Glider buses best fix for Liverpool city transport woes
Glider buses funded by a £100m transport boost for Liverpool will be "the best quick fix" to link up the city's airport and football stadia, the city region mayor has said.Liverpool City Region has been handed £1.6bn by Chancellor Rachel Reeves as part of a £15bn transport spending announcement. The £100m will be spent on a new rapid transit bus system on three routes to take passengers from Liverpool John Lennon airport to the city centre and to Liverpool and Everton's stadiums, Steve Rotheram said.Money will also be spent on a new fleet of buses across the city region, being rolled out in St Helens first in 2026, and on three new railway stations.
The challenge of how to transport people from the airport into the city centre was a central debate in last year's Liverpool City Region mayoral election. The nearest railway station is Liverpool South Parkway, which still requires passengers to catch a bus or a taxi to reach the terminal building. Transport for fans attending Everton's new stadium has also faced criticism and it is hoped the gliders would address these concerns, although a timescale for their introduction has not yet been published.Rotheram said the gliders were something he had first seen in Belfast.
'Fill the gaps'
The 59ft (18m) articulated vehicles can carry about 30% more passengers than an average double decker bus. They have been described as "bendy buses" and look a bit like trams but have wheels and are designed to operate on roads. In Belfast they run on dedicated lanes. Rotheram said details needed to be worked out on how the vehicles would use the roads in Liverpool but part of the money announced earlier would pay for any required infrastructure improvements.Opposition councillors in Liverpool have criticised the plans for not being ambitious enough.But Rotheram said the gliders would "fill in the gaps" in the city's transport network. He told BBC Radio Merseyside: "We need to connect those areas with significant footfall much more quickly."A planned Liverpool tram system – Merseytram - which would have linked Liverpool's major landmarks and eventually other parts of Merseyside was scrapped in 2013.Asked if the gliders were a poor relation to a tram system, the metro mayor said: "We haven't got a tram system and if we had a tram system like we should have done with Merseytram then I would be using this money to extend that and build on it but we would need an act of parliament to start that journey." Rotheram said he would "bite your hand off" for trams in the region and added it might be something future politicians could resurrect, but with the gliders scheme "we've asked what can be done most quickly".
Leader of the opposition Liberal Democrat group on Liverpool City Council councillor Carl Cashman said the investment in Liverpool was welcome but described it as a "second best" deal.He said: "Manchester, Yorkshire and Birmingham get new tram lines while Liverpool is left behind with more of the same. Buses."Alan Gibbons who leads the Community Independent group of councillors in Liverpool said the announcement of these bus routes "falls far short of the needs of the city".He added: "It is ridiculous there is no Merseyrail train link to John Lennon Airport. "Transport links in this city are inadequate, particularly when it comes to cross-city travel. So much more is needed."Money from the £1.6bn pot will also be invested in the city region's rail network, with three new stations – Carr Mill in St Helens, Woodchurch in Wirral, and Daresbury in Halton.Rotheram said: "We have seen with our new stations at Maghull North and Headbolt lane in Kirkby that people who might not have used public transport jump on the train." A new station has already been agreed for Liverpool's Baltic area.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Copy Reform and you'll get eaten, Kinnock tells Starmer
Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader who now sits in the House of Lords, said the Prime Minister had been 'not well advised' on how to tackle the rise of Nigel Farage's party. He suggested that attempts to ape Reform's language were 'mortally stupid', and advised the party that 'achievement' in Government was the best way to counter the Reform threat. Lord Kinnock told Prospect Magazine: 'Appeasers get eaten. It's very important to remember that if people are offered two versions of a particular political brand, they will always choose the genuine one.' He added: 'If a progressive party is trying to use the vocabulary of isolationism or segregation or division, it's the same. It is silly to do that. It isn't evil, but it is very, very silly – maybe mortally stupid.' The former Labour leader's intervention is the latest development in growing tensions within the Labour Party about how to tackle the rising tide of Reform support. His remarks came after the Prime Minister announced measures to tackle immigration and a tightening of the system, warning that without such a move the UK risked becoming an 'island of strangers'. The speech followed Labour 's drubbing in the local elections last month, where Reform won hundreds of council seats and seized the parliamentary seat of Runcorn and Helsby. The comments were supported by some figures in Red Wall seats, which are under greater threat from the surge in Reform support, but denounced by many Left-wing Labour MPs. Lord Kinnock said: 'I think there are elements in and around the Labour party encouraging that as a way of responding to Reform, and they are fundamentally, 100 per cent, 22-carat wrong.' He added: 'I don't fear Reform, but I do think we ought to fight them rather harder and with more purpose.' The peer told the magazine: 'The playbook is familiar to anybody who studied the 1930s in Europe and or indeed in the United States of America. 'I'm not saying we are in any sense slipping towards some kind of fascist system… But those factors and the way in which they generate division and envy and isolationism – they're unhealthy features of any democracy.' On how to beat Reform, he said: 'Nothing replaces achievement in government, [concentrating on] what people regard to be the primary issues on the agenda, which is to say: health, decent jobs, affordable costs and wages that can meet those costs.' Lord Kinnock led the Labour Party before famously losing the 1992 election to Sir John Major despite the polls being in his favour, leading to another five years of Conservative rule. The pro-Europe politician said that decisions to use phrases such as 'island of strangers' and not to scrap the two-child benefit cap were based on post-Brexit preconceptions of the electorate. He said: 'Certainly there were elements among the advisory team who had an overreaction to the reason for, and the consequence of, the Brexit referendum vote. I think that overreaction has lasted through till now. 'I don't think that they are reactionary individuals. I don't think they're frightened individuals. I think they have overreacted to a misinterpretation of what happened in 2016.' The former leader went on to suggest that Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, should consider a wealth tax, citing as an example a two per cent levy on assets above £10 million. 'Property taxation in our country, asset taxation, is outdated,' he added, as he urged the party's senior figures to be bolder. 'There's a degree of steadiness from Keir which, on a good day, is very, very reassuring. However, that can translate into a paralytic caution. That means that this government, much as I love them – and they know I do – has got a kind of audacity deficit.' Lord Kinnock appeared at Sir Keir's victory speech on the morning of July 5, when the Prime Minister led the party to a landslide win.
