logo
Elon Musk calls Trump's ‘big, beautiful' tax bill a ‘disgusting abomination'

Elon Musk calls Trump's ‘big, beautiful' tax bill a ‘disgusting abomination'

The Guardian2 days ago

Elon Musk, the billionaire tech entrepreneur, has opened a new rift with Donald Trump by denouncing the US president's tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination'.
Musk's online outburst could embolden fiscally conservative Republican senators – some of whom have already spoken out – to defy Trump as they continue crucial negotiations on Capitol Hill over the so-called 'one big, beautiful bill'.
'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on his X social media platform on Tuesday. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.'
Musk, who had previously voiced criticism of the proposed legislation, quipping that it could be big or beautiful but not both, added on X: 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.'
He continued: 'Congress is making America bankrupt.'
A top donor to Trump during last year's election campaign, Musk departed the White House last week after steering its 'department of government efficiency', or Doge, with the stated mission of slashing fraud and abuse within federal departments. He has argued that the Republican bill will undermine Doge's work and drive the US further into debt.
On Tuesday, Musk drew immediate support from Thomas Massie, one of only two Republicans who last month voted against the bill in the House of Representatives. 'He's right,' Massie responded on X.
Having narrowly passed the House of Representatives, the bill is now under consideration in the Senate, which is aiming to pass a revised version by 4 July. Some Republican fiscal conservatives, such as senators Ron Johnson and Rand Paul, share Musk's concerns about the need for significant spending cuts.
Johnson told CNN: 'We have enough [holdouts] to stop the process until the president gets serious about spending reduction and reducing the deficit.'
Trump has previously dismissed Republican dissenters as 'grandstanders' and urged them to get onboard. His influence proved decisive in quelling a potential rebellion in the House. On Monday he wrote on his Truth Social platform: 'So many false statements are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL'.'
The White House acknowledged Musk's stance but said it has not changed its position on the bill. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters: 'Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion: this is one big, beautiful bill and he is sticking to it.'
The bill extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts and includes new spending for border security and the military. Republicans aimed to offset these costs with cuts to programmmes such as Medicaid, food stamps and green-energy tax credits.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
Projections from the Congressional Budget Office and independent analysts indicate that the bill would add between $2.3 tn and $5tn to the deficit over the next 10 years. White House officials contend that the economic growth generated by tax cuts will offset the increased spending.
Russ Vought, director of the office of management and budget, told CNN: 'This bill doesn't increase the deficit or hurt the debt. In fact, it lowers it by $1.4tn.'
But Democrats have warned that the budget would raise the cost of healthcare for millions of people, and cause millions to lose coverage, in order to pay for tax cuts for billionaires. A new analysis by Yale University and the University of Pennsylvania found that it could lead to more than 51,000 preventable deaths.
Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader, said in a floor speech on Tuesday: 'Donald Trump and his so-called 'big, beautiful bill' is ugly to its very core. Behind the smoke and mirrors lies a cruel and draconian truth: tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy paid for by gutting healthcare for millions of Americans.'
Bernie Sanders, an independent senator from Vermont, added in a statement: 'Let's be clear. The Republican reconciliation bill which makes massive cuts to Medicaid in order to pay for huge tax breaks for billionaires is not just bad public policy. It is not just immoral. It is a death sentence for struggling Americans.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here's what to know about Trump's new travel ban
Here's what to know about Trump's new travel ban

NBC News

time7 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Here's what to know about Trump's new travel ban

