Investigators exploring whether grenades found at apartment caused blast that killed 3 LA deputies
Investigators served a search warrant Monday morning at an address in the Marina del Rey neighborhood. The department didn't say what, if anything, was found as detectives chase leads following the deadly blast early Friday at the Biscailuz Training Facility.
Officials said they are exploring whether there may be a connection to the discovery on Thursday of grenades at an apartment complex in Santa Monica, a few miles north of Marina del Rey. The three members of the arson and explosives team responded that day to assist local police.
Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna said the deaths marked the department's worst loss of life in a single incident since 1857, when four officers were killed by gunfire.
Those killed on Friday were identified by the department as Detective Joshua Kelley-Eklund, Detective Victor Lemus and Detective William Osborn. They served 19, 22 and 33 years in the department respectively, Luna said.
The deaths are being investigated by the department's homicide detectives, with the assistance of the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
Luna said Friday that it took more than four hours to render the scene safe and the deaths were being investigated by the department's homicide detectives, with the assistance of the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. No one else was injured, he said.
The sheriff said the arson and explosives team undergoes in-depth training and responds to more than 1,000 calls a year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘It's racist': Latino tenants who sued their landlord got threatening message about ICE
A Los Angeles area family of Latino renters suing their landlord over a 2024 eviction claim they were met with a thinly veiled threat that they would be picked up by immigration agents, amid the ongoing, high-profile campaign of raids across the city. 'It's not fair for him to take advantage of that,' former tenant Yicenia Morales told The Los Angeles Times. 'I was born here. I have a birth certificate. I pay taxes.' 'I was already depressed over the eviction,' she added. 'Now I'm hurt, embarrassed and nervous as well. Will he really call ICE on us?' 'It's racist,' her attorney, Sarah McCracken, added in an interview with the paper. 'Not only is it unethical and probably illegal, but it's just a really wild thing to say — especially since my clients are U.S. citizens.' The controversy stems from a June message from attorney Rod Fehlman, whom Morales and her lawyers at the firm Tobener Ravenscroft said they saw in state records was the legal point of contact for landlord Celia Ruiz and her real estate agent David Benavides. In the midst of a back-and-forth over the case in June, Fehlman sent an aggressive message referencing recent arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, McCracken said. 'It is also interesting to note that your clients are likely to be picked up by ICE and deported prior to trial thanks to all the good work the Trump administration has done in regards to immigration in California,' Fehlman told the renters' legal team in email after being served this summer, according to McCracken. Fehlman told The Independent he cannot comment on 'ongoing litigation,' but said the message was taken out of context. Instead of a threat, he said, he was warning Morales's San Francisco-based lawyer about the ongoing pattern of ICE agents arresting immigrants at courthouses and immigration offices. 'My email mentions nothing about Ms. McCracken's client's citizenship,' Fehlman wrote in an email. 'This is an ongoing problem in Southern California and a sad reality that litigants have been picked randomly at Courthouses. It is unfortunate that this comment has been taken out of context intentionally by Ms. McCracken's firm and used to defame my office.' (The real estate agent named in the suit responded to the complaint with a different law firm than Fehlman's, according to the Times, and the renters have been unable to serve the landlord with the complaint yet. Fehlman did not respond to a question regarding which parties he was or had been representing in the eviction dispute.) McCracken told The Independent she was taken aback by her exchanges with Fehlman. 'This case doesn't involve my client's race or ethnicity or immigration status, or at least it didn't until he made that comment,' she said. 'We just thought it was irrelevant and an inappropriate way to try and get an edge in the case.' The Independent has contacted Morales for comment. Real estate agent Benavides, when reached by The Independent, hung up. On Tuesday, California Attorney General Rob Bonta warned that discriminating, retaliating against, or attempting to influence tenants based on their immigration status, including by reporting tenants to immigration services, is illegal. 