'Organised By Students': Harvard Distances Itself From 'Pakistan Conference' Row After Pahalgam Attack
Harvard University, after a backlash, clarified that the 'Pakistan Conference 2025' was independently organised by students and not endorsed by donors or the administration.
Days after organising the 'Pakistan Conference 2025' on April 27, Harvard University's South Asia Institute has distanced itself from the controversy that followed and asserted the conference was independently organised by the students and their faculty advisor.
The University faced a backlash for organising the event just five days after the Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir, which claimed the lives of 26 tourists on April 22.
In a statement, Harvard University's South Asia Institute also extended its condolences to the victims of the attack.
'The Institute supports academic research projects and works with other university partners on multiple events throughout the academic year. One such event was 'The Pakistan Conference', organised by students from Harvard and held on April 27, 2025," the statement read.
'In accordance with our principles of operation, we did not consult any benefactor of the Institute regarding this conference. The students, along with their faculty advisor, independently determined the topics and speakers presenting," it added.
'We share the grief and anguish with our friends, colleagues, and loved ones in India who have been affected by the attack in Pahalgam on April 22, 2025, and we offer our heartfelt condolences," the University stated.
'These acts of violence were not indiscriminate— they were calculated attacks based solely on religious identity," the letter by the students stated.
'While formally denying involvement, Pakistan's ministers and lawmakers have simultaneously issued aggressive warnings to India and reaffirmed their support for insurgent activity in Kashmir. Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Ishaq Dar has even issued threats of retaliation, should India take any 'kinetic step' in response," the letter read.
'Welcoming representatives of a government that not only denies accountability for but also ideologically supports such religion-based terrorism, risks Harvard being complicit in legitimising those who enable or justify these crimes," the students wrote in the letter.
'We ask for the clarity, courage, and compassion for Hindu and Indian students grieving the targeted killing of members of their faith. We request you to take a stance against Hinduphobia," it read.
'We respectfully request that Harvard University: 1. Issue a public statement condemning the Pahalgam terror attacks and affirming support for victims of religion-based violence. 2. Review the participation of Pakistani officials at the Pakistan Conference 2025 in light of their government's ideological and rhetorical support for groups like LeT. 3. Provide emotional and institutional support to affected students through the Office for Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging," the letter mentioned.
'This is not about political posturing. It is about moral clarity. Harvard must ensure its campus does not become a platform for whitewashing state-enabled religious terrorism," it concluded.
STUDENTS SAY PAHALGAM ATTACK WAS 'TARGETED'
Speaking to news agency ANI recently, Surabhi Tomar said, 'The horrible attack in Pahalgam was a targeted, religion-based massacre. When Harvard invites officials, especially officials who have ideologically justified such acts, it risks legitimising the state-backed terror narratives on our campus. This is the reason why we thought that we should take some action or ask people to take some action."
Elaborating more on the event, Tomar said, 'It was a pre-planned event, and it was a coincidence. However, even given the coincidence, we do not think that it is correct for anyone, especially a university like Harvard, to legitimise such voices, especially when they in their country are trying to justify such acts and not condemning them."
She further said that the students have urged US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to 'deny visas to officials who support terror-linked ideologies."
'We shouldn't stay silent after a faith-based killing, that is our belief. We consulted our peers. We received a great deal of support from students from 65 countries. We read the testimonies of survivors, and we acted on a shared moral obligation to speak out. We emphasised that this was not random violence. It was religious persecution," she said.
'We urged Harvard to stand against Hinduphobia and asked the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to deny visas to officials who support terror-linked ideologies," Tomar added.
ALSO READ | Indian Army Northern Command Chief Ousted Over Pahalgam Attack? PIB Fact-Checks Pro-Pakistani Handles
Another student, Rashmini Koparkar, expressed disappointment, stating that the guests at the event didn't condemn the Pahalgam attack and show sensitivity.
'We were expecting a certain degree of sensitivity and acknowledgement of what has happened. The event was pre-planned and already discussed. It was a coincidence that the event took place within five days. However, a more thoughtful gesture would have been preferable."
'First of all, they could have condemned the attacks. Secondly, the number of guests and the high-ranking officials that were arriving at this event were actually in question because this is a state which has been harbouring cross-border terrorism for years. India has been suffering," Koparkar said.
THE PAHALGAM TERROR ATTACK
On April 22, armed terrorists unleashed horror by opening fire at tourists in Kashmir's iconic Pahalgam.
The wives and other relatives of those killed in the attack later revealed to the media that the terrorists asked the names and the faith of tourists before shooting them dead.
They also reportedly asked those who said they belonged to the Muslim community to recite the Kalma.