President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday night that nationals from 12 countries would be banned from entering the United States. Trump said that the ban, which primarily targets countries in Africa and the Middle East, was necessary in the name of preserving national security and to prevent terrorism in the U.S. "As President, I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people," t he proclamation reads. "I remain committed to engaging with those countries willing to cooperate to improve information-sharing and identity-management procedures, and to address both terrorism-related and public-safety risks." Who is banned? Citizens of the following countries will be blocked from entering the United States: Afghanistan, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, the Republic of Congo, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. In addition to the 12 countries listed above, nationals of the following seven countries will be barred from coming to the country permanently or entering under several visa programs: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. When does the ban take effect? The executive goes into effect at 12:01 am Eastern Daylight Time on June 9, 2025. Why now? A similar policy implemented during the first Trump administration, which barred foreigners from six Muslim-majority countries from entering the country, was reversed by former President Joe Biden. On the campaign trail, Trump promised he would revive the ban. In a Wednesday video the White House posted on YouTube, Trump cited the recent attack in Boulder as justification for a travel ban renewal. "The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas," Trump said. We don't want them." On Sunday, a man was accused of using a "makeshift flamethrower" and Molotov cocktails on a group of people peacefully calling for the release of Israeli hostages in Gaza. The suspect in connection with the incident, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, entered the U.S. from Egypt on a tourist visa, according to officials. Egypt is not one of the countries affected by the policy. Are there any exceptions? Yes. The travel ban will not affect nationals who are already lawful permanent residents of the U.S. In other words, the proclamation will not apply to nationals from the list of banned countries who have green cards or who are living in the U.S. with a visa. It will also not affect citizens of the banned countries who have citizenship in a second country and are entering the U.S. with a passport from an unrestricted nation. Other exemptions include Afghans who helped the U.S. government during the war in Afghanistan, ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran, athletes from banned countries who are entering the U.S for the World Cup or the Olympics, and children who are being adopted.

Starmer steps up call for aid to flow into Gaza after US vetoes UN resolution
Starmer steps up call for aid to flow into Gaza after US vetoes UN resolution

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Starmer steps up call for aid to flow into Gaza after US vetoes UN resolution

Aid needs to reach the people of Gaza 'at speed and at volume', Sir Keir Starmer has said, describing the current situation as 'utterly intolerable'. The UK backed a UN Security Council resolution calling for Israel to lift restrictions on aid, but the move was vetoed by Donald Trump's US. The Prime Minister called for the restoration of a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas and the release of the remaining hostages being held by the group. At the UN late on Wednesday, the US vetoed the proposed resolution demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza because it was not linked to the release of hostages. It also did not condemn Hamas over the October 7 2023 atrocities or insist that the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza — two other demands from the Trump administration. The UK was among the 14 other members of the 15-nation council to vote in favour of the resolution, which described the humanitarian situation in Gaza as 'catastrophic' and called on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid to the 2.1 million Palestinians in the territory. Sir Keir told reporters during a visit to a school in Harlow: 'In relation to what's happening in Gaza, we've been absolutely clear that it is intolerable and we need to get back to a ceasefire urgently and that is our constant work with other allies to get us to that position. 'We need those hostages to come out, many of them have been held for a very long time. 'And of course, humanitarian aid needs to get in at speed and at volume, but that can only happen if we get back to a ceasefire so I'm absolutely clear that the situation as it is is utterly intolerable, and that's why we've taken measures like the trading talks have been stood down, the sanctions we've put in and we're working with allies to see what else we can do.' In a briefing in Westminster, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'Israel has clear obligations under international humanitarian law to agree to and facilitate humanitarian aid. 'The unimpeded entry of assistance at scale to meet the needs in Gaza must be restored. 'We made that clear through the UN Security Council yesterday as well and that's why we're working with allies at pace to to achieve that.' Israel said it had recovered the bodies of two hostages taken in the October 7 attack. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the remains of Judih Weinstein and Gad Haggai had been recovered. Meanwhile, the Church of England's current most senior bishop condemned 'yet another callous, reckless attack' on the Anglican-run Al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza. Archbishop of York Stephen Cottrell said: 'Despite our repeated requests, the Israeli government has been unable to prove its claims that Al-Ahli Hospital has been used by Hamas. 'Instead this is part of a relentless and outrageous pattern of attacks on hospitals and healthcare facilities in Gaza. There is no justification for this under international humanitarian law.' According to Gaza's health ministry, which is led by medical professionals but reports to the Hamas-run government, three local reporters were killed and six people wounded in a recent strike on the courtyard of the hospital.

