Is ‘Reef Safe' Sunscreen Really Better?
Some of the sunscreen you slather on this summer will end up in lakes, streams or the ocean, even if you don't go swimming. And a growing body of evidence suggests that ultraviolet filters, the active ingredients in sunscreens, can harm creatures that live in the water.
Some products are marketed as 'reef safe' or friendly to aquatic life. But has that been proved? We talked to a dermatologist, several ecologists and toxicologists, and a chemical engineer to find out the best way to protect your skin and the environment, too.
Your sunscreen options
There are two kinds of UV filters in sunscreens on the market today.
Mineral sunscreens create a physical barrier on your skin that reflects UV rays like a mirror, while chemical sunscreens are absorbed into the skin and convert the UV radiation into harmless heat. (Chemical sunscreens are also sometimes labeled 'organic,' but that's a chemistry term, not a claim of environmental friendliness.)
Any sunscreen you apply will eventually end up in water. Researchers estimate that between 25 and 50 percent of sunscreen comes off during a dip. The rest goes down the drain when you shower or enters the wastewater system through the laundry when you wash your beach towels.
Most standard treatment plants aren't effective at removing trace levels of UV filters from wastewater, said Dunia Santiago, a chemical engineer at the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria in Spain who studies how treatment plants process contaminants. That means the chemicals are still in the water that flows out of the plant and into the world.
And, since many UV filters don't biodegrade well, levels can build up over time in the environment, floating around, settling into sediment and being eaten by animals, especially in shallow areas popular with swimmers.
What we know and don't know
There's a growing body of evidence that both chemical and mineral UV filters have the potential to harm wildlife, including coral reefs, at high concentrations. A 2016 study on the potential for a chemical UV filter called oxybenzone to make coral more vulnerable to bleaching made a particularly big splash in the public consciousness, increasing demand for gentler alternatives and leading some places to ban the sale of some chemical sunscreens.
In response, some manufacturers started marketing mineral sunscreens as 'reef safe.' But researchers generally agree you shouldn't put too much stock in these labels, which aren't regulated.
Calling one UV filter safer than another 'implies that we have information to make a comparison, which we do not have,' said Sandy Raimondo, an ecologist at the Environmental Protection Agency who studies chemical contaminants.
The science on UV-filter toxicity isn't rock-solid because the laboratory methods used to test them haven't been standardized, according to ecologists and toxicologists we interviewed.
One important issue is the 'stickiness' of chemical UV filters. They cling to the surface of the water, the sides of tanks and the inside of tools designed to measure their concentrations. When researchers can't be certain of the concentration of a chemical in water, Dr. Raimondo said, the resulting data isn't reliable.
While the data on mineral UV filters is more reliable, new formulations designed to minimize that ghostly white cast on the skin cause their own problems. Some manufacturers use so-called nano versions of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide. These even-tinier particles can get embedded in the tissues of plants and animals in ways that scientists are only beginning to understand, Dr. Raimondo said.
Trying to fill in the blanks
The E.P.A. is currently funding studies to fill the gaps in our understanding of UV-filter toxicity. Top priorities include resolving measurement issues and developing standardized methods to make comparisons easier. But President Trump's plans for deep cuts at the agency have put the future of many environmental studies in doubt.
Even if those studies continue, they will probably take years to complete, and the agency could take several more years to conduct an official ecological risk assessment for any particular UV filter.
Some researchers say that, even with our incomplete knowledge of the impacts of UV filters, the existing evidence on certain chemical UV filters is damning enough for us to switch to alternatives that use non-nano mineral UV filters. Indeed, the stickiness of chemical UV filters may mean that existing research underestimates their environmental toxicity.
What you can do right now
Thankfully, you don't have to broil to help the environment. Dermatologists and toxicologists agree on the best form of sun protection. But it's not mineral or chemical sunscreen. It's clothing.