The Sun
18 minutes ago
- The Sun
£4million a DAY migrant hotel bill will continue to spiral unless Labour does three things
Trip advisors THE woke brigade in the Home Office who spent years revolting against Tory efforts to curb illegal migration finally have an incentive to drop their opposition. Sensibly, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said she will spare deep cuts in the department — and potential job losses — IF it saves money on the spiralling hotel bill for migrants. 1 And the faster Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's army of leftie civil servants meet these new targets, the more cash she can keep for other projects. Skint Britain forks out £4million every day to house people who largely have no right to be here. The problem is that the number of new arrivals isn't slowing down. Unless Labour ends the golden ticket to the El Dorado paradise of benefits, free housing and illegal work, that hotel bill will continue to rise. Reform act He has Labour pedalling leftwards over welfare and the Tories rightwards on immigration. The Reform leader's ear is well-tuned to discontent with the Government. A desire for real change has delivered control of local councils to his fledgling party for the first time. His problem now is how to show Reform can actually govern — without falling into mini-meltdowns like the ones caused by the exits of chairman Zia Yusuf and MP Rupert Lowe. Reform's surge has been stunning. But being a one-showman band will only get Farage so far. Court out COULD the days of the European Court of Human Rights ruling over our borders finally be numbered? Even the head of the European Council, which oversees the unelected court, is starting to accept it will have to adapt to the public's concerns. Leaders across Europe are waking up to the problems caused by mass migration and want urgent legal reform. And Tory leader Kemi Badenoch is ready to quit the court — as is Reform. Roll with it Apparently, it all kicked off in Tokyo after tourists saw a waxwork of Greggs' pastry snack at Madame Tussauds. No word yet on whether it tasted better than a vegan sausage roll.
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Family faces shock £1,400 demand for meter switch-off or face having no heating
An energy firm tried to charge a Scots family £1,400 to change their meter before it is switched off this month, it has emerged. MSPs and consumer groups last night issued a warning to families that their energy supplier must pay the cost of replacing Radio Teleswitching Systems (RTS) meters. It follows revelations that a supplier tried to charge one Orkney household £1,400 to replace their meter, including £200 for a hotel booking, £382 for a ferry and £820 for a day's work. The supplier – which has not been named – only backtracked from forcing the family to pay when challenged by Liam McArthur, Liberal Democrat MSP for Orkney. It triggered a warning that customers should never pay for work which needs to take place before the RTS system is shut down at the end of this month. As of last month, 124,864 of the RTS meters still needed to be replaced in Scotland. Mr McArthur, said: 'I am deeply concerned to hear reports of some energy suppliers attempting to charge constituents to have their RTS meters replaced with smart meters. 'It is the obligation of suppliers to ensure customers have a working meter, and that there are no upfront costs for customers, including businesses, who pay for their meters through billing. 'Suppliers should also not be telling customers in places such as Orkney that they are required to cover costs related to accommodation or travel for engineers. This is simply not the case.' Mr McArthur said he contacted the supplier and it dropped the demand for payment. The RTS system – a feature of older electricity meters linked to heating and hot water usage – uses a longwave radio frequency to switch between peak and off-peak rates. But the technology is becoming obsolete and energy firms have a deadline to change customers' meters by June 30. It has led to concerns that some households could lose their heating and hot water if their meter is not replaced in time. Andrew Bartlett, chief executive of Advice Direct Scotland, which runs said: 'Suppliers should install smart meters at no cost. If that is not possible, they still have a duty to replace RTS meters with a suitable alternative, and customers should not be charged.' Advice Direct Scotland supported one customer who faced a £700 kitchen repair bill following a meter replacement, and another quoted £1,290 to move a fuse by an inch for a smart meter. Energy UK, which represents most suppliers but not the one responsible for imposing the £1,400 charge in Orkney, said: 'Customers should not expect to pay for an RTS meter replacement. We also urge customers to look out for scammers pretending to be suppliers.' A spokesman for Ofgem said: 'We will look into this and hold to account any supplier that breaches our rules.'
