Russian journalists jailed for 5-1/2 years for alleged extremist ties to Navalny
Antonina Favorskaya, Sergei Karelin, Konstantin Gabov and Artem Kriger have been on trial behind closed doors since October on charges, which they deny, of belonging to an extremist group.
Prosecutors said they created materials for the YouTube channel of Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK), which is banned in Russia as a "foreign agent" and an extremist organization.
Russia has intensified pressure on domestic and foreign reporters since the start of its war in Ukraine. Supporters of the accused journalists said the trial was aimed at intimidating the press and punishing reporters for doing their jobs.
Navalny, the most prominent opponent of President Vladimir Putin, had spent years denouncing corruption in the Russian elite. He died suddenly in an Arctic penal colony last year while serving a long sentence on corruption and extremism charges, which he denied.
Despite claims by Yulia Navalnaya, Navalny's wife, that he was murdered, Russia's investigative committee in 2024 told her it had concluded that Navalny's death was caused by a "combination of diseases."
The Kremlin also has strongly rejected his supporters' accusation that Putin had him murdered. U.S. intelligence agencies later determined Putin likely did not order his death, the Wall Street Journal and the Associated Press reported.
Before the sentences were read out, media were allowed briefly to film the accused journalists as they stood in handcuffs behind a glass screen.
"Everything will be fine. I see how the dynamics are developing. I give this regime another year, another year and a half at most," Kriger said.
Karelin said: "I hope my daughter will be proud of me."
Neither the court nor prosecutors responded to requests for comment.
Karelin and Gabov are freelancers who have worked for a variety of news organizations including, respectively, the AP and Reuters.
Favorskaya and Kriger both work for SOTAvision, an independent outlet that has also been designated a foreign agent. Favorskaya recorded the last video of Navalny taking part in a court hearing the day before he died.
"Konstantin Gabov is a freelance journalist who between 2022 and 2024 occasionally contributed to Reuters as a desk producer, editing video and scripting stories assigned to him. We have no evidence that shows the charges against him relate to his freelance work at Reuters," a spokesperson for the Reuters news agency said.
"Reuters is deeply committed to freedom of the press and opposes the imprisonment of any journalist for doing their job. Journalists must be free to report the news in the public interest without fear of harassment or harm, wherever they are."
The Associated Press did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
Alexandra Ageeva, the founder of SOTAvision, who is listed by Russia as a foreign agent, said the sentences were expected.
"Huge prison terms were handed down to journalists who were simply doing their jobs. It is terrible,' Ageeva said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
20 minutes ago
- Nikkei Asia
Trump exacts a price from Nvidia, AMD for AI chip sales to China
Advanced Micro Devices can export lower-performance AI chips to China in exchange for giving 15% of the revenue to the U.S. government, under a deal with the Trump administration. © Reuters RINTARO TOBITA and KOSUKE SHIMIZU August 13, 2025 01:53 JST WASHINGTON/PALO ALTO, California -- U.S. President Donald Trump's deal with chipmakers to allow exports to China in exchange for a cut of revenue looks set to boost Washington's coffers, but the security concerns that prompted the original export restrictions still remain.
