Sir Dave Dobbyn shares health update, how Parkinson's has changed his performing
'It was a relief to find out what it was, because my family couldn't really recognise me. During Covid I went right down the rabbit hole somewhere, I got quite lost.
'And there can be a slight personality change, it can become quite pronounced in some people.
'Thankfully for me, it wasn't too bad. I was rescued by my family, shall we say, and I was able to tackle it head-on.'
Dobbyn said almost three years on from that life-changing diagnosis he was 'thrilled with my progress'.
'It does change you, it makes you more receptive, and humble, you find your place in it.'
Dobbyn is also 'literally' fighting the progressive neurological disorder by taking up boxing.
'Twice a week I go and do my boxing with some other Parky people, that's what we call ourselves – the Parkies,' Dobbyn told Mulligan.
Dobbyn said the combat exercise has helped him counteract many of the physical symptoms of the neurodegenerative disease.
'It [boxing] does wonders for your balance, because your balance is shot with Parkinson's.
'You get all these things that are taken away from you, your balance, the strength of your voice in terms of loudness, things like that become difficult.
'But if you're fighting it and you're doing some exercises, it's the best way to deal with it.'
Dobbyn was in good spirits during the performance. He said he considers himself in 'good shape' at the moment but admitted his musicality has been affected by the disease.
'I play less. I can't shred anymore, not that I ever did really... things get taken away. I do less on the piano, which is probably a good idea, I do less on the guitar and focus on the vocal.
'Eventually, it takes your voice, so you sound like a slurring drunk. But I think I'm a few years away from that. I've already done the slurring drunk bit, and it didn't involve Parkinson's.'
Dobbyn was knighted in 2020 and appointed an Officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit in 2003 for services to music.
He is set to perform a show at the Auckland Town Hall on June 4. He said the thought of the performance 'scares the hell out of me right now, but I'm sure in doing it on the night it will just be glorious'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
Senior doctors' union worried national health plan lacks detail
Health Minister Simeon Brown blamed the delay in releasing the plan on the additional audit requirement, which was "imposed by the previous government". Photo: Calvin Samuel / RNZ The lack of detail in the national health plan for how Health NZ will meet its lofty goals, or pay for them, is especially worrying at a time when the public system is under massive pressure, warns the senior doctors' union. Auditor-General John Ryan has found Health NZ's plan - which was released last week, 18 months' overdue - had failed to show how it would deliver public health services , nor how much they would cost. Association of Salaried Medical Specialists principal policy advisor Virginia Mills said the fact there was no roadmap for delivering services, or even an estimate of "unmet need", was a damning indictment on the agency. "Essentially it means he's [the Auditor-General] been unable to vouch for the plan. And that's quite concerning because we've got a health system that's under extreme pressure at the moment, and we're not confident that this plan is going to fix those issues or deliver on better health for New Zealanders," Mills said. Of further concern was the fact that the Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Bill, currently before Parliament, included a clause scrapping the requirement for the health plan to be scrutinised by the Auditor-General at all, she said. "That would be like if you got a school report to say your child was struggling, and instead of helping your child to do better, you called the teacher and said you didn't want the report anymore," Mills said. "It seems like the Government is saying, 'We didn't like this level of independent scrutiny. Let's get rid of that legislation'." Mills said both those things were at odds with the Government's claim that it wanted greater transparency and accountability. Health NZ blamed the delays in getting out the plan on its "immature" reporting systems, but said they were now bedding in. However, Mills said it was also possible that the focus on cost-cutting (from then Commissioner now board chair Dr Lester Levy's "Reset Plan") had made future planning more difficult. In a written response to RNZ, Health Minister Simeon Brown blamed the delay in releasing the plan on the additional audit requirement for the New Zealand Health Plan, which was "imposed by the previous government". "Removing it aligns Health New Zealand's planning processes with other crown agencies and allows the system to be more focused on delivering timely, quality healthcare care for patients," Brown said. "As part of making the system more efficient and focused on patients, we are also removing bureaucratic processes and aligning Health New Zealand's planning documents with other public sector planning documents." Health NZ would continue to have its annual financial statements and statement of performance audited by the Auditor-General, as required of all Crown entities under the Crown Entities Act. His priority was "to ensure everyone can access timely, quality healthcare whenever they need it, regardless of who they are or where they live", Brown said in a statement. "That's why, for the first time, we are putting health targets into law so every part of the system is focused on delivering faster care, shorter wait times, higher immunisation rates, and real results." Those targets would be included in the Government Policy Statement on Health, to which the New Zealand Health Plan would give effect. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
18 hours ago
