logo
Community of ‘tiny homes' to be built in Joplin

Community of ‘tiny homes' to be built in Joplin

Yahoo03-06-2025
JOPLIN, Mo. — The Joplin City Council approves the plan for a small-format housing community.
During Monday's meeting (6/2), council members gave the green light to what will be called the 'Wiggans Campus' of 'Vita Nova Village.'
It will consist of 16 small-format, or tiny homes, built in a walk-through community near West 12th Street and South Byers Avenue.
The one-bedroom, one-bath homes will be located on approximately 1-1/2 acres, and will include an on-site community building with a storm shelter and laundry facilities.
The entire project — costing more than $450,000 — will be paid for by community grants and private donations.
The project is meant to help folks who are struggling to find housing.
'Homelessness went up over 60% in the last year, and it's not looking to go down any at all, especially with the cost of housing rising significantly year-after-year, and wages just aren't keeping up, so I think the need is just going to keep increasing,' said Vita Nova Village Executive Director, Rhonda Thompson.
No word yet on when construction will begin on the 'Wiggans Campus.'
Plans are in the works for other small-format housing communities to be built in the Joplin area under the Vita Nova brand.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stablecoins Should Not Be Exempt From New York Crypto Tax, Lawmaker Says
Stablecoins Should Not Be Exempt From New York Crypto Tax, Lawmaker Says

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stablecoins Should Not Be Exempt From New York Crypto Tax, Lawmaker Says

New York State Assemblymember Phil Steck's proposed tax on crypto transactions will not be modified to accommodate stablecoins' use in everyday payments, the lawmaker told Decrypt. 'I don't think that there should be some exemption from a tax on crypto if you buy it for the purpose of using it as a currency,' he said on Tuesday. 'I can't see, frankly, crypto being used to take the place of the dollar bill in everyday transactions.' Last week, Steck estimated that a 0.2% tax on crypto transactions in the Empire State would generate $158 million annually, which could go toward helping schools combat substance abuse in upstate New York by funding the expansion of an existing support program. 'We thought this might be a way to raise the money needed to make this a statewide program,' he said, noting that the state's Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services currently serves communities in New York City and has faced budget constraints. Crypto advocates should support what appears to be a painless way of raising money to help those in need because it would 'show their commitment to doing something positive for the public,' the 66-year-old lawmaker said. Not all cryptocurrencies are the same, but digital assets are mostly speculative and resemble a form of entertainment, Steck said. And when Steck wants to watch professional baseball, he has no problem with paying a 4% sales tax on Mets tickets. Steck's bill would go into effect immediately if passed, and it comes as stablecoin legislation is expected to unlock more competition in the $280 billion sector, from the likes of Bank of America to Citigroup, following the passage of the GENIUS Act last month. But at least one observer has raised concerns that the bill would penalize consumers for transfers between their own accounts that incur no profits. These movements are similar to those an individual would execute between a savings and checking account. Stablecoins are often pegged to the U.S. dollar and backed by a mix of cash and U.S. Treasuries. Some regulators have compared them to poker chips in the past because crypto traders primarily use them primarily as a way to swap out of relatively volatile assets. Visa Adds More Stablecoin Features, Unveiling Avalanche, Stellar Support Steck's bill could make a positive impact upstate, but it's unclear how a 0.2% excise tax would play out in the epicenter of the financial world. Steck said his legislation would not include exemptions for high-frequency traders, who can execute thousands of transactions in a second while using complex computer algorithms to capitalize on the smallest changes in markets. 'I would see taxing high-frequency trading as very advantageous because [many economists] do not consider that to be productive economic activity,' he said. 'It's not for investment purposes. It's essentially a form of gambling.' Steck has meanwhile called for the reinstatement of a state tax on stock transfers. New York collected a 5-cent fee on sales over $20 from 1905 to 1981. It's possible that Steck's $158 million revenue estimate is low. His team tried to get information on the volume of crypto transactions in New York from the state's Department of Financial Services, but a bill memo shared with Decrypt notes those efforts were unsuccessful. Under the bill's plain text, crypto users would be taxed for moving funds between accounts they own, a non-event from the perspective of federal tax, Nick Slettengren, co-founder and CEO of Count on Sheep, a tax preparation service, told Decrypt. 'Unless regulations carve it out, [the bill] would penalize basic security hygiene and bookkeeping,' he said. 'That's a recipe for confusion, over-collection, and disputes.' Steck isn't the only one turning to crypto to help fund schools. Wyoming debuted its Frontier Stable Token (FRNT) on Tuesday, becoming the first state to issue stablecoin, and revenue generated by the token's reserves will go toward the state's school foundation fund. Asked for his thoughts on FRNT, Steck said 'they're going to have to pay a lot of money to create that currency digitally, which is very expensive from the point of view of using energy.' The lawmaker did not appear to know the difference between proof-of-work or proof-of-stake, or that Bitcoin's energy consumption is massive compared to other networks, including the seven blockchains that Wyoming's stablecoin debuted on earlier this week. So far, Steck said he hasn't had the opportunity to gauge assemblymembers' thoughts on the crypto tax. Not only was the bill just introduced, but he said that the New York legislature will not be in session until January.

