Stellantis warns of $2.7 billion loss for 1st half of 2025 due to tariffs and some big charges
The automaker anticipates an impact of about 300 million euros for net tariffs incurred, and also expects planned production losses related to implementing its response plan.
The automaker provided preliminary financial figures on Monday after suspending financial guidance in April due to Trump's tariffs. It also halted production at plants in Canada and Mexico in response to a 25% tax on imported cars, and it temporarily laid off 900 workers at plants in Michigan and Indiana.
Stellantis expects approximately $3.84 billion of pretax net charges mostly related to program cancellation costs and platform impairments, restructuring and the net impact of costs related to emission standards. Automakers have been penalized if the average fuel economy of their annual fleet of vehicle production exceeds a certain level.
Antonio Filosa took over as CEO two months ago after Carlos Tavares resigned under pressure last year.
Stellantis, which was created from the 2021 merger of France's PSA Peugeot with Italian-U.S. carmaker Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, is the world's fourth-largest car manufacturer. It is based in the Netherlands.
Stellantis will release its financial results for the first half of the year on July 29.
President Donald Trump signed executive orders in April to relax some of his 25% tariffs on automobiles and auto parts, a significant reversal as the import taxes threatened to hurt domestic manufacturers.
Automakers and independent analyses have indicated that the tariffs could raise prices, reduce sales and make U.S. production less competitive worldwide. Trump portrayed the changes as a bridge toward automakers moving more production into the United States.
The tariffs ordered by Trump are hitting the entire auto sector, which sends vehicles and parts across the northern and southern borders of the U.S. repeatedly as they are assembled. The Center for Automotive Research says that a uniform 25% tariff on all trading partners would have an increased cost of $107.7 billion to all U.S. automakers and an increased cost of $41.9 billion for the Big Three automakers in Detroit, Stellantis, General Motors and Ford.
In May, General Motors lowered its profit expectations for the year as the carmaker braced for a potential impact from auto tariffs as high as $5 billion in 2025.
The Detroit automaker said at the time that it anticipated full-year adjusted earnings before interest and taxes in a range of $10 billion to $12.5 billion. The guidance includes a current tariff exposure of $4 billion to $5 billion.
That same month, Ford Motor said that it expects to take a $1.5 billion hit to its operating profit from tariffs this year and was withdrawing its full-year financial guidance due to the uncertainty created by the Trump administration's evolving trade policy.
Ford and Tesla are expected to see a smaller impact from tariffs than GM and other automakers because they assemble more of their cars in the U.S. Still, what impact they do see won't be insignificant.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Minerals Technologies Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS Beats Expectations
Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$528.9m (down 2.3% from 2Q 2024). Net income: US$45.4m (up 131% from 2Q 2024). Profit margin: 8.6% (up from 3.6% in 2Q 2024). EPS: US$1.44 (up from US$0.61 in 2Q 2024). This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Minerals Technologies EPS Beats Expectations Revenue was in line with analyst estimates. Earnings per share (EPS) surpassed analyst estimates by 3.2%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 4.2% p.a. on average during the next 2 years, compared to a 4.3% growth forecast for the Chemicals industry in the US. Performance of the American Chemicals industry. The company's shares are up 15% from a week ago. Risk Analysis It is worth noting though that we have found 2 warning signs for Minerals Technologies that you need to take into consideration. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US cattle tally shows no end in sight for soaring beef prices
(Bloomberg) — The latest US cattle tally offered little relief for consumers paying record beef prices, even as the cycle of herd liquidation seems to be coming to an end. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom Trump Administration Sues NYC Over Sanctuary City Policy There were about 94.2 million cattle and calves in the US as of July 1, the lowest mid-year count on record in data going back to 1973, the Department of Agriculture said in a report. The number of animals placed in feedlots for weight gain before being sent to slaughter plunged to the lowest since 2017, the USDA said in a separate note. A severe shortage in the world's largest beef-producing country has sent cattle costs soaring, wiping out billions in profits for companies such as JBS NV and Tyson Foods Inc., while driving record beef prices at grocery stores. For years, ranchers have been slashing their herds due to a combination of high interest rates, costly feed and persistent drought. But record cattle prices and improved pasture conditions this year are raising speculation that ranchers are moving to rebuild their herds — a move that is yet to be confirmed. The latest USDA numbers offer 'very little indication of much herd rebuilding or anything very aggressive,' said Derrell Peel, a professor of agricultural economics at Oklahoma State University. The number of heifers in feedlots remained mostly stable relative to that for steers, suggesting ranchers are not meaningfully retaining females for breeding. 'We are probably stabilizing cattle numbers, but we're not growing yet,' he said. A large decline in beef cows raised specifically for breeding purposes also indicates that a rebuild has yet to kick in — prolonging a money-losing cycle for meat producers and potentially pushing consumers toward cheaper proteins like pork and chicken, according to Benjamin Theurer, an analyst at Barclays Plc. 'A full rebuild and margin recovery is a ways away,' he wrote in a note to clients. Even if ranchers start rebuilding now, beef supplies aren't expected to meaningfully recover before 2028 or 2029 — meaning cattle and beef prices are poised to remain elevated for years. Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This couple is stuck in a ‘mother-son' dynamic — and Ramit Sethi says their pasts are derailing any real future together
