Tony Blair's letter saying sorry to Guildford Four was not meant as apology
New cabinet documents released by the National Archives in London show it was intended that Mr Blair would stop short of an apology and instead just express regret that they went through a miscarriage of justice.
A letter sent by Mr Blair to Courtney Kennedy Hill, the wife of Paul Hill, one of the Guildford Four, was reported to have been the first time that a British leader had apologised for the wrongful conviction.
Mr Hill, Gerry Conlon, Patrick Armstrong and Carole Richardson were given life sentences for bombing public houses in Guildford, Surrey, and each spent 15 years in prison. Their convictions were overturned by the court of appeal in 1989.
READ MORE
In a letter to John Sawers, foreign policy adviser to Mr Blair, Stephen Harrison of the Home Office wrote: 'The prime minister said ... that he was very sorry indeed that there were miscarriages of justice in Paul Hill's case and the cases of those convicted with him.
'This was not intended to be an apology: rather, the prime minister was acknowledging that the four were victims of miscarriages of justice, and expressing his regret that this should have happened.
'However, in June this year, the letter was publicised for the first time and was widely reported in the media as an apology.'
Ms Kennedy Hill wrote to Mr Blair in April 1999 to query her husband's compensation for the 15 'stolen years' he had spent in prison. 'For this terrible miscarriage of justice Paul Hill has received no apology,' she wrote.
When Mr Blair replied the next month, he said: 'I believe that it is an indictment of our system of justice and a matter for the greatest regret when anyone suffers punishment as a result of a miscarriage of justice. There were miscarriages of justice in your husband's case and the cases of those convicted with him. I am very sorry indeed that this should have happened.'
[
Blair apologises to the Guildford Four
Opens in new window
]
The letter Mr Blair sent used a similar form of words that was used by the home secretary in a letter to one of the Birmingham Six, said Mr Harrison.
Details of the letter to Ms Kennedy Hill emerged in an edition of BBC Northern Ireland's Spotlight programme which told Mr Hill's story in 2000.
The human rights solicitor Gareth Peirce, who was acting for one of the other members of the Guildford Four, complained about the fact the letter had only been sent to Ms Kennedy Hill and said it had caused additional hurt to the other three. Home secretary Jack Straw suggested Mr Blair write to the other members.
The following year, 2001, Anne Maguire of the Maguire Seven wrote to Mr Blair asking for an apology for herself, her husband and her sons for their wrongful conviction for the unlawful possession of explosions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Man (76) charged after children fell ill at Leicestershire summer camp
A 76-year-old man has been charged after a number of children became unwell at a summer camp in Leicestershire, England . Jon Ruben, of Ruddington, Nottingham, has been charged with three counts of wilful ill treatment of a child. The charges relate to three children at the rural camp in the village of Stathern, Leicestershire police said on Friday. Police launched an investigation after children attending the camp at Stathern Lodge, near Melton, became unwell. Emergency services attended the scene and eight children, all boys aged between eight and 11, along with one adult, were taken to hospital as a precaution. All of the patients have since been discharged. READ MORE Mr Ruben has been remanded into custody and will appear at Leicester magistrates court on Saturday. Janine McKinney, chief crown prosecutor for CPS East Midlands, said: 'The Crown Prosecution Service has authorised the prosecution of a 76-year-old man with child cruelty offences following a police investigation into a summer camp held at Stathern Lodge, Leicestershire. 'This decision has been made after reviewing a file of evidence from Leicestershire police. 'Jonathon Ruben will be charged with three offences of wilful ill treatment of a child relating to three boys. He will appear at Leicester magistrates court on Saturday, August 2nd. 'This has been an extremely upsetting and shocking moment for the community, and especially for the children and parents most directly affected. 'We would like to remind all concerned that there are now active criminal proceedings against Mr Ruben and he has the right to a fair trial. There must be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online that may in any way prejudice these proceedings.' Leicestershire police had originally said the incident happened on Monday, before amending it to Sunday, and it remains unclear whether officers only responded on Monday and whether that is why the force has referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). The force said in a statement: 'The owners and operators of Stathern Lodge are independent from those people who use or hire the lodge and are not connected to the incident.' The investigation is being led by the East Midlands special operations unit's major incident team. Detective inspector Neil Holden, the senior investigating officer, said: 'We understand the concern this incident will have caused to parents, guardians and the surrounding community.' He added: 'This is a complex and sensitive investigation and we will continue to provide updates to both parents and guardians and the public as and when we can.' The IOPC said: 'Our assessment team has examined all available evidence and concluded the matter should be independently investigated by the IOPC. 'The investigation will look at whether there were any breaches of professional behaviour – namely a failure to carry out duties and responsibilities – that resulted in a delay in Leicestershire police's response to what was later declared a critical incident.' - Guardian
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Discriminations by AC Grayling: A simple take on the culture wars
