logo
German Industry At A Crossroads Amid Political Upheaval & Thirst For Film Reform

German Industry At A Crossroads Amid Political Upheaval & Thirst For Film Reform

Yahoo17-02-2025

As Germany heads into a key general election on February 23, there's a cloud of uncertainty hanging over the country's film industry. Europe's largest economy is facing a third consecutive year of recession, which is having a stark knock-on effect on the German media landscape as inflation and cost of energy prices hit the production sector.
Across the last three years, the industry has been seeking a solution to its woes by working closely with the country's government to install what was slated to be the country's biggest reform to film funding to date. For many years, Germany has traditionally been a powerhouse in the international film sector, particularly at markets such as the EFM where a German acquisition of a title, which was often aided by strong TV commitments, was a huge coup for producers and sellers. But things are evolving as traditional TV commitments are less potent. Germany's box office dipped by 6.5% year-on-year in 2024, the most of all major European territories.
More from Deadline
German Talents From 'Unorthodox', 'We Children From Bahnhof Zoo' & 'Tides' Among Those Selected For German Films Face To Face Campaign
UFA Hires 'September 5' EP; 'Patience' Trailer; BBC/CBC Podcast; AACTA Award Noms - Global Briefs
Critical Content Boss Jenny Daly Talks Going Global, Prepping Formats With 'Physical: 100' Team & Rebooting 'Storage Hunters' As Firm Strikes Deal With Germany's Leonine
Built across three pillars, the proposed film funding reform involved an improved version of its German Film Law (FFG), a tax incentive model and a law for streamer investment obligations with IP protections for indie producers. Insiders say progress was being made until Germany's coalition of the Social Democrats (SDP), Free Democratic Party (FDP) and the Green party collapsed in November, effectively grinding conversations to an abrupt halt.
'We found a solution for basically every single topic,' says Constantin CEO Oliver Berben. 'We were talking about a three-legged system that we're trying to build here to grow the industry.'
Before it was dissolved in December, the parliament ushered in an improved but nonetheless watered-down version of the new film funding law, which aims to create a more centralized funding system for production, distribution and exhibition, it was met by some with a bittersweet response as it left the long gestating proposed 30% tax incentive and streamer investment obligation laws unratified.
There's also discomfort at the exclusion of other anticipated reforms around diversity and green production, especially with the anti-immigrant and anti-green policies of far right party AFD, which is forecast to take 22% of the vote in the election.
An early draft of the FFG included specific gender equality and anti-discrimination standards that would have been codified under law and brought Germany in line with standards in other territories like the UK. The reforms had been drafted in close consultation with industry unions like the Black German Filmmakers Association (Schwarze Filmschaffende).
'We'd been talking to them for two years,' Association board member Benita Sarah Bailey says. 'We went to the Bundestag and spoke with MPs and the Cultural Ministry. We made proposals and shaped the law. It was going great. Better than we expected. But then the coalition broke down, ironically on the day of Trump's election, so to make sure at least some of the law passed, there had to be a compromise with those who demanded the diversity committee was excluded. So basically, they traded us in.'
Bailey describes the exclusion as a 'major blow' for filmmakers in Germany who had believed codified standards on diversity and inclusion could protect them from the volatility of changing political winds in Germany.
'We were hoping to get this ratified before the upcoming elections because the law lasts for five years,' Bailey says. 'It can't be changed in that time, no matter who takes power. That's why it was so important for us.'
