Parents who have children with autism or ADHD can claim up to £16,157 from DWP
UK families with children who have autism or ADHD can claim up to £16,157 in benefits.
Parents of children living with autism or ADHD can access £16,157 in benefits and additional support. Six payments totalling nearly £17,000 have been revealed, which parents can utilise if their children are living with autism or ADHD.
ADHD is a disorder characterised by behavioural analysis, those with ADHD exhibit a consistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity–impulsivity that hampers daily functioning and/or development. In the UK, a research survey involving 10,438 children aged between 5 and 15 years discovered that 3.62% of boys and 0.85% of girls were diagnosed with ADHD.
UK households who eat chips 'three times a week' given urgent warning
Autistic individuals may struggle with communication and interaction with others or find it challenging to comprehend how others think or feel. They might find elements such as bright lights or loud noises overwhelming, stressful or uncomfortable, according to the NHS.
Further information from the NHS states that they could become anxious or distressed about unfamiliar situations and social events, or may take longer to process information. They may also repeatedly do or think the same things, reports Birmingham Live.
Here are the six payments, worth almost £17,000, that parents can claim if their children have autism or ADHD.
Disability Living Allowance (DLA) - £9,700
DLA consists of two parts, the 'care component' and the 'mobility component'. To qualify for DLA, you must be eligible for at least one of the components.
The amount of DLA you receive depends on how your disability or health condition impacts you. You might be entitled to the care component of DLA if you:
need help with things like washing, dressing, eating, using the toilet or communicating your needs
need supervision to avoid putting yourself or others in danger
need someone with you when you're on dialysis
cannot prepare a cooked main meal
You can claim this part if no one is actually providing the care you need, or if you live alone.
Carer's Allowance - £4,331
You could receive £83.30 a week if you care for someone for at least 35 hours a week and they are in receipt of certain benefits. You don't have to be related to, or live with, the person you care for.
There's no additional payment if you care for more than one person. If another person also cares for the same individual as you, only one of you can claim Carer's Allowance. You can choose to be paid weekly in advance or every 4 weeks.
Extra Tax-Free Childcare - £2,000
Tax-Free Childcare is a government initiative that assists with childcare costs up to a maximum of £2,000 per eligible child each year (£4,000 if your child is disabled). The scheme covers the whole of the UK, including England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
The scheme is available to all parents of children under 12 (or under 17 if disabled). To qualify for the Tax-free Childcare Scheme, you must be working (and if you have a partner, they must also be working), and you must not be receiving any support through Universal Credit.
Most parents who are eligible for Universal Credit can save more money using the childcare elements of this benefit instead of using Tax-Free Childcare. Typically, both partners in a couple must be employed or self-employed, each earning at least £2,539 (2025/26) every three months.
However, recent changes allow newly self-employed individuals to have start-up periods where this income threshold doesn't need to be met, or they can use an average over the tax year.
Save a third on train travel - £126
The Disabled Persons Railcard offers a third off rail fares across Britain, allowing regular users to pocket around £126 annually. The card is priced at £14.50 a year for young persons aged five to 15.
While the card doesn't slash child fares, it does permit one person accompanying the cardholder to enjoy a third off most rail fares, meaning a parent can reap the savings.
Family Fund
Family Fund determines your family's eligibility for a grant based on your income and the impact of disability on your child or young person. Submitting through an online application form is the fastest and simplest way to apply.
Online applications are also processed quicker, so you could receive your grant decision sooner. Please be aware that access to the online application form is only possible when there is grant funding available for your country of residence. Currently, the application form is closed to new applicants in Wales.
