Protesters say Bezos' star-studded Venice wedding highlights growing inequality
Jeff Bezos's lavish Venice wedding has sparked protests from local activist groups, highlighting concerns about wealth disparity and the prioritization of tourism over residents' needs. Demonstrators, united under the banner "No Space for Bezos," criticize Amazon's labor practices, tax disputes, and Bezos's political affiliations.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
This weekend's star-studded Venice wedding of multi-billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez has galvanized activist groups that are protesting it as a sign of the growing disparity between the haves and have-nots as well as disregard of the city's residents.About a dozen Venetian organizations - including housing advocates, anti-cruise ship campaigners and university groups - have united to protest the multi-day event under the banner "No Space for Bezos," a play on words also referring to the bride's recent space flight.They have staged small-scale protests, unfurling anti-Bezos banners on iconic Venetian sites. They were joined this week by Greenpeace and the British group "Everyone Hates Elon," which has smashed Teslas to protest Elon Musk, to unfurl a giant banner in St. Mark's Square protesting purported tax breaks for billionaires."IF YOU CAN RENT VENICE FOR YOUR WEDDING YOU CAN PAY MORE TAX," read the banner, which featured a huge image of Bezos. Police quickly took it away.There has been no comment from Bezos' representatives on the protests.The local activists had planned a more organized protest for Saturday, aiming to obstruct access to canals with boats to prevent guests from reaching a wedding venue. Then they modified the protest to a march from the train station after claiming a victory, asserting that their pressure forced organizers to change the venue to the Arsenale, a more easily secured site beyond Venice's congested center."It will be a strong, decisive protest, but peaceful,'' said Federica Toninello, an activist with the Social Housing Assembly network. "We want it to be like a party, with music, to make clear what we want our Venice to look like."Among the 200 guests confirmed to be attending the wedding are Mick Jagger, Ivanka Trump, Oprah Winfrey, Katy Perry and Leonardo DiCaprio.Venice, renowned for its romantic canal vistas, hosts hundreds of weddings each year, not infrequently those of the rich and famous. Previous celebrity weddings, like that of George Clooney to human rights lawyer Amal Alamuddin in 2014, were embraced by the public. Hundreds turned out to wish the couple well at City Hall.Bezos has a different political and business profile, said Tommaso Cacciari, a prominent figure in the movement that successfully pushed for a ban on cruise ships over 25,000 tons traveling through the Giudecca Canal in central Venice."Bezos is not a Hollywood actor,'' Cacciari said. "He is an ultra-billionaire who sat next to Donald Trump during the inauguration, who contributed to his re-election and is contributing in a direct and heavy way to this new global obscurantism.''Critics also cite Amazon's labor practices, ongoing tax disputes with European governments and Bezos' political associations as additional reasons for concern.Activists also argue that the Bezos wedding exemplifies broader failures in municipal governance, particularly the prioritization of tourism over residents' needs. They cite measures such as the day-tripper tax - which critics argue reinforces Venice's image as a theme park - as ineffective. Chief among their concerns is the lack of investment in affordable housing and essential services.City officials have defended the wedding. Mayor Luigi Brugnaro called the event an honor for Venice, and the city denied the wedding would cause disruptions."Venice once again reveals itself to be a global stage,'' Brugnaro told The Associated Press, adding he hoped to meet Bezos while he was in town.Meanwhile, a Venetian environmental research association, Corila, issued a statement saying Bezos' Earth Fund was supporting its work with an "important donation."Corila, which unites university scholars and Italy's main national research council in researching Venetian protection strategies, wouldn't say how much Bezos was donating but said contact began in April, well before the protests started.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran a step closer to suspending cooperation with IAEA as parliament passes bill
Iran's parliament approved a bill on Wednesday to suspend cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, state-affiliated news outlet Nournews reported. Iranian protesters hold their country's flags and posters of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in an anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli rally at Enqelab-e-Eslami (Islamic Revolution) square in downtown Tehran, Iran, Tuesday, June 24, 2025.(AP) The move follows an air war with Israel in which Iran's longtime enemy said it wanted to prevent Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon. The bill, which must be approved by Iran's unelected Guardian Council to become law, stipulates that any future inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) would need approval by the Supreme National Security Council. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf was quoted by state media as also saying Iran would accelerate its civilian nuclear programme. Tehran denies seeking nuclear weapons and says an IAEA resolution this month declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations paved the way for Israel's attacks. Qalibaf was quoted as saying the IAEA had refused even to appear to condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities and "has put its international credibility up for sale." He said that "for this reason, the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend its cooperation with the Agency until the security of the nuclear facilities is guaranteed, and move at a faster pace with the country's peaceful nuclear programme." Parliament's national security committee approved the bill's general outline this week and the committee's spokesperson said the bill would suspend the installation of surveillance cameras, inspections and filing of reports to the IAEA. The IAEA did not immediately comment on the Iranian parliament's approval of the bill. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said on Wednesday he was seeking the return of inspectors to Iranian sites, including the plants where it was enriching uranium, until Israel launched strikes on June 13. The full extent of the damage done to nuclear sites during the Israeli attacks and US bombing of underground Iranian nuclear facilities is not yet clear. "I think that our view on our nuclear programme and the non-proliferation regime will witness changes, but it is not possible to say in what direction," Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi told Qatar's Al-Araby Al-Jadeed this week.
