Senate Confirms Billy Long As The Next IRS Commissioner
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 20: Former Rep. Billy Long (R-MO), U.S. President Donald Trump's nominee to be Internal Revenue Service Commissioner, speaks during a Senate Finance Committee nomination hearing on Capitol Hill on May 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by)
Getty Images
The Senate has confirmed former U.S. Representative Billy Long of Missouri as the next commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The vote was 53-44 along party lines, with all Republicans in the Senate voting yes—all of the no votes came from Democrats.
The vote puts a period on a process that had grown contentious at times. President Donald Trump announced Long's nomination in December of 2024, even though Danny Werfel was then serving a term as IRS Commissioner that would normally run until late in 2027.
Werfel subsequently announced his resignation, effective January 20, 2025. Since Long had not yet been confirmed at that time, Werfel was replaced by Doug O'Donnell, who had served as Acting Commissioner following Werfel's departure. O'Donnell left his position on February 28, 2025 and was replaced by then IRS Chief Operating Officer Melanie Krause. Krause announced her departure in April 2025, following the tax agency's agreement to share immigrant tax data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Michael Faulkender joined the revolving doors at the IRS as the Acting Commissioner on April 18, 2025—he has been in the position since that time.
Long will now officially take the reins at the tax agency.
Long does not have any formal training in tax, law, or accounting, does not have a college degree, and never served in Congress on a tax writing committee. He dropped out of the University of Missouri before returning to school—this time, to an auction training program at the Missouri Auction School. He was told, he explained to Auctioneer Magazine, that it was the "Harvard of auctioneering schools.' There, he earned his Certified Auctioneer designation.
Once he made the career switch to auctioneering, Long says he averaged about 200 auctions per year for 20 years. Today, he is in the National Auction Association Hall of Fame.
In 2010, Long was elected as the U.S. Representative of Missouri's 7th Congressional District, serving until 2023. He subsequently ran for the U.S. Senate in 2022 but lost in the Republican primary.
While in the House, Long served on the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the Republican Steering Committee. He did not serve on any tax or finance committees. However, he was awarded the "Tax Fighter Award" by the National Tax Limitation Committee (the organization appears to no longer exist—its former website now points to a Thai gambling site).
IRS Commissioners are appointed for a five-year term that runs from the date of appointment (as opposed to the date of Senate confirmation). Before Trump's announcement, Werfel had previously indicated that he intended to serve out his term, which was slated to expire in 2027.
Before Werfel, Charles Rettig, a tax lawyer and Trump appointee, served as Commissioner. Rettig left office on November 12, 2022, at the end of his term, which began on October 1, 2018, after he was confirmed.
Long was confirmed despite concerns about his ties to companies that promoted controversial tax credits, including a nonexistent 'tribal tax credit and the employee retention tax credit (ERC).
Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, pulled no punches at Long's May 20 confirmation hearing, saying, 'Congressman Long's experience with tax issues came after he left Congress, when he dove headlong into the tax scam industry.' Democrats also expressed concern that Long might allow political interference from the White House at the tax agency, an issue that has been in the spotlight more since Trump threatened to revoke Harvard University's tax-exempt status. Long has reposted social media posts critical of Harvard, Columbia, and other tax-exempt organizations.
When questioned about the issue by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Long initially suggested that he would seek legal advice to determine whether it would be appropriate for the president to direct the IRS to conduct an investigation or audit. Long replied, 'I'm gonna follow the law, and if that's the law, yes.' Warren confirmed that it was the law, reading aloud part of the statute (Section 7217), which she had sent to him in advance.