The Diplomat
2 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Censored Thai Exhibition Undermined ‘Core Interests,' China Claims
A detail from the poster advertising the 'Constellation of Complicity' exhibition, which opened on July 24 at the Bangkok Art and Culture Center in Bangkok, Thailand. China's government has accused the organizers of an exhibition in Thailand of undermining its 'core interests,' after the publication of a report that the show's co-curator removed and altered artworks at the request of the Chinese embassy in Bangkok. The Reuters news agency reported last week that the Bangkok Art and Culture Center (BACC) had removed materials about China's treatment of ethnic minorities in Tibet and Xinjiang and its policy toward Hong Kong from an exhibition featuring artists from authoritarian nations. In a written response to Reuters yesterday, the Chinese Foreign Ministry stated that the exhibition 'promoted the fallacies of so-called 'Tibetan independence', 'the East Turkestan Islamic Movement' and 'Hong Kong independence',' distorted China's policies and 'undermined China's core interests and political dignity.' The exhibit, titled 'Constellation of Complicity: Visualizing the Global Machinery of Authoritarian Solidarity,' opened at the BACC on July 24. According to the center's website, it features artworks from Myanmar, Iran, Russia, Syria, the diaspora community, and 'regions with cultural and autonomy demands.' It said that the exhibition sought to interrogate the 'formal and informal alignments between authoritarian states through the lens of artists who have lived through – or in exile from – their consequences.' Reuters' report quoted Sai, an artist from Myanmar who has co-curated the exhibition, as saying that three days after the show opened, Chinese embassy staff, accompanied by Bangkok city officials, 'entered the exhibition and demanded its shutdown.' The news agency also quoted an email dated July 30 in which BACC said: 'Due to pressure from the Chinese Embassy – transmitted through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and particularly the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, our main supporter – we have been warned that the exhibition may risk creating diplomatic tensions between Thailand and China.' The email said the gallery had 'no choice but to make certain adjustments.' According to a report by Khaosod English, China was originally included in the list of repressive countries, but the word had been covered with black tape, 'both in the Thai and English descriptions of the exhibition.' It quoted Sai as saying that the names and regional affiliations of three artists, from Hong Kong, Tibet, and the Uyghur diaspora, had been 'covered with black tape,' while the Tibetan and Uyghur flags in one installation were removed. 'Later, all of Tibetan artist Tenzin Mingyur Paldron's video works were taken down, and postcards referencing Xi Jinping and a book were removed,' he added. 'It is tragically ironic that an exhibition on authoritarian cooperation has been censored under authoritarian pressure,' Sai told Reuters. 'Thailand has long been a refuge for dissidents. This is a chilling signal to all exiled artists and activists in the region.' Sai reportedly fled abroad after Thai police sought to find him. The censorship of the exhibition is a sign of Beijing's willingness to leverage its diplomatic clout to prevent the expression of criticism of Chinese policies, whether by Chinese nationals or foreigners. Indeed, it is just the latest in a line of Chinese attempts to shut down film screenings, exhibitions, and other cultural events abroad. In 2009, Beijing demanded that the Palm Springs International Film Festival withdraw two China-related films; the same year, Chinese hackers attacked the website of the Melbourne International Film Festival over its decision to screen a documentary about the exiled Uyghur leader Rebiya Kadeer. In both cases, the organizers refused, after which Chinese films were subsequently pulled from the festival line-ups, apparently under Chinese government pressure. Similarly, in July of this year, Chinese officials sought to halt the initial screening of the Philippine film 'Food Delivery: Fresh From The West Philippine Sea,' which details the experiences of Filipino troops and fishermen facing Chinese pressure in the South China Sea. According to its makers, the film was quietly dropped from the roster of the PureGold CinePanalo Film Festival due to what its organizers described as 'external factors.' (The filmmakers later moved to an alternative venue.) Chinese diplomats also attempted – unsuccessfully – to have 'Food Delivery' removed from a film festival in New Zealand. According to correspondence seen by the New Zealand press, the Chinese Consulate in Auckland said that the documentary 'is rife with disinformation and false propaganda, serving as a political tool for Philippines to pursue illegitimate claims in the South China Sea. Its screening would severely mislead the public and send the wrong message internationally.' In many of these past cases, festival organizers and gallery owners have refused to accede to Chinese requests to withdraw films or censor artworks. According to Sai, BACC also 'never wanted to censor' the 'Constellation of Complicity' exhibition and 'showed remarkable courage and professionalism in resisting repeated demands from the Chinese Embassy.' But the reported participation of the Bangkok Metropolitan Authority in the enforcement of the exhibition's censorship sends a worrying sign of Thailand's shrinking commitment to freedom of expression – and raises fears that close Thailand-China relations will exact a cost on the Thai creative community.