Sunscreen is an important component of protection, 'but it's not the only component,' said Dr. Henry Lim, a dermatologist at Henry Ford Health in Detroit and a former president of the American Academy of Dermatology. 'Staying in the shade, wearing photoprotective clothing, a wide-brimmed hat and sunglasses are very, very important.'
Cover as much real estate as you can with UPF rated clothing (that's the SPF equivalent for fabric). 'Sunscreen should be applied only in the areas that cannot be covered,' Dr. Lim said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Potentially Deadly Mistake People Make When Returning From Vacation
Whether you're walking around Disney World, swimming in the ocean or taking a mountain trip, it's needless to say that many vacations — while tons of fun — can also be tiresome. After packing in as much as possible on your days off, exhaustion may set in as you rush back home to prepare for going back to work or school. It's important to be aware of a danger that comes with this: drowsy driving. Defined as driving while sleepy, it's more common than you think. According to a Centers for Disease Control survey, about 1 in 25 adult drivers reported falling asleep while driving within the past 30 days. According to a study by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, 21% of fatal crashes involved a drowsy driver. So, while you may feel like you're in control and can keep yourself awake, remember that probably everyone in that situation also felt the same. Tiredness can affect your mind and ability to drive in a slew of ways, too, so there's no one way in which an accident will happen. According to Susan Miller, a lead researcher and certified sleep expert at being sleepy can impair your judgment and decision-making, reduce awareness of your surroundings (from cars to road conditions to traffic signals), and affect your coordination, balance and fine motor skills. 'Even a momentary lapse of attention can be dangerous while driving, so prioritizing safety is important,' she added. Jeff Kahn, a sleep expert and the CEO and co-founder of Rise Science, agreed. 'Microsleeps, in particular, are a cause for alarm, as they can last only a few seconds and occur unknowingly,' he said. 'While this might not seem like much, on a highway traveling at 65 miles per hour, those seconds can mean the difference between life and death.' Further, the dangers of driving while sleepy are often compared to the dangers of driving drunk. Kahn said 24 hours worth of sleep deprivation — at once, or accumulated over time — results in the same cognitive impairment equivalent as a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.10%, which is higher than the legal limit. And again, he added, it's unsafe to drive even before you reach that point. He pointed to the concept of 'sleep debt,' or not getting enough sleep cumulatively. 'If you regularly miss an hour of sleep for 10 consecutive nights, your cognitive impairment can be as severe as if you hadn't slept for 24 hours straight,' he explained. One of the two time ranges when this occurs may surprise you. According to the Department of Health of New York State, most sleep-related crashes occur between 1 p.m. and 4 p.m., and 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. So yes, driving in the early morning isn't a great idea, but that 'afternoon slump' period isn't either. This is when bodies are typically the most tired. 'Importantly, these are the times when you're biologically-inclined to be more drowsy, thanks to the peaks and dips of your circadian rhythm (your internal body clock),' Kahn said. 'Your circadian energy dips will happen regardless if you had enough sleep or not, but sleep deprivation will make you feel drowsier at these times than you otherwise would.' Unfortunately, many factors can contribute to this, though some may be more common than others. Here are a few of the most common ones: 'One of the biggest contributors to drowsy driving is sleep deprivation,' Miller said. 'This can lead to difficulty concentrating, slower reaction times and even falling asleep at the wheel.' While the amount of sleep each person needs will vary, most adults need seven to nine hours a night, she added. (BTW, 'junk sleep,' or low-quality sleep, doesn't count.) A bigger sleeping issue may be going on, so checking with a doctor is smart. 'Some disorders, like obstructive sleep apnea, cause low-quality sleep as sleep is often interrupted or restricted, thus low-quality and less restorative,' said Nicole Eichelberger, a sleep expert at Mattressive. What's even scarier is that it's not always noticeable. 'Unfortunately, most people who suffer from sleep disorders are unaware,' she continued. 