Trump 'serious' about Washington Commanders threat, White House says
Leavitt did not address how Trump has the power to restrict the team's planned relocation back to the site of Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium in D.C., which served as Washington's home stadium from 1961 to 1996, before the team's move to Landover, Maryland.
Trump's ability to unilaterally scrap the team's deal for a new stadium to return to the RFK site appears doubtful after Congress passed a law in December that transferred ownership of the RFK stadium site from the National Park Service to the District of Columbia. The $3.7 billion stadium deal, which includes $1.1 billion in local taxpayer funds, is in the hands of the D.C. Council, which is nearing a vote on the project.
However, Trump has shown a willingness in other political battles to threaten federal funding from states, cities, colleges and universities to get his way. Another route could be to lobby Republicans in Congress to rescind the land transfer bill they passed last year.
More: Trump threatens Washington Commanders' stadium plans if franchise doesn't change name
White House doubles down on Trump's threat
Leavitt pointed to Trump's reputation as a dealmaker. "As part of the 'art of the deal,' part of his negotiating skills, as you know, sports is one of the many passions of this president and he wants to see this team's name changed," she said.
When asked to explain Trump's authority to block the Commanders' stadium deal, a White House official directed USA TODAY to Leavitt's remarks.
More: DC locals on Trump's attempt to force Commanders' name change: Stay in your 'own lane'
The Commanders, which enjoyed its most successful season in decades after making it to the NFC Championship Game last year, have not commented since Trump brought up the team's name in a Truth Social post on Sunday. In the same post, Trump called on another professional sports team that was previously named for native Americans - the Cleveland Guardians, formerly the Indians - to go back to its old name.
"The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this," Trump wrote. "Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!"
Trump had previously voiced support for the team's former name, but it marked the first time he has used his position to call for a name change. He followed it up with a subsequent post suggesting he might hold up the team's stadium plans if it doesn't ditch Commanders and go back to its former name.
"I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,'" Trump wrote. "I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington. The Team would be much more valuable, and the Deal would be more exciting for everyone."
DC mayor focuses on council, not Trump
Under the Constitution, Congress has authority over the District of Columbia. The District of Columbia Home Rule Act, signed by President Richard Nixon in 1973, gave the city local governance including an elected mayor and city council. However, Congress can still review all legislation passed by the D.C. Council and retains authority over the district's budget.
No sign off from Trump is required for approval of the Commanders' stadium deal.
Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser, who helped orchestrate the stadium deal, deflected when a reporter asked her Monday whether she believes Trump has the power to block the Commanders' stadium deal.
"I think the thing that we should focus on in D.C. is doing our part," Bowser said, adding that the council still needs to approve the stadium deal. "We need to complete our part."
Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has often talked about taking over the governance of D.C., a city he has long derided for crime and homelessness. Nevertheless, Trump hosted Bowser and the Commanders' Harris at the White House in May to announce Washington's National Mall would host the 2027 NFL Draft.
"I think you've seen the president gets involved in a lot of things that most presidents have not," Leavitt said when asked why changing the Commanders' name is a priority for Trump. "He's a nontraditional president. He likes to see results on behalf of the American people."
She added that Trump is getting behind something most Americans want.
"If you actually poll this issue with sports fans across the country and even in this city, people actually do support the president's position on this and the name change," Leavitt said.
Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
38 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Fed governor Kugler to resign, offering Trump early vacancy to fill
Kugler's resignation gives Trump an opportunity to at least partially shape the Fed's makeup to his liking ahead of her original departure date. Kugler, a Biden-appointed governor, joined the seven-member board in 2023 and was set to serve through January 2026. Kugler didn't offer a reason for her Aug. 8 departure. A statement from the Fed said she would return to Georgetown University as a professor this fall. In a letter to President Donald Trump, Kugler said it has been the "honor of a lifetime" to serve on the Fed's board of governors. "I am especially honored to have served during a critical time in achieving our dual mandate of bringing down prices and keeping a strong and resilient labor market," Kugler said. "The Federal Reserve does important work to help foster a healthy economy and it has been a privilege to work towards that goal on behalf of all Americans for nearly two years." In a July 30 note, Bill Adams, chief economist for Comerica Bank, noted that Trump may use Kugler's opening to appoint his pick for Fed Chair Jerome Powell's replacement. Powell, who was appointed by Trump in 2017, will have his term as Fed chair end in May 2026. The president, who has recently backed away from threats to fire Powell, has made clear that he's unhappy with the Fed's decision to hold off on rate cuts. In June, Trump said he's hunting for a new Fed chair and has narrowed his search to "three or four people." Adams said Trump's next pick for chair could be a current Federal Open Market Committee member or an external hire. "Perhaps the next Chair will have a different approach to monetary policy than Powell, but it's hard to say--recall that Powell himself is a Trump appointee," Adams wrote on July 30, before Kugler announced her resignation. "In any case, the Fed seems likely to cut interest rates between now and when Powell's term ends, which would make the transition feel less fraught."
