Indian students in Iran to be relocated Foreign Ministry
Parents of the stranded Indian students have appealed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar, requesting their intervention to ensure the safe return of their children, local media said. Israel launched "Operation Rising Lion" on Friday against Iran, which retaliated with missiles attacks against the Jewish state. Since then, both countries have launched further missile barrages against each other.
The majority of Indian students in Iran, who are primarily pursuing medical degrees in cities such as Tehran, Shiraz, and Qom, are now awaiting assistance to return home, the NDTV news channel has reported. On Monday the Indian Embassy in Tehran said it isclosely monitoringthe security situation and is in constant touch with the students.
The embassy, which on Sunday, advised all Indian nationals and Persons of Indian Origin to remain vigilant, has provided a link to a Google Docs form on its X account to provide their contact details. The mission has also provided a link to a Telegram group and asked Indian citizens to join it to receive updates.
All flights to and from Iran have been suspended, with the country's airspace remaining indefinitely closed for commercial aviation. According to a report by news magazine The Week, five Indian students, including three from Kashmir and two from Maharashtra, were injured in Israeli airstrikes. "Around 300 of us were shifted to a safer location, which I cannot reveal for security reasons," a student was quoted as saying to the magazine.
New Delhi has requested that Tehran facilitates the safe evacuation of its stranded citizens. Iran said on Monday that although the country's airspace is currently closed, all land borders remained open, allowing for safe evacuation. India enjoys warm ties with Iran's neighbor Armenia, which is seen as a safe destination for Indian students.
(RT.com)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Nuclear laws and the role of Opposition
Political parties in India, especially the Opposition, will soon need to take a view on a critical subject with a bearing on the country's energy security and climate change mitigation. The proposal to amend the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act (CLNDA), 2010, and the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), 1962 — which in the past witnessed intense debate — sooner or later, is expected to come up in Parliament. With the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led National Democratic Alliance government indicating its intention to introduce it during the monsoon session, Parliament will revisit the issue whenever the Bills are introduced. The plan is to amend the CLNDA and the AEA to address the vexatious issue of liability on the suppliers of equipment and permit private parties in the field of nuclear energy, respectively. The India-U.S. Civil Nuclear Agreement and the enactment of the CLNDA led to a series of standoffs between the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government and Opposition parties — the BJP and the Left parties led by CPI(M). Historical context Fifteen years ago, the government introduced a Bill to write laws for compensation to the people for nuclear accidents, as India was not a party to any of the existing conventions. Parliament was engaged in a lengthy debate, as the government preferred the passage of liability along the lines of international covenants. Lack of requisite strength in the Rajya Sabha, dreadful memories of the suffering of people from the 1984 Bhopal gas leak, the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, and the damage to the nuclear reactor at Fukushima, Japan, following an earthquake, provided the backdrop. Sensing an opportunity, the combined opposition pressed to raise the compensation bar on suppliers of nuclear reactor equipment and beyond the immediate compensation liability on the operator. The insertion of the clause rendered the Act dead on arrival. Western country equipment suppliers shied away. An attempt to tweak it a decade ago made little difference, and international response remains lukewarm. In 2007, during the debate around the nuclear deal, questions were raised about whether it was considering amending the AEA, allowing private sector participation. The government then noted that the 1997 report of the Dr. Raja Ramanna Committee had been examined, and a review of the Act had been under consideration since then. Now both issues are scheduled to return on Parliament's agenda. Raising concerns In February this year, the Congress raised objections to the announcement to amend the Acts. It said the move dilutes accountability of suppliers, raises domestic risk, and protects equipment suppliers, reflecting the Convention on Supplementary Compensation, compromising the citizens' safety, and leaning in favour of international corporations. The party also alleged that the move was intended to appease foreign interests, particularly France and the U.S., ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit. Back in 2010, then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh stated that the process for compensation for nuclear accidents began in 1999, and such a law was needed. The government then dismissed claims that the proposed law was timed with a visit by President Barack Obama. Now, the central issue is whether the Congress will take a studied stance on the proposed legislation. There is a serious debate taking place outside on the move to build small modular reactors, with many countries vying to have a piece of the pie. The contribution of energy from nuclear power is estimated to be slightly over 3% of the total power generation. At the end of last year, the installed capacity of 24 nuclear power plants stood at 8.8 GW, the government informed Parliament. This was when the country set a target of 10 GW by the year 2000. The government now aims for 22.48 GW by 2031-32 and an ambitious 100 GW by 2047. In the past, the Opposition took an about-turn on three key issues. At the turn of the century, opposition led to a delay in enacting an amendment to the Patents Act, 1970. Eventually, after a change of sides, the Opposition's support resulted in the mandatory amendment. A decade ago, on two other contentious issues, the Opposition stalled laws, one on insurance law to raise the foreign direct investment ceiling, and the ratification of the exchange of enclaves with Bangladesh under the Land Border Agreement. Finally, these proposed laws were enacted with the then-Opposition offering support, with minor or no concessions. Leaders across the aisle walked together to arrive at an agreed position as the governments of the day worked, in their assessment, to further the national interest. Need for a debate Today, the NDA government does not have to look across the aisle for support. The current issues have long-term implications, and there is a need for a well-rounded discussion that takes into account all factors around nuclear energy, the shift towards small modular reactors, the larger question of disposal of nuclear waste, and allied subjects. The Opposition should play a leading role in initiating this discussion and decide accordingly. Otherwise, during a debate on a contentious issue two decades ago, a member on the Treasury Benches remarked to another member of the Opposition that a change of sides should not result in a change of stand. K. V. Prasad is a senior Delhi-based journalist and authored a book Indian Parliament Shaping Foreign Policy
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Anticipating GST changes, Ludhiana industry wants reforms expedited.
