a federal government employee to engage in political activities in violation of the Hatch Act. It comes after Senate Intelligence Chair TOM COTTON (R-Ark.) requested that OSC investigate Smith for 'unprecedented interference in the 2024 election.' The office, an independent agency in the executive branch, investigates whistleblower complaints and alleged violations of civil service laws. It is separate from DOJ special counsels who are appointed by the attorney general to handle politically sensitive cases. The inquiry raises a number of questions, including: what conduct, if any, by Smith might be considered political; how the OSC could even punish him; and what Trump's ultimate aim could be. What did Smith say or do that could be considered political activity? Smith appeared to go to great lengths during his investigations to avoid saying anything publicly that could be construed as political. During the prosecution of Trump for his effort to subvert the 2020 election, Smith avoided any mention of the looming 2024 election. And he made no mention of the contest in court briefs urging the Supreme Court to quickly take up the election subversion case. Smith referenced the country's 'compelling interest' in determining the outcome of the case, writing that the public interest demands 'prompt resolution' without 'undue delay.' Cotton said Smith's push for a speedy trial and what he described as a 'procedurally irregular' brief in September 2024 'were the actions of a political actor masquerading as a public official.' The brief, which Smith filed at the direction of a federal judge, included large swaths of evidence to argue the case was still salvageable in the wake of the Supreme Court's immunity ruling. Trump balked about the inclusion of derogatory details of the case being made public in the final weeks of the election. But RICHARD PAINTER, who served as the chief White House ethics lawyer for former President GEORGE W. BUSH, said that 'absent Smith giving interviews, making public statements referring to the 2024 election,' his behavior wouldn't merit a Hatch Act violation. Justice Department policies prohibit indicting a candidate close to an election, but 'if you have a previously indicted candidate, and you're just going through the steps you know that lawyers go through in these cases,' that is permissible activity, Painter said. 'I've never heard of a Hatch Act case being premised on court filings,' he said, adding: 'I just don't see the evidence there.' A lawyer for Smith didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson for OSC declined to comment. How might OSC punish Smith if it were to find a violation occurred? There's virtually no way to punish Smith. Federal employees who are found to violate the Hatch Act primarily lose their jobs, but Smith is no longer employed by the federal government. Other penalties include suspension, formal reprimand and a $1,000 fine. So, what does Trump get out of this? One possibility is that Trump's disdain for Smith, whom he has described as 'mentally deranged,' is satisfied merely by seeing headlines about Smith under investigation. And even if Smith is ultimately cleared, Trump may take pleasure in dragging Smith through the burdens of an investigation — including the legal expenses. And it is possible for OSC to take the rare step of escalating the inquiry into a criminal matter, according to Painter. The office can make a criminal referral if it finds that someone ordered or coerced a federal employee to engage in partisan politics. 'I don't see any evidence, quite frankly, that he violated that,' said Painter, who added that he isn't aware of the OSC ever having made such a referral. MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@ Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe! POTUS PUZZLER Which presidents have donated their salaries? (Answer at bottom.) WHO'S IN, WHO'S OUT LABOR SHEDS CIO: THOMAS SHEDD left his role as chief information officer at the Department of Labor last week, Nextgov/FCW's NATALIE ALMS reports, a move that comes as the agency has lost about 20 percent of its total workforce and about 40 percent of its tech office to voluntary departures. The former Tesla engineer still appears to hold positions at the General Services Administration and the Federal Acquisition Service. FEMA TO ICE: The Department of Homeland Security has reassigned dozens of employees with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to Immigration and Customs Enforcement to assist in vetting and processing new hires for the government's mass deportation efforts, WaPo's BRIANNA SACKS reports. DHS stressed that the moves are temporary and won't impact disaster relief, but five current and former FEMA officials told WaPo that losing that many people, even for a few months, will slow down operations for an agency that has already been significantly gutted. DHS Assistant Secretary TRICIA McLAUGHLIN confirmed the reassignments, saying that 'through the One Big Beautiful Bill, DHS is adopting an all-hands-on-deck strategy to recruit 10,000 new ICE agents.' She added that 'to support this effort, select FEMA employees will temporarily be detailed to ICE for 90 days to assist with hiring and vetting.' Agenda Setting TOP SECRET NO MORE: The Trump administration overrode concerns from the CIA and other intelligence agencies' officials in its push to release a lightly redacted version of a highly classified document on Russia's interference in the 2016 election, WaPo's WARREN P. STROBEL reports. The officials were specifically concerned that more of the document should remain classified to obscure U.S. spy agencies' sources and methods. The document that Director of National Intelligence TULSI GABBARD, with the president's blessing, ordered released last month is a 46-page report stemming from a review that began in 2017 by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee. The report takes issue with U.S. intelligence agencies' finding earlier that year that Russian President VLADIMIR PUTIN developed a preference for Trump over Democratic candidate HILLARY CLINTON and looked to help him win the election. The document contains multiple references to CIA human sources reporting on Putin's plans. Those sources are among the agency's most closely guarded secrets — so much so that after the report was completed in 2020, it was considered sensitive enough to be stored at the CIA rather than on Capitol Hill. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. A CIA spokesperson said Director JOHN RATCLIFFE 'strongly supports' the release of the report. ANOTHER ONE: UCLA is at risk of losing more than half a billion dollars in federal research funding as the Trump administration continues its pressure on higher education institutions to address allegations of antisemitism on campuses, our NICOLE NORMAN reports. UCLA officials announced today that the administration is withholding $584 million. The sum is far more than what was initially estimated when the DOJ announced last week it was investigating the school. In a University-wide letter sent this morning and shared with POLITICO, UCLA Chancellor JULIO FRENK confirmed the grant money, aimed at funding hundreds of research projects in a wide array of fields, is 'suspended and at risk.' UNION CUTS: The Department of Veterans Affairs announced today it had canceled several agreements with unions, including the American Federation of Government Employees; National Association of Government Employees; National Federation of Federal Employees; National Nurses Organizing Committee/National Nurses United; and the Service Employees International Union. The agency said the move follows Trump's March executive order revoking federal bargaining rights from some federal workers. The thousands of VA police officers, firefighters and security officers will retain their bargaining rights. 'Too often, unions that represent VA employees fight against the best interests of Veterans while protecting and rewarding bad workers,' VA Secretary DOUG COLLINS said in a statement. 'We're making sure VA resources and employees are singularly focused on the job we were sent here to do: providing top-notch care and service to those who wore the uniform.' LET'S SLOW DOWN: The Trump administration is directing the Bureau of Land Management to cut spending associated with several key agency programs, including renewable energy and land acquisitions, POLITICO's E&E News' SCOTT STREATER reports. The guidance, sent Monday from the Office of Management and Budget, directs BLM to cut spending on these programs 'outside of Federal salary and payroll expenses, minimum expenses to maintain safe operations, or payments otherwise required by law.' Representatives at the Interior Department and BLM did not respond to requests for comment. What We're Reading 'You're Asking Me to Contemplate the Nuclear Scenario' (POLITICO's Victoria Guida) Trump's War on Big Law Means It's Harder to Challenge the Administration (ProPublica's Molly Redden) Trump Amps Up an Obama Strategy to Crack Down on Colleges (NYT's Jeremy W. Peters) POTUS PUZZLER ANSWER Trump today claimed to be the only president to donate his salary, but two others have as well: former Presidents HERBERT HOOVER and JOHN F. KENNEDY, according to the National Archives.
