logo
River Thames pier renamed over slavery links

River Thames pier renamed over slavery links

Telegraph09-04-2025
A River Thames pier called 'Plantation Wharf' has been renamed after anti-racism campaigners said that it was linked to slavery.
The wharf in Wandsworth, south London, will now be known as 'St Mary's Wandsworth Pier' after the local Labour MP said it was 'highly offensive'.
The pier was named after an adjoining housing development called Plantation Wharf.
The site was built on a former sugar refinery by Iain Shearer, the millionaire dockland developer in the 1980s and early 1990s.
The development also includes a series of British Empire-themed names, including Cotton Row, Spice Court and Ivory Square.
Uber Boat by Thames Clippers, which owns the pier, renamed it on Monday after a backlash from anti-racism campaigners.
Marsha de Cordova, the Labour MP for Battersea, said the pier's former name had made 'a mockery of the violent history of chattel enslavement'.
She said: 'The term 'plantation' carries highly offensive connotations, does not serve the wonderful diversity of Battersea's residents and makes a mockery of the violent history of chattel enslavement.
'Having campaigned for Thames Clippers to change the pier's name, I am pleased this has been achieved. It marks an important step forward in how we structure our public spaces.'
Rachelle Ferron, a fellow campaigner and the head of entertainment at ITV's Good Morning Britain, said the pier had previously been 'a shameful signpost to slavery'.
She said: 'While advocating for Plantation Rum to rebrand in 2022, I was taken aback to learn about Plantation Wharf on the world-renowned River Thames, which stood as a shameful signpost to slavery.
'Uber Boat by Thames Clippers inherited the name from a neighbouring development, which continues to brand its bricks with references to the transatlantic slave trade.
'I am pleased that Uber Boat by Thames Clippers listened and led the way by renaming its pier to St Mary's Wandsworth, which is much more appropriate for our times and diverse city.'
Ms de Cordova and Ms Ferron have now called for Plantation Wharf Management Ltd, which manages the housing development, to follow suit. Other colonial-themed names at the development include Molasses Row, Calico House and Cinnamon Row.
Estate name change
Vanessa Brady, the chairman of the estate's board of directors, said residents would be consulted on changing its name.
Ms Brady said: 'It is not a simple process, but we will continue to consult with residents to see if they agree to pay for the costs incurred in changing the name and indeed if they want to change their name.
'We can only consult and then act on the wishes of the leaseholders. Another idea would be to receive a fund from the Mayor's office to pay for it.'
Uber Boat by Thames Clippers said: 'From April 7, Plantation Wharf Pier will be known as St Mary's Wandsworth following productive talks with house/boat residents, with the pier's signage being updated to reflect the change.
'The updated pier name will appear in our new Uber Boat by Thames Clippers timetable and route map, which comes into effect on the same day as the official name change.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Labour can build a stronger British economy
How Labour can build a stronger British economy

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

How Labour can build a stronger British economy

If Rachel Reeves is serious about ensuring that Labour's second year in power is all about a stronger economy that rewards working people across the country (In our first year Labour fixed the foundations – now we must build a stronger economy for a renewed Britain, 13 August), she needs to rethink what your editorial called the UK's 'broken growth model' (6 August). The growth that Britain needs is an increase in economic activity that improves social and environmental infrastructure nationwide. This involves a huge increase in secure, well-paid jobs to rebuild a more resilient future economy. The last thing that is required is Reeves's obsession with more deregulation of the City and pressuring savers into investing in the stock market. What is needed instead is a massive increase in a socially and green-oriented bond market that will provide secure returns for savers. This will require intense pressure to be put on Reeves to shift her emphasis away from global financiers to recognising UK savers as saviours. She should make clear that in return for the tax breaks that those investing in Isas and pensions receive, a considerable percentage of such savings would be invested in green and social infrastructure projects. This would help tackle the climate crisis and rebuild our economy as well as the crumbling cohesion of our society. Colin HinesConvener, Green New Deal Group Rachel Reeves wants to solve Britain's productivity problem by kickstarting economic growth. Four decades ago, Britain decided to become a consumer economy when others chose to be investment economies. The mistake in tackling the fallout of the global financial crisis after 2008 was to slash capital spending at a time when money was cheap. The chaotic governments of Boris Johnson and Liz Truss created damaging uncertainty for investors. The world has become more uncertain, but political decisions also mean growth each year was on average twice as strong in the 16 years before the financial crisis than in the 16 years since, taxation as a proportion of GDP has reached historic highs and productivity is painfully weak. The chancellor needs to be bold and ambitious for Britain's economy. We must exploit the opportunities of the digital revolution, advance our skills base, join up government so that departments are all focused on growth and become a true investment economy at Stephen BarberUniversity of East London Rachel Reeves claims to have fixed the country's financial foundations in Labour's first year in office, but I am certain that the 4.5 million children still living in poverty, an increase of 100,000 from the previous year, wouldn't agree. At the same time, UK billionaires' wealth increased by £35m a day to £182bn, with Britain having the highest proportion of billionaire wealth derived from monopolies and cronyism among G7 Michael SymondsEmeritus professor, University of Nottingham No, you haven't 'fixed the foundations', chancellor. Where are the Labour values in 'renewal is our mission and productivity is our challenge'? Not a word about redressing the wealth gap between the rich and the poor; not a word about ending the two-child benefit cap; not a word about restoring the level of overseas aid. Rachel Reeves's article could have been written by George Osborne – and I for one fear what else that might entail for our dilapidated public space. It isn't good enough just to be wealthy – it's what you do with it and how fairly you spread it that counts. That is supposed to be the Labour D BryantPenarth, Glamorgan I find it disappointing that Rachel Reeves refers only to 'working people'. This indicates that she is not considering other groups such as pensioners, or those who cannot work either through disability or because of a lack of suitable jobs for which they are qualified. She refuses to target the super-rich, preferring to hit easy targets by keeping the two-child benefit cap, not raising tax thresholds (pushing more people into paying tax and higher tax) and targeting cash Isa allowances. Some people have had bad experiences with stocks and shares and are reluctant to risk their savings again. She has not learned at least two things from history: first, trickle-down economics does not work, as wealth floods into foreign tax havens, not to the less well off. And second, removing restrictions on the financial sector leads to people and financial organisations being overstretched and a banking EvesMold, Flintshire Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

