All-American skier dies from head injury at Lake Tahoe resort
A former NCAA All-American skier died in an accident on the slopes in the Greater Lake Tahoe area on Saturday, authorities said.
Ellery "Ellie" Curtis, 26, of San Francisco suffered a head injury and was pronounced dead at the Palisades Tahoe resort in Olympic Valley, according to the Placer County Sheriff's Department.
The Sheriff's Department received a distress call at 3:45 p.m., but Curtis was already dead by the time deputies arrived, according to sheriff's spokesperson Elise Soviar.
Sheriff's officials did not provide any other details and directed inquiries to Palisades Tahoe.
The ski resort did not respond to questions from The Times, but said in a statement that they were "deeply saddened" by the accident and referred to Curtis as a "beloved skier."
Read more: A Tahoe snowboarder was 'buried alive' on the slopes. Lawsuit says the resort is to blame
Matt Lorelli, a senior editor for the skiing and resort digital site Powder, wrote that Curtis suffered severe injuries while descending Ahhh Chute, "a challenging trail" on Palisades' famous KT-22 lift.
Curtis' death is one of three fatalities that occurred in the area in the last two weeks.
On March 29, Corona resident Roman Lacayo died in a snowboarding accident at the Kirkwood Ski Resort and 7-year-old Reno resident Adelyn Grimes was killed by a falling boulder at the Diamond Peak Ski Resort at Incline Village.
While attending Dartmouth College, Curtis was a second team All-American in the giant slalom, placing eighth at the NCAA championships in March 2022 in Park City, Utah. Curtis' father, uncle and a cousin also attended the Ivy League school.
Read more: Ski slopes seem to be getting more dangerous. The resorts don't want to talk about it
"Ellie Curtis was a hardworking, passionate and driven student athlete whose passions went beyond the snow," her Dartmouth coaches, John C. Dwyer and Anny Jenny, said in an email. "Ellie was kind, caring and loved to be involved in many organizations and environmental projects."
Curtis was also a three-time National Collegiate All-Academic Ski Team member, meaning she earned a cumulative 3.5 grade point average and competed in one of three NCAA Regional Championships.
Curtis worked as an analyst for the California Public Utilities Commission, according to her LinkedIn profile.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Texas ex Scottie Scheffler eyes U.S. Open glory at Oakmont after PGA Championship Triumph
Texas ex Scottie Scheffler eyes U.S. Open glory at Oakmont after PGA Championship Triumph Scheffler helped lead the Longhorns to NCAA prominence in the golf field. Scottie Scheffler enters the 2025 U.S. Open at Oakmont Country Club riding a wave of dominance that has the golf world taking notice—and the oddsmakers making history. After a relatively slow start to the season by his lofty standards, Scheffler has surged to win three of his last four events, including victory at the PGA Championship at Quail Hollow last month. The former Texas Longhorn has now held the world No. 1 ranking for 107 consecutive weeks and is a strong contender for what would be a record-tying fourth straight PGA Tour Player of the Year award. Scheffler's recent run is drawing comparisons to Tiger Woods, the gold standard of professional golf excellence. Woods remains the only player in recent memory to have enjoyed a stretch as dominant as Scheffler's current form. Scheffler is not just headlining the field at Oakmont—he is the overwhelming favorite. According to BetMGM, his +275 odds to win are the shortest for any player in a major since Woods in 2009. Trailing Scheffler in the betting are defending U.S. Open champion Bryson DeChambeau, 2025 Masters winner Rory McIlroy, and two-time major champion Jon Rahm. Oakmont, widely considered one of the toughest courses in the world, presents a stern test for the field. The last time the U.S. Open was held here in 2016, only six players finished even or under par. Scheffler, then an amateur and student at Texas, made his major championship debut at Oakmont that year. He shot a one-under 69 in the opening round but followed with a 78 on Friday, missing the cut by a single stroke. 'I remember coming here and thinking it was really fun, really cool to be playing in the U.S. Open,' Scheffler said Tuesday in a pre-tournament press conference. 'You know, it was my first major and it was maybe my third start on the pro tour at the time ... It definitely made me excited to get out here for real because it was a really fun week. Obviously, I had a really good first round. I didn't play as well in the second, and that was a tough pill to swallow, missing the cut by one.' The question asked to Justin Thomas was simple. 'What is Scottie Scheffler doing that is so special, what do you say?' 'What is he doing?' Thomas responded, during his pre-tournament press conference at the U.S. Open. 'Well, everything.' You've heard that refrain before.… — (@GOLF_com) June 10, 2025 Scheffler's game has matured since that first U.S. Open appearance. He now boasts the best birdie-to-bogey ratio on the PGA Tour this season, a testament to his consistency and composure under pressure. As he prepares for another test at Oakmont, Scheffler remains focused on his own game, despite the growing chatter around his status as the betting favorite. 'Starting Thursday morning, we're at even par and it's up to me to go out there and play against the golf course and see what I can do,' Scheffler said. Scheffler will tee off alongside Collin Morikawa and Viktor Hovland at 1:25 p.m. ET on Thursday as he seeks his second major title of the season—and perhaps another step toward golf history.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
