Questions loom over potential Trump-Putin summit
Much is still unknown about the meeting, including when, where — and even whether — it will happen.
Both the White House and the Kremlin have indicated the meeting will take place soon, potentially as early as next week. But officials did not offer details on where it would take place, how long it would last or who would be involved.
Trump told European leaders on a call on Wednesday that his idea was to meet with Putin and then have a trilateral meeting with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. It was unclear if all parties would agree to such a setup, or who else might attend.
Trump told reporters Thursday that Zelensky's attendance was not a prerequisite for him to meet with Putin.
Possible venues could include Turkey, which has served as a mediator for U.S.-Russian prisoner swaps. The United Arab Emirates has also mediated between Russia and Ukraine for prisoner swaps. Qatar is a mediator the U.S. has relied on heavily in negotiating between Israel and Hamas and between warring parties in Africa.
One key piece of any potential summit is Ukraine's role.
Trump indicated to European leaders that his idea would be to meet with Putin, then host a meeting with Putin and Zelensky. The Kremlin had earlier dismissed the possibility of a meeting between Putin and Zelensky unless negotiators had reached the final stages of a deal to end the war.
Zelensky has not publicly commented on a potential meeting with Putin, and such a meeting would be the first time the two leaders have come face-to-face since the war began in 2022. But he has been adamant that there should be no decisions about Ukraine without Ukrainian input.
Such a high-stakes meeting could yield a historic diplomatic win for Trump if he stops the war — but it also carries risks for all parties involved.
Trump has repeatedly demurred on whether Putin is stringing him along, and an in-person meeting could buy the Russian leader more time without producing concrete results toward a ceasefire in Ukraine.
White House officials have indicated they are going into the potential meeting with eyes open about Putin's lack of commitments thus far.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Germany to Halt Military Supplies to Israel for Gaza Attacks
(Bloomberg) -- Germany will halt deliveries to Israel of military equipment that could be used in operations in the Gaza Strip, taking the step over concern for humanitarian suffering in the territory. All Hail the Humble Speed Hump Three Deaths Reported as NYC Legionnaires' Outbreak Spreads Mayor Asked to Explain $1.4 Billion of Wasted Johannesburg Funds Major Istanbul Projects Are Stalling as City Leaders Sit in Jail What England's New National Cycling Network Needs to Get Rolling The ban on deliveries of spare parts for tanks and other defense-related goods will be in place until further notice, Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Friday in a statement. The move was prompted by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's move to secure approval for a military takeover of Gaza City. 'The German government remains deeply concerned about the ongoing suffering of the civilian population in the Gaza Strip,' Merz said. 'With the planned offensive, the Israeli government bears even greater responsibility than before for providing for them.' The decision is a significant step for Berlin, which has been one of Israel's strongest supporters because of its historical responsibilities stemming from the Holocaust. It was taken amid growing international outrage over the humanitarian disaster unfolding in Gaza during Israel's war against Hamas. In the past few weeks, Merz repeatedly called on Israel to alleviate the 'catastrophic' humanitarian crisis in Gaza and threatened that his government would consider potential further steps should the situation not improve. In his statement, Merz reaffirmed Israel's right to defend itself, but questioned whether further attacks on Gaza can help it achieve its goals of defeating Hamas. Even so, the chancellor's decision to halt supplies is largely symbolic as little in the way of Germany military aid has been sent in recent weeks, and Israel has been getting spare parts for its tanks from the Americans. Through its naval division, Thyssenkrupp AG has served as a key supplier to the Israeli Navy, providing advanced diesel-electric submarines and support through maintenance and parts supply agreements. These vessels form a central component of Israel's military and operate from the Haifa naval base, however it's not clear if they'd be involved in any further attack on Gaza. In Germany, all military exports to conflict areas have to be approved by the federal security council, which meets secretly, and its decisions are not made public. In the case of Israel, military exports have been particularly sensitive. Merz's predecessor, Olaf Scholz, said that Germany would continue to export military equipment, despite growing domestic criticism. Merz's announcement follows a trip by his foreign minister, Johann Wadephul, to Israel and the Palestinian territories last week. Wadephul signaled for the first time that his government could speed up the process of recognizing a Palestinian state should Israel annex the West Bank. Upon his return to Berlin, however, Wadephul softened his tone and said that he had seen some improvements of the humanitarian situation in Gaza. (Updates with) The Pizza Oven Startup With a Plan to Own Every Piece of the Pie Digital Nomads Are Transforming Medellín's Housing Russia's Secret War and the Plot to Kill a German CEO It's Only a Matter of Time Until Americans Pay for Trump's Tariffs The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Los Angeles Times
9 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: Enough harping on the Democrats. What about the ‘spineless' GOP?