Discriminations: Making Peace in the Culture Wars Author : AC Grayling ISBN-13 : 978-0861549962 Publisher : Oneworld Guideline Price : £12.99 In Discriminations, AC Grayling essentially suggests that respect for human rights and commitment to reasoned debate are the antidotes to the poisonous state of politics. A simple solution. The title, Discriminations, plays with two meanings. Firstly, there is discrimination in the sense of sexism, racism and other prejudices which Grayling positions himself as firmly against, taking the side of social justice and defending those pilloried as 'woke'. Secondly, there is discrimination in the sense of making subtle distinctions – between rights and interests, between free-speech and hate-speech, for instance. Grayling offers a historical perspective on cancel culture, stretching the term to include collective cancelling, for example the crusade against Albigensian heretics in 13th century France, or individual cancelling, such as the pillory of Oscar Wilde. He argues that tactics such as 'no-platforming' or 'cancelling' are rarely justified, and that abandoning the principle of free speech to the right is a mistake by the left, feminists or the 'woke'. READ MORE Aside from how far-fetched these historical comparisons appear, the main thrust of the book is that the current poisonous state of the culture wars is created by all participants, left, right or otherwise. Grayling suggests that the left must examine its tactics and respect free speech, and that the right must respect human rights as distinct from interests – the maintenance of advantages. Along the way, he drifts into 'both-sides' style equations of the hard left and hard right. The extremes are the problem; those in the centre hold the answers. Supposedly rising above the 'culture war', Grayling proposes liberal solutions: rights, debate, freedom. These are hard to disagree with but obviously these are widespread, even dominant ideas of the last century. Grayling admonishes everyone to return to these principles, which should deliver a harmonious political debate – full of difference and disagreement but civil. Today, when authoritarian populists and neoliberals are the champions of free speech, this is insufficient. With a schoolmasterly tone – though often implausible, ' ... reflection will suggest, fundamentally, morality is a matter of good manners ...' – Grayling's book is almost endearingly nostalgic. The simple solution of reasonable arguments countering problematic views is alluring, but hardly tenable now. Effectively, the culture wars means that what counts as problematic or reasonable is now essentially contested. Even where his diagnosis is apt, his solutions seem implausible.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
NI community projects fear closure after US and UK funding reportedly pulled from peace organisation
A number of community and peacebuilding projects supported by the International Fund for Ireland (IFI) fear they will close due to the reported loss of vital funding from the US . It also emerged this week that the UK government had pulled a promised £1 million , citing budgetary pressures. However, multiple organisations told The Irish Times their 'bigger concern' was the halting of the US contribution to the peacebuilding and reconciliation body. The IFI said it had received financial support from 'a range of international donors including the US government' and was seeking clarity and support from its US partners. READ MORE The peacebuilding organisation was established by the British and Irish governments in 1986 to promote economic and social development and bring together nationalist, unionist and cross-Border communities. Since then, the IFI has spent €974 million supporting more than 6,000 projects, including efforts to remove peace walls and to prevent young people from being recruited or attacked by paramilitaries. The US government has traditionally been the IFI's largest funder. According to the IFI's accounts, its donations last year came from two sources, €2.5 million from the US and €5.5 million from the Irish Government. USAid, which administers foreign aid for the US government, was closed by president Donald Trump earlier this year. [ Senator George Mitchell: Northern Ireland's peace must evolve. And if it is here to stay it must be shared Opens in new window ] In February, Donald Trump's administration cut USAid jobs. Photographer: Pete Kiehart/Bloomberg via Getty Images It is not yet clear precisely how this will impact the IFI, but groups which deliver its projects in Ireland fear their funding will not be renewed at the end of this financial year. 'Since Donald Trump removed the USAid ... they've been more or less telling us we don't have any funding,' said a representative of one community organisation, who asked to remain anonymous so as not to jeopardise their contract. 'We've been told we should look for other funding if we want to keep the project going.' Conal McFeely, of Creggan Enterprises, which has previously received IFI funding, said: 'We've been told the reason the IFI are now considering withdrawing is because they've been choked of this funding from USAid, and they're out telling groups they're not going to continue their funding'. Emphasising the 'highly significant' role the body had played, he said it was 'instrumental in bedding down the peace here and attempting to contain and settle the conflict. They're a key player'. But he said 'a number of programmes, particularly in the Derry area, including here in Creggan, have been informed it's likely their programmes will not be funded beyond the current term, and they've been told to consider winding the projects down. 'There is a complete lack of alternative funders willing to take a risk ... lots of those initiatives will unfortunately fall by the wayside,' he added. Mr McFeely added it was 'extremely disappointing' the UK government was 'withholding its last [£1 million] phase of funding, and that will have a detrimental impact on the ground here in terms of marginalised communities that are still dealing with the fallout from the conflict. 'If the Irish Government is still prepared to put in money, why is the British government not matching that money? It's scandalous,' he said. In a statement, the IFI said that it 'has received financial support from a range of international donors including the US government, the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and the UK. 'We are grateful for the long-standing support from all our partners, including the bipartisan support under various US administrations,' it said. 'We are continuing to engage with our US partners to seek clarity around support from the US government which will play a key role in the delivery of the IFI's programmes into the future.' It said all projects currently funded by the IFI 'remain unaffected and their funding is secure as per their letters of offer'. 'Support from the US and others remains critical in our ability to deliver peace and reconciliation initiatives in Northern Ireland and the southern border counties,' the body said.