Local Grants
Both the government and local charities offer financial assistance for those in need, which doesn't require repayment. Turn2Us provides an online tool that checks your eligibility for more than 1,400 grants.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
Derby man 'lucky to be alive' after US building site fall
Rob Bell had been working at a construction site in the US when he fell 25ft from a building three years construction engineer from Chaddesden, Derby, was lucky to survive the accident, which left him with seven broken ribs and a fractured head injury caused a series of strokes followed by up to 25 seizures a told the BBC he was left feeling suicidal after initially failing to receive the right help from the NHS - but his situation improved with the help of a specialist team in Derbyshire that the government hopes to replicate 53-year-old credits the team with helping him to rebuild his life - and he has set his sights on one day regaining the ability to walk. Rob's accident happened in 2022 when a forklift truck driver knocked the pallet of one of the supporting legs from a structure he was working on, causing it to extensive injuries saw him suffer three strokes in the space of five days - one of which made his heart temporarily stop - and he spent three months in hospital in the US followed by a further seven months in hospital back in the was later diagnosed with Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) which gives him life-altering symptoms including paralysis and occasional blindness. Rob said the medication he received to help control multiple seizures a day severely impacted his memory and ability to recognise his 10 grandchildren, as well as sending him spiralling into injuries also saw him having to spend around £500 a week on taxis travelling to use public toilets for over a year, because his own toilet at home was not accessible for his new a result of the drain on his finances, he ended up skipping meals and having to rely on foodbanks, further adding to his mental health struggles. "After I got out the hospital and I was on the just wanted to give me more medication, and I said, I don't want more medication," he said."I was basically on the clouds, they were drugging me up that much. That was not the life I wanted."I even told my family, if nothing's done, I'm not going into a new year the way I am, I'm just going to take my own life."During this desperate time, he was repeatedly admitted into emergency mental health care. But things began to change when Rob was eventually referred by his GP to the NHS's Team Up Complex Care Team in Derbyshire, The team is a few years old and focuses predominantly on care for people unable to leave their received help with physio, GP visits, and tailoring his medication with a pharmacist, which reduced his tablets from 70 a day to team, which is run by Primary Healthcare Derby Limited on behalf of Derby and Derbyshire NHS Integrated Care Board, also assisted in finding him a suitable new accessible home. The government's 10-year plan for the NHS includes plans for "pioneering neighbourhood health teams [which] focus on patients with multiple long-term conditions and more complex issues".It has cited the Derbyshire team as an example of what it is trying to achieve and "bringing the best of the NHS to the rest of the NHS". While critics have highlighted that care closer to home will not necessarily save the health service money, the Derbyshire ICB says last year this team prevented 900 admissions to the emergency department and 500 non-elective admissions by sending specialists out into the community. "The complex needs team spent time listening to Rob to understand his difficulties, and then involved a wider multi-disciplinary team to develop a plan to support him", said Dr Ruth Lenehan, Rob's GP in the complex care team."This plan then enabled him to get the right help to address his many complicated medical and social problems."The team is currently working through the detail on how further expansion of the initiative might work. Since receiving the help, Rob says he can finally focus on "living" again."I'm living now, I'm not existing. It's a massive difference. I've been to my daughter's plays, the simple things", he while Rob has been told he is unlikely to walk again, he intends to keep trying."They say it's highly unlikely but I say, well - I'm going to do my best," he you have been affected by any of the issues in this story, help is available via BBC Action Line.
The Courier
an hour ago
- The Courier
REBECCA BAIRD: NHS Tayside waiting lists could make a hypocrite out of me
We've all heard the expression 'a hill I'm willing to die on'. It's for those arguments you just won't give up on, no matter the personal cost. I always thought universal free healthcare through the NHS was a hill I was willing to die on. But here's the thing – you only get one body. And when it comes to declining health, there's no extra time, no saved checkpoint from which to respawn. There's only that body getting more and more damaged by illness as it waits for help. In Dundee, Perthshire and Angus, NHS Tayside patients are waiting far too long for desperately needed treatment. I am one of them. I am currently 14 months into a 24-month waiting list for endometriosis investigation. My first appointment to discuss my chronic – often debilitating – pain with my GP was in 2022. Over the last three years, I have been comparatively lucky. I've been listened to (eventually) by doctors, I've been given medication to help manage symptoms, and I've been put on the referral list for specialist investigation. Unfortunately, I've also gained weight as a result of the medication, which makes me less eligible for the surgery I suspect I'll need once I get to the top of that list. The lingering fatigue and pain levels make consistent exercise difficult, which will make losing