The issue of time and the forthcoming election is a worry for many German industry members. The fear that if these laws aren't passed fairly quickly – which is a possibility with a new government – this will lead to a significant decline in local productions as cash-strapped indie producers look to shoot in neighboring nations with more favorable tax breaks such as Austria and the Czech Republic.
'Nobody sees Germany as a relevant production hub because we don't have any kind of tax incentive or investment obligation like other big production countries in Europe,' says Prof. Dr. Lisa Giehl, EVP of Subsidies & Public Policy at Leonine.
She adds: 'The German funding system is so complicated, and we need a simpler system. We have so few international productions shooting here because of our funding situation and we need to be attractive and look for bigger productions from the UK, the U.S. and elsewhere to come and shoot here.'
FFG
The new German federal FFG law, which regulates state funding for the German film industry, was passed in December and some are encouraged by the new structure, which sees the country's main rebate subsidy programs – the German Federal Film Fund (DFFF) and the German Motion Picture Fund (GMPF) – raise its existing cash back production grant from 25% to 30%. Additionally, Germany's overall funding pot remains the same at $375M.
Philipp Kreuzer, Chairman of the Supervisory Board of German Films and founder of Penzing Studios in Munich which recently housed the Cliffhanger reboot with Lily James, is encouraged by the new measures that have been put in place in the FFG. 'The support is more automatic, and the grant has been increased and optimized,' he says.
'The old model is still there, and it works,' he says. 'The fact there is no tax credit doesn't mean there are no incentives. The government has managed to increase the existing model until we get a tax credit in place.'
The rebate, however, is still capped at $27.6M per feature film and high-end TV series have been offered rebates of between 20% and 25%, with a cap of $11M.
German Films Managing Director Simone Baumann agrees. 'It's a much more automatic system now, which is good news and there is more money for development.'
But producer Henning Kamm of Real Film Berlin, who is behind TV projects such as Unorthodox and upcoming Berlin ER, is dubious. 'They're prolonging the system we had in place before – the DFFF and GMPF,' he says. 'They've made it prettier but it's by far not what was intended, which was having a true tax rebate system that has no ceiling. We're still dealing with a limited amount per year and now that you can claim a higher percentage, it means that with more productions getting off the ground, the pool is going to be emptier quicker.'
Investment obligation
Giehl says that the most important step is the investment obligation from streaming providers, which would be 'a real game changer' for Germany.
Similar deals have been struck with streamers in neighboring countries like France where Disney+ signed a landmark media chronology deal agreeing to invest 25% of its annual net turnover in France in French and European productions. The Mickey Mouse streamer has also committed to acquiring a minimum of 70 feature films over the three-year period. Apple TV+ similarly signed its first agreement with French audiovisual sector professional bodies in January committing the platform to investing 20% of its turnover in local and European productions.
Although it is important to note that while German-based productions continue to travel far, with titles like Netflix's Liebes Kind (Dear Child) and Prime Video's soapy romantic drama Maxton Hall – The World Between Us topping the streaming charts, the country hasn't been immune to the tough and largely arbitrary effects of global streaming market correction. Paramount Global has pulled out of the territory along with HBO Max and Starz Play, while Apple, Disney+, and Prime Video have reined in spending.
Discussing the investment obligation, one prominent local producer told us it is really 'a question of perspective.'
