S. Korea, US to hold regular KIDD defense talks at Pentagon next week: spokesperson
The spokesperson said that the Korea-US Integrated Defense Dialogue is set to take place at the Pentagon on Thursday and Friday. The upcoming meeting will mark the first KIDD gathering since US President Donald Trump took office in January.
"The Korea-US Integrated Defense Dialogue will occur next week and there will be a joint press statement release after the meeting," the spokesperson told Yonhap News Agency via email.
Launched in 2011, KIDD is a comprehensive senior-level defense meeting between the allies.
Next week's talks will be attended by Cho Chang-rae, South Korea's deputy defense minister for policy and key US defense officials -- John Noh, who performs the duties of the assistant secretary of defense for Indo-Pacific security affairs, and Andrew Winternitz, who performs the duties of the deputy assistant secretary of defense for East Asia.
Participants will touch on a range of bilateral security policy cooperation issues, including reinforcing deterrence against evolving North Korean nuclear and missile threats, and the allies' combined defense posture, the South's defense ministry said in a release.
The two sides also plan to hold in-depth discussions on the allies' joint efforts for the conditions-based transfer of wartime operational control from the US to South Korea and cooperation in the areas of shipbuilding and maintenance, repair and overhaul, it said.
The forthcoming KIDD meeting is expected to help ease lingering concerns that a political transition period in Seoul following the ouster of President Yoon Suk Yeol could have a negative effect on the allies' security policy coordination.
Stoking worries over defense collaboration, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth skipped South Korea in his recent trip to the Indo-Pacific that included stops in Japan and the Philippines. His predecessor, Lloyd Austin, also canceled the Korea portion of his Asia swing in December.
Asked to comment on the future operation of the Nuclear Consultative Group, the allies' key nuclear deterrence body, the spokesperson said that "NCG deliberations are ongoing."
Earlier this week, an official in Seoul said that Seoul and Washington will keep the NCG running under the Trump administration with its next meeting set to take place as early as June.
The NCG was launched by former President Yoon and former US President Joe Biden following their April 2023 summit to strengthen the US "extended deterrence" commitment to defending its ally South Korea with all of its military capabilities, including nuclear weapons. (Yonhap)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
US senator says Congress to review shipbuilding reforms after Lee-Trump summit
A US senator said Wednesday that Congress will review what legislative reforms may be needed to facilitate shipbuilding cooperation with South Korea, based on the outcome of next week's summit between President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump. Sen. Andy Kim (D-NJ) made the remarks during a press availability in Seoul, days before Lee and Trump are set to hold their first summit in Washington on Monday (US time), following a recent tariff agreement between the two countries. "There might be some reforms that can make it more efficient, speed the process, and we'll look at that appropriately," Kim said when asked about US shipbuilding regulations prohibiting foreign involvement. "I cannot move forward until I have a sense of what comes out from the summit next week. So we'll see how that's structured and how the investment is laid out, and then we'll move with the appropriate level of urgency," he said. With the tariff deal, South Korea has proposed large-scale shipbuilding cooperation projects, dubbed "Make American Shipbuilding Great Again (MASGA)," to held restore the sluggish US shipbuilding industry, including building new shipyards in the United States and partnerships on maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) projects. However, concerns have been raised about how quickly the shipbuilding projects can move forward, as US laws, such as the Jones Act and the Byrnes-Tollefson Amendment, remain as a legal barrier restricting foreign operations in commercial shipping and military shipbuilding. "If there are proposals needed for reforms that make sense to both of our countries, I think it could move fast," Kim said. Kim also addressed the need for the US to be clear about its goals in shipbuilding cooperation with South Korea, such as the number and type of ships it needs to build, saying that any legislative support would start from there. As a New Jersey resident who lives about 15 minutes away from the Philly Shipyard, run by South Korea's Hanwha Ocean, Kim described South Korea as the "best partner" in boosting American shipbuilding capabilities. "We are supportive of President Trump's efforts to continue to increase shipbuilding capabilities, and we're prepared to provide whatever type of legislation as well as resources behind it to be able to make that successful," he said. Regarding the Trump administration's push for "modernizing the alliance," which potentially calls for reorienting the role of US troops in Korea to deter China, Kim said related bilateral discussions should take place in a way that ensures US commitment to deterring North Korean threats, as well as addressing shared regional challenges. "I want to make sure that ... in the Indo-Pacific, (we) are able to address the array of different challenges and threats that we face. We can do that in a way that still protects extended deterrence, protects our interests here on the Korean Peninsula," Kim said. "Any changes that we would see in significant ways to troop presence, we would want to make sure that Congress has a role in oversight," he added. Kim, the first Korean American elected to the Senate, visited South Korea this week with Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Il) for meetings with government officials and business leaders. They also met with President Lee. Kim said Lee's decision to stop in Japan before going to Washington for the summit with Trump was a "brilliant move." "I can think of few opportunities that are more impactful than recommitment to the trilateral process between the United States, South Korea and Japan," he said. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