'California tenants — no matter their immigration status — have a right to safe housing and to access housing documents in a language they can understand,' Bonta said in a statement. 'I will use the full force of my office to go after those who seek to take advantage of California tenants during an already challenging time.' McCracken said she has encountered landlords making verbal comments about ICE to tenants in the past. Now, however, she said people seem 'emboldened' to make boundary-pushing spoken and written comments about race and immigration status to renters under the second Trump administration, based on what she has heard from potential clients and legal colleagues. Renters have faced threats over their immigration status predating the second Trump term, too. In 2019, a New York judge fined a landlord $5,000 and ordered the payment of $12,000 in damages to a tenant who was threatened with ICE if they didn't pay rent, thought to be the first such case in the country. Earlier this year, an Illinois judge ruled on a similar case, dating back to 2022. Under the Trump administration, with its mass expansion of military-style immigration raids, unscrupulous individuals have also allegedly impersonated ICE to achieve unsavory ends, including a January incident in which a North Carolina man allegedly pretended to be an immigration agent to coerce a woman into having sex.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Doctor who gave Matthew Perry ketamine and called him 'a moron' pleads guilty to role in his death
The doctor who gave actor Matthew Perry doses of ketamine before he overdosed and drowned in the hot tub of his LA home has pleaded guilty to playing a role in his death. Dr. Salvador Plasencia appeared in federal court on Wednesday and was mostly quiet as the judge went over the plea agreement for nearly an hour. Plasencia, who was often called 'Dr. P', was facing in a potential 40-year prison sentence had he not taken the plea deal. He is expected to return to court on December 3 for sentencing and will face up to 10 years in federal prison. When asked by the judge if he and his lawyers had considered all the possibilities of pleas and sentencing in the case, the 43-year-old physician replied, 'They've considered everything.' He had previously pleaded not guilty, but in exchange for the guilty pleas prosecutors have agreed to drop three additional counts of distribution of ketamine and two counts of falsifying records. The Santa Monica physician is the fourth person who was indicted on criminal charges in connection to the Friends' star's death on Oct. 28, 2023. Jasveen Sangha, was known to her customers as the 'Ketamine Queen', is the only defendant who has not decided to take a plea deal in connection to the actor's death. She is slated to return to court August 19. Sangha remains in custody in Los Angeles awaiting trial. Others who have plead guilty include Perry's assistant, Kenneth Iwamasa, who discovered the actor's lifeless body in his hot tub. The LA County Medical Examiner's Office determined that the actor — who had battled substance abuse issues throughout his life — died of 'acute effects of ketamine.' Perry had been receiving ketamine infusion therapy as treatment for his depression, but the last session was a week and a half before he died, the medical examiner determined. Ketamine is only in your system for three to four hours, which means it did not lead directly to his death. 'At the high levels of ketamine found in his postmortem blood specimens, the main lethal effects would be from both cardiovascular overstimulation and respiratory depression,' the medical examiner, Raffi Djabourian, concluded. Two others — physician Mark Chavez, of San Diego and Erik Fleming, 54, of Hawthorne — also plead guilty to conspiracy to distribute ketamine causing death. In his plea agreement, Plasencia admitted he met Perry through another patient connected him with Perry. He admitted supplying Perry with 20 vials of ketamine totaling 100 mg of the drug, along with ketamine lozenges and syringes about a month before the actor's death. He also admitted enlisting Dr. Chavez, who supplied the drugs. In court documents, Plasencia texted Chavez: 'I wonder how much this moron will pay,' referring to Perry. Federal prosecutors said Plasencia sold the drugs to the actor for $4,500. He also told Chavez to keep the supplies coming so they could become the actor's 'go-to'. Perry - who had long struggled with addiction and staying sober - told Iwamasa to procure illegal drugs for him in late September 2023. Iwamasa allegedly obtained the ketamine he gave to Perry from Plasencia and Fleming. The assistant reportedly met with Plasencia at least seven times between September 30 and October 28, 2023. On the day of his death, Perry reportedly told Iwamasa to 'shoot me up with a big one,' and was injected with ketamine by the assistant three times, according to his plea agreement. Prosecutors allege Iwamasa also began obtaining ketamine for Perry from Fleming and Sangha beginning in mid-October 2023. After discussing prices with Iwamasa, Fleming allegedly coordinated the drug sales with Sangha, and brought cash from Iwamasa to Sangha's stash house in North Hollywood. On October 24, 2023, while waiting for Sangha's ketamine to arrive, In October 24, 2023, Fleming allegedly told Iwamasa that the ketamine was 'on its way to our girl,' referring to Sangha.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Pro-Baldoni YouTuber targeted by Blake Lively in 'invasive' subpoena reveals ironic financial link to Ryan Reynolds