'Therefore, it is essential to seek medical help if you notice excessive daytime sleepiness.' Miller also listed alcohol and medications, such as antihistamines or benzodiazepines, as contributors to drowsiness and impaired cognitive function. So if you're enjoying a few cocktails by the pool, for example, be cognizant of this. 'Even small amounts of alcohol and certain drugs can cause drowsiness, poor coordination and slower reaction times, making driving dangerous,' she said. To avoid this, Eichelberger urged reading the side effects listed on the medicines you take, and to avoid driving if drowsiness is listed. The time of day and distance matter, too. Many of us road trip to our vacation destinations and often power through the drive in order to get there or get home. 'Driving overnight (which can be tempting to avoid traffic) increases the risk of experiencing sleepiness, even if you think you are well-rested,' said Holly Milling, a clinical psychologist, behavioral sleep medicine specialist and director of The Sleep Practice. 'Driving for long periods of time, at any time of day, is also tiring, and driving without a break can increase vulnerability to sleepiness.' Simply put, you shouldn't drive while sleepy, even if you think you can make yourself stay awake. More specifically, here are some other danger signs these experts listed: Being unable to remember driving for the last few minutes Struggling to focus your eyes and concentrate Drifting into another lane Head bobbing Yawning Feeling easily frustrated Rubbing your eyes or struggling to keep them open Following cars too closely Getting restless or fidgeting Not keeping a consistent speed Braking too late Missing signs and exits 'Even if you don't feel like you'll fall asleep, these signs indicate that your driving ability is impaired and that it's unsafe to continue driving,' Kahn said. As tempting as it sounds, the answer isn't louder music, colder air or talking to someone. 'The only cure for sleepiness is sleep,' Milling said. While napping in public may feel uncomfortable, it's crucial. You can take a nap at a rest area, gas station or other place you feel safe. And hey, only a short nap is needed. 'Ideally, you should take a 20 to 30 minute nap to feel refreshed, but not so long that you enter a deep sleep cycle and wake up feeling groggy,' Miller said. 'If you're unable to nap, simply resting your eyes or having a break from driving for a few minutes can also be helpful.' While caffeine can help, Miller continued, it's a short-term fix and it can't cure severe fatigue. She recommends drinking about 200mg of caffeine (equivalent to a cup of coffee) 30 minutes before getting back on the road. Having a coffee between napping and driving also adds time between waking up and driving, which Kahn said is important. He encourages having that buffer time 'to ensure the post-nap grogginess doesn't affect your driving skills (even if you've only napped for less than 20 minutes).' Combining the two can eliminate mid-afternoon sleepiness for up to an hour, according to a study in the journal Psychophysiology. But again, these experts say a nap comes first and foremost. 'Whether you include caffeine or not, though, the most important ingredient is the nap,' Milling emphasized. 'Never skip sleep in favor of a double espresso.' Lastly, while it may seem counterintuitive, some movement (along with the nap) can help. 'A short burst of exercise can wake you up and increase your alertness,' Miller said. She encouraged light stretching or a short walk. You could even get some errands done during this time, like walking around the grocery store. If these options feel undoable or aren't cutting it, don't let that deter you. 'Call someone to drive you home or the rest of the way,' Eichelberger urged. 'You can also find a motel [and] rest for the night, or get a cab and head home.'While a Lyft ride or motel stay won't be inexpensive, it is cheaper — and safer — than the alternative. Long-term, Eichelberger recommended maintaining good sleep habits. If you notice excessive fatigue often, she added, consider talking to a sleep doctor so you can avoid car accidents (and various other problems). Being proactive is always smart, too. Milling mentioned not driving if you've been awake for 18+ hours and scheduling breaks every couple of hours, to start. This way, you're less likely to get caught in a drowsy driving situation. While vacations and life can keep us busy, sacrificing sleep isn't a great idea — especially if you're ever behind the wheel. The Time It Takes To Fall Asleep Can Reveal A Lot About Your Health How To Change Your Default Sleeping Position To A New One The 1 Habit Doctors Say Is Secretly Making You Tired The Next Day
Forbes
12 hours ago
- Forbes
