logo
The High Cost of Anti-Blackness: Lessons from Google's $50M Case

The High Cost of Anti-Blackness: Lessons from Google's $50M Case

Forbes24-05-2025

Google settled a $50 million lawsuit by Black employees who alleged racial bias at the company.
Recently, Google settled a $50 million lawsuit by Black employees who alleged racial bias at the company. The settlement included over 4,000 Google employees in California and New York, with plaintiffs making the case that Google kept Black employees in lower-level jobs, paid them less, lowered their performance ratings and prevented Black employees from advancement. The lead plaintiff, a Black woman named April Curley, alleged that Google hired her for outreach to historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs). While at the company, Curley claimed that Google prevented her from advancing, labeled her as an 'angry' Black woman and then fired her after a six-year tenure, as she was developing a report on racial bias at the company.
In the class-action lawsuit filed by Curley and other Black employees, the complaint alleges that managers disparaged Black employees who were not 'Googley' enough, kept Black workers in lower-level jobs, paid them lower wages and subjected them to hostile comments. In addition, Curley claimed that Google kept her in a job that was not at a comparable seniority level based on her background and experience. Curley also alleged that Google didn't promote her or provide her with merit pay increases despite her 'stellar qualifications and performance.' She claimed that Google was reluctant to hire Black talent and subjected them to more rigorous hiring practices compared to their counterparts, asking Black candidates questions unrelated to the role they were applying for, to damage their interview evaluations.
This is not the first time Google has been accused of discrimination. In 2021, Google agreed to pay $3.8 million to 5,500 employees and applicants in California and Washington state due to pay discrimination. Pay disparities were identified for female employees in engineering positions, as well as Asian females applying for software engineering positions.
When there is more transparency and objectivity around workplace practices, this can lessen the ... More likelihood of employees leaning on their own personal biases to make workplace decisions.
There are several steps that Google should take to prevent these types of situations from happening in the future; the first is frequent pay audits. It is unclear how often Google and other organizations conduct pay audits, but this is a practice that should be done regularly to address and rectify pay disparities across different populations. In addition, to mitigate systemic inequities, organizations should implement more objective processes into the workplace. This means introducing scorecards and rubrics for different workplace practices including recruitment, interviews, hiring and selection, and for advancement and promotion processes. When there is more transparency and objectivity around workplace practices, this can lessen the likelihood of employees leaning on their own personal biases to make workplace decisions.
Despite the pervasive anti-DEI backlash, all companies must think about ways to implement frequent and ongoing education to ensure employees understand issues like racial bias and stereotyping, in order to mitigate workplace discrimination. Do employees, for example, understand how the angry Black woman stereotype shows up in the workplace? Do managers understand anti-blackness and how it can show up in decision-making? How do employees from marginalized communities internalize negative stereotypes about their own communities and how does this impact behaviors? Is everyone in the workplace aware of tone-policing and how it can manifest? Employees should be well-equipped with this knowledge and understanding beyond just a one-time workshop—education should be consistent and ongoing.
In the current climate, it's important and necessary to stay abreast of all DEI-related news, particularly as it pertains to executive orders around DEI. Despite the DEI backlash, there are still many steps corporations can legally take to ensure that equity and fairness are cornerstones of the organization. There are steps that every organization should take to build an equitable workplace for Black employees. Understand that Blackness is not a monolith—frequently
solicit feedback from Black employees to understand their experiences and parse out the data from employee surveys and exit interviews to better understand Black employee experiences.
Frequently solicit feedback from Black employees to understand their experiences.
Conduct an audit of your practices to ensure objectivity is embedded into workplace systems and consider different ways to hold leaders accountable for cultivating an inclusive and equitable environment. This could look like fairness, equity, and inclusivity ratings being part of leadership performance evaluations. Also consider integrating anonymous reporting systems into the workplace to better address issues of bias and unfairness before they snowball into bigger issues.
Anti-blackness is a widespread issue in many workplaces. For Black employees who have experienced racial bias or discrimination, there are several steps that can be taken. It's important to document any incidents of discrimination. Employees can also try to find internal support networks to lean on, whether that is an employee resource group, a trusted leader or a fellow colleague. Consider consulting with external support networks for advice and guidance, which can include a mentor, a friend or legal professionals who specialize in workplace discrimination. Lastly, it's important to know your rights as an employee. Familiarize yourself with state and federal laws to understand what protections you have against racial discrimination in the workplace.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No Pipeline, No Progress: Meeting The Demand For Advanced Degrees
No Pipeline, No Progress: Meeting The Demand For Advanced Degrees