this weight more challenging than it would have been a few years ago. And already, in the time it will theoretically take to get help, the decline of my health has become a bit of a downward spiral. I'm not alone – just last month, The Courier revealed the shocking extent of gynae waiting lists in Dundee and Angus. In Fife, heart patients are waiting more than two years for care. And five-year waiting lists for childhood ADHD diagnoses have pushed some Tayside parents to the brink. For some people in our communities, 'dying on the hill' of NHS loyalty means literally dying. So I completely understand why hundreds of local NHS patients are opting to pay thousands of pounds for private healthcare, rather than watch their health worsen while they wait. I admit I've thought about it seriously a few times in the past three years. But what sticks in my craw is the idea that by going private, I'd be contributing to the very two-tier system I hate so much. I can't help but think that if all those who could opted for private healthcare, it wouldn't magically free up NHS resources; it would be an excuse for governments to cut them further. And what about those for whom private healthcare is simply not an option? Do we really want to buy into a system like the US, where the poor struggle for access to decent healthcare? Disease does not discriminate, but money talks. If we want the powers that be to be responsible for national health, we can't let them off the hook by each paying someone else to look after our own. Future generations deserve the access to the free-at-point-of-use healthcare that we've all enjoyed until now. But that's easy for me to say; I'm not staring down the barrel of a life-threatening illness. Yet. The truth is, I'm not saying I'll never opt for private healthcare, if I need it and can afford it. Turns out I'd rather be alive and a hypocrite than dead and principled. But for as long as I can, I'm going to make my health the NHS's problem. It might be the best way to keep it in business.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
NHS to spend more on US drugs as Britain bows to Trump
Ministers are preparing to boost NHS spending on US drugs in a race to avoid a future tariff hit from Donald Trump. The Government told drugmakers last week that it would agree to boost spending on medicines to comparable levels with the US. The promise to increase the GDP share allocated to medicines is understood to have been made as part of talks with drug bosses over the NHS drugs spending cap. It follows demands from the US president that other countries stop 'freeloading' on American innovation and pay more for its medicines. In the US-UK trade agreement, signed earlier this year, ministers said the NHS would review drug pricing to take into account the 'concerns of the president'. The UK's expenditure on new innovative medicines currently stands at just 0.28pc of GDP, around a third of America's proportionate spending of 0.78pc of its GDP. Even in Europe, the UK lags other countries, with Germany spending 0.4pc of its GDP and Italy spending 0.5pc. Ministers are understood to have offered to take steps to get the UK level closer to the US proportion. However, sources said the Government did not provide details on timing or concrete actions as to how the NHS would increase medicine spending. One insider claimed the proposal was 'a lot of jam and a lot of tomorrows'. The offer comes weeks after the US president told the world's biggest drugmakers that they needed to lower prices for Americans, suggesting they pay for this by charging higher fees abroad. In a letter sent to the bosses of 17 pharmaceutical companies, Mr Trump demanded they 'negotiate harder with foreign freeloading nations' for their medicines, suggesting he would use tariffs to push through higher prices if countries resisted. Earlier this year, the Telegraph revealed that the White House was already pressing for the NHS to spend more on American drugs. US officials are particularly concerned by an arrangement that allows the NHS to spend less on medicines than other countries by forcing drugmakers to pay rebates. The UK's voluntary scheme for branded medicines pricing, access and growth (known as VPAG) makes sure that the NHS does not overpay for medicines. It does this by requiring pharmaceutical companies to pay sales rebates back to the NHS if its medicine bill rises faster than expected, essentially keeping a cap on drug costs. Earlier this year, the Department of Health launched a review of the scheme under pressure from Mr Trump and the pharmaceutical industry. Since then, ministers have been in negotiations with drug companies over how much the NHS should be able to claw back in rebates. Drug company chiefs are expected to vote on whether to accept the latest offer next week. The offer follows years where drug bosses have called for the UK to spend more on medicines. Albert Bourla, the chief executive of US drug giant Pfizer, said in June: 'We represent in the UK 0.3pc of their GDP per capita. That's how much they spend on medicine. So yes, they can increase prices.' He said countries were other countries were 'free-riding' on the US. A government spokesman said: 'The VPAG review is one of many ways in which we are taking decisive action to unlock innovation and drive investment in the UK's world-class pharmaceutical sector including the Life Sciences Sector Plan. 'We will make sure the next game changers in medicine are developed here in Britain, for the benefit of our health at home and abroad. 'We continue to work closely with industry, including Associated of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, on the VPAG review and the outcome will be announced in due course.' The Government previously argued it would 'only ever sign trade agreements that align with the UK's national interests and to suggest otherwise would be misleading'.