Since Long is serving out the remainder of Werfel's term, he is expected to serve through November 12, 2027.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
5 minutes ago
- Forbes
Bitcoin Battle: Saylor's Dream Meets Chanos' Reality
Michael Saylor, co-founder and executive chairman of MicroStrategy Inc., speaks during the Bitcoin ... More 2025 conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, US, on Thursday, May 29, 2025. The event will examine Bitcoin's evolving global impact, with speakers from education, policy, finance, and technology. Photographer: Ronda Churchill/Bloomberg It's rare to see two titans of finance openly clashing on Bloomberg. On one side, you have Jim Chanos, the short-selling legend who made his name exposing Enron, now calling a multi-billion-dollar Bitcoin strategy 'financial gibberish.' On the other, Michael Saylor, the billionaire evangelist who transformed MicroStrategy into a leveraged crypto play, fired back that Chanos 'just doesn't get it' and is ignoring a model that has 'generated $8.4 billion in shareholder value.' This dispute isn't just a squabble; it's a philosophical showdown. At its core, the debate focuses on a fundamental question in modern investing: is Saylor's company a revolutionary tool for wealth creation, or is it just a glorified Bitcoin tracker that trades at an unjustifiable premium? When a legendary short seller calls your model absurd, and you counter by claiming billions in value creation, Wall Street takes notice. And so should we. Beneath the headlines lies a deeper question: what should we value, and how should we determine that? The name Jim Chanos evokes shivers in boardrooms. Best known for shorting Enron before its collapse, Chanos has built his reputation sniffing out companies with weak fundamentals and flashy facades. To him, valuation matters. Cash flows matter. Reality matters. On the opposite end of the spectrum stands Michael Saylor, the philosophical bull turned Bitcoin maximalist. Once the CEO of a quiet business intelligence firm, Saylor transformed MicroStrategy with a bold financial experiment: raise debt and equity, buy Bitcoin, repeat. While Chanos sees a threat, Saylor envisions a future secured by digital scarcity and conviction. It's not just a disagreement over numbers. It's a clash of belief systems: value versus vision, discipline versus disruption, and fundamentals versus faith. The stakes aren't just about one stock; they're about which worldview wins the next decade. DELIVERING ALPHA — Pictured: Jim Chanos, Founder and Managing Partner, Kynikos Associates, during ... More the Best Ideas panel at the 6th annual CNBC Institutional Investor Delivering Alpha Conference on Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at the Pierre Hotel in New York — (Photo by: Heidi Gutman/CNBC/NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty Images) When you set aside the brand and discussions about legacy software, Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy, no longer operates as a tech company. It's a leveraged Bitcoin holding vehicle with a public ticker. The playbook is simple, bold, and controversial: issue equity or preferred shares, use the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, then do it all over again. Rinse, repeat, and continue the cycle. This model has transformed Saylor's firm into a robust corporate Bitcoin ETF. But unlike a regulated ETF, Strategy isn't passive. It's actively engineering upside using capital markets. To Saylor, this technique is an innovation. He calls it 'financial engineering for the digital age,' a form of monetary arbitrage. Borrow at 10%, bet on Bitcoin appreciating at 50%+, and shareholders pocket the difference. Critics like Jim Chanos call it something else: dangerous leverage masked as genius. They argue that the company is no longer generating value through operations or fundamentals but through financial alchemy based entirely on Bitcoin's price rising forever. However, others are copying Saylor's blueprint. Trump Media, other crypto-adjacent SPACs, and a crop of speculative small caps are now mimicking this model of equity offerings, hype, and digital assets as collateral. The question is no longer what Strategy does. It's how long the market will reward it for doing it. Never one to hold back, Jim Chanos views Strategy's valuation as detached from reality. At the heart of his critique is what he calls a 'yawning disconnect' between the company's share price and its actual Bitcoin holdings. Chanos argues that Strategy's current trading at approximately 1.8 times its net asset value (NAV), essentially its Bitcoin per-share value, is irrational. 'That's like buying Bitcoin with an 80% premium slapped on,' he told Bloomberg. To illustrate, Chanos offers a memorable analogy: 'It's like saying my house that rose in value from $450,000 to $500,000 last year is not worth $500,000. It's worth $1.5 million because it is worth $500,000 plus a 20 multiple on the $50,000 increase. Of course, that's absurd.' He argues that little more than hype and financial sleight of hand sustain this premium. Chanos disclosed that he shorted Strategy when the NAV premium was between 2.2 and 2.3 times, expecting it to compress back toward 1x. His position reflects more than just a tactical trade; it's a philosophical objection to what he sees as a marketing-driven vehicle masquerading as a technology company. 'This is not a tech business,' Chanos says. 