Ocean Acidification Crossed A Critical Boundary, Threatening Marine Ecosystems
How quickly can we change ocean chemistry without damaging marine ecosystems and its associated ecosystem services? An unhealthy sea butterfly, or pteropod, showing effects of ocean acidification including ragged, ... More dissolving shell ridges on upper surface, a cloudy shell in lower right quadrant, and severe abrasions and weak spots at 6:30 position on lower whorl of shell. (Image ID: fis01026, NOAA's Fisheries Collection, public domain) The world's oceans are in worse health than realised, according to an international collaboration of oceanographers, ecologists and marine biologists. They recently published a report that finds parts of the world's oceans have undergone increased acidification that has already surpassed what is now known as a 'planetary boundary'. Planetary boundaries were first proposed in 2009 (ref) and were defined as the amount of harm the planet can sustain due to global warming, pollution, habitat destruction and other destructive human activities, before damaging consequences occur – such as the development of devastating new weather systems. 'The planetary boundaries were established to indicate when we move outside of what we (as humans) have known to be 'safe': i.e. the stable period of time that humans have evolved that has allowed us to develop the societies that we now operate in [especially]'The OA planetary boundary considers more of an environmental perspective, given how much the Ocean provides us (in a goods and services sense),' Professor Findlay explained in email. Of the nine planetary boundaries identified, six are thought to have already been surpassed. Now, according to research by Professor Findlay and collaborators, a seventh planetary boundary was also exceeded – five years ago. 'It's worrying because we are already impacting the system in ways that we either know are bad, or in ways that we don't yet fully understand the implications of. But we do know they are difficult to reverse.' A planetary boundary is not a tipping point because, unlike a tipping point, it is possible to reverse the damages we've caused by, in this situation, stopping emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. 'How quickly can we change the ocean chemistry (i.e. ocean acidification) without it impacting marine ecosystems and its associated ecosystem services?' Professor Findlay asked rhetorically. The ocean acts like a carbon sponge, absorbing roughly 25% of atmospheric CO2. Absorbed CO2 reacts with water molecules to form carbonic acid. This acid lowers the pH of seawater and reduces the concentration of carbonate ions available to marine creatures, particularly to a variety of 'calcifying' organisms such as oysters, clams, mussels, sea urchins, shallow water corals, deep sea corals, certain species of plankton, and tiny sea snails known as pteropods (Figure 1). All these calcifying species, and more, then struggle to maintain their protective shells, leading to weaker shells, slower growth, reduced reproduction and decreased survival rates. F I G U R E 1 : A sea butterfly (pteropods, a key food web species) shell is shown dissolving over ... More time in seawater as its pH decreases. When carbon dioxide is absorbed by the ocean from the atmosphere, the chemistry of the seawater becomes acidified and marine creatures die. (Credit: NOAA Ocean Acidification Program, public domain) Professor Findlay and collaborators analyzed both new and historical physical and chemical measurements collected from ice cores, combined with computer models and prior studies of marine life. This gave the scientists an overall assessment of the past 150 years. The new analysis provides a global assessment of the saturation state of a form of the mineral aragonite. Aragonite is a form of calcium carbonate that marine organisms use to build their shells and skeletons. The aragonite saturation state in seawater, represented by ΩArag, is a measure of how easily aragonite dissolves in seawater, and is used to track ocean acidification. When pH – and thus, ΩArag – drops below safe levels, shell-y marine creatures struggle to maintain their protective structures. The difference between sea urchins exposed to normal and acidified conditions. (Credit: Plymouth ... More Marine Laboratory, image appears here with kind permission.) In their study, Professor Findlay and collaborators discovered that by the year 2000, global ocean conditions had already crossed a revised, more limited boundary for acidification. That boundary is crossed when the amount of calcium carbonate in seawater hits a 20% reduction relative to levels present before the Industrial Revolution. Professor Findlay and collaborators found that as of 