To the editor: I am so tired of hearing people talk about the ailing, aimless Democratic Party ('Kamala Harris won't cure what ails the Democratic Party,' Aug. 5). What about the ailing, spineless Republican Party? Without its complete capitulation and fealty to President Trump, this country wouldn't be in the sorry state it's in. The Democrats are fighting back with everything they have at their disposal, but when a large portion of the country no longer believes in truth, science, the law or common decency, it's almost impossible for them to get their message out. The very people that Trump's policies are hurting the most don't even recognize it. What ails the Democrats is that they care about decency, the law, the common man, fairness and all of the things our country used to stand for. What do Republicans in power care about? Their wallets and, as far as I can tell, absolutely nothing else. Certainly not clean water and air, vaccines, science, legality, helping the less fortunate — the list goes on and on. Democrats are far from perfect, but how do members of the GOP sleep at night? Tracey Pomerance-Poirier, Chatsworth
New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump backers finally reap rewards after years of debanking, black-listing
The business of MAGA is booming. There's crypto, and of course The Donald's signature country clubs and golf courses that people are willing to pay big bucks to get into. There's also a quieter but increasingly lucrative business of consulting corporate America on how best to deal with Trumpers who control the vast administrative state, On The Money has learned. Yes, knowing President Trump and the people he has appointed is a good thing these days, four years ago not so much. 3 Knowing President Trump and the people he has appointed is a good thing these days, four years ago not so much. Donald Pearsall/NY Post Design In fact, being associated with Trump for many people who served during his first term was for a time the employment version of catching leprosy, former Trump officials tell me. Their comments came following my scoop that JPMorgan and Bank of America 'debanked' Trump for his role in the January 6 Capitol Hill melee. It followed pressure from the Biden administration, people at the banks say, to steer clear of Trump and his family's business interests after he lost the 2020 presidential campaign. You can be like me and not condone the January 6 upheaval and still shudder at the thought that Trump's actions that day means he can't have a private business life, which is what the Biden administrative state working with the nation's two largest banks appeared to have tried to do, people at the banks confirm. But the blackballing apparently didn't stop at the banking business – it spanned across corporate America, sources told On The Money. It included major corporations throwing away the resumes of very capable people, being excommunicated from teaching posts at major universities. It meant being kicked off the speaking circuit, and no book deals, all for working for a time with Trump during his first term, former officials said. Here's how one former top Trump economic aide put it: 'The entire weight of government came out against Trump and people who worked for him including yours truly. It went beyond banking. People couldn't get hired. People couldn't get speaking gigs. It was really, really bad all fueled by the Biden administration.' 3 JPMorgan and Bank of America 'debanked' Trump for his role in the January 6 Capitol Hill melee. It followed pressure from the Biden administration, people at the banks say, to steer clear of Trump and his family's business interests after he lost the 2020 presidential campaign. AFP/Getty Images How it was communicated by the Biden people to big companies to blacklist Trump and his people isn't quite known. Big business, however, is highly regulated. You can see how having a former Trumper in a top role at a major corporation, or Trump's businesses holding accounts at JPMorgan or Bank of America, could bring scrutiny or worse. So why take the risk? Most major companies and banks didn't, my reporting shows. The people from Trump who did land not long after January 6 and Trump's first term ended did so in safe spaces for conservative voices, such as my employer, Fox News (which shares corporate ownership with The Post) and right-of-center think tanks. Of course, many Americans rebelled against Sleepy Joe's various economic policies – from high taxes to inflation-inducing overspending – coupled with high regulation, not to mention its embrace of woke culture. 3 Many Americans rebelled against Sleepy Joe's various economic policies – from high taxes to inflation-inducing overspending – coupled with high regulation. REUTERS Trump was re-elected president in 2024 and corporate America began to open up to former Trump acolytes, But until recently, when Trump actually got back into the White House for Round 2, their job prospects never matched what those who served in the Obama administration experienced. They immediately snapped up jobs on corporate boards, and landed plum assignments in public policy and public affairs the minute Barack left office. Gary Goldstein, CEO of Whitney Partners, an executive search firm, said part of the problem with being associated with Trump wasn't just his deeds during January 6, or even his election denialism after he lost to Biden in 2020. Charlie Gasparino has his finger on the pulse of where business, politics and finance meet Sign up to receive On The Money by Charlie Gasparino in your inbox every Thursday. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Rather, it stems from the fact that businesses hate controversy and before he was president, Trump was a polarizing figure in New York, known more for his brash persona and reality TV show, Goldstein tells Fox Business's Teuta Dedvukaj. 'Anyone who is in business and gets involved in politics is putting themselves in harm's way,' Goldstein said. 'It's better to be agnostic. Once you cross that line, especially with someone like Trump, you can't un-ring that bell.' Well, being elected president a second time has done a lot for un-ringing. JPM and BofA will now gladly take The Donald's money, and the banks are all hiring consultants and flacks to deal with MAGA 2.0. Finally it's getting profitable to be MAGA.