Donald Trump's travel ban isn't actually about protecting Americans
Donald Trump's travel ban isn't actually about protecting Americans

Metro

time18 minutes ago

  • Metro

Donald Trump's travel ban isn't actually about protecting Americans

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Donald Trump's latest travel ban isn't about making America safe. It's about making cruelty normal. The administration wants us to believe this is a sober, considered security measure. Twelve countries blacklisted. Seven more partially restricted. The justification? In Trump's words: 'We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States.' The accusation seems to be that these countries pose a threat to the United States based on historical precedent. Let's take that at face value for a moment. Myanmar, for example, is in a state of disarray. The UK Government advises against travel due to civil unrest, armed conflict, and arbitrary enforcement of local laws. So, it is possible that it has no functioning national vetting system. However, as far as I know, there has never been a single incident of a person from Myanmar carrying out a terrorist attack on US soil. Not one. The people fleeing from Myanmar are escaping widespread violence, not inciting it. So what exactly is Trump protecting against? The answer isn't found in intelligence briefings or airport protocols. It's found in a different kind of calculation – a political one. It's a message to Trump's base that the world – especially those with different faiths or colours – is dangerous. That only he can protect them and that empathy is a threat to be eliminated, not a value to be upheld. It comes after the Trump administration sought to end deportation protections for 350,000 Venezuelans in the US. They were (and some still are, after a federal judge blocked the move) allowed to remain under a scheme that permits people to work and live there if their home countries are deemed unsafe. The US Government's own assessment of Venezuela is that citizens and tourists are at risk of 'wrongful detention, torture in detention, terrorism, kidnapping, arbitrary enforcement of local laws, crime, civil unrest, and poor health infrastructure'. Cruelty isn't the side effect. It's the point. It will tear apart families mid-airport transfer and strand people who have already sold everything for the chance of safety or opportunity. Foreign students who want to study or take part in exchange programmes are on the chopping block – a move that, I'm sure, has nothing to do with the legal battle between Harvard and the Trump Administration who froze billions of dollars of federal funding after accusing it of failing to root out antisemitism on campus. And let's talk about who's not on the list. Egypt, for example, where the suspect in the recent Boulder attack came from. Not included. This is despite Trump specifically mentioning this terrorist attack as a justification for implementing the new travel ban. Saudi Arabia, whose nationals carried out 9/11? Also not included. Those banned are often fleeing conflict, violence or persecution for their gender, sexual orientation, or beliefs. All of which makes one thing clear: This isn't about risk, it's about optics. By design or naivety, women and girls, whose reproductive rights have already been weaponised and criminalised by Trump, and LGBTQ+ individuals, whose protections have also been stripped away, are now the targets of this performative and punitive ban. Even setting aside the moral argument, the legal case is clear. No one is advocating complete open borders, but if travellers have the proper documentation, how can you justify turning them away? When Trump introduced a similar order in 2017, targeting seven Muslim-majority countries, it was condemned as a 'Muslim ban' and tied up in endless legal challenges. President Joe Biden repealed it in 2021. This time, Trump says the rationale for the countries chosen is based on visa overstay rates or political instability. But, in my view, the evidence doesn't back this up. The White House wants you to believe this is a temporary measure, a pause until things can be properly assessed, but there's no transparency, no end date, and no consistent criteria. This is, as usual, theatre. Cruelty as a campaign tactic and the weaponisation of lives as a headline generator. More Trending Theatre has become the new normal for US politics, but we should still call it what it is. Punitive. Senseless. And above all, ineffective. A policy that punishes students, bans refugees, and abandons families is not national security. It's moral submission. This isn't border control; it's moral control in Trump's America, where kindness is weakness. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: The Virgin Island hate is atrocious – season 2 will prove me right MORE: In defence of Meghan Markle's twerking pregnancy video MORE: Double decker bus roof ripped off after crashing into railway bridge in South Norwood

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store