'It's a tracker fund with leverage and a bullhorn.' He believes that the sole significant innovation in this situation is the branding, and he is confident that the market will eventually recognize it. From my seat after three decades of analyzing markets, bubbles, and breakups, I can say this: both Jim Chanos and Michael Saylor are right, but they're having two different conversations. Saylor has built a model that's undeniably worked as long as Bitcoin keeps climbing. He's turned capital markets into a Bitcoin-buying engine, leveraged the spread between the cost of debt and BTC appreciation, and framed that delta as value creation. That playbook has printed shareholder gains. There's no disagreement at that point. But Chanos isn't debating Bitcoin. He is questioning the valuation multiple, and he is correct in doing so. Strategy trades at a ~1.8x premium to its net Bitcoin holdings. Strip away the narrative, and you're paying $1.80 for every $1.00 of crypto exposure. Would you do that for gold? Would you choose to invest in Tesla stock, which has a substantial cash reserve? This conversation isn't a debate about crypto conviction; it's about valuation discipline. As investors, our job is to ask not what the company owns, but how the market is pricing it. Markets misprice dreams all the time. The challenge is knowing when the dream is priced in and when it's overbought. Saylor may be running the most successful macro trade of the decade. But Chanos reminds us: even the best trades can lose their edge when priced like religion, not risk. This saga is not just a dispute between two titans of finance, but it also serves as a lesson in understanding market perception. Don't confuse performance with fundamentals. MicroStrategy isn't a tech innovator anymore; it's a Bitcoin carry trade dressed in corporate clothing. Investors must ask: are you buying a business or renting exposure to an asset? 'Story stocks' often thrive on blurred lines between narrative and numbers. That's where risk hides. Financial engineering, despite its power, has both positive and negative effects. When done with precision, it unlocks value. When misunderstood, it magnifies volatility and obscures true worth. Know what you own. Respect the difference between price action and pricing power. Above all, avoid mistaking a trade for a strategy. This feud between Chanos and Saylor is more than a personality clash on Bitcoin, it's a mirror held up to modern markets. Fundamentally, it compels us to consider a more profound inquiry: what should we incentivize? Should we reward profits or performance? Should we prioritize substance over spectacle? When does bold strategy become reckless leverage? And when does skepticism blind us to financial innovation? Chanos sees a tracker fund in a tuxedo dressed up, overvalued, and divorced from fundamentals. Saylor sees the future of corporate finance leveraging cheap capital to capture asymmetric upside. The market, for now, seems to be siding with the tuxedo, favoring Saylor's bold Bitcoin vision over Chanos' valuation discipline. However, seasoned investors are aware that markets often make subtle changes before making significant ones. Whether it's Saylor's leveraged bet on Bitcoin or Chanos' warning about unsustainable premiums, the real risk lies in the assumptions we fail to question. Pay attention not just to the noise but to what's quietly being priced in.
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'No Kings' marks Fremont's biggest protest of the year
FREMONT - Despite rain, the "No Kings Nationwide Day of Defiance" protest on June 14 was the largest anti-Trump administration event in Fremont this year. 'Hey-Hey-Ho-Ho Donald Trump has got to go!' chanted the more than 250 protesters, who occupied all four corners of West State and Front streets in downtown Fremont. That was more than double the numbers from previous protests. Two counter-protesters showed up, erecting a tent on the southeast corner. Mass cheering and the honking of car horns were frequent during the two-hour rally that kicked off at noon. However, occasional hecklers came through, some yelling obscenities, and one man decided to roll coal with his pickup truck. A Fremont police officer immediately pulled him over after seeing him squealing his tires and fishtailing the vehicle as plumes of black exhaust poured out. 'I am the host of this No Kings rally. While we are here today, we are also going to celebrate that today is Flag Day for the United States of America," organizer Brian Earhart said. "It's also the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. So, we're going to be holding protests as well as celebrating those two days." Earhart has been involved in recent protests in Fremont against the Trump administration. 'What we're trying to do is help people in America understand that this country was started by getting rid of a king that was running this country to begin with," he said. "We are going to keep this going, and we are going to keep the current White House administration from doing that same thing.' Many were carrying signs, showing support for immigrants, Medicaid, veterans, Social Security, human rights and the U.S. Constitution. Ray Moreno has protested several other times this year in Fremont. He was born in Texas, but has lived in Fremont since 1966. 'I'm here protesting all the stuff going on with the government nowadays since Trump took over," Moreno said. "He hasn't been following the Constitution like he should be, and his Republican congressmen and senators aren't doing anything to stop him. They just let him do whatever he wants." 