'Those affected, especially streamers and media library providers, are of course working against it,' the producer says. 'However, an overall package would be important not only to attract foreign projects, but also to boost German productions.'
Fabian Gasmia of Seven Elephants, who most recently produced Lena Dunham and Stephen Fry starrer Treasure says: 'Public funding should only be granted to productions where the rights remain with, or at least revert to, a German or European-owned company. This is the only way to build a resilient and independent German industry, rather than subsidizing international corporations without long-term benefits for the local ecosystem.'
In order to get the tax incentive across the line in Germany, Giehl notes that it's essential to get Germany's various federal states to approve the measures but with the current limbo of the political situation in the country, everything is at a standstill.
'It's very complicated to get them into the boat because they feel a loss of tax income for their own state,' she says. 'As we all know, the tax incentive model has a very high return on investment, but it's still complicated and a majority of the federal states would have to agree to this. We feel there is a strong will to implement the tax incentive, but we'll have to wait until after the elections.'
For Berben and many of his counterparts, there's a question mark around the speed at which the new government may or may not pass these laws. 'When the new government comes into place, we don't know how long it will take to get these measures implemented, if at all. If they start this process from scratch, it could take another year, and we would have two or three years until the whole industry would be able to step up and compete with neighboring countries in Europe.' This, he says, may result in 'local productions moving out of Germany'.
'It will be a huge problem for people working in the industry because there will be less work,' he says. 'The other thing that might happen is that production will not happen at all, especially for companies that are smaller. If they don't have the fiscal ability, how will they finance a movie? It's not going to work.'
Next steps
On a national level, if the new government doesn't pass the remaining two pillars of the film laws, it will be extremely harmful to the business, says Kamm. 'We would completely lose the attractiveness for outside productions coming into Germany if we don't have an incentive in place.'
Kamm stressed concerns for the health of Germany's renowned production entities such as Studio Babelsberg, which largely depend on big, Hollywood productions to use their studios. Kamm recently shot a Disney+ show at Babelsberg and admits he was surprised he was able to get the production into the studio. 'I would have never expected to be able to shoot at this prestigious studio,' he says.'In the past, it was always filled with American productions. Let's hope they're coming back soon and we can work side by side.'
Rental services, VFX and post-production houses equally all rely on international business coming in. 'This would really set the industry back because there would be a lot less international finance coming in.'
Kamm points to his recent production Berlin ER, which was originally set up at Sky but when they pulled out of German originals at the last hour, ZDF and AppleTV+ stepped in with the streamer taking worldwide rights except for UK and Ireland, which Kamm retained. That experience showed him that 'retaining rights is extremely important and I would want to push this through as much as we possibly can.'
'I expect it to be easier to retain rights than ask for a share in profits,' he says. 'To me, this would mean a cultural shift. Historically, it's always been enough for us to produce German content for the German market – unlike smaller territories there wasn't an existential need to compete on the on the international market. It would give another perspective.'
Best of Deadline
How To Watch Sunday's 'SNL50: The Anniversary Special' Online & On TV
Everything We Know About Christopher Nolan's Next Film – 'The Odyssey': Release Date, Cast And More
'Bridgerton' Season 4: Everything We Know So Far

