
Ofwat ‘to be abolished and replaced with new water regulator'
Ofwat is reportedly to be abolished on Monday under recommendations from the review led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe.
Multiple reports suggest the review has concluded and Ofwat should be abolished as ministers look to replace it with a new regulator for the beleaguered industry. The regulator employs about 300 people.
Sir Jon's independent review has focused on the water sector and its regulation, with no limits on the scope of its potential recommendations.
Launching the review in October, environment secretary Steve Reed left getting rid of Ofwat altogether on the table.
'I don't rule that out. What I've asked Sir Jon to do is a root-and-branch review of the entire sector – that includes looking at regulation and the regulator,' he told Sky News at the time.
It followed years of underinvestment, a growing population and extreme weather caused by climate change have led to intense pressure on England's ageing water system, causing widespread flooding, supply issues, sewage pollution and leakages.
Public fury has swelled over the degraded state of the country's rivers, lakes and coastal waters and at a lack of investment in water infrastructure, rising bills, high dividends, debt, executive pay and bonuses at privatised water firms.
The Environment Agency (EA) this week said serious water pollution incidents rose by 60 per cent last year with three companies responsible for the majority of them.
The latest data from across England showed that Thames Water, Southern Water and Yorkshire Water were behind 81 per cent of cases, but added that there had been 'consistently poor performance' across all nine water companies.
Meanwhile, just two companies - Northumbrian Water and Wessex Water - had no serious incidents last year, meeting the EA's expectations to see a trend to zero pollution incidents by 2025.
Thames Water accounted for 33 of 75 serious incidents recorded by the EA - more than a third of the total.
Overall, the watchdog said all pollution incidents increased by 29 per cent, with water companies recording 2,801, up from 2,174 in 2023.
The EA blamed the spike on persistent underinvestment in new infrastructure, poor asset maintenance, and reduced resilience due to the impacts of climate change.
Labour MP Clive Lewis said abolishing Ofwat 'would not clean up rivers or lower bills'.
'Blaming Ofwat alone is like blaming the satnav for driving off a cliff when the road was built that way,' the left-winger said.
Mr Lewis called for water to be brought into public ownership, adding: 'The real problem is a privatised, extractive model prioritising shareholder payouts over public good.'
Downing Street said the government will wait for a final report on the water industry due next week when asked if there were plans to scrap Ofwat as the regulator.
A No 10 spokesman said: "We are waiting for Sir Jon Cunliffe's final report next week - you can expect us to set out our response after that on what more we will do to turn the sector around."
Sir Jon's interim report warned of 'deep-rooted, systemic' failures in the water sector and said Ofwat had largely lost the public's trust.
It comes as Britain's biggest water firm Thames Water faces the prospect of nationalisation, with private equity firm KKR having pulled out of a planned £3bn bailout.
Thames Water is about £19bn in debt, with MPs having been warned that it has just weeks worth of cash in hand as it seeks to avoid going bust.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Now Police Scotland chiefs say no uniformed officers to take part in Pride march
Police officers in uniform will not take part in a Pride event in Scotland's biggest city on Saturday following a landmark High Court judgment. The Mail revealed yesterday that bosses of the force faced mounting pressure to ban officers from participating in the controversial marches. On Wednesday, the High Court ruled that Northumbria Police, one of Britain's largest forces, breached impartiality by marching at an LGBT + event. On Friday Police Scotland Deputy Chief Constable Alan Speirs said no uniformed officers would march at Pride in Glasgow today - in contrast with the situation last year, when dozens of officers were paid to take part. It is understood that a decision had been taken not to participate prior to the court ruling - but plans for minor 'engagement' were dropped after the High Court judgment. This could have included officers manning stalls or taking part in related events at the Pride march. Last night Scottish Tory community safety spokesman Sharon Dowey said: 'This is a welcome decision by Police Scotland. 'Given the SNP's sustained cuts to frontline policing, it is common sense that resources should be directed towards keeping people safe.' Explaining the police position, Mr Speirs said: 'Police Scotland has vast experience in policing events and in the coming days we will continue to do so in a professional, engaging, and proportionate manner. 'Glasgow's Pride will be no different and we will continue to engage closely with event organisers, although no officers will participate in forthcoming events in uniform. 'We continue to review the UK High Court judgment on Northumbria Police's participation in Newcastle Pride 2024 and its implications. 