Marion County Coroner identifies one of the two people found in Indianapolis waterways
Officers received a call about the body floating in the water near 9500 Fall Creek Road at about 4:15 p.m. The kayaker spotted the body near the Upper Fall Creek Loop Trail.
On May 27, the Marion County coroner's office identified the body as 55-year-old Andrew W. Nevers.
Police said it appeared as if the body had been in the water for quite some time and they do not suspect foul play.
This was the second body pulled from a Marion County waterway on Monday, after the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department found a man in the White River earlier that day.
Contact IndyStar reporter Noe Padilla at npadilla@indystar.com, follow him on X @1NoePadilla or on Bluesky @noepadilla.bsky.social.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Coroner identifies man found in Fall Creek on Monday
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
7 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Despite denials, email shows ex-Henry County sheriff knew of sex abuse claim
A newly disclosed email contradicts previous claims by former Henry County Sheriff Ric McCorkle that he knew nothing about a 2018 sexual abuse allegation against a community corrections official who was also a special sheriff's deputy. McCorkle said earlier this year that he was unaware of an inmate's allegation in 2018 that Deputy Community Corrections Director Jason Bertram had touched the man's genitals during a work release meeting in 2018. The accuser is one of at least seven men who claim Bertram used his power to coerce them into unwanted sexual acts before killing himself in 2023. Most of the men were abused after 2018. Six of them are now suing Henry County leaders in federal court for failing to take steps that could have prevented the abuse. McCorkle, who was sheriff from 2015 to 2022, said under oath in a March 6 deposition that he was "not aware" of the 2018 allegation. He also told IndyStar in a June 5 phone interview that the allegation "wasn't brought to my attention" and that he "wasn't aware of the '18 complaint." But an email unearthed as part of the pending civil lawsuits against him and other officials suggest he did know about the allegation. The email is the most recent evidence to emerge that McCorkle and other Henry County leaders knew about allegations against Bertram for years, but failed to stop him from victimizing more men. In the June 12, 2018, email, then-Henry County Prosecutor Joe Bergacs asked the Indiana State Police to take over the investigation from the sheriff's department. Bergacs wrote that he "received a call from Sheriff McCorkle" informing him that a Henry County jail inmate named Michael Ritchie had made a complaint against Bertram under the Prison Rape Elimination Act. "The allegations contain inappropriate touching by Mr. Bertram against Mr. Ritchie," Bergacs wrote, noting that Bertram is "a special deputy appointed by the Sheriff." When confronted with the email, McCorkle told IndyStar he didn't remember the allegation or speaking with Bergacs, but he acknowledged it may have happened. "I'm not gonna tell you that I didn't," he said in an Aug. 14 phone interview. "I don't remember it. I just don't remember. I have no reason to lie to you, I just don't remember doing any of that with Michael Ritchie." At the time of the 2018 complaint, both Bergacs and McCorkle sat on the Henry County Community Corrections Advisory Board, which had the power to fire Bertram. But even after they learned of a second accusation from a different inmate in 2020, they took no action to restrict Bertram's access to clients. Only after several more men came forward with allegations amid a new state police investigation did the board finally fire Bertram in 2022. "It's sad that this went on so long and that the cover up is still continuing," said Indianapolis attorney Jonathan Little, who is representing Bertram's accusers. "Just think of all the men and boys who could have been spared." McCorkle attributed the board's inaction to "a lack of sharing information" and said he doesn't beleive there was a cover up. "I don't know why it got dropped," he said, "but I can't imagine anybody wanting to cover it up." As deputy director of community corrections, Bertram oversaw defendants placed on house arrest or assigned to community service. McCorkle said he designated everyone who worked in community corrections a "special deputy" so that they had arrest powers if needed. McCorkle isn't the only one who said he forgot about Ritchie's case. Bergacs, the prosecutor at the time, also claimed during a recent deposition that he didn't recall Ritchie's case. "I really don't remember anything," he said. "I'm sure it had to do with inappropriate touching, but I don't remember whatever the specific allegations are as I sit here now." Bergacs did not respond to an inquiry from IndyStar, but the newly disclosed email and previously disclosed state police records show that he was heavily involved and that he declined to prosecute Bertram because the statute of limitations had expired. The statute of limitations is a time limit set in state law for filing criminal charges after an alleged crime is committed. The limit is generally longer for more serious offenses. Little contends the statute of limitations had not expired for crimes such as sexual battery and official misconduct. He criticized McCorkle and Bergacs for their claims they couldn't remember such a serious allegation against a member of Henry County's law enforcement community. "Should we be concerned about the rash of amnesia in Henry County?" Little said. Although McCorkle and Bergacs no longer hold elected office, both men have continued in government service. McCorkle is now a school resource officer for South Henry School Corp. Bergacs is one of four public defenders listed on the county's website. As IndyStar reported in June, Bergacs and McCorkle are among several county officials who have been named as defendants in lawsuits filed by Bertram's accusers. Others include Community Corrections Director Joni Williams and Henry Circuit Court Judge Kit Crane. Read IndyStar's investigation: County official abused clients for years. Leaders knew of allegations, but failed to stop him The lawsuits accuse Henry County officials of effectively running a sex trafficking operation and are seeking damages under federal Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act and the Rackateer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO. Henry County officials have denied in court records that they failed to properly respond to the abuse allegations. Bergacs and Crane have also argued they are entitled to qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that protects government officials from civil liability unless they violate clearly established law.
Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indianapolis mother of 3-year-old found in pond says his death was an accident
Those who knew him best said Ka'Mauri Williams didn't care who was watching while he danced. He loved to smile, wave and say hi to anybody he could. His loved ones said the 3-year-old chatty child was hardly ever quiet. "He talked. From the time he got up in the morning to the time he went to sleep," his mother, Korie Bankhead, told IndyStar. "He was a vibe all the time and so full of life." The Marion County Coroner's Office identified Ka'Mauri Williams as the boy who was found in a retention pond before being pronounced dead Aug. 17. While people speculate online about what happened, his mother said the 3-year-old's death was an accident. Indianapolis doesn't require fencing around retention ponds. Just before 7 p.m. Aug. 17, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police were called about a missing child at the Avalon Lake Apartments in the 5600 block of Wyckfield Way. Officers arrived while loved ones, including a neighbor, searched for the 3-year-old. That neighbor found the boy unresponsive in the pond and performed CPR on him until help arrived. He was taken to St. Vincent Hospital in critical condition before being pronounced dead. The Marion County Coroner's Office has not released his cause and manner of death. Police are investigating and said detectives believe Williams' father was inside the apartment before Bankhead came home and realized the door was open and her son was gone. He was found a short time later. "It was an accident," Bankhead said. "Accidents happen every day, and it's unfortunate that this one happened." She said her eyes have been burning from crying and she hasn't slept or eaten since he died. She understands people have questions, but she said right now she needs support. She wants to focus on remembering her son and holding on to what makes him who he was. "My baby was smart," Bankhead said of her son, whose favorite show was Paw Patrol. "He knew his ABCs and 123s. He knew his colors. He was well-loved and taken care of." The family loved music, and Bankhead said her son was always singing and dancing. Even if he didn't know a song's lyrics to sing or know the steps to a popular dance, he always figured something out. His loved ones said he was always the center of attention. The family is hosting a balloon release for his Aug. 22, within the apartment complex.
Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
IMPD denounces Nazi flag-waving group but maintains its right to free speech
When fewer than a dozen members of a hate group walked the streets of downtown Indianapolis over the weekend, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department patrol cars drove alongside them. For many residents watching over social media, it was a jarring image. They questioned why the police buffered the march of a small group hoisting Nazi flags. In an Aug. 17 statement, IMPD Chief Chris Bailey pointed to the U.S. Constitution to understand why his department responded the way it did. "Safeguarding First Amendment rights, even for those whose views we find reprehensible, is a responsibility we take seriously," his statement reads. "But let me be clear: protecting those rights is not an endorsement of those beliefs: not now, not ever." He repeatedly condemned the group's message, but said his officers were there to ensure safety and the right to free speech, not to support its message. The demonstration Saturday is one of many instances of extremist groups gathering in Indianapolis over the years. Last year, white supremacist flyers proliferated around the metropolitan area. In 2021, about 100 Proud Boys and Trump supporters protested election results at the Indiana Statehouse. Earlier that year, the New Black Panthers, a group in no way affiliated with the original Black Panthers of the 1960s, marched in honor of a teenager killed during downtown riots. The Southern Poverty Law Center designates both as hate groups. The First Amendment enshrines the right of the public to speak, petition and assemble, regardless of their opinion. The Constitution protects a broad swath of speech, including much that the public finds objectionable. In 1929, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes described the First Amendment as "not free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.' As it stands, hate speech is generally considered to be legal, protected speech. However, not all demonstrations espousing hate speech are legal. Courts have found that threats and the incitement of lawlessness are outside the reach of First Amendment protection. If hate speech crosses into those areas, police may legally step in and disperse a demonstration. A question First Amendment lawyers, advocates and scholars have long debated is how the government can install limits on hate speech without infringing on other expression rights indirectly. Some have said answering that question is "impossible." Specifically, regarding Nazi symbolism, some have considered just the sight of such a flag to be an act inciting lawlessness or a threat. This debate was revived following the 2017 clash at a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. However, experts say that the argument doesn't hold up since it would require more immediacy of the threat and call to lawlessness, per U.S. Supreme Court decisions. The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.
