TVS launches Jupiter 125 Dual Tone SXC variant with SmartXonnect technology at Rs 88,942
TVS Motor Company has expanded its Jupiter lineup with the introduction of the new Jupiter 125 Dual Tone SmartXonnect (SXC) variant. Positioned as an urban commuter scooter, this model combines practical features with updated design elements, aiming to address the evolving needs of city riders.
The Jupiter 125 Dual Tone SXC comes with a refreshed look, featuring a dual-tone color scheme and subtle design enhancements such as diamond-cut alloy wheels and a redesigned LED headlamp. Two new color variants — Ivory Brown and Ivory Grey — have been introduced, appealing to customers looking for a modern yet practical two-wheeler.
Under the hood, the scooter retains its 124.8 cc single-cylinder engine, delivering 11.1 Nm of torque at 4,500 rpm. It also includes TVS's iGO Assist technology, aimed at optimizing pickup and maintaining fuel efficiency during city rides.
In terms of rider comfort and convenience, the Jupiter 125 SXC offers features such as a segment-leading 33-litre under-seat storage space, which can accommodate two helmets. The seat has been extended to provide improved support for both rider and pillion, with the addition of a cushioned backrest. A front fuel-fill cap and 2-litre open glove box enhance daily usability.
The scooter also includes a reverse LCD digital console, offering call and SMS alerts, trip information, real-time mileage, and other essential indicators. Safety and durability are supported by the use of a reinforced metal body and larger tyres for improved stability on city roads.
With this update, TVS aims to strengthen its presence in the 125cc scooter segment by offering a model that balances performance, comfort, and technology. The Jupiter 125 Dual Tone SXC is now available at TVS dealerships, priced at ₹88,942 (ex-showroom, Delhi).
Aman Shukla is a post-graduate in mass communication . A media enthusiast who has a strong hold on communication ,content writing and copy writing. Aman is currently working as journalist at BusinessUpturn.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Senate GOP seeks to cut off funding source for top consumer watchdog
Senate Republicans are seeking to cut off a key funding source for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) as part of a mammoth package to advance President Trump's tax agenda and spending cuts. Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee said the legislative text unveiled Friday would block CFPB's ability 'to fund itself' by significantly limiting its funding structure. Currently, as part of its funding structure, the CFPB receives transfers from the central bank not exceeding a cap set at 12 percent of the Federal Reserve System's total operating expenses in 2009. However, the proposal offered by Senate Republicans on Friday would reduce that cap to zero. The measure goes further than the House version of Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' which seeks to reduce the cap to 5 percent. The GOP-led Senate committee said Friday the move would not 'affect the Bureau's existing ability to request funds from Congress' and would result in about $6.4 billion in savings over 10 years. The CFPB has long faced legal challenges over its funding structure, as Republicans have pushed for the agency to be funded through the annual appropriations process in Congress that many other federal agencies are subject to instead of the Federal Reserve. Some Republicans have said they see the broader tax and spending cuts plan as their best shot to rein in an agency they've argued has too much power and independence. The recent text has drawn swift backlash from Democrats on the banking committee, however. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), the top Democrat on the committee, attacked the Republican proposal in statement Friday afternoon, saying it 'goes beyond the already extreme House bill and is yet another example of Republicans' reckless and bloodthirsty pursuit of destroying the CFPB — an agency that has returned over $21 billion to scammed Americans — by any means necessary, after failing to get their way in court.' Another section of the legislation calls for moving 'non-monetary policy related Federal Reserve employees to a new pay scale calculated at 70 percent of the pay of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,' Republicans outline in a breakdown of the measure. Republicans say the employees' salaries would be adjusted 'to approximately the same as employees at the Department of the Treasury' as part of a measure the committee estimates would generate 'savings of $1.4 billion.' Republicans say the move would bring 'parity to the pay scale of the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department.' However, Democratic members of the banking committee accused their GOP colleagues of punishing Fed staff and undermining their ability 'to police' big banks. Other proposals sought by the committee include measures to yank back funding for the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Green and Resilient Retrofit Program authorized under the Biden administration, eliminate what Republicans say is the Treasury Department's 'duplicative office' of Office of Financial Research, and transferring duties and functions of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The language is similar to recent legislation that passed the House. The measure also seeks to provide $1 billion for the Defense Production Act fund. Overall, Republicans on the committee estimated the 'net budgetary impacts' of the legislation to 'result in a 10-year budgetary savings of $8.447 billion.' Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott (R-S.C.) said Friday that he worked with House and Senate colleagues to 'carefully scrutinize programs and spending within our jurisdiction and identify efficiencies and cost savings.' 'This legislation takes important steps to reduce waste and duplication in financial regulation while bolstering our national security, and I look forward to advancing these provisions as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill,' he said. Democrats, on the other hand, are vowing to fight the suite of proposals as what they have described as an 'attack on American consumers.' 'Their bill also guts other regulators created after the 2008 crisis that help keep our financial system safe,' Warren said Friday. 'This will not stand — and don't just take it from me, take it from the litany of Senate Republicans who are on the record saying this violates Senate rules.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
8 hours ago
Senate Republicans revise ban on state AI regulations in bid to preserve controversial provision