Forbes

time12 minutes ago

  • Forbes

No Pipeline, No Progress: Meeting The Demand For Advanced Degrees

As demand for master's and doctoral degrees surges, too few programs exist to support the students most often excluded—despite their potential. The United States stands at a crossroads. While innovation, competitiveness, and global leadership increasingly depend on highly educated workers, access to graduate education remains deeply unequal and underfunded. Over 60% of business and government leaders hold graduate degrees—with more than half in business and nearly a third in law. A 2020 report by Brint and colleagues found that 61% of top media figures and 78% of think tank and foundation leaders also held advanced degrees. In many leadership roles, graduate education is no longer a competitive advantage—it's a requirement. Demand is rising. A 2024 report from Georgetown University's Center on Education and the Workforce projects that nearly 1 in 5 jobs will soon require an advanced degree. Among 'good jobs'—those offering middle-class wages of $43,000 or more—1 in 4 will demand graduate credentials. Yet access to graduate education remains deeply inequitable. Madeline Brighouse Glueck finds that parental education still shapes graduate enrollment, especially in high-investment, high-return programs like law, medicine, and PhDs. In medicine alone, over 75% of students come from the top two income quintiles. Even academically qualified first-generation and low-income students are often left behind. While families with financial and social capital can navigate elite admissions and cover soaring costs, others are shut out. The only federally funded graduate pipeline program is the McNair Scholars Program, which supports first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented undergraduates seeking PhDs. This program—and others like Upward Bound—are now at risk of being defunded. As the federal government grows increasingly hostile toward identity-based programs in higher education, the burden of promoting equitable access is falling to the private sector and nonprofit organizations. Yet only a handful of national nonprofits directly focus on this issue: These organizations are doing powerful work—but their combined reach can only serve a fraction of the students who deserve access. To meet the moment, coordinated investments are needed—not just in graduate preparation, but also in affordability, mentorship, and long-term support: Graduate education is not a luxury—it is a national imperative. If we want to lead in science, health, law, and business—and if we believe in opportunity—we must invest in the people who will lead those fields. Let's ensure that talent, not zip code or family background, determines who has a seat at the table. Change can't wait. The time to invest is now. —--------- Help us widen the pipeline. Support Leadership Brainery in creating equitable pathways to graduate education. Donate today!

The Cheapest Pickup Trucks You Can Buy in 2025 Aren't All Small
The Cheapest Pickup Trucks You Can Buy in 2025 Aren't All Small

Motor Trend

time14 minutes ago

  • Motor Trend

The Cheapest Pickup Trucks You Can Buy in 2025 Aren't All Small

Almost across the board, pickup truck prices are creeping upward. Most of this is due to inflation (and more recently, tariffs), but formerly cheap trucks like the new generation Toyota Tacoma are going somewhat upmarket, while the price creep affecting the cheapest pickups like the Ford Maverick appears to be due to automakers capitalizing on unexpected success and, again, more recently, responding to tariffs. (The Maverick, like some other trucks on this list, is assembled outside of the U.S., which raises price pressure compared to home built options.) For now, the cheapest work trucks you can buy can still be had for under $40,000, but you don't need us to tell you that the versions of the most common full-size trucks most consumers buy are in the $50,000 to $60,000 range. Of course, the base price isn't the only metric by which to measure a truck, but it's an important one. If you want to explore other ways pickup trucks stack up against each other, MotorTrend 's proprietary algorithm provides the ultimate source of automotive data by combining over 75 years of our own instrumented performance, comfort, and efficiency testing on more than 5,000 vehicles. That data is fused with decades of expertise from former heads of design, engineering, and our own car buying experience experts. Built by statisticians and honed by automotive experts, MotorTrend 's Ultimate Car Rankings will assist in finding your perfect vehicle. But, you came here for cheap trucks, and here they are, the cheapest trucks you can buy in 2025:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store