A smalltime YouTuber has hit back in a court filing after Blake Lively subpoenaed her bank details – accusing the Gossip Girl star of pursuing 'desperate and paranoid' tactics, and submitting an official complaint against the actress's lawyer. Lively, 37, has claimed throughout her ongoing legal battle that her ex co-star Justin Baldoni paid influencers to smear her following the premiere of 2024 domestic violence drama film It Ends With Us. But in an ironic twist, pro-Baldoni YouTuber Kassidy O'Connell says the only money she has received is from ads on her videos starring Lively's husband Ryan Reynolds. 'Ms. Lively, who still cannot accept that the criticism against her online is completely organic and of her own making, has made yet another move guaranteed to make matters far worse for her reputation by lashing out at content creators on social media,' O'Connell wrote in the filing published on the docket Friday. It Ends With Us actress Lively sparked uproar on social media when she sent a legal demand to Google for the financial and personal records of 16 YouTubers earlier this month, and to social media site X for another 20 users. Some of the content creators told they believe Lively is trying to prove a conspiracy that her legal nemesis Baldoni paid them to produce negative content about her, which they deny. One creator, who uses the pseudonym Kassidy O'Connell, has filed a fiery response asking the judge to cancel her subpoena, and accusing Lively of a 'desperate and paranoid' attempt to prove 'an imaginary smear campaign'. O'Connell, who has around 16,000 subscribers to her YouTube channel, submitted her initial response last Wednesday without a lawyer, saying she was trying to meet tight court deadlines before she had a chance to hire an attorney. She was scathing of Lively in her 11-page motion to quash the Google subpoena, which she filed alongside a copy of her California State Bar complaint against Lively attorney Esra Hudson. 'No third party has access to add additional money to a YouTuber's monthly pay,' she wrote, trashing the theory that creators were paid by Baldoni. 'We are paid by AdSense according to ads run on our channel. Ironically enough, Mint Mobile often runs ads on my channel featuring their spokesperson, Ryan Reynolds, so if I've been paid directly or indirectly by anyone involved in this case, it's former party, Ryan Reynolds.' Reynolds stars in Mint Mobile commercials, and owned a reported $300million stake in the company until 2023. The subpoena to Google asks for O'Connell's address, bank details, subscriber records, and detailed information on her YouTube account. O'Connell argued in her filing that it was an unwarranted invasion of privacy, pointing to Lively's own previous legal filings that asserted the actress' right to privacy when Baldoni tried to subpoena her data. 'Ms. Lively herself makes a compelling argument that individuals have a constitutional right to privacy regarding their financial information,' O'Connell wrote. 'Ms. Lively appears to recognize the basic elements of privacy rights that individuals are entitled to, despite her attempts to pierce the rights others are equally entitled to.' The YouTuber, who makes videos dissecting court documents in celebrity cases and prominent criminal prosecutions, said she had already been the victim of a stalker and sexual assault, and that she was terrified Lively would leak her private information putting her in harm's way. 'Plaintiffs' counsel has an established history in this case of improper (completely absent) redaction in filings and have exposed the home addresses of every Wayfarer defendant,' O'Connell wrote. The notices were sent out to the YouTubers via their Google accounts and demanded 16 content creators to produce their private information - which initially led many to believe that it was a phishing scam 'This led to death threats to all the defendants, several of which are women, threats of kidnap and harm to a wife and daughter not affiliated with the lawsuit, an act of arson where the arsonist is currently in jail, and the disclosure of two separate medical conditions, further heightening the risk of exposure and harm to any person's information presented to this lawsuit. 'She proclaims herself to be the 'voice of women' and vowed to not stop speaking for us, while simultaneously causing lasting harm to woman after woman with her counsel and the Court's assistance. 