The terrorists shot dead those who said they were Hindus, and left their relatives, especially women, asking them to narrate the ordeal to the government.
top videos
View all
The attack claimed the lives of 26 tourists, including one Nepali national.
ALSO READ | PM Modi Chairs Cabinet Committee On Political Affairs Meet, First Since Pulwama Attack
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
Harvard University Pahalgam attack
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
April 30, 2025, 13:40 IST
News world 'Organised By Students': Harvard Distances Itself From 'Pakistan Conference' Row After Pahalgam Attack
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
4 minutes ago
- Business Standard
How China gained control over the global rare earth minerals supply chain
The alarm has been intensifying in the past few weeks as global automakers, including major German manufacturers, raised concerns over China's export restrictions on rare earth alloys, magnets, and mixtures, warning that the curbs could trigger production delays and operational shutdowns. The latest backlash follows similar complaints from US firms and an Indian electric vehicle producer last week, highlighting the mounting global fallout from Beijing's April decision to suspend outbound shipments of several critical minerals. China has intensified its strategic dominance over the global supply of rare earth elements by adding critical minerals to its export control list, further straining already fragile global supply chains amid rising geopolitical tensions. The move, seen as a direct response to heightened tariffs imposed by the United States, underscores China's decades-long state-led push to monopolise both the mining and, more critically, the processing of rare earth materials—metals that are essential to a range of advanced technologies from electric vehicles to fighter jets. The 1990s strategy that gave China a monopoly Despite being relatively abundant in the Earth's crust, rare earths are rarely found in concentrated deposits and require complex, often environmentally hazardous, refining processes. China's edge lies not only in its 30–36 per cent share of global reserves but in its near-total control of the processing chain, estimated at over 85 per cent of global capacity. Beginning in the 1990s, Beijing classified rare earths as strategic resources, shielding the sector from foreign control and channelling significant state support into extraction and refining. Initiatives like 'Made in China 2025' ensured rare earths remained embedded in the country's high-tech ambitions. Western retreat allowed China to dominate supply chains As the US and other Western nations shut down domestic operations over cost and environmental concerns, China ramped up investment. It perfected the solvent extraction method, a process initially developed in the US but later abandoned due to regulatory and environmental challenges. By the early 2000s, China produced up to 97 per cent of the world's rare earths and began restricting exports, simultaneously driving up global prices and encouraging foreign manufacturers to relocate operations to China to secure uninterrupted supply. Export curbs on 7 key elements spark global concern In April, China extended export restrictions on terbium, yttrium, dysprosium, gadolinium, lutetium, samarium, and scandium—seven of the 17 recognised rare earth elements. Each plays a unique role in modern technologies and defence systems. Why terbium, yttrium and dysprosium matter globally Terbium: Vital for smartphone displays and aircraft magnets. China exports 85 per cent to Japan, just 5 per cent to the US. Yttrium: Used in medical lasers and superconductors. US relies 93 per cent on China. Dysprosium: Key for EV magnets and wind turbines. Majority goes to Japan and South Korea. Gadolinium: Common in MRI scans and reactor cores. Lutetium: Used in oil refining, mainly imported by the US. Samarium: Strategic for military-grade magnets and nuclear use. Scandium: Critical for aerospace; no US production in 50+ years. Japan, US, EU scramble to reduce China dependency China's move is expected to hit countries that are already struggling to build independent rare earth supply chains. According to Chinese customs data, Japan remains the largest buyer of these restricted materials, followed by South Korea and the US. Global supply chain diversification faces uphill battle In response, nations are accelerating efforts to reduce reliance on Chinese supply. Australia's Lynas Rare Earths is expanding its Malaysian plant. The EU is funding scandium production, and the US has revived mining at the Mountain Pass facility in California—though the ore is still sent abroad for processing. Yet such initiatives face formidable challenges. China's low production costs, lenient environmental standards, and strong vertical integration give it a lasting competitive edge.
