logo
Auschwitz was built on lies. They still haunt Israel and our world today.

Auschwitz was built on lies. They still haunt Israel and our world today.

USA Today27-01-2025

Elisha Wiesel
Opinion contributor
Auschwitz was liberated 80 years ago Monday. Its lies still imprison us today.
It was with lies about work abroad that the Nazis persuaded the Jews of Europe to get on the trains, and it was with lies about showers that Jews were greeted when they got off.
There are the lies the world told itself as these atrocities unfolded. That they were doing all they could − even as the railroad tracks to Auschwitz were not bombed; as the St. Louis ship, full of Jewish refugees, was turned back from Florida to Europe; as Britain froze European Jewish immigration to the British Mandate for Palestine, preventing the escape of hundreds of thousands who could have been saved.
And finally there are the lies told in the following decades because they were convenient. 'They were victims,' President Ronald Reagan said in 1985 of the Wehrmacht soldiers buried at Bitburg cemetery, where he intended to visit, 'just as surely as the victims in the concentration camps.'
Elie Wiesel confronted Reagan on national TV
It was too late to stop this last lie, but my father, Elie Wiesel, was determined to try. His response made headlines around the world.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
'The issue here is not politics,' he told Reagan on national TV, 'but good and evil. And we must never confuse them, for I have seen the SS at work, and I have seen their victims.'
My father was unsuccessful. Reagan paid his respects at Bitburg anyway, and the line between the perpetrators of evil and their victims continued to blur.
Today, only 40% of people under 35 recognize the Holocaust as historically accurate. That number is even worse in the Middle East, where only 16% of Israel's neighbors accept the facts.
Opinion:My father, Elie Wiesel, survived Auschwitz. He'd ask these questions about Israel-Hamas war.
But the problem is worse than ignorance. Many in the younger generation, reliving Reagan's moral confusion, see today's Hamas fighters as victims just as surely as the Israelis they kidnapped on Oct. 7, 2023. To them, Hamas is the underdog hero.
My father spoke out against indifference. What we now face is something else. Nobody is indifferent; everyone has an opinion on the Israel-Hamas conflict. Is it mass gullibility? Good intentions gone wrong? Surely many Christians who slaughtered Jews in the Middle Ages believed that they were protecting their families, that the Jews had in fact poisoned the wells. Had they not seen the dead body of a child, produced as the blood libel's evidence?
It is hard to look evil in the face. To see the jihadists in Gaza fire rifles in the air as 90 Palestinian prisoners were exchanged for only three Israeli women.
One of the terrorists set to be released by Israel is Abu Warda, who was responsible for killing 45 civilians in the 1996 bus bombings in Jerusalem. Does he occupy the same moral universe as these women?
Hamas wants to eradicate Israel
It is easier to believe that this militant mob wants their own state than to hear, really hear, what they shout: that their mission, as the Hamas charter states, is the eradication of Israel. Since this ceasefire, Hamas has retaken the Gazan streets − and we'll watch them wreak further destruction on the people of Gaza.
My father, in his Bitburg speech, quoted the great New York Times executive editor Abe Rosenthal. He had visited Poland and wrote a piece in 1990 called 'Forgive them not, for they knew what they did.'
Opinion:Peace in Israel isn't possible until Palestinians stop paying terrorists to kill
The Christian desire to forgive and move on is a powerful one in the American psyche, especially when the terror being forgiven was visited on others. But Americans must not forgive Hamas. We must confront evil when and where we see it. There is no time to lose.
Good intentions are not enough.
My grandfather Shlomo Wiesel, who perished at Buchenwald a week after the liberation of Auschwitz, was also the son of an Eliezer. My great-grandfather was killed as a medic in World War I, drafted into service for the Kaiser. And now I see my father's rebuke of Reagan drafted into service by those who hate Israel, who shout that to fight indifference is to blindly support the eradication of a democratic state.
It is terrifying to confront a mob, especially when it contains our own − our friends, coworkers, even our children, swept up in that deep moral confusion laying waste to college campuses. But on this anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, we must ask ourselves these questions:
Will we continue explaining away the images of non-uniformed Palestinian civilians celebrating − and actively aiding Hamas − in the Oct. 7 attacks, much as a previous generation sought to explain away the SS, the Wehrmacht and the civilians who kept them in power?
Will we continue confusing the concepts of perpetrator and victim, of terror and a just war, losing the distinction between Hamas, who hide behind human shields, and the Israel Defense Forces, who do more than any army ever has to avoid loss of life while bombing the tunnels built to facilitate the next Holocaust?
Will we continue giving moral credibility to voices who say that the tiny nation of Israel is the villain for refusing to die?
To differentiate good from evil, one must begin by choosing between truth and lies.
Forty years ago, President Reagan had not learned this lesson. Eighty years after the liberation of Auschwitz − have we?
Elisha Wiesel is the son of Marion Wiesel and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Elie Wiesel.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-top Shin Bet official to 'Post': Palestinian groups fighting Hamas in Israel's interest
Ex-top Shin Bet official to 'Post': Palestinian groups fighting Hamas in Israel's interest

