Patients sought for new NHS trial for brain cancer after man sees tumour vanish
People diagnosed with deadly glioblastoma will receive immunotherapy with the drug ipilimumab before undergoing standard treatment, when their immune system is at its strongest.
The trial, from University College London Hospital's National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, follows a previous one on the same drug which closed because of lack of recruitment.
One patient from that trial, Ben Trotman, is still showing no signs of glioblastoma following the treatment – well over two years since he got the drug in a world first. Most people with glioblastoma die within 12-18 months.
Mr Trotman was diagnosed with glioblastoma in October 2022, when he was 40.
Now aged 43 and two years and eight months on from having the treatment, his scans are clear and there are no signs of tumour.
Consultant medical oncologist, Dr Paul Mulholland, who is leading the new trial and treated Mr Trotman, said: 'It is very unusual to have a clear scan with glioblastoma, especially when he didn't have the follow-up surgery that had been planned to remove all of the tumour that was initially visible on scans.
'We hope that the immunotherapy and follow-up treatment Ben has had will hold his tumour at bay – and it has so far, which we are delighted to see.'
Mr Trotman got married to Emily two months after the immunotherapy treatment and in April, his daughter Mabel was born.
Mrs Trotman said: 'Getting this diagnosis was the most traumatic experience. We were grappling with the fact that Ben had gone from being apparently perfectly healthy to having months to live.
'Had we not met Dr Mulholland, that would have been it for us. We felt we had a lucky break in an otherwise devastating situation.'
Mr Trotman went on to have the current standard treatment of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. He has quarterly scans, which continue to be clear.
Mr Trotman said: 'We obviously don't know what the future holds but having had the immunotherapy treatment and getting these encouraging scan results has given Emily and I a bit of hope.
'We are focused on rebuilding the life we thought we had lost and enjoying being parents.'
Dame Siobhain McDonagh MP led a fundraising campaign to raise more than £1 million to cover the costs of the new trial.
Her sister, Baroness McDonagh, died from glioblastoma in 2023.
Dame Siobhain said: 'My beloved sister Margaret was appalled to discover that there had been no advances in brain cancer treatment for decades when she was diagnosed with glioblastoma.
'Changing this was Margaret's final campaign and one that I have continued in her memory.
'I am so grateful to the many people who knew and respected Margaret who have come together and helped to raise funds and campaign for this new trial that we are calling Margaret's Trial.'
Dr Paul Mulholland said: 'When I met Margaret she said to me 'what can I do to support you to cure this disease?'.
'I am incredibly grateful to her and to Siobhain whose campaigning and fundraising in her sister's memory has led to this new clinical trial opening for patients with this most aggressive form of brain cancer that has such a poor prognosis, with most patients surviving just nine months after diagnosis.
'The crucial element of this trial is that patients will have their immune system boosted by the drug before they have any other treatment, when they are fit and well enough to tolerate the immunotherapy.
'We're taking everything we have learned from previous trials into this new study and we are already planning follow-on trials.
'My aim is to find a cure for glioblastoma.'
The National Brain Appeal is currently funding two posts in support of Dr Mulholland's research.
Treatment will take place at the NIHR UCLH's Clinical Research Facility and at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery.
Patients interested in the new Win-Glio trial should discuss it with their consultant.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
The story of NHS Fife's legal fees in Sandie Peggie tribunal
However, the case is complex and NHS Fife do not actually pay the full costs. The taxpayers most likely will. Shared legal team Crucially, NHS Fife is sharing a legal team with Dr Upton, the transgender medic at the forefront of the case. This may sound odd but it is actually standard in NHS legal cases. It is argued that the staff member may only have become exposed to any risk of liability after being sued while doing their job. However, NHS Fife must weigh up the risks in sharing a legal team, including whether there could be any "conflicts of interest". Ms Peggie is suing her employer and Dr Upton after she objected to the trans medic's use of the female changing room on Christmas Eve in 2023 at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy. She also made reference to the situation being similar to men being housed in the female prison estate. The nurse was placed on special leave in December 2023 and suspended in January 2024. She was cleared of all misconduct allegations on July 15 2025, including two patient safety complaints. NHS Fife legal team It is important to note that health boards in Scotland do not directly employ their own solicitors. Solicitors in the Central Legal Office (CLO) act exclusively for the NHS. However, the CLO then appointed Jane Russell KC, from the Essex Court of Chambers in London, to represent the case in court. Silks - or King's Counsel (KC) barristers - typically charge between £500 and £1,500 per hour. Given Ms Russell had been at Dundee Tribunal Hearing Centre over 10 days from July 16, with court sitting approximately between 10am and 4pm each day, the recent sessions could have cost the health board in the region of £30,000. However, NHS Fife is a member of the Clinical Negligence and Other Risks Indemnity Scheme (CNORIS). This is a pooling arrangement between Scottish health boards and means NHS Fife will only be required to meet the first £25,000 of the cost. The remaining bill is covered by the scheme, which is paid for through the Scottish Government's Health and Social Care Directorate that underwrites the scheme. Costs so far As of June 30, NHS Fife have accrued £258,831.31 in legal costs associated with the Sandie Peggie case. But the costs are undoubtably set to rise. Research by Murray Blackburn Mackenzie policy collective states: "The decisions which have driven the cost of this case rest formally with NHS Fife, but in practice the CLO also appears to be a relevant decision-maker of some sort, but to what extent and with what oversight from its own senior management, is very difficult to say. "Perhaps the only place it will ever be possible to unpick the full story of who decided what, when and how, will be in front of a parliamentary committee, with the questions asked direct of senior staff and board members for NHS Fife, National Services Scotland and the Scottish Government itself." In a statement published on July 18, NHS Fife said: "As of 30 June 2025, £258,831.31 in legal costs have been recorded as expenditure related to the legal services associated with this case. "NHS Fife is liable for the first £25,000 of costs associated with defending the case." Earlier this year, NHS Fife did not reveal the legal costs, stating that the health board "believed that it did not hold the figures requested as the legal fees were managed through the Central Legal Office (CLO) and National Services Scotland (NSS) who administered the CNORIS Indemnity scheme". Following criticism from the Scottish Information Commissioner, NHS Fife revealed the costs amounted to £220,465.93 up to May 2025.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Thanks to the Instagram algorithm I'm convinced I have ADHD