- RNZ News
GP funding changes will worsen Māori health inequities, expert says
The GP funding changes are proposed to take effect from 1 July 2026. Photo: RNZ A public health expert says the government's updated funding formula for general practices will fail to address the country's biggest health inequities because it excludes ethnicity. From July 2026, GP clinics will receive funding based on factors such as age, sex, rurality, socioeconomic deprivation and morbidity. The changes are intended to replace a 20-year-old model that largely used age and sex to determine funding levels. But public health senior research fellow at Otago University Dr Gabrielle McDonald said the government had ignored expert advice to also include ethnicity, despite strong evidence it was a powerful indicator of health need. "It's illogical," she told RNZ. "Leaving ethnicity out means [funding is] not going to be allocated to those highest areas of need, which will make accessing health care more difficult for Māori and Pacific communities." McDonald said data showed Māori lived seven years less than non-Māori and had higher rates of many serious illnesses, including cancer, even when poverty and other social factors were taken into account. "There's a lot of data that shows Māori don't get as good a deal from the health system as non-Māori. We've got a system that doesn't respond to Māori and Pacific people, it's geared towards the so-called majority Pākehā," she said. The funding formula is used to allocate money to general practices based on the characteristics of their enrolled patients. A 2022 government commissioned analysis by consultancy Sapere recommended it should include age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, morbidity and rurality. "It was very thorough and they produced a high-quality report and put ethnicity in the funding formula because there was evidence to support that. "And so the government has said, yes, that's good, we will use that formula, but they've taken the ethnicity out, which is illogical," McDonald said. McDonald said removing ethnicity would make it harder to reduce inequities in primary care, which acted as the "gatekeeper" to the rest of the health system. "We know that general practices are the backbone of any good public health service. "Measures that don't aim to reduce inequities at that spot mean you're going to be playing catch-up throughout the health system if you can't reduce inequities in accessing primary care." She said including ethnicity was "highly justified." "We know our health dollar is really scarce and it needs to be spent where it's most needed. Leaving ethnicity out means it's not going to be allocated to those highest areas of need, which will make accessing health care more difficult for Māori and Pacific communities." McDonald has been a public health physician since 2011 and is a Pākehā researcher at Kōhātū - the Centre for Hauora Māori at the University of Otago. She has worked as a doctor for about 25 years, including extensive experience reviewing child and adolescent deaths. "I've spent a large amount of time reviewing child and adolescent deaths, and the inequity is very, very obvious there," she said. "Māori and Pacific children bear the brunt of many of the negatives of living in our society and they pay for it with their lives. We've got inequity in death rates for children and adolescents in almost all areas." Minister of Health Simeon Brown says Māori and Pacific peoples, in particular, will benefit from the updated GP funding model. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER In a statement to RNZ Minister of Health Simeon Brown said too many Kiwis were waiting too long for a GP appointment. "The current funding model is outdated and doesn't fully reflect the needs of patients," he said. "That's why we're making changes to the way GP clinics are funded to ensure money goes where it's needed most, with the revised formula going beyond age and sex to also factor in rurality, multimorbidity and socioeconomic deprivation." GP clinics serving communities with higher health needs would receive more funding to care for their patients, he said. "The reweighted formula recognises the impact that age, rurality, complexity and deprivation have on health outcomes, and will ensure resources are targeted to those with the greatest need. "Māori and Pacific peoples, in particular, will benefit from this change." The changes are proposed to take effect from 1 July 2026. Public health physician and Otago University research fellow Dr Gabriel McDonald says data shows Māori often face extra hurdles getting the right care and the same treatment as non-Māori, even when poverty is factored in. Photo: Supplied / Gabrielle McDonald However, McDonald said she expected the government to implement a "state-of-the-art, fully fit-for-purpose formula," but that the final version "ignored the ethnicity funding factor". "We know from the data that outcomes are not the same for Māori and non-Māori, even when you take into account poverty and other factors. "Māori face additional barriers to accessing care, to accessing appropriate care, and to receiving the same level of treatment once they do access care. There's a lot of data showing Māori don't get as good a deal from the health system as non-Māori." "And then there are the determinants of health, things like poverty, level of education and other factors, which we know are not equally distributed, with Māori marginalised in almost every area." She also believed the decision reflected a wider trend in government policy. "There's a lot of pushback to talking about the needs of ethnic groups, even where there's really good reason to pay attention to ethnicity." She argued the government should adopt a complete, evidence-based mechanism for funding general practices, rather than the partial formula announced, to align with its stated goal of needs-based funding. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