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
UK to purchase 12 US-made F-35 jets capable of carrying nuclear bombs: PM Keir Starmer
Jun 25, 2025 03:47 PM IST The United Kingdom will buy 12 U.S.-made F-35 fighter jets capable of carrying nuclear bombs and will join NATO's shared airborne nuclear mission, in a major expansion of its nuclear deterrent, Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Wednesday. Only three NATO members – the U.S., Britain and France – are nuclear powers, while seven nations contribute to the alliance's nuclear mission by contributing jets. (Pic used for representation)(AP) The government called it 'the biggest strengthening of the U.K.'s nuclear posture in a generation.' Starmer made the announcement while attending a NATO summit in the Netherlands. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte welcomed the decision, calling it 'yet another robust British contribution to NATO.' The U.K. phased out air-dropped atomic weapons in the 1990s after the end of the Cold War. Its nuclear arsenal now consists of submarine-based missiles. Only three NATO members – the U.S., Britain and France – are nuclear powers, while seven nations contribute to the alliance's nuclear mission by contributing jets that can carry either conventional or weapons or American B61 bombs stockpiled in Europe. The use of nuclear weapons by the U.K. as part of the mission would require the authorization of the alliance's nuclear planning group as well as the U.S. president and British prime minister. Starmer also announced that the U.K. will provide 350 air defense missiles to Ukraine, funded by 70 million pounds ($95 million) raised from interest on seized Russian assets. The announcements come as the U.K. and other NATO members pledge to increase spending on security to 5% of gross domestic product by 2035. The total includes 3.5% on defense and another 1.5% on broader security and resilience efforts. The U.K. currently spends 2.3% of national income on defense and says that will rise to 2.6% by 2027. Get the latest headlines from US news and global updates from Pakistan, UK, Bangladesh, and Russia get all the latest headlines in one place with including Vance Luther Boelteron Hindustan Times.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
What's the real reason for Prince Harry-Meghan Markle leaving the Royal family? Biographer reveals
Prince Harry And Meghan Markle We all remember the royal bombshell of 2020— Prince Harry and Meghan Markle officially stepping down from royal duties. At the time, it was painted as a dramatic escape from media intrusion and family tension. But according to royal biographer Valentine Low, there's more to the story than meets the eye— and it's not just about privacy or palace politics that made Prince Harry and Meghan to leave their royal life behind in Britain. In his book 'Courtiers', Low sheds light on what he claims is the real motivation behind the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's big royal exit: freedom, money, and brand-building. According to the New York Post, Low writes that Harry and Meghan's desire for independence was deeply tied to their ambition— not just to live a quieter life in California, but to create their own global identity, get involved in causes they care about, and yes, to make serious money. As Low puts it, Meghan 'wanted to make money'— and doing that within the constraints of royal protocol was practically impossible. Royal rules don't exactly allow for side hustles, Netflix deals, or lifestyle brands. So, to pursue their own ventures, the couple had to break free. While the couple initially floated the idea of a 'hybrid' model— still performing select royal duties while earning independently— the Palace quickly shut that down. Queen Elizabeth II reportedly insisted that being royal was an all-or-nothing commitment. Half-in, half-out just didn't fly. And so, the Sussexes packed their bags and made California home, where they wasted no time in turning their post-royal lives into a business empire. In 2020, they reportedly signed a $100 million deal with Netflix and have since launched various projects, including Meghan's podcast and her soon-to-launch lifestyle brand. It's safe to say they've swapped palace gates for digital platforms. And it's not just business. There's been plenty of buzz about their growing presence in U.S. political circles too. Meghan's well-documented connections— like her rapport with President Biden's sister, Valerie Biden Owens— have often fueled speculation that politics could be on the horizon, especially for Meghan. So, was it really just about press pressure and palace drama for Harry and Meghan to leave the British Royal family? Or was it a smart power move to step out of the shadow of the Crown and into a global spotlight of their own making? Either way, one thing's clear: Harry and Meghan didn't just leave royalty— they rewrote the rulebook. King Charles Makes POWER MOVE, Harry & Meghan Step Back? Netflix Crowns A New Royal Star One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