The Diplomat
2 hours ago
- The Diplomat
How India Could Capitalize on Trump's Trade Moves
This is an opportunity for New Delhi to make strategic choices that don't compromise its national interests, and to showcase its commitment to strategic autonomy. On August 6, U.S. President Donald Trump announced an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods, citing New Delhi's 'direct or indirect importation of Russian Federation oil.' India's purchases 'undermine U.S. efforts to counter Russia's harmful activities…. necessitating stronger measures to address the national emergency,' the statement said. It follows Trump's decision to impose a 25 percent 'reciprocal tariff' on Indian imports to the U.S., which took effect on August 7. Together with the new import tax, effective August 27, duties on some Indian exports will be as high as 50 percent — among the highest levied on any U.S. trading partner. Following the announcement, India's Ministry of External Affairs released a strongly worded statement describing the actions as 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable.' New Delhi said it would take 'all actions necessary to protect its national interests.' Last week, in response to Trump's allegations that India was 'not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil… (but also) selling it on the open market for big profits,' New Delhi issued a strong statement highlighting how after the 'commencement of the Ukraine conflict…. the United States at that time actively encouraged such (oil) imports…for strengthening global energy markets stability.' When Trump was sworn in as president, there was optimism in New Delhi that India-U.S. relations would soar, given the great personal rapport between India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump, which was on display during the latter's first term. In fact, Modi was one of the first global leaders to be hosted by Trump in his second term. However, more recent developments, notably the conflicting messaging over Trump's role as a mediator in the India-Pakistan crisis in May this year, and Washington's re-hyphenation of New Delhi and Islamabad, has significantly strained India-U.S. ties. Besides hurting trade with India, Trump's tariffs are expected to cause a serious setback to the India-U.S. partnership. Reports suggest that New Delhi has already put on hold new weapons and aircraft procurement plans from the United States, although India's Ministry of Defense has officially denied this. While New Delhi has so far not announced any action against the U.S. for its tariffs, its moves following the announcement are significant. Instead of caving in to Washington's pressure, New Delhi has opted to double down on its ties with Russia. Just a day after Trump's tariff announcement, India's National Security Advisor Ajit Doval met with Russian President Vladimir Putin to prepare for the latter's visit to India. Doval hailed the 'strategic and special partnership' with Russia during a 'tumultuous situation' in the world. The following day, Modi spoke with Putin and both sides reaffirmed their commitment to deepen the 'Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership.' New Delhi also seems to be focusing on a diplomatic outreach to East Asia, with Modi set to visit Japan and China later this month. With India-U.S. tensions expected to spill over to multilateral platforms, such as the Quad grouping (Australia, India, Japan, and the United States), Modi's meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru signals that India's ties with Japan at the bilateral level will remain unaffected. Modi's in-person participation at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit, his first since 2022, indicates that New Delhi is rethinking its approach toward China, after the 2020 border dispute brought relations to their lowest point in decades. The resumption of tourist visas and the flurry of high-level diplomatic engagements in recent months indicate that New Delhi is adopting a more pragmatic and flexible strategy toward China. While it remains unlikely that China-India relations will return to what they were pre-2020, Trump's trade policy targeting both these Asian giants seems to be driving them to a rapprochement. Trump's selective targeting of BRICS member nations through tariffs has also provided New Delhi with the impetus to renew its engagement with the grouping. In light of its waning influence within the BRICS grouping, India should use this opportunity to re-engage with the bloc and strengthen its credentials as a Global South leader, as it prepares to take over chairmanship next year. By neglecting the Global South through his 'America First' policies, Trump is indirectly aiding the transformation of BRICS — from a loose grouping of countries to one that is increasingly investing among themselves and turning regionally to oppose superpower bloc politics. India sees itself as a force in global politics, engaging in strategic multi-alignment to secure its national objectives. A long-standing criticism of New Delhi's foreign policy choices has been that it does not look beyond tactical challenges. This is an opportunity for New Delhi to make strategic choices that don't compromise its national interests, and to showcase its commitment to strategic autonomy. It is an opportunity for India to be truly strategically multialigned, economically diversified, and deeply integrated within the extended region.