7 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Westinghouse deal tensions loom over Korea-US summit
Controversial KHNP agreement faces backlash at home as leaders prepare to discuss nuclear energy cooperation Escalating tensions over a deal between South Korea's state-run energy firms and US company Westinghouse are complicating the agenda for the upcoming Korea-US summit, where nuclear energy cooperation is expected to take center stage. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump are scheduled to meet in Washington next Monday for their summit, with officials saying nuclear partnership will be high on the agenda. According to a local media report on Wednesday, state-run Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power and Westinghouse, the two companies at the heart of the controversy, are preparing to form a joint venture to enter the US nuclear reactor market on the occasion of the upcoming summit. The report explained that since KHNP cannot independently access the US market, it plans to enter through a partnership with the American firm while handling most of the construction work. Nuclear energy's inclusion on the summit agenda was widely expected, given that the sector was part of South Korea's $200 billion investment pledge in the US under the tariff deal announced last month. President Trump has vowed to expand US nuclear energy capacity from 97 gigawatts to 400 gigawatts by 2050. Achieving this target would require constructing approximately 300 new 1,000-megawatt reactors. Industry observers view the US as eyeing Korean companies' technological expertise and construction capabilities to meet this goal. The plan comes amid controversy over a separate agreement that KHNP and Korea Electric Power Corp. struck with Westinghouse in January, sparking worries about potential summit implications. The settlement resolved Westinghouse's claims that KHNP had violated its intellectual property rights by using licensed Westinghouse technology in the development of its APR 1000 and 1400 nuclear reactor designs. The deal cleared the way for a KHNP-led consortium to sign an estimated 26 trillion won ($18.58 billion) contract in June to build two nuclear reactors in the Czech Republic. But after details of the settlement came to light on Monday following another local media report, the state-run company came under fire for agreeing to lopsided conditions to reach a swift deal, while burdening itself with hefty financial commitments. According to the agreement, KHNP agreed to sign contracts for goods and services worth $650 million with Westinghouse for each export of a single nuclear reactor, and to pay an additional $175 million per reactor in technology licensing fees. The 50-year deal also contains a provision requiring Westinghouse to verify the technical independence of Korean companies before they can bid on overseas nuclear reactor projects, including small modular reactors. It also restricted KHNP to pursuing nuclear projects in only 12 designated countries -- including the Philippines, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Morocco, Egypt, Brazil, Argentina, Jordan, Turkey, UAE, Saudi Arabia and South Africa -- while barring it from new deals in North America, Britain, Japan, Ukraine and the EU, except for the Czech Republic. Lawmakers blamed KHNP for bowing to US pressure to secure the Czech deal. 'It has been confirmed that the Yoon Suk Yeol government signed an unfair contract with Westinghouse to break the deadlock in the Czech project,' said Rep. Han Jeong-ae of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea at the National Assembly on Tuesday. Amid the controversy, KHNP CEO Whang Joo-ho on Tuesday said the deal terms remain within acceptable limits, but he declined to provide detailed answers, citing confidentiality obligations. 'While I cannot say (Westinghouse's demands) are justified, they are something tolerable enough for us to endure and still generate profit,' Whang said at the National Assembly. Meanwhile, opposition People Power Party lawmakers also stressed that just before the Korea-US summit, it may not serve the national interest for the parliament to directly confront the Westinghouse issue. 'Westinghouse may hold the original technology, but it lacks the construction capacity to independently build reactors, which means Korean companies are likely to handle the construction,' said an industry insider on condition of anonymity. 'Even if the deal is viewed as unfavorable, I believe it was inevitable if Korean companies are going to expand their overseas nuclear businesses.' Amid growing backlash, South Korea's presidential office has ordered the Industry Ministry to investigate the deal to verify that the negotiations and contract process were carried out based on laws and regulations and in accordance with principles and procedures.
