‘JAC non-binding on judge picks'
The Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) said the Act's main role is to screen, evaluate and recommend candidates to the Prime Minister, while appointments to the Federal Court, Court of Appeal and High Court must still follow Article 122B of the Federal Constitution.
'The JAC Act is not a final step in the appointment process.
'It only recommends names, and these recommendations are not binding.
'For JAC's role to be legally binding, the Constitution would need to be amended,' she told reporters after officiating the 22nd Pengerang UMNO Division Delegates Meeting yesterday.
Azalina also cited a previous explanation by former Minister in the Prime Minister's Department, Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz, who clarified in Parliament that the JAC Act is an administrative provision and does not have binding legal effect.
On the planned march by the Malaysian Bar today, Azalina said it is within their democratic right, as long as it is carried out professionally and within the boundaries of the law.
'If they want to march, that is their right.
'As lawyers, I believe most of them are professionals who understand Article 122B (of the Federal Constitution) and the JAC Act 2009,' she said, Bernama reported.
Azalina also said that the appointment of a new Chief Justice will only be decided after the 269th Conference of Rulers, scheduled to be held from July 15 to 17.
Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim is exercising the powers and duties of the office of the Chief Justice (including those under the Constitution) until the position is filled.
This is in accordance with Article 131A of the Federal Constitution, as well as paragraph 9(1)(b) and subsection 9(3) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, to ensure continuity in the administration of justice in the country.
The Chief Justice position became vacant following the mandatory retirement of Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat on July 2.
She was the country's first woman to serve in the role.
Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim retired as President of the Court of Appeal (the second highest position) on July 3.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Saifuddin Nasution: Govt respects free speech rights but democracy belongs in Parliament
ALOR SETAR, July 26 — The Madani government is committed to upholding the principles of the Federal Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech for Malaysians, says Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. Saifuddin Nasution said that due to this principle, his ministry did not place too much emphasis on the assembly held in the capital today. 'When the court says there's no need to notify the police, we go along with it. 'But the main issue I want to raise is this — if the Opposition truly respects democratic principles, I wish to pose the question, do they want to act outside Parliament or inside Parliament?' he said. He was speaking to reporters after officiating the opening of the Kedah Contingent Children Interview Centre (CIC) here today, which was also attended by Deputy Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay and Home Ministry Secretary-General Datuk Awang Alik Jeman. Saifuddin Nasution said that if demands towards the government were made outside Parliament, such as by holding assemblies, it would have no impact. 'In Parliament, the prime minister has opened up the opportunity fully, and the Opposition can table a motion of no confidence. In this case, the Prime Minister even said the Opposition's motion would be given priority, and government business would be postponed. But Parliament has been sitting for five days now, and it's been silent,' he said. According to Saifuddin Nasution, if the Opposition understands the democratic process and wants to use democratic means to topple someone, it should be done through Parliament. 'All we see now is noise outside about the gathering. So, the people can now see — do they want to uphold democratic principles or simply create uneasiness? 'Do they want to paint an ugly picture, send negative signals to potential investors, just as the economy is beginning to move in a better direction?' he said. — Bernama
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
MADANI govt upholds freedom of speech, says Saifuddin Nasution
ALOR SETAR: The Madani government remains steadfast in upholding the Federal Constitution's guarantee of freedom of speech, Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said today. He emphasized that his ministry did not overreact to the recent assembly in Kuala Lumpur, respecting court rulings on police notification exemptions. 'When the court says there's no need to notify the police, we go along with it,' Saifuddin Nasution told reporters after launching the Kedah Contingent Children Interview Centre (CIC). The event was also attended by Deputy Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay and Home Ministry Secretary-General Datuk Awang Alik Jeman. The minister questioned the opposition's approach, asking whether they preferred to act outside Parliament rather than within it. 'If the opposition truly respects democratic principles, do they want to act outside Parliament or inside Parliament?' he said. Saifuddin Nasution argued that assemblies outside Parliament have little impact compared to formal legislative processes. 'In Parliament, the Prime Minister has opened up the opportunity fully, and the opposition can table a motion of no confidence. The Prime Minister even said their motion would be prioritized, yet after five days of parliamentary sessions, there's silence,' he added. He urged the opposition to use democratic channels properly if they seek change. 'If they understand the democratic process and want to topple someone, it should be done through Parliament. Instead, we see noise outside about gatherings. The people must decide—do they want democracy or just unrest?' The minister also warned against negative economic repercussions. 'Do they want to paint an ugly picture and scare investors just as the economy is improving?' he asked. - Bernama
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Rallies and shouts of ‘turun' will not lead to resignation of PM — Hafiz Hassan
JULY 26 — A written constitution like the Federal Constitution gathers unto itself various sources of law, some of which are implicit. These are unwritten sources in the form of conventions, prerogatives, discretionary and residual powers. One can therefore look beyond the written law to help ensure the continuation of constitutionalism and the rule of law. (see Zainun Ali JCA (as she then was) in Dato' Dr Zambry bin Abd Kadir v Dato' Seri Ir Hj Mohammad Nizar bin Jamaluddin (Attorney General of Malaysia, intervener) [2009] 5 MLJ 464) The first of the unwritten sources – that is, convention – is a well established source. In the Zambry v Nizar case, the established convention on loss of confidence was acknowledged by Raus Sharif JCA (as he then was). The appellate court, though, may not have decided on the convention. As such, the statement on the convention is – what lawyers call – obiter dictum. The term is Latin for 'something that is said in passing' or simply 'other things said'. Under the doctrine of stare decisis or binding legal precedent, obiter dictum (plural dicta) is not binding. It is the ratio decidendi (plural rationes decidendi) of a judgment that is binding. The term means 'the ground or reason of decision' or simply 'the rule in a decision'. It is the legal principle upon which the decision in a specific case is founded. The rule in the Zambry v Nizar case in the higher Federal Court when Nizar appealed against the decision of the Court of Appeal is this: There is nothing in the Perak State Constitution stipulating that the loss of confidence in the Menteri Besar (MB) may only be established through a vote in the Legislative Assembly (LA). Evidence of loss of confidence in the MB may be gathered from other extraneous sources, provided they are properly established. Such sources should include the admission by the MB himself and/or representations made by members of the LA that the MB no longer enjoys the support of the majority of the members of the LA. On the facts of the case, there was evidence of such admission by Nizar himself and the loss of confidence of the majority of the members of the LA in the leadership of Nizar as expressed by 31 members of the LA. As there is similarly nothing in the Federal Constitution stipulating that the loss of confidence in the prime minister may only be established through a vote in the Dewan Rakyat, the ratio in the Zambry v Nizar case applies to establishing the loss of confidence in the prime minister. But while a vote on a motion of confidence in the Dewan Rakyat is not the only mechanism to establish or determine the loss of confidence, shouts of 'turun' certainly do not determine the loss of confidence. And while demonstrations or representations made by MPs – properly established – of the loss of confidence in the prime minister outside the Dewan Rakyat is a decided mechanism, public rallies are not – no matter the number of rally protestors: 10,000, 100,000 or 1 million. MPs can shout 'turun' in the Dewan Rakyat; they can join the public in a rally to call for the prime minister to 'turun' in the exercise of their basic freedoms guaranteed by the Federal Constitution. But neither will lead to the resignation of the prime minister. All it takes is a majority vote of 'Aye' to a motion of no confidence in the prime minister or properly established representations made by MPs that the prime minister has lost the confidence of the majority of MPs. That's 112 out of 222 MPs. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has dared the Opposition to 'go and table a no-confidence motion' in the Dewan Rakyat. Will the Opposition take the dare after the 'turun Anwar' rally?