'We will ensure Police Scotland's response to events continues to be in line with our values and code of ethics, providing a professional and impartial service which upholds the human rights of all.' The Scottish Police Federation (SPF), representing rank-and-file officers, and former senior officers, had backed the High Court ruling earlier this week, piling pressure on top brass to ban uniformed police participation in Pride events. Last night SPF general secretary David Kennedy said it 'proudly supports the principles and values of the Pride movement, including equality, inclusion, and the right of all individuals - regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity - to live free from discrimination and prejudice'. But he added that 'we also support the operational judgment that police officers should not march in uniform while on duty at Pride events'. Mr Kennedy said: 'Participating in any march while on duty, including Pride, can give rise to questions around neutrality and may impact perceptions of police objectivity. 'Officers who wish to take part in Pride events in their own time should be supported and encouraged to do so, and we welcome efforts to facilitate this wherever possible. 'Supporting Pride and supporting operational clarity are not mutually exclusive—we believe both can, and should, co-exist.' Welcoming the High Court ruling, Kate Barker, chief executive of LGB Alliance, the UK's only LGB charity (excluding transgender people) said last night: 'LGB people have been deeply distressed by how it has become hijacked by gender identity ideology in recent years.' In July last year, the Mail revealed that police officers in Scotland were paid to take part in Pride parades despite the force cutting back on fighting crime. Uniformed officers were urged to represent the overstretched force at LGBT+ events in exchange for either pay or a day off in lieu. Meanwhile, the Mail can also reveal that officers have signed Pride flags in a show of solidarity with the LGBT+ movement. In 2023, officers were photographed signing flags as part of Pride Month. Argyll and West Dunbartonshire officers marked the occasion by signing a Pride flag which was sent round police stations. Chief Superintendent Lynn Ratcliff, who was the final person to sign it to show she was an LGBT+ 'ally', said she wanted her division to be the 'most inclusive area in Police Scotland'. In 2022, a Pride flag was sent round police stations in Edinburgh to 'allow officers to sign it to show support to LGBT colleagues and communities'. Last night Kath Murray of gender-critical think-tank Murray Blackburn Mackenzie said it is 'hard to think of a clearer example of institutional capture than literally signing allegiance' to the Pride flag.


Scottish Sun
16 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Britain's sewage crisis spirals after surge in number of serious pollution incidents
SEWAGE SPILLS SOAR Britain's sewage crisis spirals after surge in number of serious pollution incidents Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) BRITAIN'S sewage crisis exploded last year with serious pollution incidents up by 60 per cent, damning stats reveal. There were 75 major incidents in 2024, up from 47 in 2023. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up Thames Water was behind 33 of last year's incidents, while Southern Water caused 15, and Yorkshire Water logged 13. It means the three firms caused 81 per cent of the most serious environmental damage. Environment Secretary Steve Reed called the figures 'disgraceful' and a 'stark reminder' of how underinvestment and weak regulation had led to record sewage pollution. He highlighted Labour's ban on bonuses for water bosses and a pledge of £104billion to upgrade failing sewage pipes. READ MORE ON SEWAGE SPILLS RECORD WATER FINE Thames Water hit with largest ever water company fine over sewage spills And on Monday, he will receive an independent review of the water industry, paving the way for root-and-branch reform. He is expected to promise to halve spills by 2030 and ensure bills do not spiral. Sources say he could even scrap watchdog Ofwat — which has been criticised for failing to hold firms to account. The Environment Agency report also revealed 2,801 total pollution incidents in 2024, up from 2,174 in 2023. Raw sewage floods street of iconic Scots golfing town


The Sun
17 minutes ago
- The Sun
Israel's ambassador to Britain says she has ‘no confidence' in BBC's head of news following Hamas remarks
ISRAEL'S ambassador to Britain says she has 'no confidence' in the BBC's head of news following controversial remarks about Hamas. Tzipi Hotovely slammed Corporation executive Deborah Turness for insisting there is a difference between Hamas' political leadership and its military wing. 2 Ms Turness sparked a row this week when she told an all-staff call on the BBC's Gaza documentary scandal that 'we need to continually remind people of the difference'. It is despite the British government saying any distinction is 'artificial' and Hamas is a 'single terrorist organisation'. In a letter to BBC boss Tim Davie, Ms Hotovely said: 'This is an utterly outrageous position to take… it shows a shocking lack of understanding about the nature of Hamas by the head of BBC News.' She added: 'I have absolutely no confidence in Mrs Turness's ability to deal with this issue sufficiently and believe that a fundamental change is required in the approach of the BBC to address this systemic issue properly.' A BBC spokesman said earlier this week that Ms Turness was not implying that Hamas was a single terrorist organisation. They added: 'The BBC constantly makes clear on our programmes and platforms that Hamas are a proscribed terrorist organisation by the UK Government and others. 'We are also clear that we need to describe to our audiences the complexities of life in Gaza, including within the structure of Hamas, which has run the civilian functions of Gaza.' 2