Ludhiana: As Prime Minister Narendra Modi unveiled what he called a "Diwali gift", major reforms to the Goods and Services Tax (GST), industrial and trade bodies are expressing cautious optimism. While they welcome the simplification, stakeholders insist that swift implementation, especially of refunds, is essential to prevent disruptions and revive consumption. In his August 15 Independence Day address, PM Modi revealed plans to overhaul GST by October, aimed at easing the tax burden on daily-use items and MSMEs. The long-standing four-slab system (5%, 12%, 18%, 28%) is being anticipated to be replaced by a streamlined two-slab structure with rates of 5% and 18%, and a special 40% rate on sin and luxury goods like tobacco and pan masala, as per reports of proposal having been sent to the group of ministers (GoM) and state finance ministers, ahead of the GST council's meeting. Industrialists and businessmen of Ludhiana expect that this reform could boost domestic consumption, exports, and market sentiment. "The prospect of two main GST rates are welcome, but delayed refunds could cripple operations. If we must wait for GST refunds on expenditure on raw materials, it's going to be tough," Avtar Singh Bhogal, vice-president, UCPMA, said, stressing that timely refunds would support purchasing power and curtail GST evasion. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's Daughter Shiloh Now Goes by a New Name After Dropping Pitt BigGlobalTravel Undo Upkar Singh Ahuja, president of the Chamber of Industrial and Commercial Undertakings (CICU), echoed the urgency. He warned that markets were already slow and showed signs of recession, with consumers delaying purchases in anticipation of GST relief. "Whatever changes are to be done, do them now, not wait until Diwali," he urged. "People are have stopped purchasing on big items anticipating lower GST and, thus, prices," he said. There have been long-standing industry demands for GST simplification, Harsimarjit Singh Lucky, UCMPA president said. He added that reforms would bring relief that would curtail evasion and simplify compliance. Sonu Nilibar, president of the Punjab Textile Merchant Association, said "A uniform 5% GST rate on garments would be a landmark reform. It will bring much-needed clarity, make goods affordable, boost consumption, and ease compliance. On behalf of trade, I warmly thank Prime Minister Modi for considering this long-awaited reform." Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Buddhist monk from Bangladesh who applied for citizenship under CAA booked for holding fake Indian passport
Nagpur: Joysen Barua, a 41-year-old Buddhist monk from Chittagong in Bangladesh, who was among the first to apply for citizenship in Nagpur under the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), is now on the run facing charges of holding a fake Indian passport. An FIR was registered against him on Tuesday. This happened even as his application under CAA was being processed by the district level committee (DLC). CAA allows Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, Parsis, and Christians from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan to obtain Indian nationality on a fast-track basis. The DLC holds its meetings at the General Post Office from time to time to process the applications. Living in India since 2011, Barua applied for citizenship under CAA and first appeared before the committee in June 2024. His case could not be processed as he needed to submit more papers to prove his Bangladeshi citizenship. He again appeared before DLC on August 8 this year, but again sought time for getting the papers. A source said he did not have an original Bangladeshi passport and submitted a coloured photocopy of the passport. However, the DLC needs original documents. He did not even have a resident permit (RP), which is issued for foreigners coming to India. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "An offence has been registered against him for possessing a fake Indian passport and a search is on to trace him," said the police inspector (Gittikhadan station) Kailas Deshmane, where an offence has been registered against him. The DLC had scheduled an appointment for CAA applicants on Wednesday. However, on Tuesday, Barua simply walked into the regional passport office and told an official that he was a Bangladeshi citizen living on a fake Indian passport. He also handed over the allegedly forged Indian passport, admitting that it was fake. Barua said he wanted to obtain Indian citizenship through legal means. When TOI interviewed him in June 2024 at the GPO, Barua displayed his school leaving certificate and marksheet from Boalkhali in Chittagong district of Bangladesh. Barua told TOI that he applied for CAA soon after the law came into force in March 2024. He also accepted that his visa was not valid. He came to India in 2011 on a tourist visa to visit Bodh Gaya in Bihar, but overstayed. "There were other monks from Bangladesh who eventually reached Nagpur. In 2014, communal strife back in Chittagong prompted him to stay back in India. His parents and brother continue to live in Chittagong," he said. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
