Truckloads of Scotland's rubbish will be exported to England, say experts
The ban was originally meant to be in place by 2021 but was delayed because of the Covid pandemic and concerns that businesses were not ready.It will see a string of materials banned from landfill, including non-recyclable black bag municipal waste, wood, textiles, paper and food.Such biodegradable waste breaks down to produce methane, a greenhouse gas that is around 28 times more potent than carbon dioxide.Some inert material, such as ash from incinerators and building rubble, will still be allowed at landfill sites.The Scottish government wants to stop traditional black bag waste being buried in the ground by increasing recycling rates and using more energy-from-waste incinerators.However, four years on from the date of the original plan, environmental consultants have concluded that hundreds of thousands of tonnes of rubbish still has no home.
More waste is already being sent to incinerators - or energy-from-waste sites - but not enough of them will be ready by the 31 December deadline.It is leaving a "capacity gap" which is estimated by Zero Waste Scotland to be 600,000 tonnes in the first year of the ban.Some councils and commercial waste companies have been approaching rubbish handling operators in England to negotiate "bridging contracts".Because most incinerators run with very little spare capacity, it would mean sending Scotland's excess waste to be landfilled in England.The UK government also wants to eliminate biodegradable waste from landfill and it announced a consultation earlier this year but there is currently no policy in place south of the border.
David Balmer, a waste expert from ERS Remediation, told the Disclosure programme: "You're looking at the equivalent of between 80 and 100 trucks minimum running seven days a week to take this material to a facility in England or abroad."And there are concerns that logistically the transportation might not be fully achievable.Alasdair Meldrum, director of waste management consultants Albion Environmental, said: "We've probably not got the trucks and vehicles to actually move it."He added: "You've got the environmental impact of all that transport, it's nonsensical, but the people who have invested in incinerators are saying 'we've invested all this money because of the ban'."So, we're stuck in a really hard place."
While the reason for the ban is to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases coming from landfill sites, the short term impact will be a rise in emissions from the fleet of heavy vehicles taking the waste to sites in Cumbria, Northumberland or potentially as far as Manchester.The long-term strategy had been to reduce the amount of 'black bag' waste households generate, meaning less would have to be incinerated.But domestic recycling rates have barely budged in a decade.In 2013, Scottish homes recycled 41.6% of their waste but by 2023 that figure had increased by less than 2 percentage points to 43.5%.The figures for England and Northern Ireland are slightly better but for Wales it's a massive 64.7%.
In Scotland, there are currently eight operational incinerators across the country.Until 2022 there was a rush to build more but the Scottish government put the brakes on development fearing there would end up being an overcapacity. The only additional ones which will now be built have already entered the planning process.While incinerators are still responsible for a significant amount of greenhouse gases, experts say they are about a third less environmentally damaging than the methane caused by materials rotting in landfill sites.As an additional benefit, they also produce some electricity and some recover heat to warm neighbouring homes and buildings.Colin Church, who chaired an independent review into incineration in Scotland, believes the shift to incinerators has been the right choice.He told Disclosure: "It's probably the best thing that we can do with waste, with our current levels of technology, and so capturing some energy from that is a good idea."