Korea Herald
7 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Samsung, TSMC face subsidy-for-shares dilemma under Trump plan
Critics argue Trump's equity demand is no subsidy but an attempt at ownership of private companies Washington is reviewing options to acquire equity stakes in foreign chipmakers such as Samsung Electronics and TSMC in return for the federal subsidies they are receiving to build factories in the US, industry sources said Wednesday. The idea has rattled the industry, with analysts dismissing it as 'unrealistic,' saying it reflects US President Donald Trump's intent to walk back on grants pledged under the former Biden administration. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday openly floated the idea in reference to Intel, as the White House reportedly weighs options such as taking a 10 percent stake in the company. 'We should get an equity stake for our money,' Lutnick told CNBC, referring to Intel. 'So we'll deliver the money, which was already committed under the Biden administration, and we'll get equity in return.' Citing sources familiar with the matter, Reuters reported that Lutnick is exploring applying the same approach to other chipmakers, including Samsung. Lutnick argued that the Biden administration 'literally was giving Intel money for free, and giving TSMC money for free,' underscoring the Trump administration's critical stance on federal grants. The CHIPS and Science Act, legislated under the Biden administration, pledged subsidies to global chipmakers building plants in the US as part of a wider effort to reshore semiconductor manufacturing. 'Donald Trump turns that into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action,'' Lutnick said, adding that any potential arrangement would not give the government governance rights in Intel. Intel has said it finalized a nearly $8 billion grant under the CHIPS and Science Act to build its factories, while TSMC was awarded $6.6 billion to expand chip production at its Arizona facilities. Samsung Electronics, which is building a $37 billion advanced chip plant in Taylor, Texas, secured a $4.75 billion subsidy package under the Biden administration last year. SK hynix is also set to begin construction of a $3.87 billion advanced packaging plant for AI memory in West Lafayette, Indiana, in the second half of this year. 'It's an unreasonable idea. The US government is effectively demanding equity in private companies — not state-run firms or startups, but already well-established foreign businesses like Samsung and TSMC. That is not a subsidy anymore, it is ownership,' said Kim Yang-paeng, a senior researcher at the Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade. According to Kim, the plan reflects Trump's long-standing view that subsidies are a 'waste' and should not be handed out. 'What Washington is really saying is it wants equity equal to the subsidies, which means it's no longer a subsidy,' he said. 'US firms might accept that since it is their own government, but Samsung or TSMC will not.' In Intel's case, the Trump administration's plan to acquire a 10 percent stake is seen as roughly equivalent to the $7.86 billion in subsidies the company is set to receive, compared with its market capitalization of $110.8 billion. If applied to Samsung, the approach would translate into about a 1.6 percent stake, based on the $4.75 billion subsidy against its 414 trillion won market capitalization as of Wednesday. As the Korean chip giant is listed on the domestic stock market, Washington may instead target stakes in its US subsidiaries, such as Samsung Semiconductor and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, industry experts said.
