logo
U.S. Sen. Luján signs onto HHS Head Start letter

U.S. Sen. Luján signs onto HHS Head Start letter

Yahoo04-02-2025

(Stock photo by Johner Images/Getty)
U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), along with more than two dozen colleagues, has signed onto a letter to the U.S. Health and Human Services Department expressing ongoing concerns about Head Start programs in New Mexico and around the country in the wake of an attempted federal funding freeze last week.
Luján, who attended Head Start, has referenced the program several times since the Trump administration tried to freeze federal funding, as well as during Senate confirmation hearings. New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez said last week his office had received reports of problems accessing the Head Start funding portal.
The senators' letter, addressed to Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services Dorothy A. Fink and Acting Director of the Office of Head Start Captain Tala Hooban, noted 'ongoing, urgent concerns' at Head Start programs across the country, including 'a lack of clarity on the status of renewals and notice of awards' in the Feb. 1 grant cycle; delays in processing reimbursements; and 'a lack of clear communication with grantees throughout this confusing time.'
The letter requests 'immediate action and assurance' that all requests for disbursement of funds be promptly processed; Feb. 1 grant cycle programs be notified in a timely way; and HHS implement 'transparent and consistent communication' with Head Start programs.
'Head Start programs cannot pay their teachers and staff and continue normal operations without the assurances of payment processing and notices of grant renewals and awards,' the letter said. 'This will impact children, families, and communities across the country, particularly the rural communities where these programs represent a large share of the child care options.'
A spokesperson from Luján's office said while there have been 'reports from other states about accessing funding,' none were specific to New Mexico at this time. The president of New Mexico's Head Start Association could not be reached for comment. Source also has pending inquiries with the AG's and governor's offices, and will update this story as needed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Medgar Evers' family fights efforts to strip his name from Navy vessel
Medgar Evers' family fights efforts to strip his name from Navy vessel

Associated Press

time22 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Medgar Evers' family fights efforts to strip his name from Navy vessel

A week after Pentagon leaders announced their intention to possibly rename the USNS Medgar Evers, christened for the World War II veteran and civil rights leader, his family urged the Department of Defense and the Navy to reverse their position. The ship is one of eight vessels named after activists – among them Cesar Chavez, Harvey Milk, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Harriet Tubman – that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wants to rebrand in a large offensive against 'wokeness' and diversity, equity and inclusion in the military to reestablish the 'warrior ethos.' This could be the second time Evers' name is erased. Although President Donald Trump called Medgar Evers a 'great American hero' at the 2017 opening of the Mississippi Civil Rights Museum, his name was removed last March from a site on the Arlington National Cemetery Website, which featured a section honoring Black Americans who fought in the nation's wars. 'Renaming the USNS Medgar Evers is not only malicious — it is despicable,' said Evers' daughter, Reena Evers-Everette. 'As my mother said, 'This is an injustice to a man who fought for his country both at home and abroad.'' Evers was among the continuing wave of U.S. soldiers who arrived on the beaches of Normandy after the D-Day invasion in 1944. He enlisted in the U.S. Army at 17 and served in the Red Ball Express, a convoy run largely by African-American soldiers that transported equipment from Normandy beaches to Allied forces in inland France. He earned several military medals for his service. After fighting the Nazis in World War II, he returned home to fight racism again in the form of Jim Crow, which barred Black Mississippians from restaurants, restrooms and voting booths. In 1954, he became the Mississippi NAACP's first field secretary and played a major part in the development of the organization. He led protests and boycotts for voting rights and desegregation of public schools, parks and Mississippi beaches. A target of white supremacists in Mississippi, he was murdered in 1963 by a member of the segregationist White Citizen's Council and Ku Klux Klan. In 2009, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus – a former Mississippi governor – announced the naming of a dry cargo ship after Evers. On Nov. 12, 2011, the USNS Medgar Evers was christened by Evers' widow, Myrlie Evers. 'I will not have to go to bed again wondering whether anyone will remember who Medgar Evers is,' she said at the ceremony. Mabus said he named the ship after Evers because the Lewis and Clark ships are named for pioneers and explorers, 'those who have pushed past boundaries, and Medgar Evers was just such a civil rights pioneer.' Since its launch, the ship has traveled around the world and has taken part in NATO exercises. By attempting to remove the names of activists who fought with courage and honor for the citizens of their country, the secretary of Defense sacrifices military values to a revisionist definition of patriotism, Evers-Everette said. 'The USNS Medgar Evers was not named to make a political statement,' she said. 'It was named to reflect a deeper truth: that freedom is not free — and some Americans have paid dearly for it.' ___ This story was originally published by Mississippi Today and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

As Europe sweats Trump, U.S. lawmakers seek trade show diplomacy in Paris
As Europe sweats Trump, U.S. lawmakers seek trade show diplomacy in Paris