Economic Times
5 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Viral video: Parle-G packet sells for Rs 2,300 in Gaza, Palestinian father shares post about daughter's favourite treat
A viral social media post featuring a Palestinian girl in Gaza holding a Parle-G biscuit has spotlighted the severe food shortages and inflated prices amid the ongoing conflict. The biscuit, ordinarily inexpensive, was purchased at a drastically increased price due to wartime scarcity. This image has resonated globally, symbolizing both the hardship and resilience of civilians in the crisis. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A biscuit amid the blockade Netizens react with emotion and appeals Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Symbol of hardship and hope A social media post by a Palestinian father showing his daughter receiving a packet of Parle-G has gone viral, drawing attention to the severe food shortage in Gaza and the soaring prices of basic goods amid the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict. The biscuit, which costs Rs 100 in regular international markets, was reportedly bought for over Rs 2,300 due to wartime Jawad, a resident of Gaza, posted a video on X (formerly Twitter) showing his daughter Rafif holding a Parle-G biscuit packet. In his post, he wrote, 'Even though the price jumped from €1.5 to over €24, I just couldn't deny Rafif her favorite treat.' The post quickly gained traction across social media, especially among Indian users, many of whom were surprised to see the Indian biscuit brand in a conflict-hit poured in, with many Indian users tagging government officials and the Parle company. One user wrote to India's Minister of External Affairs, '@DrSJaishankar that baby is eating India's favourite biscuit. Look I know we are neutral about the war. But can we please send more Parle G to Palestine? These are Glucose Biscuits and will help relieve the civilian population.'Another user tagged the biscuit-maker with a simple plea: '@ParleFamily can you help?' A third user said, 'She's got great taste. Parle-G is a part of my childhood. And my adulthood. And everything in between. I wish I could send you all the Parle-G in the world for Rafif.'The post comes at a time when Gaza is facing acute shortages of food and essential supplies due to the continuing Israeli military blockade. Basic commodities are being sold at steep prices. For many, the image of a child holding a Parle-G biscuit became a symbol of resilience and innocence caught in a humanitarian crisis.'Sad to see people profiteering in such times,' said another user reacting to the inflated price of the biscuit in incident highlights both the emotional power of small gestures in wartime and the role social media plays in connecting global communities during humanitarian emergencies.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 minutes ago
- Business Standard
No official Bharat Mata image, cannot be allowed in events: Kerala govt
The Left government in Kerala on Friday made it clear that it was not in agreement with the use of the Bharat Mata portrait at the Environment Day event at the Raj Bhavan here as the picture was not authorised as the official version by the Constitution or the Indian government. Kerala Agriculture Minister P Prasad, who boycotted the event at the Raj Bhavan a day ago over the use of the portrait, said that those in constitutional offices cannot convert government programmes into political events. A similar view was also expressed by state General Education Minister V Sivankutty who said that the Raj Bhavan and the Governor were above politics and said that Arlekar should withdraw from the stand taken by him. The government's stand came a day after Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar asserted that there would be no compromise on Bharat Mata. Prasad, while talking to a TV channel, said that no Bharat Mata portrait has ever been acknowledged as the official or authorised version by the Constitution or any of the governments in power since independence. He further said that the portrait about to be used at the event was not carrying the Indian flag, but that of a political organisation, and therefore, it could not be honoured during a government event. The minister said that the particular political organisation and the Governor were free to pay homage to the portrait at private events, but it cannot be done in state government programmes. "We all have a political view, but those in constitutional positions have restrictions on how they express it," he added. He said that the government view was that such a stand ought not to have been taken by a constitutional establishment and expressed hope that it will be corrected by the concerned persons. "It actually should not be repeated in our country. We cannot accept it in Kerala," he added. The minister also questioned why the Governor was "rigid" on the issue, when none of the earlier Governors in the state and not even the Presidents of the country have carried out such a practice in the past. For the World Environment Day event, the Raj Bhavan came out with a minute-to-minute programme, but it initially did not have anything about paying floral tributes to the portrait of Bharat Mata, he said. On eve of the programme, a new schedule was sent to us and it included the paying of floral tribute to Bharat Mata portrait. "So, I enquired with the Raj Bhavan about the floral tributes and asked them to send me a picture of the portrait. The portrait was the one used by the RSS and was not recognised or authorised as an official version, I informed the Raj Bhavan that we cannot offer floral tributes to it," he said. The minister said that the Raj Bhavan in response said they cannot remove the portrait. On being told that the opposition was criticising the lack of response on the issue by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, Prasad said that the Congress-led UDF was trying to gain political mileage out of it especially in view of the upcoming bypoll in Nilambur assembly constituency. After knowing Raj Bhavan's stand, the state government relocated the event to the Secretariat's Durbar Hall and the Raj Bhavan went ahead with its programme. Later, in a statement issued by the Raj Bhavan, the Governor said, "Whatever be the pressure, from whichever quarters, there will be no compromise whatsoever on Bharat Mata." In his speech at the Raj Bhavan programme, the Governor said two ministers--state Education Minister and Agriculture Minister--had agreed to attend the function but they did not turn up for the event. While Sangh outfit Bharatiya Vichara Kendram strongly backed the Governor, the ruling CPI(M) and the Congress criticised the Raj Bhavan on the matter.