2020, over 40% of the surface of the ocean had passed the OA boundary. According to the study, the largest documented change in surface waters has been in polar regions, whilst the largest change in deeper waters has been in the sub-polar regions and along the west coast of North America from Canada to Mexico (red areas; Figure 2). F I G U R E 2 : Ocean Acidification planetary boundary. (a) Percentage (%) reduction between present ... More day and pre-industrial aragonite saturation state for the surface global ocean and the seven ocean regions, also comparing to the Richardson et al. (2023) planetary boundary assessment (blue circle and blue line). The red circles represent the multi-model ensemble median with the associated propagated errors for the multi-model ensemble standard deviation and the pre-industrial uncertainties. The 20% boundary value is presented as the dark grey lines with their associated uncertainties shown by the light grey banding. Regions are defined as: Arctic Ocean (Arctic) region north of 65° N; north Pacific Ocean (Pacific-N) between 40° N and 65° N; north Atlantic Ocean (Atlantic-N) between 40° N and 65° N; central Pacific Ocean (Pacific-C) between 40° S and 40° N; central Atlantic Ocean (Atlantic-C) between 40° S and 40° N; Indian Ocean (Indian) between 40° S and 25° N; and the Southern Ocean (Southern) ocean south of 40° S. (b) Regional assessment of ocean acidification in year 2020, relative to the boundary of 20% reduction from pre-industrial aragonite saturation state, as in (a), with grey bars representing the boundary uncertainties, and colours depicting whether that boundary has been crossed (red) or not (green). (c) Map showing the percentage difference in surface ΩArag between pre-industrial (1750) and year 2020. The black contour line on the map represents a 20% reduction from pre-industrial values. (doi:10.1111/gcb.70238) These changes in seawater chemistry are not only measurable in the ocean's surface waters. The deeper in the ocean that Professor Findlay and collaborators looked, the more worrying the findings were. For example, at 200 metres below the surface, 60% of global waters had breached the 'safe' limit for acidification. 'Most ocean life doesn't just live at the surface,' Professor Findlay said. 'The waters below are home to many more different types of plants and animals. Since these deeper waters are changing so much, the impacts of ocean acidification could be far worse than we thought.' Although the ocean has experienced these pH levels before, it was long ago, in the deep past. 'Paleo-records suggest that we have not seen the rate of change for nearly 55 million years,' Professor Findlay said. 'The rate is important as it determines how quickly the ocean, its ecosystems and organisms, have to respond to change. During past events, there was a loss of diversity (mass extinctions), but many organisms also become smaller (which we've seen happen in lab experiments), which they do to preserve energy. There are also records showing calcified plankton being replaced by diatom (silicious) counterparts.' These periods are generally associated with warming and extinction events. These findings have huge implications for important underwater ecosystems such as tropical and even deep-sea coral reefs that provide essential habitats and nursery grounds for the young of many marine species. Further, it indicates big changes are coming in marine biodiversity. What's different about this particular assessment? '[O]ur study looked in more detail, as well as accounted for uncertainties, and came up with a more robust way of looking at the boundary,' Professor Findlay replied in email. 'In particular we use regional assessments, which show that the polar regions are vulnerable, but we also see change happening below the surface of the ocean. These nuances matter when it comes to action and management.' Only a rapid global reduction in CO₂ emissions, Professor Findlay and collaborators warn, can stabilize OA trends. Without it, nearly 100% of the global ocean surface will exceed safe acidity levels by 2100 under mid- to high-emissions scenarios. 'It's really important that we have a global understanding of OA so that we can tackle the issue at an international level. But it's also important that our science informs regional and national actors, so that management organisations can implement the required action.' Source: Helen S. Findlay, Richard A. Feely, Li-Qing Jiang, Greg Pelletier, and Nina Bednaršek (2025). Ocean Acidification: Another Planetary Boundary Crossed, Global Change Biology 31(6):e70238 | doi:10.1111/gcb.70238 © Copyright by GrrlScientist | hosted by Forbes | Socials: Bluesky | CounterSocial | LinkedIn | Mastodon Science | MeWe | Spoutible | SubStack | Threads | Tumblr | Twitter