College World Series 2025 team rankings: The eight teams in Omaha from best to worst
College World Series 2025 team rankings: The eight teams in Omaha from best to worst Show Caption Hide Caption Which NCAA baseball teams could blow up the bracket The Montgomery Advertiser's Adam Cole and The Southwest Times Record's Jackson Fuller break down who could wreck the tournament bracket. The group of teams set to descend on Omaha, Nebraska, for the premier event in college baseball is an intriguing mix of longtime powers and recent upstarts. Perhaps the most curious fact is this – none of the eight participants in this year's College World Series made it there last year. That is not to say there is no tradition of winning among the participants. Five of the eight programs have earned titles within the last 13 years. The list of past champions, however, does not include the team that should probably be considered the favorite to claim the crown this season. Here's how we'd rank the Omaha eight, bearing in mind as always that at this juncture any of them could win the whole thing. No. 1 Arkansas Will this 12th trip to the CWS finally be the year that the first championship will be coming home to Fayetteville with the Razorbacks? Arkansas look to be the most complete team of the group, with the right mix of fire power at the plate and pitching depth to succeed on the big stage. They've dominated in the postseason, winning all five games with a combined margin of 41-13. No. 2 Coastal Carolina Built around superb pitching and timely run support, the Chanticleers are anything but underdogs in this field despite playing outside the Power Four conferences. The program hasn't been back to Omaha since its groundbreaking run to the title in 2016, but this year's version is more than capable of capturing that magic once again. Coastal enters this round on a 23-game winning streak and proved its mettle in sweeping Auburn on the road last weekend. DIVERSE FIELD: College World Series highlights what college sports is about No. 3 LSU Historically the most accomplished squad here, the Tigers have the bats to add an eight trophy to their collection in Baton Rouge. They also boast two excellent starters - Kade Anderson and Anthony Eyanson - and reliever Zac Cowan. Being in the same half of the bracket as Arkansas is the biggest obstacle, but it also creates a first game should be appointment viewing Saturday night. No. 4 UCLA It's been a while for the Bruins, who haven't been back to Omaha since claiming the program's first baseball title in 2013. The pitching staff - in particular starter Michael Barnett - has answered the bell thus far in the postseason, which should continue to serve the team well at Charles Schwab Field where runs can be hard to come by. No. 5 Oregon State The Beavers represent the Pac-12's old guard as well as the league's future. In the here and now though, the decision to make a go of it as an independent in 2025 has worked out well. They were forced to travel for the majority of games and that experience helped shape them for difficult challenges when facing elimination in both the regionals and super regionals. Oregon State might not have the number of proven bullpen arms as others in this field, but it has power throughout the lineup, led by 2B Aiva Arquette, and are never out of a game. No. 6 Louisville The super regionals were not nearly as good for the ACC as the earlier rounds, as the Cardinals are the only squad among the league's five entries to survive the second weekend. But now that they've reached the CWS for the sixth time in program history and first since 2019, they might have what it takes to claim their initial title. The outfield duo of Lucas Moore and Zion Rose leads the offense. Louisville's pitching has been outstanding in the postseason and could propel a run to the championship series. No. 7 Arizona Credit the Wildcats for getting off the deck after being bludgeoned for 18 runs in their series opener at North Carolina. They then rallied late in the next two games to knock off the No. 1 team in the coaches poll. Arizona is a program full of championship pedigree. This is its 18th trip to Omaha. The Wildcats play sound defense in the field and are capable of putting up a high run total themselves, but they must avoid more meltdowns from the mound like that opener against the Tar Heels last week. No. 8 Murray State The Racers, just the fourth No. 4 regional seed to make it all the way to Omaha, are sure to be fan favorites. The thing they do best is hit. They rank 11th in score and have generated 70 runs in seven tournament games. But the fact that they're made it this far indicates they can get key outs when needed as well. Going through the loser's bracket may be difficult but anything is possible if Murray State can win early and save arms.