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and Putin hint at US-Russia trade revival, but business environment remains hostile

time20 minutes ago

Trump and Putin hint at US-Russia trade revival, but business environment remains hostile

Hundreds of foreign companies left Russia after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, including major U.S. firms like Coca-Cola, Nike, Starbucks, ExxonMobil and Ford Motor Co. But after more than three years of war, President Donald Trump has held out the prospect of restoring U.S.-Russia trade if there's ever a peace settlement. And Russian President Vladimir Putin has said foreign companies could come back under some circumstances. 'Russia wants to do largescale TRADE with the United States when this catastrophic 'bloodbath' is over, and I agree,' Trump said in a statement after a phone call with Putin. 'There is a tremendous opportunity for Russia to create massive amounts of jobs and wealth. Its potential is UNLIMITED.' The president then shifted his tone toward Putin after heavy drone and missile attacks on Kyiv, saying Putin 'has gone absolutely crazy' and threatening new sanctions. That and recent comments from Putin warning Western companies against reclaiming their former stakes seemed to reflect reality more accurately — that it's not going to be a smooth process for businesses going back into Russia. That's because Russia's business environment has massively changed since 2022. And not in ways that favor foreign companies. And with Putin escalating attacks and holding on to territory demands Ukraine likely isn't going to accept, a peace deal seems distant indeed. Here are factors that could deter U.S. companies from ever going back: Russian law classifies Ukraine's allies as 'unfriendly states' and imposes severe restrictions on businesses from more than 50 countries. Those include limits on withdrawing money and equipment as well as allowing the Russian government to take control of companies deemed important. Foreign owners' votes on boards of directors can be legally disregarded. Companies that left were required to sell their businesses for 50% or less of their assessed worth, or simply wrote them off while Kremlin-friendly business groups snapped up their assets on the cheap. Under a 2023 presidential decree the Russian government took control of Finnish energy company Fortum, German power company Unipro, France's dairy company Danone and Danish brewer Carlsberg. Even if a peace deal removed the U.S. from the list of unfriendlies, and if the massive Western sanctions restricting business in Russia were dropped, the track record of losses would remain vivid. And there's little sign any of that is going to happen. While the Russian government has talked in general about companies coming back, 'there's no specific evidence of any one company saying that they are ready to come back,' said Chris Weafer, CEO of Macro-Advisory Ltd. consultancy. 'It's all at the political narrative level.' Russia's actions and legal changes have left 'long-lasting damage' to its business environment, says Elina Ribakova, non-resident senior fellow at the Bruegel research institute in Brussels. She said a return of U.S. businesses is 'not very likely.' In a meeting at the Kremlin on May 26 to mark Russian Entrepreneurs Day, Putin said that Russia needed to throttle large tech firms such as Zoom and Microsoft, which had restricted their services in Russia after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, so that domestic tech companies could thrive instead. 'We need to strangle them,' Putin said. 'After all, they are trying to strangle us: we need to reciprocate. We didn't kick anyone out; we didn't interfere with anyone. We provided the most favorable conditions possible for their work here, in our market, and they are trying to strangle us.' He reassured a representative from Vkusno-i Tochka (Tasty-period) — the Russian-owned company that took over McDonald's restaurants in the country — that Moscow would aid them if the U.S. fast food giant tried to buy back its former stores. Asked for comment, McDonald's referred to their 2022 statement that 'ownership of the business in Russia is no longer tenable.' On top of Russia's difficult business environment, the economy is likely to stagnate due to lack of investment in sectors other than the military, economists say. 'Russia has one of the lowest projected long-term growth rates and one of the highest levels of country risk in the world,' says Heli Simola, senior economist at the Bank of Finland in a blog post. 'Only Belarus offers an equally lousy combination of growth and risk.' Most of the opportunity to make money is related to military production, and it's unlikely U.S. companies would work with the Russian military-industrial complex, said Ribakova. 'It's not clear where exactly one could plug in and expect outsize returns that would compensate for this negative investment environment.' Some companies, including Renault and Ford Motor Co., left with repurchase agreements letting them buy back their stakes years later if conditions change. But given Russia's unsteady legal environment, that's tough to count on. The Russian purchasers may try to change the terms, look for more money, or ignore the agreements, said Weafer. 'There's a lot of uncertainty as to how those buyback auctions will be enforced.' Multinational oil companies were among those who suffered losses leaving Russia, so it's an open question whether they would want to try again even given Russia's vast oil and gas reserves. US.. major ExxonMobil saw its stake in the Sakhalin oil project unilaterally terminated and wrote off $3.4 billion. Russia's major oil companies have less need of foreign partners than they did in the immediate post-Soviet era, though smaller oil field services might want to return given the size of Russia's oil industry. But they would have to face new requirements on establishing local presence and investment, Weafer said. According to the Kyiv School of Economics, 2,329 foreign companies are still doing business in Russia, many from China or other countries that aren't allied with Ukraine, while 1,344 are in the process of leaving and 494 have exited completely. The Yale School of Management's Chief Executive Leadership Institute lists some two dozen U.S. companies still doing business in Russia, while some 100 more have cut back by halting new investments. U.S. sanctions are considered the toughest, because they carry the threat of being cut off from the U.S. banking and financial system. But the EU is still slapping new rounds of sanctions on Russia. Even if U.S. sanctions are dropped, EU sanctions would continue to present compliance headaches for any company that also wants to do business in Europe.

