Why does Donald Trump actually want Greenland?
X / @justinbwells
Donald Trump wants the United States to buy Greenland for its strategically vital resources, to bolster US security and give China a bloody nose.
But he also wants to strike his largest ever real estate deal because Greenland is 'massive', he 'loves maps' and because he is very, very stubborn.
Who owns Greenland?
World's largest island
To impress his billionaire allies
Space base and missile defence
Russia and China's arctic alliance
Treasure trove of rare minerals
Can Trump even buy Greenland?
What is Greenland's response?
Mr Trump's desire to swell the US with a territory roughly the size of Texas and Alaska combined is nothing new.
He tried to bounce Denmark into selling Greenland, which is geographically in North America, during his first presidency – but was rebuffed.
Mr Trump cancelled a 2019 state visit and branded Mette Frederiksen, Denmark's prime minister, 'nasty' after she said the idea was 'absurd'.
Like all hard-nosed negotiators, Mr Trump doesn't take no for an answer and took the chance of naming his ambassador to Denmark to revive the demand this weekend.
As his son Donald Trump Junior arrived for a visit to Greenland, Mr Trump declared: 'I am hearing that the people of Greenland are 'MAGA'.'
Credit: @OJoelsen/@DonaldJTrumpJr/X
He added: 'Greenland is an incredible place, and the people will benefit tremendously if, and when, it becomes part of our nation. We will protect it, and cherish it, from a very vicious outside world. MAKE GREENLAND GREAT AGAIN!'.
Greenland is a very large, strategically important landmass.
'You take a look at a map. I'm a real estate developer,' Mr Trump said in an interview for The Divider, a book by The New York Times' Peter Baker and The New Yorker's Susan Glasser.
'I love maps. And I always said: 'Look at the size of this. It's massive. That should be part of the United States',' he added.
However, Greenland is actually much smaller than it appears on maps because of the Mercator projection, which makes it look a similar size to Africa.
The projection is used to create flat maps but makes landmasses larger the further away from the Equator they are.
Mr Trump reportedly insists that the idea of making America's largest land buy since the Alaska Purchase in 1867 is all his own.
But according to The Divider, Mr Trump got the idea from Ronald Lauder, a billionaire heir to the Estée Lauder cosmetics fortune.
Mr Lauder, 80, a longtime friend of Mr Trump and a New York-born political activist, reportedly offered himself as a back channel negotiator with the Danish government.
Some Left-leaning commentators have branded Mr Trump's coveting of Greenland as a neo-colonist urge to emulate nationalist autocrats like Vladimir Putin.
The United States has history when it comes to buying land. Its last land purchase was 1917's acquisition of the US Virgin Islands … from Denmark.
Before then it bought Alaska from the Russian Empire (which was widely seen as an expensive mistake until gold and oil were discovered there), Louisiana from France, as well as territory from Mexico and the Philippines, now independent, from Spain.
The US offered Denmark $100 million (£79 million) for Greenland after the Second World War.
Washington instead secured a defence treaty centred on a US military base on Greenland.
Pituffik Space Base, formerly Thule Air Base, has been strategically vital ever since the first years of the Cold War.
It is the US military's most northerly outpost and is a vital location for missile defence and space surveillance, housing America's solid state phased array radar system, known colloquially as the ballistic missile early warning system radar network.
Buying Greenland would ensure continued access to the base, although there is no suggestion that it is at risk.
Mr Trump, nevertheless, is adamant he wants Greenland for national security reasons.
'For purposes of national security and freedom throughout the world, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity,' the president said on social media.
Aside from the base, Greenland is on strategic sea lanes like the Northwest Passage and the Greenland-Iceland-UK gap, and is beneath Arctic flight paths. It is on the shortest route from North America to Europe.
Moscow and Beijing have been working hand in glove to bolster their influence in the Arctic, which is a key region for transportation and resources.
Climate change could mean new waterways and new territories for settlement being opened, raising the likelihood of a race for the Arctic amid competing superpowers.
Chinese leaders see the region as a new crossroads of the world, a new source of raw materials and new avenues for manifesting its growing power, the US defence department has said.
In 2019, Republican politicians warned China was trying to build airports on Greenland and even buy an old American naval base there.
Beijing's activities are being facilitated by Russia, which continues to invest heavily in both military and economic terms in the Arctic despite its illegal war in Ukraine.
US officials have also been concerned by joint Russian-Chinese military drills in the area, which seem aimed at Washington and its Nato allies.
Buying Greenland would be a show of strength from the US at a time when its rivals are encroaching into the region.
Greenland is a potential treasure trove of natural resources, including rare earth minerals.
These minerals are vital for high-end military, green energy and industrial technologies but their production and supply is dominated by China.
Beijing last month imposed export controls on the minerals in response to US controls on advanced semiconductors.
Some 37 of the 50 minerals seen as 'critical' by the US could be found in moderate or high quantities in Greenland, based on a 2023 survey.