Circular economy
Environmental groups are concerned that contracts which guarantee waste being delivered by councils to incinerators will put off local authorities from investing in more recycling.Kim Pratt, from Friends of the Earth Scotland, described the current waste management system as broken.She said: "Incineration in Scotland is out of control. "There have been incinerators built in Aberdeen, in Falkirk, there's one this year that's going to be built in North Ayrshire as well."All of these incinerators have communities locally who are opposing them."Waste campaigner Laura Young said: "One of the worries is these are expensive facilities – expensive to run, big contracts involved in this – and it means that we need to utilise them. "We built them so we need to use them."The Scottish government points to a range of initiatives it has launched in recent years to tackle household waste and create a more "circular" economy, where material are reused over and over.These include bans on single use vapes, forthcoming charges on disposable cups and a planned deposit-return scheme for cans and plastic bottles.It said the "vast majority" of councils had alternative measures in place ahead of the landfill ban coming into force but they will "work closely with local authorities and sector bodies to monitor and review any related issues which may arise as the date of the ban approaches".The Scottish government added: "Any export of waste should only ever be viewed as a short-term solution."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
22 minutes ago
- Finextra
İşbank unit taps Algbra for UK digital banking launch
The fintech subsidiary of Turkey's İşbank has enlisted Algbra Labs to support the launch of a digital banking brand in the UK. 0 İşbank's Moka United unit is planning to launch tthe bank, dubbed Ruut, using a full-stack Fintech-as-a-Service platform from Algbra Labs, which is itself a subsidiary of ethical finance-focused and sharia-compliant UK-based fintech Algbra. The multi-phase agreement includes deployment of a partner banking platform enabling Ruut to operate client accounts; the launch of customer-named accounts, with Ruut acting as an authorised electronic money distributor; and support for Ruut to become a fully licensed EMI, with Algbra Labs continuing to provide the core banking and payments infrastructure. Moka is aiming for a fully operational platform within six months, targeting a 600,000-strong diaspora and a UK-Turkey financial corridor which currently facilitates over £28 billion in annual trade and remittance flows. Halim Memiş, CEO, Moka United and Ruut, says: "Through Ruut, we aim to deliver inclusive, user-friendly, and trusted digital banking experiences — beginning in the UK. Algbra's technological excellence and shared ethical approach make them the ideal long-term partner."
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Britain is facing an autumn of discontent: Essential services to be crippled by weeks of strikes
Britain is bracing itself for an autumn of discontent with essential services across the country crippled by strikes in coming weeks. London Underground workers are to walk out next month in a dispute over pay and conditions, the RMT union announced on Thursday. The workers will begin the week-long walkout on Friday, September 5, just as schools reopen and office staff return to their normal routines. Union leaders said rail bosses had 'refused to engage seriously' with their demands on pay as well as concerns about fatigue management and 'extreme shift patterns'. Underground workers were also demanding a reduction in the working week and to honour previous agreements made with staff. In a separate dispute over pay and conditions, workers on the Docklands Light Railway will also be striking during this period. The union said the action would bring 'significant disruption to the capital's transport network'. Meanwhile, GPs, junior doctors and nurses indicated they may strike during the winter months demanding higher pay and funding. And discontent has hit other sectors, including bin collectors in London, as well as Birmingham, where a five-month walkout is set to continue until Christmas over pay cuts. The threat of further strikes will come as a blow to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who had hoped to tame the unions with promises of backdated public sector pay rises, as well as Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who has attempted to balance demands from the unions with struggling government budgets. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the government had a 'responsibility' to stand up to pay rise demands and keep the country working. 'You look at the range of pressures we're facing domestically, internationally, economically, public services, the expectations of the country, the pain that families are feeling in their pockets and I'm always conscious that over and above everyone else, Keir and Rachel are carrying all of those pressures together', he told the Political Currency podcast. 'And so I think it is our responsibility to say to our own departments, or own audiences, or the people we're responsible for and the services that we're responsible for, 'you need to understand that we can't do everything for everyone, everywhere, all at once'.' Martin Beck, WPI Strategy's chief economist, told The Telegraph that the impending train strikes could hugely impact the capital: 'We estimate that it could cost the London economy up to a quarter of a billion pounds in the form of lost revenue to TfL and London businesses, more congestion on the roads and extra travel time for commuters.' Labour Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan also blasted the walkouts. A spokesman said: 'Nobody wants to see strike action or disruption for Londoners. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the government had a 'responsibility' to stand up to pay rise demands and keep the country working 'The mayor urges the RMT and TfL to get around the table to resolve this matter and avoid industrial action.' RMT General Secretary Eddie Dempsey said: 'Our members are doing a fantastic job to keep our capital moving and work strenuous shift patterns to make sure Londoners get to their destinations around the clock. 'They are not after a King's ransom, but fatigue and extreme shift rotations are serious issues impacting on our members health and wellbeing- all of which have not been adequately addressed for years by LU management. 'Coupled with the fact there are outstanding issues around staff travel arrangements, an atmosphere of distrust has been created, where our members feel like no one is listening to them. 'RMT will continue to engage LU management with a view to seeking a revised offer in order to reach a negotiated settlement.' A Transport for London spokesperson said: 'We regularly meet with our trade unions to discuss any concerns that they may have, and we recently met with the RMT to discuss some specific points. 'We are committed to ensuring our colleagues are treated fairly and, as well as offering a 3.4% pay increase in our ongoing pay discussions, we have made progress on a number of commitments we have made previously. 'We welcome further engagement with our unions about fatigue and rostering across London Underground, but a reduction in the contractual 35-hour working week is neither practical nor affordable. 'Given the improvements we have recently put in place in response to concerns raised by our unions, we urge the RMT to put our fair, affordable pay offer to their members and to continue to engage with us rather than threaten strike action, which will only disrupt Londoners.' The strikes will involve different parts of the rail network striking at different times. On Friday September 5 and Saturday 6, managers at Ruislip depot are set to strike over pay, in a separate walkout to the main dispute. The Central Line is likely to be affected. On Sunday 7, track access controllers, power control and Emergency Response Unit (ERU) workers will refuse to work. This is likely to cause long delays in the case of any incidents and could affect all Tube lines. On Monday 8 and Wednesday 10, the majority of engineers and station workers will walk out, which will likely lead to stations closing from lack of staff and fewer trains available on the network. While on Tuesday 9 and Thursday 11, signallers, service control and ERU members will strike. This is likely to cancel most of the services as trains are not able to safely run without signalling staff.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Britain is buying new air defence missile systems - but can they protect us?
Why you can trust Sky News The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has announced it will buy £118m worth of air defence missile systems for the British Army. But will this new purchase protect an increasingly vulnerable UK from attack, and why now? For more than 50 years, the British Army relied on the Rapier air defence missile system to protect deployed forces. In 2021, that system was replaced by Sky Sabre. The new system is mobile, ground-based, and designed to counter various aerial threats, including fighter aircraft, attack helicopters, drones, and guided munitions. It's known for its speed, accuracy, and ability to integrate with other military assets, including those of the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force (and NATO). What is the Land Ceptor missile, and why do we need more of them? Sky Sabre includes radar, command, and control capability and - most importantly - a missile to intercept incoming threats. The Land Ceptor missile weighs around 100kg, has a 10kg warhead, and can intercept threats out to around 15 miles (25km), making it around three times more effective than the Rapier system it replaced. When the MoD made the decision to replace the Rapier system, the global threat environment was very different to that experienced today. Since the end of the Cold War, the UK has been involved in expeditionary warfare - wars of choice - and generally against less capable adversaries. So, although the Land Ceptor missile is very capable, defence planning assumptions (DPAs) were that they would not need to be used in a serious way, commensurate with the threat. However, as the Russian invasion of Ukraine has demonstrated (as has the series of Iranian attacks on Israel), significantly larger stockpiles are required against a more capable enemy. Is the UK vulnerable to missile attack? In short, yes. Although the Land Ceptor missile does provide an excellent point-defence capability, it is not an effective counter to ballistic or hypersonic missiles - the Sea Viper mounted on Royal Navy Type 45 Destroyers using the Aster 30 missile has that capability. In the Cold War, the UK had Bloodhound missiles deployed around the UK to provide a missile defence capability, but as the perceived risks to the UK abated following the collapse of the Soviet Union, UK missile defence fell down the priorities for the MoD. Although the radar based at RAF Fylingdales forms part of the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System (BMEWS) can detect incoming threats, the UK no longer has an effective interceptor to protect critical national infrastructure. Instead, the UK relies on the layered defences of European allies to act as a deterrence against attack. In the near term, this timely order for Land Ceptor missiles doubles the British Army's tactical capability. However, as the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have demonstrated, ballistic (and increasingly hypersonic) missiles are being produced in increasing quantity - and quality. Without significant (and rapid) investment, this critical gap in national military capability leaves the UK vulnerable to attack.