20 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Anti-vaccine group Voices For Freedom's book criticised for misleading Covid claims
The book features photos and descriptions of 22 supporters of the VFF movement under the Latin heading 'dramatis personae', including Nelson-based lawyer Sue Grey who was recently fined for breaching a suppression order. A marketing lecturer told the Herald the design strongly evokes the look and feel of Government documents, risks misleading readers into assuming it's endorsed by the Government, and poses reputational risk for the legitimate Royal Commission. However Deeks said the book was necessary because commissioners overseeing the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Covid-19 response were relying on government agencies and 'favoured experts'. VFF was allowed to make submissions as part of public hearings on vaccine safety last month. 'If the public is to engage meaningfully, they need access to a clear, evidence-based counterpoint while the hearings are live, not months later,' Deeks told the Herald. Nelson-based lawyer Sue Grey is listed in the book as one of its 22 "dramatis personae" - or list of characters. Photo / NZME The book claims foreign DNA found in Pfizer and Moderna vaccine vials could cause cancer and 'genomic instability', suggests deaths increased as a result of the booster vaccine rollout, and that there's no robust scientific evidence for the widespread use of face masks. Many of the topic-based sections are written or co-authored by New South Wales lawyer Katie Ashby-Koppens. Ashby-Koppens has been helping represent the views of VFF founders Alia Bland and Deeks during hearings at the Government's Royal Commission. She has no medical qualifications. Otago University epidemiologist professor Michael Baker told the Herald he was 'mystified' as to the purpose of the book. He said the most productive channel for making valid arguments about the country's Covid-19 response was at the Government's official Royal Commission, where submitters, including members of the VFF, were asked to justify their views. University of Otago epidemiologist, Professor Michael Baker said if claims haven't gone through the scrutiny of a peer review process they "don't have much standing". Photo / Supplied Baker said there was also another way to gain scientific credibility. 'If you think the science is wrong, the most effective channel is to write something and get it published in a journal. Then it goes through a peer-review process. Unless it goes through some scrutiny, it doesn't have much standing,' he said. There was 'no evidence' to support increased mortality being linked to the use of vaccines, he said. The anti vaccine group Voices For Freedom has produced a 271-page book about New Zealand's response to the Covid-19 pandemic which a marketing expert says looks like a Government document. Photo / Michael Morrah Baker's colleague and professor of public health at Otago University Nick Wilson didn't think the publication was worth spending money on. 'From a public health perspective, if they're not using well-informed people, it [the book] has very little value. 'There has been a range of evidence on masks that show that they work.' Professor Nick Wilson said the book has little value "if they're not using well-informed people". Photo / John Gerritsen, RNZ He said New Zealand's Covid-19 response 'was not perfect' but it worked - a conclusion supported by the first phase of the Royal Commission, which finished last year. 'We have some very thorough documents from the first Covid inquiry. That is the official source of information,' he said. Commissioners in the first phase the inquiry concluded the vaccine mandates were 'reasonable' for specific professions in 2021 and said lockdowns were an effective tool for managing virus elimination. VFF's book uses the colour navy blue throughout and states on the front cover that it's a 'special report' on the New Zealand Royal Commission of Inquiry. Auckland University's Dr Herbert Sima said there is a credible likelihood the publication could be mistaken for an official government report. Auckland University senior marketing lecturer Dr Herbert Sima told the Herald the design of the book was problematic. 'There is a credible likelihood that this publication could be mistaken for an official government report,' he told the Herald. He said those unfamiliar with VFF or its contributors, or those who skim read the document without reading the fine print could be misled. 'The design employs multiple visual and textual strategies that can strongly evoke the look and feel of an official government document.' He said this included the navy blue colour palette and bold sans-serif fonts. He said that raised ethical concerns from a marketing perspective. 'It risks misleading readers into assuming government endorsement. It leverages public trust in official inquiries to amplify the advocacy group's viewpoint,' he said. He said it also posed reputational risks for the Royal Commission. Deeks said navy blue is a longstanding brand colour of VFF and the movement's logo is displayed on the book's cover. 'The Government does not have dibs on a colour palette,' she said. In response to Baker, Deeks claimed the book did contain legitimate scientific perspectives. 'It is grounded in peer-reviewed science, official data, and testimony from internationally recognised experts, many of whom advised governments before 2020,' she said. Michael Morrah is a senior investigative reporter/team leader at the Herald. He won News Journalist of the Year at the 2025 Voyager Media Awards and has twice been named reporter of the year at the NZ Television Awards. He has been a broadcast journalist for 20 years and joined the Herald's video team in July 2024.