Trump and Putin hint at US-Russia trade revival, but business environment remains hostile
Trump and Putin hint at US-Russia trade revival, but business environment remains hostile

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump and Putin hint at US-Russia trade revival, but business environment remains hostile

Hundreds of foreign companies left Russia after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, including major U.S. firms like Coca-Cola, Nike, Starbucks, ExxonMobil and Ford Motor Co. But after more than three years of war, President Donald Trump has held out the prospect of restoring U.S.-Russia trade if there's ever a peace settlement. And Russian President Vladimir Putin has said foreign companies could come back under some circumstances. 'Russia wants to do largescale TRADE with the United States when this catastrophic 'bloodbath' is over, and I agree,' Trump said in a statement after a phone call with Putin. 'There is a tremendous opportunity for Russia to create massive amounts of jobs and wealth. Its potential is UNLIMITED.' The president then shifted his tone toward Putin after heavy drone and missile attacks on Kyiv, saying Putin 'has gone absolutely crazy' and threatening new sanctions. That and recent comments from Putin warning Western companies against reclaiming their former stakes seemed to reflect reality more accurately — that it's not going to be a smooth process for businesses going back into Russia. That's because Russia's business environment has massively changed since 2022. And not in ways that favor foreign companies. And with Putin escalating attacks and holding on to territory demands Ukraine likely isn't going to accept, a peace deal seems distant indeed. Here are factors that could deter U.S. companies from ever going back: Risk of losing it all Russian law classifies Ukraine's allies as 'unfriendly states' and imposes severe restrictions on businesses from more than 50 countries. Those include limits on withdrawing money and equipment as well as allowing the Russian government to take control of companies deemed important. Foreign owners' votes on boards of directors can be legally disregarded. Companies that left were required to sell their businesses for 50% or less of their assessed worth, or simply wrote them off while Kremlin-friendly business groups snapped up their assets on the cheap. Under a 2023 presidential decree the Russian government took control of Finnish energy company Fortum, German power company Unipro, France's dairy company Danone and Danish brewer Carlsberg. Even if a peace deal removed the U.S. from the list of unfriendlies, and if the massive Western sanctions restricting business in Russia were dropped, the track record of losses would remain vivid. And there's little sign any of that is going to happen. While the Russian government has talked in general about companies coming back, 'there's no specific evidence of any one company saying that they are ready to come back,' said Chris Weafer, CEO of Macro-Advisory Ltd. consultancy. 'It's all at the political narrative level.' Russia's actions and legal changes have left 'long-lasting damage' to its business environment, says Elina Ribakova, non-resident senior fellow at the Bruegel research institute in Brussels. She said a return of U.S. businesses is 'not very likely.' 'We need to strangle them' In a meeting at the Kremlin on May 26 to mark Russian Entrepreneurs Day, Putin said that Russia needed to throttle large tech firms such as Zoom and Microsoft, which had restricted their services in Russia after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, so that domestic tech companies could thrive instead. 'We need to strangle them,' Putin said. 'After all, they are trying to strangle us: we need to reciprocate. We didn't kick anyone out; we didn't interfere with anyone. We provided the most favorable conditions possible for their work here, in our market, and they are trying to strangle us.' He reassured a representative from Vkusno-i Tochka (Tasty-period) — the Russian-owned company that took over McDonald's restaurants in the country — that Moscow would aid them if the U.S. fast food giant tried to buy back its former stores. Asked for comment, McDonald's referred to their 2022 statement that 'ownership of the business in Russia is no longer tenable.' Not much upside On top of Russia's difficult business environment, the economy is likely to stagnate due to lack of investment in sectors other than the military, economists say. 'Russia has one of the lowest projected long-term growth rates and one of the highest levels of country risk in the world,' says Heli Simola, senior economist at the Bank of Finland in a blog post. 'Only Belarus offers an equally lousy combination of growth and risk.' Most of the opportunity to make money is related to military production, and it's unlikely U.S. companies would work with the Russian military-industrial complex, said Ribakova. 'It's not clear where exactly one could plug in and expect outsize returns that would compensate for this negative investment environment.' Repurchase agreements Some companies, including Renault and Ford Motor Co., left with repurchase agreements letting them buy back their stakes years later if conditions change. But given Russia's unsteady legal environment, that's tough to count on. The Russian purchasers may try to change the terms, look for more money, or ignore the agreements, said Weafer. 'There's a lot of uncertainty as to how those buyback auctions will be enforced.' But what about the oil and gas? Multinational oil companies were among those who suffered losses leaving Russia, so it's an open question whether they would want to try again even given Russia's vast oil and gas reserves. US.. major ExxonMobil saw its stake in the Sakhalin oil project unilaterally terminated and wrote off $3.4 billion. Russia's major oil companies have less need of foreign partners than they did in the immediate post-Soviet era, though smaller oil field services might want to return given the size of Russia's oil industry. But they would have to face new requirements on establishing local presence and investment, Weafer said. Some never left According to the Kyiv School of Economics, 2,329 foreign companies are still doing business in Russia, many from China or other countries that aren't allied with Ukraine, while 1,344 are in the process of leaving and 494 have exited completely. The Yale School of Management's Chief Executive Leadership Institute lists some two dozen U.S. companies still doing business in Russia, while some 100 more have cut back by halting new investments. EU sanctions could remain even if US open U.S. sanctions are considered the toughest, because they carry the threat of being cut off from the U.S. banking and financial system. But the EU is still slapping new rounds of sanctions on Russia. Even if U.S. sanctions are dropped, EU sanctions would continue to present compliance headaches for any company that also wants to do business in Europe.

