
Our neighbour built TWO new builds next to our quaint cottages – we'll buy popcorn & watch council rip them down
The controversial semi-detached homes sprung up on the site of a former pub car park in Bradford, West Yorkshire.
4
4
4
But the properties, which one neighbour vehemently opposes, were built after their planning permission timeframe had lapsed.
Now locals are demanding action over the development - which they claim towers over surrounding heritage cottages and damages the area's character.
Residents have also called on council officials to make an example of developers who flout planning laws and later seek retrospective approval.
Helen Naylor, 50, said: "People in Bradford build exactly what they like, when they like, how they like. And to hell with all rules and regulations.
"The council needs to get its act together because in Bradford, nobody seems to care.
"I think everyone around here has just had enough of it."
The homes appeared in just under a year on the site of the long-disused pub car park in the Heaton area of the city, with one listed for sale online as a five-bedroom, three-storey property.
Although permission was granted in 2015 for a modest development, residents claim that lapsed long before building began.
Now, both homes face potential demolition if Bradford Council refuses to approve the scheme in hindsight.
Neighbour Jane Loe, 68, said: "It's quite funny in a way, but also horrible for those who live here.
"My neighbour and I said we're buying popcorn if and when they make them pull it down.
"We're going to sit out here and laugh."
Ms Loe, who lives opposite the new houses with husband Nick Swift, 76, has claimed that the final product looks even worse than the one that was proposed.
She explained: "The original design was unattractive but what they've actually built is even worse."
The developer, named in council documents as Amjad Yaqoob, reportedly believed the 2015 approval still applied when he purchased the land.
He has claimed to have been unaware that the consent had lapsed.
Bradford Council has confirmed that no valid permission was in place when the two homes were built.
A decision on the retrospective application is expected in the coming weeks.
Neighbours close to the new-build homes say they hope the council will take firm action.
Mr Yaqoob, who runs a building company in Bradford, declined to comment when approached.
However, architects working on his behalf told Bradford Council that there was "never any malicious intent to build something without approval", and claimed the development was "very similar" to the previously approved plans.
The firm added: "The materials used are sympathetic to the area, and there are no additional issues of overlooking or overbearing.
"We therefore feel the retrospective application should be approved.'
The developer's agents, P.N. Bakes Architectural Consultancy, argue that the homes are "very similar" to the 2015 plans and say their client believed a "material start" had already been made.
Bradford Council say enforcement action will be "reviewed" once a decision is made.
A spokesman said: "Our Planning Enforcement Team have investigated reports of these works being carried out without planning permission.
"As a planning application has now been submitted, the matter of enforcement will be reviewed once a decision on planning permission has been made, as is standard practice nationally."
4
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
17 minutes ago
- Times
Dale Vince blames ‘shadowy lawyers working for Israel' for flag row
Dale Vince, the green energy tycoon, has refused to apply for planning permission to fly an enormous Palestinian flag from his business headquarters, claiming he is fighting a tactic used by a 'shadowy group of lawyers' acting for Israel. Vince, who has donated more than £5 million to the Labour Party, has been told by Stroud district council that flying the flag of a state not recognised by the UK counts as an advertisement under town and country planning law and requires permission. He has refused to remove the flag from the building, which dominates the main route into Stroud, Gloucestershire, and says planning law states 'any country's national flag' can be flown without permission. He argues that because Palestine is recognised as a sovereign nation by 147 of the 193 UN member states, the flag falls within the meaning of a 'country flag'.


The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
Aldi joins hot air brush craze with rock-bottom £12.99 option – and similar gadgets cost over £100 more
WITH summer in full swing, we're all looking for those perfect holiday looks - from beach waves to a flawless blow-dry that lasts all night. But getting that salon-perfect hair doesn't have to mean spending a fortune. 2 While the high-end brands have dominated the market, leaving us with serious gadget envy, Aldi has launched a new product that proves you can get the hair of your dreams without breaking the bank. The supermarket has joined the hot air brush craze with a rock-bottom £12.99 option, and it's a total game-changer. While popular stylers from the likes of Dyson and ghd can cost over £100 more, Aldi's budget-friendly buy promises to deliver smooth, voluminous hair with minimal effort. The hot air brush is part of their Specialbuy range and can be used on both wet and dry hair. It's no surprise that the tool is making waves, with the hashtag #hotairbrush racking up over 42 million views on TikTok as everyone tries to achieve that professional blow-dry look at home. And if you need a new hairdryer to go with it, Aldi is also bringing back its bestselling Ionic Hairdryer for the same low price of £12.99. It comes with three heat settings, two speed options, a cool shot function, and overheat protection. Both the Hot Air Brush and the Ionic Hairdryer will be available in stores nationwide starting August 21st. But as with all Specialbuys, they're only available while stocks last, so you'll have to be quick to get your hands on them. Aldi has also launched a new skincare and beauty dupe that will have shoppers racing to stores. All upcoming 'Aldi Finds' in the middle aisle next week – including portable chargers, power toothbrushes & dryer balls The budget supermarket's new £3.99 Tanning Facial Drops promise to give a summer glow without the sun, rivalling the much more expensive Tan Luxe Illuminating Face