Lessening US dependence on Chinese supplies would be a geopolitical boost but some experts point out that buying Greenland would mean subsidising an area with the lowest per capita disposable income of any Arctic region except Russia.
Greenland's ice-sheet boasts 7 per cent of the world's fresh water and its undeveloped oil and gas resources are thought to be the third largest in the Arctic.
There is no guarantee that the almost 57,000 Greenlanders will be willing to become part of the US.
In 2009, the island assumed self-rule from Denmark under an agreement that gives it the right to one day declare independence.
By becoming part of the US, Greenland would gain independence from one country while coming under the control of another.
It would also be an expensive acquisition.
In 2019, the Washington Post estimated that Greenland could cost up to $1.7 trillion – on the assumption that the island was up for sale.
Múte Egede, Greenland's prime minister, has rebuffed all advances to date. 'We are not for sale and we will not be for sale,' he said in response to Mr Trump's comments, adding: 'We must not lose our long struggle for freedom.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock Market Today: Nasdaq Rebounds On China Trade Talk Hopes; These New IPOs Shine As Dutch Bros Breaks Out (Live Coverage)
Stock Market Today: The Dow Jones rose Thursday on a call between Trump and Chinese leader Xi. Tesla stock skidded in early trading.


Fast Company
17 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Luigi Mangione's alleged diary entries reveal UnitedHealthcare CEO ‘had it coming'
Six weeks before UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was gunned down outside a Manhattan hotel in December, suspect Luigi Mangione mused about rebelling against 'the deadly, greed fueled health insurance cartel' and said killing the executive 'conveys a greedy bastard that had it coming,' prosecutors revealed Wednesday. The Manhattan district attorney's office quoted extensively from Mangione's handwritten diary — highlighting his desire to kill an insurance honcho and praise for Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber — as they fight to uphold his state murder charges. They also cited a confession they say he penned 'To the feds,' in which he wrote that 'it had to be done.' Mangione's lawyers want the state case thrown out, arguing in court papers that those charges and a parallel federal death penalty case amount to double jeopardy. They also want state terrorism charges dismissed, have asked for the federal case to go first and say prosecutors should be barred from using evidence collected during Mangione's arrest, including a 9mm handgun, statements to police and the diary. Manhattan prosecutors contend that there are no double jeopardy issues because neither case has gone to trial and because the state and federal prosecutions involve different legal theories. His lawyers say that has created a 'legal quagmire' that makes it 'legally and logistically impossible to defend against them simultaneously.' The state charges, which carry a maximum of life in prison, allege that Mangione wanted to 'intimidate or coerce a civilian population,' that is, insurance employees and investors. The federal charges allege that Mangione stalked an individual, Thompson, and do not involve terror allegations. Mangione, 27, has pleaded not guilty in both cases. No trial dates have been set. Mangione's 'intentions were obvious from his acts, but his writings serve to make those intentions explicit,' prosecutors said in Wednesday's filing. The writings, which they sometimes described as a manifesto, 'convey one clear message: that the murder of Brian Thompson was intended to bring about revolutionary change to the healthcare industry.' They quoted excerpts in which Mangione discussed options for the attack, such as bombing UnitedHealthcare's headquarters, before deciding to target the company's investor conference in Manhattan. He wrote about plans to 'wack the CEO at the annual parasitic bean-counter convention' because it was 'targeted, precise and doesn't risk innocents.' UnitedHealthcare, the largest U.S. health insurer, 'literally extracts human life force for money,' Mangione wrote, envisioning the news headline, 'Insurance CEO killed at annual investors conference.' The company has said he was never a client. Mangione is due back in state court June 26, when Judge Gregory Carro is expected to rule on his request for dismissal. His lawyers asked Tuesday for his handcuffs and bulletproof vest to be removed during the hearing. They called him a 'a model prisoner, a model defendant' and said the security measures would suggest to potential jurors that he is dangerous. Carro has not ruled on that. Mangione's next federal court date is Dec. 5, a day after the one-year anniversary of Thompson's death. Surveillance video showed a masked gunman shooting Thompson from behind as he arrived for the conference Dec. 4 at the New York Hilton Midtown. Police say 'delay,' 'deny' and 'depose' were scrawled on the ammunition, mimicking a phrase commonly used to describe how insurers avoid paying claims. Mangione was arrested Dec. 9 at a McDonald's in Altoona, Pennsylvania, 230 miles (about 370 kilometers) to the west, and he is being held in a federal jail in Brooklyn. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has called the ambush 'a killing that was intended to evoke terror.' U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced in April that she was directing federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty for 'an act of political violence' and a 'premeditated, cold-blooded assassination that shocked America.' The killing and ensuing search for Mangione rattled the business community while galvanizing health insurance critics who rallied around him as a stand-in for frustrations over coverage denials and hefty bills. Supporters have flocked to his court appearances and flooded him with mail. Mangione 'demonstrated in his manifesto that he was a revolutionary anarchist who would usher in a better healthcare system by killing the CEO' of one of the biggest U.S. companies, prosecutors wrote. 'This brutal, cowardly murder was the mechanism that defendant chose to bring on that revolution.'