EU member Bulgaria faces protests over adopting the euro
EU member Bulgaria faces protests over adopting the euro

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EU member Bulgaria faces protests over adopting the euro

Bulgaria is expected to get a green light from Brussels in June to adopt the euro -- but the prospect is unsettling many citizens. "If Bulgaria joins the eurozone, it will be like boarding the Titanic," Nikolai Ivanov, a retired senior official, told AFP at a recent protest calling for the country's currency -- the lev -- to be maintained. Since January, opponents of Bulgaria adopting the common European currency have launched demonstrations and demanded a referendum on the issue, amid a torrent of disinformation. Memories of a 1996-1997 economic crisis that saw 14 banks go bankrupt and hyperinflation of more than 300 percent also resurfaced, fuelling the opposition. Several recent surveys showed nearly half of those questioned said they were opposed to Bulgaria joining the eurozone. The debate has reignited anti-EU propaganda, and many of those opposed to adoption of the euro have taken to waving Russian flags. Bulgaria, which joined the European Union in 2007, is the poorest nation in the bloc. And "the poor are afraid of becoming even poorer", said Boriana Dimitrova, director of the Alpha Research institute. That, coupled with a mistrust of institutions after years of instability, has created fertile conditions for the population of 6.4 million to fear economic change. That fear has been stoked by some political groups, including the far-right Vazrazhdane party, which called for a new anti-euro rally on Saturday in the capital. The country's pro-Russian president, Rumen Radev, made a surprise announcement in early May also calling for a referendum on the matter. This week, he accused the government of not implementing needed measures to allow the "most vulnerable" to withstand the shock of euro adoption. - Pro-EU voices struggling - A third of Bulgarians faced the threat of poverty or social exclusion last year, according to Eurostat figures. People particularly in small towns and rural areas are reluctant to adopt the single currency, with some of them having never travelled abroad and not used to international transactions. Disinformation widely shared on social networks claims, falsely, that with the introduction of the euro, "Brussels will confiscate your savings to finance Ukraine". Dimitrova told AFP that Radev was making "a well-calculated political move", appealing to a disillusioned segment of the electorate. But his referendum proposal, deemed "unconstitutional", sparked an outcry from legal experts, and from Assembly Speaker Natalia Kiselova, who refused to put it to a vote. Meanwhile, pro-European voices are struggling to be heard. "In Sofia and the larger cities, the population -- wealthier, better educated and younger -- sees it as a logical next step in the European integration process," Dimitrova said. Institutions and banks are already prepared, and the coins' design has been chosen, with the local two-euro coin showing off the inscription "God protect Bulgaria". But in a sign of the lack of information and a feeling of inferiority that is still widespread in the country, "some people still ask me if the Bulgarian euro will even be valid in France or Germany", Dimitrova said. str-rb-anb/jza/rmb/sco

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store