The Herald Scotland
38 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
July jobs report takeaways: Weakening labor market, recession fears
By late afternoon Aug. 1, Trump announced he ordered the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the U.S. commissioner of Labor Statistics. The president in a social media post accused McEntarfer of manipulating figures for "political purposes," though he did not provide any evidence. In early afternoon trading, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down about 607 points and the benchmark S&P 500 index was off 1.5% Over the past three months, the economy has averaged just 35,000 employment gains. Here are a few takeaways: This was no blip The poor showing likely wasn't an outlier that will be followed by a resumption of healthy job gains in the months ahead, economists said. Consumers have reined in their spending somewhat, amid worries about Trump's tariffs pushing up prices, and are pulling back on travel and recreational activities. As more of the import charges hit store shelves, Americans will likely restrain their outlays further, Pantheon Macroeconomics wrote in a note to clients. That should translate into weaker job gains, especially in sectors such as manufacturing, retail, trucking and warehousing, the research firm said. And on July 31, Trump escalated his global trade fight with a sweeping new round of import levies. Meanwhile, executives' confidence in the business outlook has been shaken in recent months by the tariffs - which are squeezing profit margins - and that's expected to spell a more pronounced decline in business investment, Pantheon said. "Sadly, employment appears set for a further summer slowdown as firms, facing renewed cost volatility from escalating trade tensions, remain focused on managing labor costs through reduced hiring, performance-based layoffs, restrained wage growth, and lower entry-level wages," Gregory Daco, chief economist of EY-Parthenon, wrote to clients. Also, after the Supreme Court recently lifted a stay on mass federal layoffs, "the decline in federal employment likely will gather more momentum over the coming months," Pantheon said. The Labor Department has tracked 84,000 federal job losses this year, but the number of buyouts and job cuts announced was much larger. Hiring across the economy hit a 12-month low in June, Labor Department figures show. Will there be a recession in 2025? The dreaded word has slipped back into the conversation after fading the past couple of months as Trump delayed many tariffs and reached deals with several countries. "To me, today's jobs report is what entering a recession looks like," Josh Bivens, chief economist of the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute, said in a statement. "Could we pull up? Sure. But if we look back and end up dating an official recession that starts 3-6 months from now, this is what it would look like today - rapid softening/deterioration in the labor market." A recession now appears "very, very likely" unless Trump lowers the tariffs by Labor Day, said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics. Could a skidding economy and stock market lead Trump to reverse course? A darkening economic outlook and tumbling stock market could well prompt Trump to try to soften the import fees, Zandi said. "He's going to try to pull it back," he said. But if he doesn't act before Labor Day, "It will be too late," Zandi said, adding the duties will start to ripple too dramatically into retail prices and consumer and business sentiment for the effects to be undone. A September fed rate cut likely At a July 30 news conference following the Fed's decision to hold rates steady for a fifth straight meeting, Fed Chair Jerome Powell described the labor market as solid and balanced. He also said officials would focus primarily on the unemployment rate as they decide whether to lower rates in September. The jobless rate edged up to 4.2% in July. It's still historically low even as Trump's immigration constraints, particularly deportations, shrank the labor force - the pool of people working or looking for jobs. Still, employer demand for employees has waned. But Morgan Stanley suggested the feeble job gains of the past three months would spur the Fed to act in September despite stable unemployment. "The slower payroll pace keeps downside risks elevated and a September cut on the table," Morgan Stanley said in a research note. Fed fund futures markets are now putting the chances of a September rate decrease at 85%, up from 45% after Powell's July 30 remarks. AI is starting to crimp job gains Professional and business services shed 14,000 jobs in July and payroll gains in the sprawling white-collar sector have been stagnant for more than two years. July's showing included job losses in computer and technical roles. Staffing executives say companies are replacing many entry-level information technology workers with artificial intelligence. "It is happening," Goldman Sachs chief economist Jan Hatzius said on CNBC after the release of the July jobs report. "This is not the main thing driving the labor market... But we're seeing early signs." (This story was updated to add new information)
The Herald Scotland
38 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Voters hate Medicaid cuts. Now Republicans are backpedaling
