Welsh Government ‘disobeying Supreme Court trans ruling'
A human resources document for the devolved administration on 'trans inclusion' continues to claim 'trans women are women'.
That is despite the country's highest court ruling in April that transgender women are not legally women.
The Supreme Court ruled that the word 'sex' in the Equality Act refers only to biological sex, not to a person's gender identity.
But in the document, the Welsh Government said: 'The Welsh government's policy position is that trans women are women, trans men are men, and non-binary identities are valid.
'As an employer, the Welsh government civil service aims to be an inclusive and diverse workplace where everyone feels able to be their true selves.'
The document, which was published before the judgment but remains in use, was branded 'clearly unlawful' by gender-critical campaigners.
Cathy Larkman, lead for the Women's Rights Network in Wales, told The Telegraph: 'We are aware of this clearly unlawful policy, which reflects the long-held and deeply entrenched position of Welsh Government.
'We have long pointed out to them that their ideological approach has harmful impacts on the rights of women and girls in Wales.'
Darren Millar, leader of the Welsh Conservatives, said: 'Biological sex is a clear and important legal concept that must be respected. That the Welsh Labour Government appears to be ignoring the Supreme Court's ruling is totally unacceptable.
'A government that cannot properly distinguish between men and women, and fails to uphold the law, has no place running our public services.
'It is clearer than ever that Wales needs a new government that will protect women's rights, take action on single-sex spaces, women-only sports and fairness in employment policies and practices.'
The Welsh Government has maintained that it was still 'considering' the Supreme Court judgment despite almost three months having passed since it was given.
Elsewhere in the document, the government commits to editing 'all' transgender staff records to match their transgender identity – even when they do not have a gender recognition certificate (GRC) and therefore have not formally changed gender.
'A person does not require a GRC to live in their affirmed gender – the GRA [Gender Recognition Act] only confers legal recognition of that gender in certain areas,' it reads.
The document later adds: 'The Welsh Government will amend all records to match an employee's affirmed gender although HMRC and Pension provisions may only be changed following the receipt of a GRC.'
The document also says that non-binary staff who are required to wear workwear will be given male and female versions.
'Where gendered items are part of the uniform, staff can mix and match as they wish,' the document reads. 'Where non-binary staff require both a 'uniform A' and 'uniform B', this will be provided.'
Maya Forstater, chief executive of Sex Matters, said: 'This is a ticking time bomb for the Welsh Government. It's as if the For Women Scotland judgment hasn't happened. It ignores the established legal position that 'woman' and 'man' are defined by biological sex.
'Non-binary identities are certainly not recognised in law. This nonsensical policy would not withstand a legal challenge.'
A spokesman for the Welsh Government said: 'The document referred to predates the Supreme Court ruling.
'As an employer, we are working to understand the implications of the ruling on our policies and practices and will be guided by the revised statutory EHRC Code of Practice once it is published.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
27 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Could massive solar farms damage the Gwent Levels?
The call comes as the Welsh Government considers a new application to build a solar farm on the ecologically sensitive Gwent Levels. Planning and Environment Decisions Wales (PEDW) is currently reviewing the controversial Wentlooge Solar development. The proposed 318-acre site has sparked fierce debate, following damning evidence of environmental destruction caused by a similar solar project at Llanwern. Geoff Devlin of Stop Craig y Perthi—a campaign opposing another proposed solar farm near Bishton—said: "To influence debate in the Senedd, people need to be aware of and discussing the key issues. There is now clear evidence of serious environmental damage caused by the Llanwern solar site, and people must pressure politicians. It's the only way to influence those in the Senedd." PEDW is ruling on the Wentlooge site after operators RWE appealed a previous rejection under Development of National Significance (DNS) rules. The Welsh Government's 2019 declaration of a climate emergency may bolster RWE's case, as the site could be seen as contributing to climate policy goals. The legal battle coincides with a Welsh Government-commissioned study into the Llanwern solar plant—built entirely within two Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs)—which revealed catastrophic impacts on wildlife and water quality. Lapwing breeding pairs dropped from eight to two, with no successful nesting recorded in 2023. Shrill carder bee and brown-banded carder bee populations plummeted, likely due to herbicide use and failed wildflower planting. Bat activity declined sharply. The rare Eurasian crane, once seen as a hopeful returnee to the Levels, has vanished. The report also highlights dangerous pollutants—including cadmium and lead—leaking into the reens and ditches, vital waterways that support otters, water voles, and rare aquatic flora. These findings were presented at PEDW hearings, raising urgent questions about whether mitigation measures can ever succeed in such a fragile ecosystem. Gwent Wildlife Trust CEO Natalie Buttriss stated: "Mitigation has failed catastrophically. The proposed Wentlooge site is even larger than Llanwern and poses an even greater threat to this irreplaceable landscape." Campaigners emphasize they are not opposed to solar energy, but argue that developments must avoid nationally protected areas. Only 12% of Wales is designated as SSSI, and these fragments, they say, should be sacrosanct. With vast areas of non-designated land available, they urge the Welsh Government to redirect solar projects away from sensitive habitats. The Gwent Levels—often dubbed Wales's Amazon—are home to a rich mosaic of wildlife. Magor Marsh, a flagship reserve of Gwent Wildlife Trust, preserves one of the last remaining pieces of natural fenland in Britain. From cuckoos and warblers to kingfishers and wintering teal, the area supports biodiversity year-round. The reens, unique to the Levels, remain a haven for water voles—one of the UK's fastest declining mammals. Public support for protecting the Levels is growing, with backing from naturalists Iolo Williams, Gillian Burke, and Lizzie Daly, and authors Julian Hoffman and Horatio Clare. As PEDW prepares its decision, campaigners warn that approval could set a precedent for industrial-scale development on protected land. Meanwhile, green energy giant RWE still operates lignite power stations in Central Europe. Lignite is a highly invasive and inefficient source of carbon energy. RWE has committed to phasing out all lignite sites by 2030.
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Reeves 'set to raise taxes' to fund Starmer benefits surrender: PM says he is 'pleased' after Labour revolt forces guarantee that NO-ONE will be stripped of handouts
Keir Starmer insisted he was 'pleased' today after caving into a massive Labour revolt on welfare. The PM claimed he had 'listened' in making major concessions to rebels threatening to kill flagship legislation on health and disability benefits. More than 120 MPs had publicly promised to oppose the plans in a crunch vote on Tuesday. But after frantic negotiations - with Sir Keir personally lobbying backbenchers - a deal was announced after midnight, including guarantees that existing claimants will not lose money. The move looks like it could be enough to prevent a disastrous defeat for the government at second reading, although some critics are still vowing to oppose the measures. However, the change on Personal Independence Payment (Pip) is estimated to wipe up to £2billion off the £5billion savings by the end of the Parliament, and Universal Credit tweaks another £1billion. Rachel Reeves was already struggling to balance the books with the economy stalling and the previous £1.25billion U-turn on winter fuel allowance. Speaking on a visit to Wales this afternoon, Sir Keir said: 'We need to get it right. That's why we've been talking to colleagues and having a constructive discussion. We've now arrived at a package that delivers on the principles with some adjustments, and that's the right reform, and I'm really pleased now that we're able to take this forward.' Challenged to explain how the funding would be found, the premier said: 'Well, the changes still mean we can deliver the reforms that we need, and that's very important, because the system needs to be a system that is fit for the future, and this is fit for the future. 'All colleagues are signed up to that, but having listened, we've made the adjustments. The funding will be set out in the budget in the usual way, as you'd expect later in the year.' Ruth Curtice of the Resolution Foundation think-tank suggested the warned she will not be able to find the money in existing budgets. 'That leaves only extra borrowing - which the Chancellor doesn't have much space for unless she were to change her own fiscal rules - or tax rises,' she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. Asked if that effectively meant there would be tax rises, Ms Curtice said: 'Yeah. Unless the government were to get better news on the economy the next time the OBR does a forecast... but when we look at everything that's happened in the world since they last did that in March our estimate is that they will actually get bad news from the OBR as well.' Sir Keir and Ms Reeves have both insisted that Labour will stick to the manifesto pledge not to increase income tax, VAT or workers' national insurance. The Chancellor has also been adamant that she will not ease her fiscal rules, after borrowing more at the last Budget to splurge on the NHS, public sector pay and infrastructure. But Downing Street did appear to hint at the possibility of a temporary loosening today. Grilled on how the step would be funded, a spokesman said: 'There'll be no permanent increase in borrowing, as is standard. 'We'll set out how this will be funded at the budget, alongside a full economic and fiscal forecast in the autumn, in the usual way.' Asked whether the Government could say there would be no tax rises to pay for the changes, the spokesman said: 'As ever, as is a long-standing principle, tax decisions are set out at fiscal events.' Challenged how the costs would be covered, health minister Stephen Kinnock told Times Radio: 'The full details around what we are laying out, what I've summarised really today, is going to be laid out in Parliament, and then the Chancellor will set out the budget in the autumn the whole of the fiscal position and this will be an important part of that. 'But forgive me, I'm not in a position to set those figures out now. 'I think that is very much the Chancellor's job as we move into the budget in the autumn.' Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said she believed Labour was in 'a good place now' on the welfare Bill. She told broadcasters: 'We have listened to people, we have engaged with them. 