
Peter McGuire on rare earth, China's dominance & alternative suppliers
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
, CEO-Australia,, says China's dominance in rare earth production, controlling 70% globally, raises concerns across industries from technology to defense. While US-China talks aim to ease supply tensions, countries like India, Australia, and Brazil are exploring domestic processing to counter China's humongous market share.A couple of things. First up, yes, its dominance is very significant and we cannot take our mind off that China accounts for roughly 70% of the world's production of rare earths. We all understand the implications and how they operate from the technologies, you have got headphones, you have got laptops, you have got smart watches, you name it, all of that side. Then, you have got the electric vehicle, then you have got more forms of technology from weaponry and from aircraft and all of those. So, not only manufacturing, and the impact that can have on the auto makers.It is a very hard one to speculate on quite simply because of the framework as far as discussions go. We all understand that China took this initiative after President Trump came very heavily down on them, going back about two months or so. In turn, their tit for tat strategy was to implement all of these issues as far as rare earth and the supply chain. We understand that America needs these for weaponry, all the way through to running its own administration and they are a critical part of the key building blocks for their defence industries. I am not sure whether it will be solved over the next 24 hours. One would hope so, but Scott Bessent, Treasury Secretary, is trying to get that on the line.That is exactly right. When you control 90% of the market then that changes the framework as far as who is in charge is concerned and for many countries, this will be a wakeup call and over the next decade, countries certainly like India and other powerhouses across Asia are going to be very aggressive in their own processing as far as these minerals are concerned.One has to look at the likes of Lynas and other rare earths that are doing it offshore. They were doing that in Malaysia, I am sure the US is going to take a very aggressive stance from a security standpoint and really ramp that up. Now, there are new production houses and manufacturers of these, one is in Nevada. Another one is opening in Texas. That is going to be a very solid output for the Trump administration over the next three to six months to get this underway.I think it is. Australia, Brazil and even India have massive land mass and that would be a path forward. You would have to think that if you have got the metals in the ground, the next step would be who is in charge of them? Have you done sales over the years? Is this going to be renegotiated? These factors are going to play out and that is what President Trump is leaning towards. There is talk about the Darwin Port in Australia. They want to renegotiate those sorts of deals where the Chinese are involved. This is real brinkmanship when it comes to geopolitics. It is going to be very hotly contested for many years to come.Well, it could. Like any market, there is a dominant player. Not only dominant, but they own the market with 90% control, So, that is the first issue. One needs to look at that from their own security view. For every country that wants to be involved in rare earth –mining as well as production– the next point is whether they can look at strategic relationships and how they can foster those better relationships with other market players.So, that is all again about negotiation and looking for opportunity and one can leave the politicians and hopefully they have got the best interest at heart to be able to structure a deal that is beneficial not only for their country's security but more importantly for its people.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Foxconn sends 97% of India iPhone exports to US as Apple tackles Trump's tariffs
Nearly all the iPhones exported by Foxconn from India went to the United States between March and May, customs data showed, far above the 2024 average of 50% and a clear sign of Apple 's efforts to bypass high U.S. tariffs imposed on China. The numbers, being reported by Reuters for the first time, show Apple has realigned its India exports to almost exclusively serve the U.S. market, when previously the devices were more widely distributed to countries including the Netherlands, the Czech Republic and Britain. During March-May, Foxconn exported iPhones worth $3.2 billion from India, with an average 97% shipped to the United States, compared to a 2024 average of 50.3%, according to commercially available customs data seen by Reuters. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Kulkas yang belum Terjual dengan Harga Termurah (Lihat harga) Cari Sekarang Undo India iPhone shipments by Foxconn to the United States in May 2025 were worth nearly $1 billion, the second-highest ever after the record $1.3 billion worth of devices shipped in March, the data showed. Apple and Foxconn did not respond to Reuters requests for comment. Live Events U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said China will face 55% tariffs after the two countries agreed on a plan, subject to both leaders' approval, to ease levies that had reached triple digits. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories India is subject, like most U.S trading partners, to a baseline 10% tariff and is trying to negotiate an agreement to avert a 26% "reciprocal" levy that Trump announced and then paused in April. Apple's increased production in India drew a strong rebuke from Trump in May. "We are not interested in you building in India, India can take care of themselves, they are doing very well, we want you to build here," Trump recalled telling CEO Tim Cook. In the first five months of this year, Foxconn has already sent iPhones worth $4.4 billion to the U.S. from India, compared to $3.7 billion in the whole of 2024. Apple has been taking steps to speed up production from India to bypass tariffs, which would make phones shipped from China to the U.S. much more expensive. In March, it chartered planes to transport iPhone 13, 14, 16 and 16e models worth roughly $2 billion to the United States. Apple has also lobbied Indian airport authorities to cut the time needed to clear customs at Chennai airport in the southern state of Tamil Nadu from 30 hours to six hours, Reuters has reported. The airport is a key hub for iPhone exports. "We expect made-in-India iPhones to account for 25% to 30% of global iPhone shipments in 2025, as compared to 18% in 2024," said Prachir Singh, senior analyst at Counterpoint Research. Tata Electronics, the other smaller Apple iPhone supplier in India, on average shipped nearly 86% of its iPhone production to the U.S. during March and April, customs data showed. Its May data was not available. The company, part of India's Tata Group, started exporting iPhones only in July 2024, and only 52% of its shipments went to U.S. during 2024, the data showed. Tata declined to comment on the numbers. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has in recent years promoted India as a smartphone manufacturing hub, but high duties on importing mobile phone components compared to many other countries means it is still expensive to produce the devices in India. Apple has historically sold more than 60 million iPhones in the U.S. each year, with roughly 80% made in China.


Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
US says China's Huawei can't make more than 200,000 AI chips in 2025
WASHINGTON: China's Huawei Technologies is capable of producing no more than 200,000 advanced artificial intelligence chips in 2025, a top U.S. exports controls official told lawmakers on Thursday, warning that though the number is below the company's demand, China is quickly catching up to U.S. capabilities. Since 2019, a slew of U.S. export rules aimed at curbing China's technological and military advancements have limited access by Huawei and other Chinese firms to high-end U.S. chips and the equipment needed to produce them. The issue has become a flashpoint in U.S.-China relations. Facing those restrictions, Huawei aims to ship its Ascend 910C AI chips to Chinese customers as an alternative to those made by the United States' Nvidia , the global leader. "Our assessment is that Huawei Ascend chip production capacity for 2025 will be at or below 200,000 and we project that most or all of that will be delivered to companies within China," Jeffrey Kessler , Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security at the Commerce Department, told a congressional hearing. Kessler said that the U.S. should not take comfort in the figure. "China is investing huge amounts to increase its AI chip production, as well as the capabilities of the chips that it produces. So, it's critical for us not to have a false sense of security, to understand that China is catching up quickly," he told the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs South and Central Asia subcommittee. White House AI Czar David Sacks said on Tuesday that China was only 3-6 months behind the U.S. in AI. The White House later said he was referring to China's AI models, adding that Chinese AI chips are one to two years behind their U.S. counterparts. Huawei's CEO Ren Zhengfei told Chinese state media on Tuesday that the company's chips were a generation behind those of U.S. competitors, but that it invests more than $25 billion annually to improve performance. Nvidia's AI chips are more powerful than Huawei's but Washington's export controls on its most sophisticated chips have caused it to lose market share. The U.S. and China reached a tentative trade truce at talks in London this week after a previous agreement faltered over China's continued curbs on minerals exports. That prompted the Trump administration to apply additional export controls on shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods. Democratic Representative Greg Meeks expressed concern that the Trump administration had conflated U.S. exports controls with broader discussions on trade. "What I will say is export controls have been strong and I'm confident that they will remain strong," Kessler said. Kessler said he was not planning any immediate new restrictions on U.S. semiconductors sold to China, but that the Commerce Department will "remain active in this space." "It's a constantly evolving landscape, and we need to make sure that our controls remain effective," he said.


United News of India
32 minutes ago
- United News of India
U.S. judge orders Trump to return control of National Guard to California
Los Angeles, June 13 (UNI) A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order late Thursday, directing U.S. President Donald Trump to return control of the National Guard to California. Trump's deployment of the California National Guard and U.S. Marines in Los Angeles was illegal, both violating the Tenth Amendment and exceeding Trump's statutory authority, said the order, which takes effect at noon on Friday. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said Trump overstepped his bounds in ordering the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard members to Los Angeles after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown. California Governor Gavin Newsom sued to block the National Guard's deployment against his wishes. California later filed an emergency motion asking the judge to block the Guard from assisting with immigration raids. The restraining order from Breyer delivered "a sharp rebuke to President Trump's effort to deploy thousands of National Guard troops on the streets of an American city, a move that has contributed to nearly a week of political rancor and protests across the country," reported The New York Times. During the hourlong hearing before Breyer in San Francisco, a lawyer for the Justice Department argued that courts lack the authority to second-guess the president's decisions concerning the National Guard troops and Marines that Trump has deployed despite objections from state and local officials. Breyer expressed doubt that Trump had complied with the terms of a statute that specifies when National Guard units, which normally are commanded by the state's governor, can be federalized. But he also said he was reluctant to grant Newsom's request for an order forbidding the use of military personnel to enforce federal laws without strong evidence that troops actually were doing so. The judge stayed his order until noon on Friday to allow for appeals, but scheduled a hearing for June 20 to determine whether to make the restrictions permanent. The Trump administration has filed for appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit after the ruling. UNI XINHUA ARN