An anatomy drawing of a person doing a plank: 'How it feels like for ADHD people to listen to someone finish a sentence they understood within the first few seconds'. 'We all have the same 24 hours.' 'Well I have ADHD so I only have two.' Two Spider-Man figures pointing at each other: 'Not getting anything done because I'm too overwhelmed'. 'Being overwhelmed because I haven't gotten anything done.' Though I have never been diagnosed with ADHD (or autism, another strand of neurodivergent memes beloved by my Explore page), social media has convinced me that I have it. I've always thought of myself as an impulsive, overthinking space cadet who gets easily overwhelmed. I always viewed these as flaws in my personality, something I alone should remedy. But these internet jokes unexpectedly made me feel seen, part of a community of people with a shared experience. Something we could affectionately laugh about and accept. Nearly every peer I speak to is 'convinced' they have adult ADHD. Is it because of the deluge of online content? Or are we just becoming more aware of it? Are all of these #ADHD traits even related to ADHD? Or just part of the human condition? It becomes easy to laugh off the frenetic way I clean my house or how I just can't stop procrastinating when I really need to get something done. There is a chance that we are over-pathologising very normal behaviours. It is incredibly difficult to get diagnosed with ADHD in Scotland unless you have a bulging wallet. To be assessed through the NHS takes years (waiting time data is patchy at best). Waiting lists have become so demanding in some areas that they have ceased assessment services altogether. Earlier this year, Aberdeenshire HSCP and NHS Forth Valley both announced they were closing their Adult Autism Assessment teams (who were also responsible for ADHD Assessments). NHS Tayside stopped taking referrals for children unless they have a pre-existing mental health condition. To be diagnosed privately can cost anywhere from £600 to £1600, depending on the type of assessment and whether it includes follow-up appointments. At ADHD Scotland in Glasgow, a pre-assessment session is £120 and an ADHD assessment is £850. If you are diagnosed privately, you could end up having to foot the bill for your own Ritalin. Now, we must think of the children because they are the ones who are truly getting the short end of the stick here. Children languishing on a waiting list for diagnosis can cause untold distress for families. In childhood, a diagnosis means schools have a better understanding of the child's needs. It is also the first step towards possible medication to help with symptoms (another seemingly endless waiting list), as The Herald reported this week. An ADHD diagnosis can also help parents better understand what their child is experiencing. Failing the mental health of children in this country is awful. This is not to point the finger. Money is tight, resources are few and far between, and demand for mental health treatment is soaring. I draw a line between children and adults when it comes to the conversation about neurodevelopmental disorders. He has claimed that ADHD diagnosis "doesn't mean anything', referring to the circular logic that symptoms (impulsivity, absent-mindedness, hyperactivity) lead to diagnosis and then diagnosis explains the symptoms. 'It's not an explanation, it's a description,' he says. Perhaps you recognise him from diagnosing Prince Harry with ADHD in a 2023 live TV interview. Everyone is different. Me? I'm with Maté on this one. I don't need to be diagnosed with ADHD. I perhaps need to stop trying to do too much, putting so much pressure on myself to be perfect, and stop doomscrolling during every free moment that I have to avoid the terrifying prospect of being alone with my thoughts for five minutes. I would not want to take up a precious diagnosis waiting list spot simply because an algorithm made me laugh with an 'ADHD people doing anything other than they should be doing' meme. I think Maté is right about taking a holistic approach to better mind health: having self-compassion, developing a consistent routine, seeking connection with other people, and avoiding stress and overstimulation from your surroundings. I've noticed one recurring comorbidity with all the ADHD content that I am fed – farm content. As if the antidote to the stresses of city life and always-on culture that plagues us is to leave it all behind and #FarmLife. If so many adults are convinced that they have a neurological disorder these days, that says a lot more about our society than it does the individual. Aldous Huxley put it best when he wrote that the real victims of mental illness are the ones who appear to be normal: 'Their perfect adjustment to that abnormal society is a measure of their mental sickness.' Marissa MacWhirter is a columnist and feature writer at The Herald, and the editor of The Glasgow Wrap. The newsletter is curated between 5-7am each morning, bringing the best of local news to your inbox each morning without ads, clickbait, or hyperbole. Oh, and it's free. She can be found on X @marissaamayy1
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Will the junior doctors regret picking a fight with Wes?
The dispute between the British Medical Association (BMA) – a trade union for doctors – and the government continues, following the five-day strike by junior doctors. Doctors argue that pay is still far below relative levels from almost two decades ago, combined with the cost of study, the cost of living and housing crises, as well as challenging conditions within the NHS. Nevertheless, with an average pay rise of 5.4% for resident doctors this year, support for the strikes appears to be falling – both with the public at large, and within the BMA. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has hit back at the BMA and said they 'will not win a war with this government'. Tim Shipman and Lucy Dunn join Natasha Feroze to discuss whether the junior doctors are wise to pick a fight with Wes. First though they talk about the fallout from Keir Starmer's announcement of that the UK could recognise Palestinian statehood in September. Given the recognition is conditional, is Starmer's position the worst of both worlds? Produced by Patrick Gibbons and Natasha Feroze.
