‘JAC non-binding on judge picks'
The Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) said the Act's main role is to screen, evaluate and recommend candidates to the Prime Minister, while appointments to the Federal Court, Court of Appeal and High Court must still follow Article 122B of the Federal Constitution.
'The JAC Act is not a final step in the appointment process.
'It only recommends names, and these recommendations are not binding.
'For JAC's role to be legally binding, the Constitution would need to be amended,' she told reporters after officiating the 22nd Pengerang UMNO Division Delegates Meeting yesterday.
Azalina also cited a previous explanation by former Minister in the Prime Minister's Department, Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz, who clarified in Parliament that the JAC Act is an administrative provision and does not have binding legal effect.
On the planned march by the Malaysian Bar today, Azalina said it is within their democratic right, as long as it is carried out professionally and within the boundaries of the law.
'If they want to march, that is their right.
'As lawyers, I believe most of them are professionals who understand Article 122B (of the Federal Constitution) and the JAC Act 2009,' she said, Bernama reported.
Azalina also said that the appointment of a new Chief Justice will only be decided after the 269th Conference of Rulers, scheduled to be held from July 15 to 17.
Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim is exercising the powers and duties of the office of the Chief Justice (including those under the Constitution) until the position is filled.
This is in accordance with Article 131A of the Federal Constitution, as well as paragraph 9(1)(b) and subsection 9(3) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, to ensure continuity in the administration of justice in the country.
The Chief Justice position became vacant following the mandatory retirement of Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat on July 2.
She was the country's first woman to serve in the role.
Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim retired as President of the Court of Appeal (the second highest position) on July 3.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
7 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Home Ministry to present Sosma amendments to parliament after Cabinet approval
KUALA LUMPUR: The Home Ministry plans to amend the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma) following numerous calls from rights groups to review or repeal the law. Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said Putrajaya was in the final stages of reviewing Sosma and expected to complete the policy memorandum soon. "The ministry intends to present the proposed amendments to Sosma at a parliamentary session, subject to Cabinet approval," he said in a written parliamentary reply last night. He said 73 offences under the security law were identified and assessed to ensure its implementation was in line with the Federal Constitution, Malaysia's international obligations, and the principle of "due process of law." "The ministry has and will carry out engagement sessions with various stakeholders, including the police, Attorney-General's Chambers, Malaysian Human Rights Commission (Suhakam), the judiciary and legislative bodies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), academics and legal experts, and other stakeholders."
The Star
37 minutes ago
- The Star
Govt has set up feasibility study for Human Right Tribunal, says Kulasegaran
KUALA LUMPUR: The government has formally set up a feasibility study committee to explore the establishment of a Human Rights Tribunal in Malaysia, with findings expected to be finalised by October this year, said M. Kulasegaran (pic). The Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) stated that the Feasibility Study Committee on the Human Rights Tribunal (JKKTHAM) was established in June, following an initial meeting chaired by himself on Nov 21, 2024, to discuss the proposal. "This effort marks a significant step in institutional reform under the Madani government. "The feasibility committee has been tasked with studying the practicality of setting up a Human Rights Tribunal and is now actively conducting the study," he told the Dewan Rakyat on Wednesday (July 30). Kulasegaran mentioned that the committee is chaired by former Court of Appeal judge Datuk Mah Weng Kwai and includes representatives from the Asean Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights, Suhakam, the Malaysian Bar Council, academia, legal practitioners, relevant government agencies, and civil society organisations. "As of July 2025, the committee has convened five meetings, with preliminary findings presented by the research team on July 9. "These covered the conceptual and theoretical framework, analysis of Malaysia's existing human rights mechanisms, international comparative practices, and a proposed model for Malaysia's own tribunal," he said. A focus group discussion (FGD) with stakeholders was also held on July 17 in Kuala Lumpur, with more FGDs planned across the country, including in Sabah and Sarawak, he added. Kulasegaran emphasised the government's commitment to ensure that the tribunal, if established, complies with the Federal Constitution, particularly Article 3, which upholds Islam as the religion of the Federation. "To this end, we have included representatives from the Syariah Judiciary Department Malaysia and the Islamic Development Department (Jakim) in the committee, to ensure that any proposal is not in conflict with the Constitution," he said. He noted that the tribunal may serve as an alternative and accessible justice mechanism for victims of human rights violations, potentially hearing cases such as those involving Teoh Beng Hock, Muhammad Adib, and baby Zara, though the specific framework and jurisdiction are still under discussion. Kulasegaran also acknowledged concerns that Suhakam's recommendations have often been non-binding, saying this issue is being carefully examined. "It is important that Suhakam's recommendations are not ignored but implemented meaningfully. "This is being considered as part of the feasibility and legal review being conducted by the committee," he said.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Home minister: Sosma review in last stages, stakeholder engagements ongoing
KUALA LUMPUR, July 30 — The government is finalising its review of the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma), with proposed amendments expected to be tabled in Parliament soon, Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said. In a written parliamentary reply to Bagan MP Lim Guan Eng, Saifuddin said the Home Ministry is also nearly done with a policy memorandum on the matter. Lim had asked for an update on the Sosma review, which involves scrutinising 73 offences under the Act for consistency with human rights standards, and whether stakeholder consultations had taken place. Saifuddin confirmed the ministry is reviewing all 73 offences to ensure their application aligns with the Federal Constitution and Malaysia's international human rights obligations. He added that the review process includes ongoing stakeholder engagements with the Royal Malaysia Police, the Attorney General's Chambers, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam), the judiciary, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), academics, and legal experts. 'The ministry has conducted and will continue engagement sessions with various parties to ensure a comprehensive and balanced outcome,' he said. Last week, Saifuddin had said his ministry plans to table a policy paper on the amendments in August. He said one of the key areas under review is Section 13, which deals with bail provisions, including offences categorised as bailable, non-bailable, and unbailable. Once complete, the amendments will be brought to Parliament following Cabinet approval. The Najib administration introduced Sosma when it repealed the controversial Internal Security Act (ISA), which had allowed for indefinite detention without trial.