'I, as most of her victims, have done nothing wrong and do not deserve to be unconstitutionally stripped of my rights to suit her whims.' O'Connell called Lively's subpoenas 'abusive' and 'sweeping', noting she served '60 third party subpoenas and intends to file several more' according to court documents. The plucky YouTuber also claimed that Lively's big law firm, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, made a procedural mistake that invalidates their subpoena. O'Connell said clerks in Northern California federal court told her the subpoena to Google's Bay Area, California headquarters was issued from New York, not NorCal. But she cited legal precedents saying that the subpoena must be routed through the nearest court to be valid. She also noted that Lively's subpoena referred to Reynolds as a 'party' to the case, though he has already been dismissed from involvement by the judge. O'Connell noted the alleged mistakes in a complaint against Manatt attorney Esra Hudson to the California State Bar for 'issuing an improper subpoena'. 'Her actions violated multiple California Rules of Professional Conduct and disregarded constitutional protections under the First Amendment,' the YouTuber wrote in her complaint. She included a claim that 'Ms. Hudson's office denied issuing the subpoena on three separate occasions […] which raises serious concerns under the rules of professional honesty and truthfulness. 'The misuse of a legal process to delay litigation, intimidate critics, and obtain improper discovery from non-parties is serious misconduct that undermines both legal ethics and constitutional protections.' New York federal Judge Lewis Liman responded to her initial submission by issuing an order on Wednesday afternoon saying O'Connell must either refile under her real name, or submit additional legal arguments explaining why she should remain anonymous. 'The Court will not entertain the motion to quash unless it is either de-anonymized or accompanied by a motion requesting leave to proceed anonymously in this Court and explaining why the movant's interest in anonymity outweighs the public interest in disclosure and any prejudice to the opposing party,' Liman's order said. O'Connell refiled her documents on Friday, this time signed by an individual named 'Ni Cai', with the title of 'Manager of Kassidy O'Connell, LLC'. Lively's theory that Baldoni hired influencers to smear her was bolstered by messages her lawyers obtained about Jed Wallace, a social media consultant used by Baldoni's publicists. Baldoni PR Melissa Nathan texted colleagues that Wallace quoted $175,000 for a three-month online campaign to 'start threads of theories' and provide 'full social account take downs', and a $25,000-per-month service of 'creation of social fan engagement to go back and forth with any negative accounts, helping to change the narrative and stay on track'. 'All of this will be most importantly untraceable,' Nathan added in the August 6 2024 text. But last Wednesday, Judge Liman dismissed Wallace from the case, in a blow to Lively's claims over the alleged smear campaign. In a summary of Wallace's arguments, the judge wrote that the online consultant found 'people on social media organically supported Baldoni and disliked Lively.' 'Wallace has an understanding of what a 'social combat' or 'social manipulation plan' could be, but he did not provide such a service related to It Ends With Us, Wayfarer, Baldoni, Lively, or Reynolds,' Liman wrote. 'Wallace states that his role was merely passive observation and analysis of the social media environment.' Liman ruled that Wallace had to be dismissed from the New York lawsuit because the court didn't have jurisdiction over him, adding that Lively was free to separately sue the consultant in his home state of Texas. Lively's lawyers also appear to have sent out a subpoena to social media site X for another 20 content creators. One account, 'The Spiritual Shift', wrote on July 17 that they received an email from X that it had received 'legal process, dated July 3, 2025, requesting information regarding your X account'. The X user, who says they are a licensed attorney, attached an apparent screenshot of the email. 'I'm a licensed attorney and casual content creator who started covering this case in late December 2024 to early January 2025 because it mattered and interested me,' The Spiritual Shift wrote in the July 17 post. 'I'm not monetized. No ads. No sponsors. No donations. Just over 2,400 followers. Zero dollars made. 'The subpoena informs me that they are attempting to obtain my personal X account information simply because I dared to speak truth to power, openly, critically, and transparently, about them and their lawsuit. '20 users were named in my copy of the subpoena,' the X user added. 'This is the height of privileged injustice. It is a fishing expedition, a deliberate attempt by the wealthy and powerful to scare, suppress, and silence dissent. It is intimidation disguised as litigation.'