Money can be a major source of conflict for couples, and it's not just about who pays for what. Sometimes, deeper dynamics can fuel resentment and erode trust. That's the case for Taylor, 29 and Hayden, 25, who sought help from Ramit Sethi on an episode of the I Will Teach You To Be Rich podcast. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to this $1B private real estate fund. In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how Taylor is a dentist who earns $14,600 a month and follows a strict savings plan. Her common-law partner, Hayden, makes $2,000 a month as a part-time bartender who 'dabbles' in real estate. But it's not his salary that's the issue. He has a history of gambling and lied about it for a year. Beyond the income gap, they also have polar-opposite money mindsets. She's a saver. He's a spender. That imbalance has created what Taylor describes as a 'mother-son' dynamic, with her as the financial provider — a role she resents. Although they've talked about getting married in the next two years, they've held off on getting engaged because of the money issues and the tension they've caused. How different money mindsets affect couples When Sethi asked Taylor if she trusts Hayden with money, she said, 'Not my money.' She added that she 'cannot seem to get over the fact that he will not track his money and be financially responsible.' She said she's also 'scared of what our future could look like if he doesn't get a hold of his spending or start budgeting.' Taylor grew up in a household marked by instability, financial stress, health issues and incarceration. Her parents weren't financially responsible, so she stepped up and became the caretaker. 'Now fast forward to adulthood,' said Sethi. 'Taylor's the saver, the contributor. Her partner is unreliable with money just like her parents. And Taylor feels safest when she's the one in control.' Hayden, on the other hand, was 16 when his dad passed away at age 42. 'Most of the guys that I know who lost their dads early have told me they expect to die at the same age,' Sethi said. 'That belief that he's going to die early shapes his view of money.' Hayden eventually got into gambling, which he admitted became a habit; an addiction. When he first moved in with Taylor, he made $35,000 from selling a house and blew all of it in about four to five months. And he managed to keep his gambling hidden from Taylor for over a year, even taking out a personal loan to 'continue the lie.' When he finally came clean, Taylor was devastated. 'I never wanted to feel like a man was just living off of me. And that's exactly what it ended up feeling like,' Taylor said. Hayden has since started therapy and joined Gamblers Anonymous. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it When one partner feels like the financial caretaker Nearly one in four couples say money is their greatest relationship challenge, according to the 2024 Fidelity Investments Couples & Money Study. More than one in four say they're often frustrated by their partner's money habits, but let it go for the sake of keeping the peace. Most Americans in relationships — 98% — say financial compatibility is important. And 23% have ended a relationship because of financial incompatibility, according to a LendingTree survey. Another 34% said they would consider doing so. The reasons vary: 38% say their partner overspends, while 34% say their partner doesn't manage their finances effectively. It often comes down to communication. The Fidelity study found that couples who make joint money decisions are more likely to say they communicate well or very well with their partner. Still, 29% of American couples rarely discuss finances, according to the LendingTree survey. Financial stress can 'lead to constant worry, tension and conflict, often spilling over into other areas of the relationship,' according to the Abundance Therapy Center in Valencia, CA. 'Financial disagreements can also exacerbate existing issues, as money often symbolizes deeper aspects of trust, security and control in a relationship.' Left unchecked, this can create 'a cycle of avoidance, resentment and increased tension around financial matters.' Breaking free requires communication It's natural to want to support a partner who's struggling financially. But the line between helping and enabling can get blurry. The way out often starts with honest communication. That could mean scheduling regular meetings — not impromptu conversations that catch one partner off guard and turn into arguments. Some couples may even want to try couples counseling or financial counseling to get professional guidance in a neutral space. From there, they can create a joint financial plan that outlines how they'll share expenses and work toward goals like saving for a wedding or putting a down payment on a home. Each partner should contribute a portion of their income toward shared expenses. But it's not a one-time fix. Couples should revisit their meetings regularly and adjust their plan as needed. Sethi's advice for Taylor and Hayden? They need to 'recalibrate' their relationship dynamics. That means having those difficult conversations about money. In this case, Sethi said Hayden should take the lead so Taylor doesn't feel like managing their finances is yet another burden. That means talking about where the money is going, what needs to change and how it could be reallocated. If they can do that before they're married and have kids, then they can probably do it even better as their family grows. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Accredited investors can now buy into this $22 trillion asset class once reserved for elites – and become the landlord of Walmart, Whole Foods or Kroger without lifting a finger. Here's how Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Solve the daily Crossword