Forbes
13 hours ago
- Forbes
Safer Sunscreens: Selecting Healthy and Reef-Safe Products
Choosing sunscreen that is healthy and reef-safe can be challenging. As summer temperatures soar and we flock to beaches, pools, and outdoor recreation areas, choosing the right sunscreen is important but challenging. On one hand, the American Cancer Society estimates that more than 100,000 Americans will be diagnosed with invasive melanoma in 2025. On the other hand, some sunscreen ingredients are linked to hormone disruption and other health harms. And then there's the fact that approximately 14,000 tons of sunscreen wash into coral reefs annually, contributing to the destruction of marine ecosystems. How can our sunscreen choices balance these concerns? Mineral Sunscreens Are Safer Than Chemical Sunscreens Under current FDA guidelines, only two active ingredients are classified as "Generally Recognized As Safe and Effective" (GRASE): zinc oxide and titanium dioxide. These mineral-based compounds work by creating a physical barrier on the skin that reflects and scatters ultraviolet radiation away from the body. In contrast, the FDA has requested additional safety data for 12 chemical sunscreen ingredients, including avobenzone, oxybenzone, octinoxate, and octocrylene. This is because there is growing evidence that these chemicals can be absorbed through the skin and may pose health risks. Mineral sunscreens are also more reef-safe. Oxybenzone and octinoxate, two of the most common chemical sunscreen ingredients, have been identified as primary drivers of coral bleaching, a process that strips corals of their life-sustaining algae and leaves them vulnerable to disease and death. These chemicals also disrupt the endocrine systems and brains of fish. Mineral-based alternatives like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide pose no known harm to coral reefs or other marine life. Sunscreen Lotions Are Safer Than Sprays And Mists While spray sunscreens are convenient, they may be the worst choice for both human health and the environment. This is because aerosol delivery systems release significant quantities of sunscreen into the air rather than onto skin. These airborne particles can travel considerable distances before settling on surfaces, potentially contaminating areas far from where we applied the sunscreen. When used near beaches, lakes, or other water bodies, spray sunscreens directly introduce chemicals into aquatic environments without the intermediate step of skin contact. There is also a risk of inadvertent inhalation of spray sunscreen particles, especially when products are used on children. Additionally, achieving adequate coverage with spray formulations proves challenging, often resulting in uneven protection and increased sunburn risk. Picking The Best Sunscreens How can you tell which sunscreens are safe for your health and for reefs? Check the label. The Surfrider Foundation's "HEL list" (Harmful Elements List) provides a clear framework for ingredients to avoid: oxybenzone, octinoxate, octocrylene, 4-methylbenzylidene camphor, PABA, parabens, triclosan, microplastics like 'exfoliating beads,' and nanoparticles. The organization emphasizes avoiding nano-sized zinc oxide and titanium dioxide particles, which may pose risks to marine ecosystems despite their mineral origin. If you're looking for specific brand recommendations, here are some expert guides: There are also helpful shopping resources like Clearya. This free platform functions as both a browser extension and mobile app, automatically scanning product ingredients against comprehensive databases of potentially harmful chemicals. You can scan sunscreens while shopping on major retail platforms like Amazon, Sephora, and Walmart, receiving instant feedback on product safety. Beyond Sunscreen: Comprehensive Sun Safety Strategies Although sunscreen is effective, it's important to remember that physical barriers are our first line of defense against UV radiation. Wide-brimmed hats provide excellent protection for faces, necks, and ears—areas often inadequately covered by sunscreen application. Lightweight, long-sleeved shirts and pants offer extensive coverage while remaining comfortable in hot weather. Avoiding direct sun exposure during peak intensity hours (typically 10 AM to 4 PM) can also significantly reduce overall radiation exposure. Seeking shade whenever possible provides natural protection. So, what's the takeaway here? Prioritize mineral sunscreens with zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, choose lotion formulations over sprays, and prioritize comprehensive sun safety strategies that protect both our health and the precious marine ecosystems.