What investors should be listening for in Jerome Powell's Jackson Hole speech
What investors should be listening for in Jerome Powell's Jackson Hole speech

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What investors should be listening for in Jerome Powell's Jackson Hole speech

Jerome Powell's remarks at Jackson Hole on Friday could have big implications for markets. Investors will be listening for any signs of hawkishness after a mixed bag of economic data recently. State Street's Michael Arone says these are the big things investors should be on the lookout for in Powell's speech. Tensions in the market are running high ahead of Jerome Powell's remarks at the Fed's Jackson Hole policy symposium. The Fed chairman is expected to give fresh insight into the central bank's plans for rate cuts. Investors have a lot riding on what Powell says on Friday, as coming rate cuts are thought to be bullish for stocks. However, uncertainty is once again creeping up after a mixed bag of economic data slightly lowered the odds of a cut. The CME FedWatch Tool shows an 85% chance of a cut next month, compared to 99% a week ago. Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Investment Management, says told Business Insider that investors should be listening for a few big themes from the Fed chief. Powell's tone Arone says he'll be focused on how Powell could use the platform to signal a potential shift in the central bank's monetary policy, and this should be top of mind for investors tuning in. "I think the biggest thing that investors should be looking for is [the] type of language where Powell suggests that the Fed is moving from moderately restrictive policy to more neutral policy," he told Business Insider. Arone said that he thinks the biggest shift will center around that topic, and that investors should also pay attention to language around the balance of risks in regards to the Fed's dual mandate of lowering inflation and boosting the labor market. "I think that the one from moderately restrictive to more neutral is the key phrase and the balance of risks is another often key signal, suggesting that the balance of risks have moved to a level where it's more appropriate to cut rates," he said. That said, Arone predicted that if Powell signals the possibility of a September rate cut, he will likely remain fairly cagey regarding what will follow in subsequent meetings. Even if interest rate cuts are coming, the market's reaction may be mixed As Arone sees it, Powell will likely use his speech from Jackson Hole to reveal that the policy shift investors have been waiting for is coming. "I believe that he will suggest that it's time to move towards a more neutral target, and that that will likely resume in September," he stated, adding that if he does not, markets will likely tumble. Despite Trump's constant criticism, Arone doesn't think Powell will opt for rate cuts because of political pressure. Instead, he believes that the Fed chairman will continue relying on economic data and monitoring the impact of tariffs on inflation. While Arone also predicted that markets will likely react well to the signal that interest rate cuts are coming, he thinks that the longer-term effect could be more complicated, particularly if Powell opts against providing much detail beyond plans for next month's meeting. "It'll be interesting to see how markets react to that," he said. "They may want more specific guidance on future monetary policy, and I believe that Chairman Powell will be reluctant to give it." Arone added that if Powell doesn't signal a shift toward more rate cuts, he expects a negative reaction, with volatility spiking in the stock market. . Read the original article on Business Insider

My Relative Insulted My Trans Fiancé. Do I Have to Tolerate Her Intolerance?
My Relative Insulted My Trans Fiancé. Do I Have to Tolerate Her Intolerance?

New York Times

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Times

My Relative Insulted My Trans Fiancé. Do I Have to Tolerate Her Intolerance?

I recently got engaged to the love of my life — a kind, intelligent, beautiful woman who shares my vision for the future. She's transgender, and I'm a cis woman. This has never mattered to me; she's simply my partner. The problem lies with my conservative family. Some of them hold hostile views toward trans people. While they've said nothing to me directly, I recently learned that one of my relatives referred to my fiancée as 'that thing' and said, 'He, she, who knows?' This relative has met my fiancée, who 'passes' as a woman to anyone who sees her. This didn't come from confusion — it felt malevolent. My relative and I already had a strained relationship, not speaking for years because of family drama. We reconnected recently, and I sent them a heartfelt message saying, essentially, 'I believe you are a good and compassionate person and would like to have a relationship.' The response was not as sincere, in my opinion, and basically brushed off my olive branch. We are both young, not even out of college. I had hoped that seeing other perspectives through education would change or at least soften my relative's thinking, but clearly it hasn't. I haven't told my fiancée what was said about her and don't plan to. I just want to know how much grace I owe someone like this relative. Am I wrong to feel that I've waited long enough for change and that, for my own peace and my future family's, it's time to move on? — Name Withheld From the Ethicist: You mentioned that your fiancée 'passes' in an effort to contextualize your relative's cruelty. But, of course, no one should have to look a certain way to be treated with dignity; plenty of cisgender men and women also don't accord with the stereotypes of their gender. All are entitled to be treated according to their identity. Courtesy isn't merely a matter of manners — treating people with appropriate respect is an ethical obligation. Your relative's remark would have been inexcusable under any circumstances. But beyond the views your relative has expressed, they don't sound like someone who treats you with care or warmth. We don't owe closeness to people just because they're family. And while shared histories can make us want to offer grace, grace has its limits. You're building a life with someone you love. It's more than fair to decide who gets to be part of that life — and who doesn't. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store