WASHINGTON -- Senate Republicans have made changes to their party's sweeping tax bill in hopes of preserving a new policy that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. In legislative text unveiled Thursday night, Senate Republicans proposed denying states federal funding for broadband projects if they regulate AI. That's a change from a provision in the House-passed version of the tax overhaul that simply banned any current or future AI regulations by the states for 10 years. 'These provisions fulfill the mandate given to President Trump and Congressional Republicans by the voters: to unleash America's full economic potential and keep her safe from enemies,' Sen. Ted Cruz, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said in a statement announcing the changes. The proposed ban has angered state lawmakers in Democratic and Republican-led states and alarmed some digital safety advocates concerned about how AI will develop as the technology rapidly advances. But leading AI executives, including OpenAI's Sam Altman, have made the case to senators that a 'patchwork' of state AI regulations would cripple innovation. Some House Republicans are also uneasy with the provision. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., came out against the AI regulatory moratorium in the House bill after voting for it. She said she had not read that section of the bill. 'We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power. Not the other way around,' Greene wrote on social media. Senate Republicans made their change in an attempt to follow the special process being used to pass the tax bill with a simple majority vote. To comply with those rules, any provision needs to deal primarily with the federal budget and not government policy. Republican leaders argue, essentially, that by setting conditions for states to receive certain federal appropriations — in this instance, funding for broadband internet infrastructure — they would meet the Senate's standard for using a majority vote. Cruz told reporters Thursday that he will make his case next week to Senate parliamentarian on why the revised ban satisfies the rules. The parliamentarian is the chamber's advisor on its proper rules and procedures. While the parliamentarian's ruling are not binding, senators of both parties have adhered to their findings in the past. Senators generally argue that Congress should take the lead on regulating AI but so far the two parties have been unable to broker a deal that is acceptable to Republicans' and Democrats' divergent concerns. The GOP legislation also includes significant changes to how the federal government auctions commercial spectrum ranges. Those new provisions expand the range of spectrum available for commercial use, an issue that has divided lawmakers over how to balance questions of national security alongside providing telecommunications firms access to more frequencies for commercial wireless use. Senators are aiming to pass the tax package, which extends the 2017 rate cuts and other breaks from President Donald Trump's first term along with new tax breaks and steep cuts to social programs, later this month.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
House Dems Get Bonus Hearing on Crypto Market Structure, Assail Trump Conflicts
WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. President Donald Trump's crypto ventures were once again under the microscope during a House Financial Services Committee hearing that otherwise saw legal experts express worries about how regulators might police digital assets under a market structure bill. The committee held a "minority day" hearing — meaning the witnesses were primarily picked by the Democrats, the current minority party in the House — on Friday, letting lawmakers ask questions more targeted on concerns they have with the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, the Republican-led market structure legislation that will receive a markup vote next week. Maxine Waters, the ranking Democrat on the committee who'd demanding this extracurricular hearing after the panel met earlier in the week on the same topic, pointed to Trump's various crypto efforts in her opening statement, saying her goal was to stop Trump from profiting off of his crypto ventures to the extent he has been. "What I'm opposed to in this act … is the crooked president of the United States of America, who's decided to use the office of the presidency to enhance his access to profits," Waters said. Republicans focused on a different tack: "Currently, there is no federal framework for non-security digital assets," Committee Chair French Hill said in his own opening statement, a stance echoed by his colleagues Bryan Steil and Warren Davidson. They contend that Democrats and the administration of former President Joe Biden allowed years to pass in which they failed to protect consumers by offering no rules to oversee crypto. Crypto has driven an ideological wedge into the Democratic Party on Capitol Hill, with many Democrats — typically skewing toward the younger members — supporting the advancement of digital assets legislation despite the direction of their leadership. Most of the Democrats attending this bonus hearing on the Clarity Act were in the crypto-critical camp, though Representative Jim Himes, a Connecticut Democrat, has supported crypto bills in the past and questioned witnesses at the hearing about his concerns that the bill may include loopholes that could allow financial firms to dodge oversight. Himes, a yes vote on last year's predecessor to the Clarity Act — the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act, or FIT21 — said some of the provisions in the new effort may allow for a carveout that can be abused by certain types of issuers under Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. The Clarity Act itself is more complicated than it needs to be and does not address some of the cybersecurity risks posed to the cryptocurrency industry, said Carole House, a former White House adviser who is now a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council GeoEconomics Center. She pointed to recent crypto hacks, including crypto exchange ByBit, as an example. Amanda Fischer, policy director at Better Markets, a Washington group advocating for financial policies that favor the public, said her bigger issue was with the exceptions that exist for companies to seek regulation under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission rather than the Securities and Exchange Commission, saying that it might provide loopholes for issuers or other crypto companies that otherwise would be regulated under the SEC and be subject to securities registration and reporting requirements. But as has been seen in other recent hearings, Trump's crypto ties again reappeared as the star of the show. Bart Naylor, a policy expert at Public Citizen and a former investigator for the Senate Banking Committee, said he believes Trump is specifically soliciting gifts through his memecoin and selling favors through actions like his memecoin dinner or by terminating SEC lawsuits against companies which donated money to him. White House officials have routinely denied Trump is exhibiting a conflict of interests in his pursuit of digital assets business gains. Waters had staged a walkout last month from what was meant to be a joint hearing of this and the House Agriculture Committee on crypto policy, though industry insiders were careful to note that not all the panel's Democrats followed Waters' departure.