But many of those same Republicans in Congress are now openly fretting about President Donald Trump's signature One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which he signed into law on July 4. Some worry that it slashes Medicaid funding for the working poor. Some think it doesn't cut enough federal funding. And it adds $4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Call this "Vote yes and second-guess." That's not exactly the vibe Trump was looking for from his political party for what he had hoped would be a summer victory tour to celebrate this and other early accomplishments in his second term. But here, Trump - and his party in next year's midterm elections - have a serious problem. Americans don't like his massive budget bill, which swaps short-term tax relief for some low-income working people for permanent tax cuts for America's wealthiest people. That's only going to get worse as Americans see what programs Trump and his Republican allies have defunded and where they are boosting federal spending. Trump is dumping money into immigration policies Americans don't like Consider immigration, a signature issue for Trump, which previously won him significant support among American voters in 2016 and 2024. He's seen a reversal of fortunes here. That's probably because so many of us are watching masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents indiscriminately grabbing people off the street to be deported with little or no due process under the law. What Trump touted as an effort to deport violent criminals who entered this country illegally has devolved into an oppressive spectacle as ICE agents snatch people who hold green cards or appear at immigration hearings. Opinion newsletter: Sign up for our newsletter on people, power and policies in the time of Trump from columnist Chris Brennan. Get it delivered to your inbox. Trump's new budget bill includes $170 billion for more of that over the next four years, with $76.5 billion going to ICE to detain people snatched off our streets and to add 10,000 new agents to a force that already has 20,000. How is that going to play across America? Gallup offered us a clue with a mid-July survey that showed a sizable shift in how Americans view immigration. Opinion: Trump's policies on immigration, economy and trade are unpopular with Americans In 2024, 55% of Americans told Gallup they thought immigration should be decreased. That dropped to 30% this year, after they saw Trump's approach on the issue. And a record high - 79% - of U.S. adults told Gallup that immigration is good for this country. That same survey found that 62% of Americans disapprove of Trump's immigration policies. And he's about to drive this country deep into debt to ramp up an approach Americans don't like. Now Republicans want you to believe they're saving Medicaid Then there is the Republican regret. You get the feeling Republicans in Congress want to increase funding either for a time machine to undo their vote or a device to make voters forget how those senators and representatives supported Trump's big, beautiful bill. This game of both sides is as desperate as it is hypocritical. U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri wrote an essay for The New York Times in May expressing concerns about how the bill will slash Medicaid for the working poor. Then he voted for Trump's budget. Now he says he's trying to undo some of the harm he supported with new legislation. U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska expressed concerns before folding to support Trump's budget. Murkowski's shameless bid to spread the blame, by urging Republicans in the U.S. House not to endorse the bill she had just endorsed, of course, fell on its face. U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado touted her vote for Trump's budget in May. By late July, she was denouncing the government for not reducing the national debt. Opinion: MAGA is coming for Trump over lost Epstein files. Bondi may pay the price. U.S. Rep. Ted Cruz of Texas is among the legislators now calling to roll back the provision in Trump's budget that changes tax deductions for gamblers. Cruz's explanation for backtracking, according to NBC News: "Most Republicans didn't even know this was in the bill when they voted to pass it." Republicans are still spending our tax dollars recklessly Trump has assumed control of the Republican Party in Congress, where legislative leaders are careful to never act as an independent and coequal branch of government. They sing a song about making America great by cracking down on federal spending, while piling up the nation's debt. They're not spending less of your tax dollars. They're just making sure the super rich in America don't have to pay at the same rates as middle-class people. They're spending much, much more, just as Americans discover they like Trump's policies less and less every day. There's a cure for all this. It's called the 2026 midterm elections. Republicans in Congress are afraid of Trump. They really should be afraid of voters tossing them out of office for backing his budget. Follow USA TODAY columnist Chris Brennan on X, formerly known as Twitter: @ByChrisBrennan. Sign up for his weekly newsletter, Translating Politics, here.