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

As Europe sweats Trump, U.S. lawmakers seek trade show diplomacy in Paris

At a moment of potential transatlantic fracture, some U.S. lawmakers are headed to France with a message: Washington still values its ties to Europe. The big picture: Tariffs, disagreements over Ukraine aid, questions of U.S. commitment to NATO and an American refusal at the U.N. to condemn Russian belligerence have all strained longstanding relationships. Driving the news: Sens. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) will lead a trip to the Paris Air Show, among the highest profile aerospace-and-defense gatherings in the world. Ahead of the visit, Shaheen told Axios she expects to encounter "some particular challenges, because of the president's trade war." There could be more rifts between the U.S. and its allies still to come. The Financial Times reported Wednesday that the Pentagon is reviewing its AUKUS defense pact with the U.K. and Australia — the key element of which is a major nuclear submarine deal — to ensure it aligns with an "America first" agenda. Zoom in: Other attendees include Democratic Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada and Gary Peters of Michigan and Republican Sens. Deb Fischer of Nebraska and Roger Wicker of Mississippi. By the numbers: Some 48 countries will be represented at the Paris Air Show, including Australia, Canada, Israel, Taiwan and Ukraine. Context: President Trump's reelection and rhetoric — smearing Kyiv and blasting the European Union as " nastier than China," for example — have forced a recalculation in Europe. "The message that we're trying to convey is we understand how important … our allies in Europe are to the United States, to our own national security here, to our economic well-being," Shaheen said. "Congress is a different branch of our government."

The great American race to the bottom
The great American race to the bottom

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

The great American race to the bottom

In 2016 Donald Trump made history, by becoming the first person to be elected president with a net unfavorable rating. In 2024, he repeated that feat. But his opponents have not fared much better. American politics has turned distinctly negative in the last 10 years, and neither party has shown much interest in reversing that trend. Trump's favorability issues are well-known. He has rarely enjoyed a net favorable rating. With the exception of the brief inauguration honeymoon, Trump has been net negative his entire time as a candidate and as president. Yet he has taken two out of three elections, to the mass confusion of Democrats. There should be no confusion. If the Democratic Party and its media allies would take a break from their all-consuming anti-Trump rage, they would see that their own team is not popular at all. Hillary Clinton was net negative for much of her campaign in 2016, and Kamala Harris hovered around break-even last year but was dragged down by the enormous unpopularity of Joe Biden. This theme of unpopularity is not limited to presidential candidates; it is prevalent throughout American politics. The politicians who are not underwater with the public tend to have low name recognition. As name ID rises, as do negative perceptions. In American politics, the more you know, the less you like. Trump is doing surprisingly well, given his past polling. His favorability is in the same neighborhood as former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama at the same point in their second terms. It is true that Trump's average is boosted by several Republican-friendly polls, with Trafalgar having Trump at plus-8, Insider Advantage at plus-11 and Rasmussen at plus-5. But even the less Trump-friendly media polls have the president's favorability in the mid-40s, which is pretty good for Trump. In the most recent YouGov poll — a poll that tends to tilt against Trump — the president scores 43 percent favorable against 52 percent unfavorable. Eighty percent of Republicans approve of Trump, against 11 percent disapprove, whereas Democrats disapprove at 93 percent against 5 percent approve. Independents are net-negative on Trump, 56 percent to 36 percent. It is this partisan split that has come to define American public opinion. The RealClearPolitics favorability average shows JD Vance, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), Republican Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) all in negative territory. Schumer has taken Mitch McConnell's crown for the most despised leader at a net-negative 18 points. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) has managed to score roughly even on favorability, but he is also the least known of all the leaders. I am sure he will join his colleagues in public opinion purgatory if people get to know him better. In the June 2 YouGov poll, a laundry list of prominent Republican and Democratic politicians were polled and almost all of them were under water with independents. Those with low net negatives often had a majority of independents with no opinion. Schumer led the hit parade of disapproval at net negative 24 points with independents, followed by Trump (minus-20 points), Biden (minus-17 points), Gavin Newsom (minus-15 points) and Harris (minus-12 points). Vance, last polled in May, was at minus-21 points with independents. Outside of Harris and Newsom, most of the potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidates were narrowly net negative, but also had low name recognition. Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Pete Buttigieg were each at minus-3 points and Gretchen Whitmer was at just minus-2 points, but all of them had under 60 percent on name identification. The most curious feature of the polling is that Bernie Sanders is the only truly popular politician among the whole bunch. Sanders, the only Democratic-leaning contender currently out on tour (great merch still available!) enjoys 48 percent approval against 38 percent disapproval, including a gravity-defying 51 percent approval with independents. But Sanders's numbers are more a reflection of his political impotence and irrelevance than anything. He is doing great because there is little pushback, and he is generating little criticism because he has no power to do anything so he doesn't matter. Trump matters, Vance matters. Johnson matters, and Schumer and Newsom have actual power. Harris remains merely a possible 2028 Democratic nominee. The American media-political power structure for both the left and the right are not going to waste their time on someone who has no real political power in Washington, is not a serious threat to be a future presidential nominee and who is repeating the same old lines over and over. Sanders's free pass keeps him popular, while his opening act, Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who could be a force in the future, gets the scrutiny — and the weaker polling (minus-6 points overall and minus-7 points with independents). The sour mood by independents is both an Achilles' heel and an opportunity for Republicans and Democrats. The 'curse on both houses' attitude means that independents are up for grabs and can make either party the majority. Neither party seems interested in a selective moderation that could attract independents. Conflict and constantly shifting policy (particularly on economic matters) may excite Trump's partisans, but they are a turn-off for independents. Meanwhile, Democrats seem determined to cling to unpopular policies, like shielding violent illegal immigrants from deportation and the most extreme transgender ideologies. A permanent majority is available in America for both parties. Too bad nobody is paying attention. Keith Naughton, a longtime Republican political consultant, is co-founder of Silent Majority Strategies, a public and regulatory affairs consulting firm, and a former Pennsylvania political campaign consultant.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store