STEPHEN GLOVER: Even our family homes are not sacrosanct for this desperate, foolish Government. If Starmer breaks his promise on Capital Gains Tax, no one should trust anything he says ever again
STEPHEN GLOVER: Even our family homes are not sacrosanct for this desperate, foolish Government. If Starmer breaks his promise on Capital Gains Tax, no one should trust anything he says ever again

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

STEPHEN GLOVER: Even our family homes are not sacrosanct for this desperate, foolish Government. If Starmer breaks his promise on Capital Gains Tax, no one should trust anything he says ever again

Taxation in this country is already at an all-time high in peacetime, and it is a racing certainty that Labour will set new records in the coming years. But until now those fortunate enough to own their home have had the consolation that at least they won't have to pay Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on it if they come to sell.

Train passengers face potential 5.8% fares hike
Train passengers face potential 5.8% fares hike

North Wales Chronicle

time3 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Train passengers face potential 5.8% fares hike

The potential rise is based on the Office for National Statistics announcing that Retail Price Index (RPI) inflation rose to 4.8% in July. The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap on regulated fare rises in 2026, but this year's 4.6% hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024. If that formula is used to set next year's fare increase, the cost of train travel will jump by 5.8%. That would mean an annual season ticket from Woking to London rising by £247 to £4,507. A flexi ticket for travel two days per week over a year from Liverpool to Manchester would increase by £120.30 to £2,195.10. Train punctuality in Britain is at its lowest level in more than five years. Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Today's inflation figure could mean a big fare rise for rail passengers next year, especially if the Government decides to go with an above-inflation increase like we saw this year. 'With the railways now moving under public control, the fundamental question for the Government is how to use its role in setting fares policy to deliver a more affordable rail network and encourage more people to travel on it. 'Next year's annual rise represents the first real opportunity for the Government to show passengers – both current and future – just how it plans to do this.' About 45% of fares on Britain's railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh Governments. They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. Paul Kohler, the Liberal Democrats' transport spokesman, said using the same formula again would be 'nothing short of ludicrous', adding: 'Commuters are simply being taken for a ride. 'We simply cannot allow the current rate of inflation to set rail fares while services get worse. 'To increase rail fares at all in the midst of a cost-of-living crisis would be nothing other than a slap in the face to ordinary people.' Mr Kohler urged the Government to scrap any plan for a rail fare rise to 'get more people onto the trains', while Conservative shadow transport secretary Richard Holden accused Labour of 'turning a blind eye to fare dodging'. He said: 'Labour's election promises ring hollow as passengers are hit with inflation-busting rises on top of cancelled trains, driver shortages and chaos across the network. 'These fare rises are a direct result of Labour's disastrous economic mismanagement.' The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year. Operators set rises in unregulated fares, although these are likely to be very close to regulated ticket increases because their decisions are heavily influenced by governments. Office of Rail and Road figures show trains in Britain reached 66.7% of scheduled stops within a minute of the timetable in the year to July 19. That is the worst performance since the year to May 30 2020. Some operators are currently struggling with dry weather. A lack of moisture in clay soil embankments has disturbed track levels, preventing trains from safely travelling at full speed in parts of south-west and south-east England. A DfT spokesperson said: 'The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. 'The Government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways (GBR), delivering the services they deserve and driving growth. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.' The Government is nationalising train operators as their contracts expire. GBR is an upcoming public sector body that will oversee Britain's rail infrastructure and train operation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store