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ex-top Shin Bet official to 'Post': Palestinian groups fighting Hamas in Israel's interest

"What are 'criminal groups' when it comes to Hamas-run Gaza?" the official said. Palestinian tribal gangs in Gaza fighting against Hamas are in Israel's interest, former top Shin Bet official Shalom Ben Hanan told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday, responding to the controversy about the agency providing weapons to such groups under orders from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Ben Hanan retired in 2022 after 27 years in the agency at the equivalent rank of a major general in charge of a whole division in comparison to IDF ranks, and was only on Netanyahu's short-list in the running for the agency's chief this Spring. The former senior Shin Bet official said, "According to reports, the phenomenon of arming Palestinian tribal gangs to harm Hamas is a positive development - this is saving the lives of our soldiers," in various cases. In other words, if Gazan Palestinians can fight Hamas and push it out of certain areas, IDF soldiers will not need to do that fighting and will be at lower risk of Hamas guerrilla ambushes in those Gazan sectors. He noted that foreign reports have reflected on past potential instances where Israel might have assisted tribal gangs in the Sinai to fight off ISIS terrorists as a potential model for what might be going on now in Gaza. Moreover, he stated that the idea of "tribal gangs rising up against Hamas should be of positive interest to Israel," in its goals and future plans for Gaza. Responding to Yisrael Beytenu party leader's framing of Netanyahu as having sidestepped the cabinet in order to provide weapons to "Gaza criminals," Ben Hanan responded, asking rhetorically, "What are 'criminal groups' in the context of Gaza?" Essentially, Ben Hanan was arguing that many people who might be considered "criminal" by Hamas might not be criminal at all. Alternatively, even if some of the Gazan groups receiving weapons from Israel are, in fact, criminals, they still might be preferable as interlocutors in Gaza if they conclude that their local non-ideological and calculated interests are to forge a stable relationship with Israel – as opposed to Hamas which is religiously and ideologically committed to Israel's destruction. The Shin Bet and IDF intelligence did not deny their involvement in providing weapons to the Gaza tribal gangs, but the Shin Bet did not provide a detailed response, and IDF intelligence did not respond. However, the Jerusalem Post was told by top defense sources, even in early 2024, that there were certain efforts to recruit Gaza tribal gangs to fight against or counter Hamas on both the military and political fronts. It is likely that the Shin Bet originated the idea based on requests from Netanyahu and then defense minister Yoav Gallant to try to find a way to circumvent Hamas and the Palestinian Authority, and given that the agency has the most long-term experts on Gaza groups. For a period of weeks, there were hopes in early 2024 that such tribal gangs, unaffiliated with Hamas or the Palestinian Authority, could be alternate rulers of Gaza to both of those groups, "the Day After" the war would end. Meanwhile, although there is a history of external spy services like the Mossad and CIA arming foreign groups, the Mossad does not and did not have any security responsibility for Gaza, so it would not be involved in the issue of arming tribal Gaza gangs. Also, late Thursday, sources close to Netanyahu himself proudly admitted his involvement in the issue, signaling they thought Liberman's attack was off-base. Further, some leaks suggested that the weapons given by Israel to these gangs were not Israeli weapons, but Hamas weapons, which Israel had confiscated. These leaks would try to defend against accusations of Israel "funding" these Gazan tribal gangs, since, if true, giving them only Hamas weapons, which were confiscated, does not implicate Israeli funds. In the broader narrative, Liberman is likely laying the ground for his biggest attacks on Netanyahu whenever the next election comes out: Netanyahu paid Qatar to pay Hamas to keep them "deterred," is now paying directly or indirectly for the Palestinians food aid, and provided weapons to dangerous Palestinian gangs in Gaza who will likely at some later point turn their weapons on Israel.