Indianapolis Star
3 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Paying players, private equity, roster limits: What House settlement means for Purdue
Purdue athletic director Mike Bobinski has publicly welcomed the revenue sharing era of college sports as a way to even the playing field and stabilize a volatile name, image and likeness market. When judge Claudia Wilken gave final approval to terms of the House vs. NCAA settlement last week, Bobinski's letter to the Purdue community stressed the competitive upside — and the financial urgency — for the Boilermakers. The initial $20.5 million which can be shared — and which Bobinski has said Purdue will fully utilize — is not the only added expense. Bobinski said Purdue will increase the number of athletic scholarships awarded in some sports. He asked for expanded support for the John Purdue Club, the primary athletics fundraising organization. He also urged contributions to athletics through the university's "Victories & Heroes: Your Campaign for Purdue" initiative. "This moment requires all of us — alumni, fans, donor and friends — to step up and be bold," Bobinski wrote. "… Your support is not just appreciated — it is absolutely essential." Here's what we know about what the settlement term means for Purdue, and how it is moving forward. Bobinski stated early and often Purdue will participate fully in revenue sharing. That $20.5 million obligation would have equated to 15.2% of the athletic department's income for the 2023-24 fiscal year based on its annual report to the NCAA. (Figures for 2024-25 are not yet available.) Additionally, the NCAA's agreement to pay $2.6 billion in back pay damages to former athletes come out of its annual distributions to member schools. Purdue expects to receive about $1.2 million per year less from the NCAA for the next decade. It received $4.47 million in 2023-24. Dating back to the hire of Barry Odom in December, both Bobinski and President Mung Chiang have suggested a change to the university's financial relationship with athletics will help close the budget gap. Per records compiled by the USA Today Network in partnership with the Knight-Newhouse College Athletics Database, Purdue was one of 11 Division I athletic programs from the more than 230 public schools in the 2023 fiscal year which either received no revenue from its university (eight) or returned any revenue it received (three). Among the ways the university could help athletics would be to take on debt obligations. Purdue listed $14.5 million in "debt service, leases or rental fees" on its 2023-24 NCAA financial report. Direct overhead and administrative expenses — things like facilities maintenance, security, insurance and utilities — accounted for almost $13 million in expenses. An announcement on the specific details will come. Whatever the solution, belt-tightening alone won't get an already lean athletic department to its $20.5 million goal. It remains to be seen how transparent Purdue will be about which sports receive what percentage of the revenue-sharing pool. However, based on reports from around the country, estimates have power conference schools allotting 70% to 75% to football and 15% to 20% to men's basketball. The sports which by far bring in the most money will receive the lion's share. Not much will change for Purdue's marquee sports. Odom said he expects to operate on the traditional 85-scholarship limit within the new roster limit of 105. Walk-ons can make up that gap. Men's basketball can use up to 15 scholarships, but don't expect coach Matt Painter to fill up that allotment often, if at all. Keeping 13 players satisfied with their roles in any given year is difficult enough. Also, teams have the option of grandfathering in current athletes who would otherwise put them over those roster limits. This most likely applies to walk-ons who will be allowed to keep their spot until their career is over. Bobinski's mention of adding scholarships might impact the non-full scholarship sports, which is everything outside of football, men's and women's basketball and volleyball. Baseball used to be limited to 11.7 scholarships, distributed at the coach's discretion, on a roster three or four times that numberr. Going forward, teams are not beholden to those scholarship limits. However, they cannot exceed newly established roster limits. Baseball, for instance, can have up to 34 players on its roster. Purrdue's roster from this past season included 44 names. In most other sports, based on rosters posted on the athletics website, Purdue operated below or near the new limits. It has known this new structure was coming for months. Within the Big Ten, the impact will likely vary from school to school. In purely speculative example, historic wrestling powers Iowa and Penn State could offer more scholarships in that sport than most schools. Athletes can still earn income beyond their revenue share cut through those avenues currently associated with NIL: endorsements, brand campaigns, online influencing, etc. In his letter, Bobinski announced the formation of Boiler BrandWorks. Described as an "in-house student-athlete marketing and brand-building unit," this new arm of the athletic department will help athletes find and develop NIL deals with local and national businesses. 'Not everybody is marketable.' Purdue coach Matt Painter welcomes 'balance' House settlement brings Per the university's athletics careers website, it is hiring a director of NIL strategy and athlete marketing who will oversee Boiler BrandWorks. Even with revenue share, programs will need to show they can maximize the earnings potential of their most marketable athletes. (Think Zach Edey, Braden Smith or football quarterbacks.) This new administrator and department are responsible for making that happen. The 501c3 non-profit collective associated with the athletic department continues to operate. It was involved with the finalization of deal such as those struck by returning and incoming men's basketball players and football's two dozen-plus spring transfer portal additions. Last winter, though, Bobinski predicted the end of the philanthropic model of NIL fundraising. Schools will no longer need to hook players up with deals attached to charitable organizations or activities. However, a 501c6 entity known as Boiler Up Inc. also operates in conjunction with Boilermaker Alliance. The main difference between the two types of non-profits is Boiler Up Inc. can raise money through memberships or fundraising without any charitable endeavors. This setup or something similar is fairly common at power conference athletic programs. In recent months, more collectives have begun sunsetting their 501c3 to focus on their other platform — some of which are for-profit LLCs. IU's Hoosiers For Good announced last December it would cease operations early this year. Purdue could keep some version of the current collective to facilitate fundraising beyond the John Purdue Club and the new, in-house marketing arm. College athletic programs across the country have begun to partner with private equity firms, or are exploring the idea. These firms would not take a stake in the athletic program. Rather, they would offer a private source of credit paid back over time. Finance bump: Indiana, Purdue received roughly $62 million of Big Ten's $928 million in revenue. What it means Such a relationship could make sense for Purdue if it directly led to a long-term revenue enhancement. For example, taking private credit to fund an important facility or resource enhancement without asking for the money from the university. However, Purdue prides itself on fiscal responsibility. It typically does not lead the pack in creative ways to spend money it does not have. This could be a realistic opportunity in time, depending on how the market evolves.