'Let my people go. I've noticed a lot more young people,' said 24-year-old Fremont native Clarita Diaz. She was holding a sign: 'No thrones, No crowns, No kings.' Many protesters wore masks and refused to give their names, saying it was due to fear of retaliation. 'We are in real bad shape here. Our country is in such danger," Lynne Hartley said. "In 73 years, I never thought this would happen. I just felt like, rain or shine, we need to be here and make our voices heard. Democracy counts. Don't let it slip away. So many of us don't realize what this really means, how we're sliding down a slippery slope, and we're almost at the bottom. Not following the Constitution. Not following due process that people need to have. Immigrants need our help. Due process is not just for citizens.' Several veterans were protesting and wore hats and shirts to show their branch of the armed forces. 'I'm out here to make sure we don't have a king in this country. The whole administration is out of control, and then they send my Marines into Los Angeles? No, sir. That's not why I went to boot camp,' said David Johnson, 'a simple infantryman." Anthony Pierce was counter-demonstrating with a tent and several flags, including a Trump 2024 flag, an American flag and a 'Don't Tread On Me' flag that had an image that appeared to be a pink-and-white anime figure. 'Hopefully, I'm countering a lot of the misinformation that folks on that side of the aisle are trying to spew against people: that posse comitatus has been violated, that Trump's a king — and none of those things are true," Pierce said. "They say he's trying to take away Medicaid — that's not true. They say he's trying to take away Social Security — and that's not true. It's a vicious cycle." One other man joined Pierce after the rain stopped. rlapointe@ 419-332-2674 This article originally appeared on Fremont News-Messenger: Rain couldn't dampen 'No Kings' anger against Trump administration
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'No Kings Day' protest brings thousands to Iowa State Capitol to 'give voice to people.'
A crowd estimated to number around 7,000 people gathered outside the Iowa State Capitol Building on June 14 in opposition to Donald Trump's Flag Day military parade in Washington D.C., a date which also coincided with the president's 79th birthday. The Des Moines protest was just one of more than 1,800 events held worldwide, 35 of which were held in Iowa, according to a news release from Indivisible 515, one of the groups that helped organize the Des Moines event. Several other groups had a hand in helping to orchestrate the rally, including Food and Water Watch, Progress Iowa, the Party for Socialism and Liberation Iowa, Team Bernie, 50501, AFLCIO of Iowa, LULAC, and ICAN. The tagline of the event? 'No Kings Day.' The mission? 'To give voice to people who want to live in a democratic society,' said Marie Herring, one of the organizers with Indivisible 515. 'We are about pro-democracy, we are anti-corruption, and I think what we are seeing is a great deal of corruption. We have different causes, we have different things that brought us here today, but today we are rallying around the common theme of 'No Kings.'' Earlier in the week, Trump warned that protesters of the Flag Day parade would be met with violence. A few days later, on June 12, he laughed off would-be protestors, saying 'I don't feel like a king' in response to a question from a reporter in the White House. In stark contrast to the president's promises, the news release from Indivisible 515 stated that 'No Kings Day' protests were committed to being non-violent, and the protest at the Iowa State Capitol reflected that. There was a minimal police presence, but no intervention ever occurred. 'I hope people understand that we're protesting for our democracy,' said Katie Johnson, 21, from Ankeny. 'I think that America could be great if we actually followed the rules that were made for us. There's a constitution for a reason.' In Ames, a similarly peaceful crowd filled Roosevelt Park. People of all ages spanned across the park, from young children to senior citizens. Several people were carrying signs that said 'No Kings,' or ones depicting crowns that had been crossed off. Many were carrying American flags. Johnson's sentiment was one shared by many of the older protestors at the rally, though in a slightly different manner. 'I want to apologize (to our grandchildren) for screwing up so bad,' said Lynne Howard, 69, from Des Moines. 'We were hoping to leave them with a better world.' Denise Wilson, 68, from Grimes also apologized to the younger generations, saying, 'It doesn't feel good to be losing our rights. We have to take a stand now because I want (our grandchildren) to grow up in a free society like what we had, and it's going away quickly.' As the official event drew to a close, protestors began to gather along Grand Avenue, cheering with signs held high. Honking cars rushed past with flags streaming from their open windows — American flags, Palestinian flags, Mexican flags and Honduran flags, among others. Drivers and passengers alike joined in chanting with those lining the street. The overwhelming majority of protestors seemed to share in one mentality, summed up by Russell Kingsley, an 86-year-old Navy veteran from Urbandale. 'I believe in democracy and I see it slipping away,' Kingsley said. 'I want to do everything I can to stop it from sliding any further.' Ames Tribune reporter Celia Brocker contributed to this report Norah Judson is a reporter for the Register. Reach her at njudson@ This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: 'No Kings Day' protest brings thousands to Des Moines