Drops and saving you £32. Perfect for packing in your holiday bag, the 30ml drops come in two shades - 'Light to Medium' and 'Medium to Dark' - and are formulated with skin-loving ingredients like Vitamin E, Aloe Vera, and Raspberry Fruit Extract. But the dupe fun doesn't stop there. Aldi has also released a £1.99 Lacura Prism fragrance, which shoppers are claiming is "nearly identical" to the iconic Prada Paradoxe, which can cost upwards of £72 for a 30ml bottle. This travel-friendly scent is another budget-friendly way to get a luxury feel for less. 2 The supermarket has also launched a new £1.99 product that promises to instantly refresh your home and save you a fortune on repainting. The supermarket's new Touch Up Markers are the perfect solution for covering up scratches, dents, and stains on surfaces like furniture, cabinets, and wood. Landing in stores as part of Aldi's Specialbuys, these bargain pens come in a variety of colours, including pine, black/brown, white, and both grey and white grout. The quick-drying formula means you can easily touch up marked areas without worrying about smudges, making them ideal for a quick and effortless home makeover. What are the best Aldi beauty dupes? ALDI has become well-known for its affordable beauty dupes that often rival high-end brands in terms of quality and effectiveness. Here are some of the best Aldi beauty dupes that have garnered rave reviews: Lacura Healthy Glow Exfoliating Tonic Dupe for: Pixi Glow Tonic Price: £3.99 (compared to Pixi's £18) Description: This exfoliating tonic contains glycolic acid and works to gently exfoliate and brighten the skin. It's a fantastic, budget-friendly alternative to the popular Pixi Glow Tonic. Lacura Q10 Renew Anti-Wrinkle Day Cream Dupe for: Nivea Q10 Plus Anti-Wrinkle Day Cream Price: £1.45 (compared to Nivea's £10) Lacura Caviar Illumination Day Cream Dupe for: La Prairie Skin Caviar Luxe Cream Price: £6.99 (compared to La Prairie's £292) Lacura Hot Cloth Cleanser Dupe for: Liz Earle Cleanse & Polish Hot Cloth Cleanser Price: £3.99 (compared to Liz Earle's £17.50) Lacura Snapshot Ready Foundation Primer Dupe for: Smashbox Photo Finish Foundation Primer Price: £5.99 (compared to Smashbox's £26) Lacura Miracle Cream Dupe for: Elizabeth Arden Eight Hour Cream Price: £3.99 (compared to Elizabeth Arden's £28) Lacura Ebony Rose Face Mask Dupe for: Fresh Rose Face Mask Price: £6.99 (compared to Fresh's £52) Lacura Charcoal Clearing Mudmask Dupe for: GlamGlow Supermud Clearing Treatment Price: £5.99 (compared to GlamGlow's £42) Lacura Velvet Touch Foundation Dupe for: Estée Lauder Double Wear Foundation Price: £5.99 (compared to Estée Lauder's £34) Lacura Tinted Lip Oils Dupe for: Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Tinted Oil


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Rachel Reeves risk repeating a mistake if she changes inheritance tax
Whenever a government is desperate to raise funds, there is a good chance it will revisit mad and bad ideas before trying something that is proven to work. As Rachel Reeves stares at the prospect of a black hole in the public finances — ranging from £20 billion to £70 billion, according to various estimates — it is clear that the chancellor cannot dig down the back of the sofa to plug the gap at the next budget. If these estimates are to be believed, dramatic spending cuts or big tax rises will be required to keep within her fiscal rules. Some Labour figures have duly called for a wealth tax, to squeeze the pips out of the country's richest who are already fleeing in rising numbers. Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, is said to have privately urged Ms Reeves to clamp down on the rich; Lord Kinnock, the former party leader, has done so publicly. Thankfully this unwise idea has been dismissed as 'daft' by Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, which hopefully means it has been discarded. Yet another such bad idea has floated into the public domain: reworking inheritance tax. Reports suggest that Treasury officials have been tasked with examining how assets are being given away before death to reduce liabilities. Under current rules, gifts made seven years or more before someone's death are not captured by inheritance tax. Any gifts handed over after that are taxed at varying rates. The Treasury is said to be examining whether a lifetime cap should be introduced and whether the so-called 'taper rates' on gifts given up to seven years beforehand need to be reworked. It is unclear whether these ideas have yet to reach the chancellor's desk. • Angela Rayner gives Labour a 12-month mission to save itself Were Ms Reeves to pursue changes to inheritance tax, it would represent the apotheosis of the Starmer government's all-pain, no-gain approach to governing. First, changing the rules on inheritance tax would not raise the projected £40 billion required to plug the gap in the public finances. Families would simply find workarounds to avoid strenuous new levies, just as they have done under the present regime. There is a risk that the government would go to great effort to craft new inheritance tax rules, only to find that it fails to deliver what was hoped for and it is back to square one. Second, it is political suicide. There are few issues more likely to incite fury among the electorate than a stricter inheritance tax regime. Swathes of middle England who have carefully accrued capital will punish any party that seeks to take it away. Gordon Brown realised this when mulling over calling an election in 2007, taking fright from the Conservative's plans to raise the inheritance tax threshold to £1 million. And finally, it is morally wrong. Inheritance tax is a levy on those who have worked hard throughout their lives to earn something to pass onto the next generation. The chancellor must draw a line under this speculation, which will prove damaging to her personally the longer it continues. There are better options available, such as tackling the ballooning welfare bill, with spending on disability benefits set to reach £100 billion by the end of the decade. There is also the dire state of productivity in the public sector, which is costing the economy £80 billion a year, as this newspaper reported yesterday. After £40 billion of tax rises in her first budget suffocated economic growth, Ms Reeves would be wise to learn and not repeat the same error.