Thousands demand respect at annual gay pride parade in Jerusalem
Thousands demand respect at annual gay pride parade in Jerusalem

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Thousands demand respect at annual gay pride parade in Jerusalem

Thousands of people took part in the annual Pride Parade in Jerusalem on Thursday amidst very strict security measures. They demonstrated for the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer people (LGBTQ) and waved rainbow flags. According to the organizers, the parade is primarily about demanding equality, respect and tolerance. The Pride Parade in Jerusalem has to be protected by a massive police presence every year. Jerusalem is home to many conservative and strictly religious Jews, Muslims and Christians who deny same-sex relationships as a violation of their religious commandments. Ten years ago, an ultra-Orthodox Jew stabbed 16-year-old Shira Banki to death during the parade. Participants observed a minute's silence at the spot where Banki was killed in 2015. Israeli President Isaac Herzog, who was at the event, said: "We demand love, respect and equality – including for the LGBTQ community, which is an integral part of Israeli society." According to the news site ynet, Herzog is the first president to take part in the Pride Parade in Jerusalem. The chairwoman of the organizer Jerusalem Open House, Hadas Bloemendal Kerem, said: "The Pride Parade in Jerusalem is a ray of light that has illuminated the city for over two decades and reminds us that we can live here together – with equality, tolerance and respect." Clashes broke out between demonstrators and the police on the fringes of the parade, according to media reports. Next week, large crowds are expected to attend the well-known Gay Pride Parade in Tel Aviv. The liberal coastal metropolis is considered a stronghold of the gay scene in Israel and the LGBTQ capital of the Middle East.

High court blocks Hamas victims' try to reopen case against Lebanese bank
High court blocks Hamas victims' try to reopen case against Lebanese bank

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

High court blocks Hamas victims' try to reopen case against Lebanese bank

WASHINGTON, June 5 (UPI) -- The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled unanimously that it would not allow relatives of victims and survivors of Hamas attacks from 2001 to 2003 to reopen a case in which they accused a Lebanese bank of providing financial services to Hamas-affiliated clients. The court ruled in BLOM Bank SAL vs. Michal Honickman, in an opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas, that the plaintiffs did not meet the requirements of extraordinary circumstances for reopening the case. When the case was originally tried in 2019, the relatives and victims lost because they failed to prove the bank knowingly took on clients affiliated with Hamas. The victims and relatives then wanted to offer evidence to which they claimed they had access later. They cited as precedent Rule 60(b), which outlines the reasons why a case could be reopened after a judgement has been issued, such as a mistake in the judgement or evidence unavailable to the plaintiffs during their original case. "It is Rule 60(b)'s standard -- and only Rule 60(b0's standard -- that applies when a party seeks relief from final judgement. A party seeking Rule 60(b) relief must always demonstrate 'extraordinary circumstances' justifying relief," the court wrote. Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson delivered a concurring opinion in which she parted from her colleagues, warning that courts should not deny requests to reopen cases simply because the requesting party was given a chance to amend a case while it was ongoing. "In particular, I think the district court was wrong to fault plaintiffs for making a 'deliberate choice' to appeal the dismissal of their complaint in lieu of accepting various pre-dismissal opportunities to cure purported pleading deficiencies." Brown wrote. The victims and families accused the Lebanese bank of aiding and abetting attacks from 2001 to 2003 by providing financial services to Hamas-affiliated clients. In 2019, the families attempted to sue the bank, but the judge dismissed the suit for not providing evidence that the bank knowingly provided financial services to Hamas-affiliated clients. The court even asked the survivors and families' lawyer if they wanted to amend the case, but they declined. They later found evidence they said proves that the bank knowingly engaged with Hamas affiliates, so they went back to court to reopen their case. Their lawyer, Michael Radine, criticized the Supreme Court's decision. Radine said in a statement to UPI that the district court would not allow his clients to retry the case unless they could meet "the erroneous and essentially unmeetable pleading standards raised by the defendant and adopted by the district court." He added that the district court required evidence such as acts or statements from bank employees proving affiliations with Hamas before discovery. "Few plaintiffs will have access to a defendant's internal communications before discovery, which is why the [2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals] tossed that pleading standard as 'too exacting,'" Radine said in the statement. During the original case, the families appealed to the 2nd Circuit and were turned down again, so they returned to the lower courts and asked to retry the case and submit evidence proving that the bank knowingly provided financial services to Hamas-affiliated individuals. They were told their case did not meet the requirement to be reopened, so the plaintiffs appealed that decision to the 2nd Circuit again. "Indeed, today's decision could empower district courts to prevent plaintiffs from amending their complaints whenever the state of the applicable law is unclear," Radine said. BLOM Bank SAL's lawyer Michael Hugh McGinley didn't respond to a request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store