'I think we're in a good place now, alongside the huge investments we are putting in to create the jobs that people need in every part of the country, to get waiting lists down in the NHS, to ensure stronger rights at work, but also to make sure there's employment support for those who can work and protections for those who can't.' Asked whether the Government had created a disparity between existing and new claimants, she insisted it was 'very common in the welfare system that there are protections for existing claimants'. 'That's happened before,' she said. Unveiling the concessions overnight, a No10 spokeswoman said: 'We have listened to MPs who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the system. 'This package will preserve the social security system for those who need it by putting it on a sustainable footing, provide dignity for those unable to work, supports those who can and reduce anxiety for those currently in the system. 'Our reforms are underpinned by Labour values and our determination to deliver the change the country voted for last year.' The Government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. In her letter, the Work and Pensions Secretary said: 'We recognise the proposed changes have been a source of uncertainty and anxiety. 'We will ensure that all of those currently receiving PIP will stay within the current system. The new eligibility requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only. 'Secondly, we will adjust the pathway of Universal Credit payment rates to make sure all existing recipients of the UC health element – and any new claimant meeting the severe conditions criteria – have their incomes fully protected in real terms.' She said a ministerial review would ensure the benefit is 'fair and fit for the future' and will be a 'coproduction' with disabled people, organisations which represent them and MPs. 'These important reforms are rooted in Labour values, and we want to get them right,' she said. The change in Pip payments would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. Tom Waters, an Associate Director at IFS, said: 'These changes more than halve the saving of the package of reforms as a whole, making the Chancellor's already difficult Budget balancing act that much harder. 'The decision is to protect existing health-related benefit claimants from the reforms, thereby making the savings entirely from new claimants to these benefits. 'This will create big differences – thousands of pounds a year, for many years in some cases – between similar people with similar health conditions who happen to have applied at a slightly different time.' If the legislation clears its first hurdle on Tuesday, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' tabled by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. She said: 'This is a good deal. It is massive changes to ensure the most vulnerable people are protected… and, crucially, involving disabled people themselves in the design of future benefit changes.' While the concessions look set to reassure some of those who had been leading the rebellion, other MPs remained opposed before the announcement.
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
46 people arrested at protest supporting banned Palestine Action
Police have arrested 46 people at a protest against Palestine Action being designated a proscribed terror group, the Metropolitan Police said. Protesters gathered for the second week in a row in central London after police reiterated that showing support for the group was a criminal offence. Other demonstrations were also planned across the UK on Saturday, including in Manchester, Cardiff and Londonderry, Northern Ireland, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries, who organised the event. Two groups of protesters gathered underneath both the Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela statues in Parliament Square for the demonstration shortly after 1pm. The individuals then wrote the message 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action' with black markers on pieces of cardboard, and silently held the signs aloft as they were surrounded by Metropolitan Police officers and members of the media. Some demonstrators could be seen lying on top of each other on the floor as police searched their bags and took their ID cards and handmade signs. Officers could then be seen carrying away a number of protesters who were lying down, lifting them off the ground and into waiting police vans parked around the square. Other standing protesters were also led away from the statues and placed into the vans. The last of the protesters was lifted from the Nelson Mandela statue shortly after 2.30pm. A Metropolitan Police officer at the scene told the PA news agency that 46 people had been arrested at the protest. The offences mainly related to Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000, the officer said. In a post shared on X, Defend Our Juries said the protesters had been arrested 'for holding cardboard signs' and that further arrests had been made at the Manchester demonstration. Scotland Yard said its stance remains that officers will act where criminal offences, including support of proscribed groups or organisations, are committed. The force added that this includes 'chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos'. Police arrested 29 people at a similar protest in Parliament Square last weekend. The terror group designation means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The move to ban the organisation came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action, saying that the vandalism of the planes was 'disgraceful' and the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'.