Atlantic
17 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.
Ukraine's drone strikes deep into Russia delivered a humiliating blow to Moscow last weekend. Kyiv's defenders celebrated the attack as a triumph of modern warfare and a warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin. But the extraordinary operation got a different response inside the White House: anger. Donald Trump has openly vented in recent weeks about Putin's unwillingness to end the war. But since Sunday's attack, which hit a series of Russian military airfields, the president has privately expressed frustration that the strike could escalate the conflict, according to three administration officials and an outside adviser to the White House. (They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.) These sources told me that the drone strike has reignited the president's long-held displeasure with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and prompted a new debate in the White House about whether the United States should abandon Ukraine. Throughout the war, Trump has deemed Zelensky a 'bad guy' and a 'hothead,' the outside adviser said—someone who could be pushing the globe toward World War III. Trump privately echoed a right-wing talking point this week by criticizing Zelensky for supposedly showboating after the drone attacks; according to the adviser, Trump was impressed with the audacity of the strikes but believes that Zelensky's focus should have been on Ukraine-Russia negotiations in Istanbul. Trump spoke with Putin yesterday, and, in a readout of the call on Truth Social, the U.S. president relayed the Kremlin's plans to strike back against Ukraine. 'We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides,' Trump wrote. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' Trump did not say whether he had warned Putin against retaliating, and two of the administration officials told me that he has not decided on his next steps. Officials have presented him with options that include sanctioning Russia and reducing American aid to Ukraine. Meanwhile, Trump told aides this week that he does not believe a summit with him, Zelensky, and Putin—which he once hoped would be a way to bring the war to a close—will happen any time soon, one of the administration officials told me. Trump, who on the campaign trail last year vowed to end the war within his first 24 hours in office, made a renewed push for a peace deal last month. While Zelensky agreed to an immediate cease-fire, Putin rejected the offer and ratcheted up his bombing of Ukrainian cities. That led Trump to threaten to walk away from peace talks, and to flash some rare ire at Putin. The president had hoped that some progress would be made in this week's talks in Turkey, but the meeting was overshadowed by the drone strikes and went nowhere. The White House has said that the U.S. was not told in advance about the surprise attack, which was carried out by drones hidden across five of Russia's time zones that hit nuclear-capable bombers and inflicted billions of dollars in damage, according to a preliminary estimate from the White House. Steve Bannon and other influential MAGA voices have berated Ukraine for the attack and are attempting to push Washington further from Kyiv. On his podcast this week, Bannon blamed Ukraine for, in his view, sabotaging peace talks while potentially provoking a massive response from Russia. 'Zelensky didn't give the president of the United States a heads-up to say he's going to do a deep strike into strategic forces of Russia, which is going up the escalatory ladder as quickly as you can, on the day before your meeting in Turkey?' Bannon said. 'On the eve of peace talks or cease-fire talks, he takes the Japanese role in Pearl Harbor—the sneak attack.' Bannon has conveyed similar messages to senior West Wing advisers, a fourth administration official told me. Keith Kellogg, Trump's Ukraine envoy, warned on Fox News that 'the risk levels are going way up' because the drones struck part of Russia's 'national survival system'—its nuclear program—potentially pushing Moscow to retaliate in significant ways. Trump has not increased aid to Ukraine since taking office again in January, and he has yet to endorse a bipartisan Senate push, led by his ally Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, to impose harsh economic penalties against Russia and countries that do business with it. There have been other recent signs that the White House is distancing itself from Ukraine, too. Yesterday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not attend a meeting of 50 defense ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels. In the past, the meeting has been an important venue for coordinating military aid for Ukraine. Hegseth was the first U.S. defense secretary to skip the event in three years. The Pentagon cited scheduling issues for his absence. When I asked a White House spokesperson for comment about the drone strikes, she pointed me to Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's briefing-room remarks on Tuesday, when Leavitt said that Trump 'wants this war to end at the negotiating table, and he has made that clear to both leaders, both publicly and privately.' In public remarks about the strikes, Putin downplayed the chances of a cease-fire, asking, 'Who has negotiations with terrorists?' But Zelensky told reporters that the operation over the weekend, code-named Spider's Web, would not have been carried out if Putin had agreed to a U.S.-proposed truce. 'If there had been a cease-fire, would the operation have taken place?' Zelensky asked. 'No.' Exasperated with the conflict, Trump continues to muse about walking away from any sort of diplomatic solution. In his Truth Social post about his call with Putin, the president seemed eager to change the subject to focus on ending a different international crisis. 'We also discussed Iran,' Trump wrote about ongoing talks regarding Tehran's nuclear ambitions. 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion.'