King and Donald Trump will no longer hold private meeting before state visit
A private meeting between Donald Trump and the King will not take place before a full state visit, as was initially proposed in a letter of invitation from the monarch, Sky News understands.
It's understood this has been accepted and appreciated by all parties.
It has been suggested the complexities of both principals' diaries has meant a private meeting is not possible over the course of the summer months, and thus the formal planning for an official state visit has begun.
30:55
It appears the visit is likely to take place in September, as mentioned previously by Mr Trump, but this has not been officially confirmed by Buckingham Palace.
The palace has confirmed that last week the "manu regia" was hand-delivered by representatives from the UK's Washington embassy to the White House.
This is the hand-signed formal invitation from the King to President Trump for a second state visit.
This follows the initial correspondence from His Majesty, which outlined one way in which a visit or visits might be arranged would be through an initial private meeting.
Confirmation of the dates of the state visit will follow in due course in the normal way.
A palace aide said: "His Majesty has known President Trump for many years and looks forward to hosting him and the First Lady later this year."
There have been reports the decision not to hold a private meeting before a state visit was going against the King's wishes but the palace continues to stress that the King has continued to act on the advice of government, and that the palace and government remain fully aligned and mutually supportive in the preparations for the visit.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
NATO boss praises ‘Dear Donald' for pushing alliance to boost defense spending: ‘You made this change possible'
Eight years after Donald Trump used his first appearance at a NATO leaders summit to castigate members of the alliance for 'not paying what they should be paying' for their own defense needs, the 32-member bloc is pledging to more than double their military budgeting commitments — and the American president is getting credit. Speaking at the outset of the group's annual confab at The Hague, Secretary General Mark Rutte said the alliance was poised to take 'historic, transformational decisions to make our people safer, through a stronger, fairer and more lethal NATO ' by implementing a 'concrete plan' for each member of the alliance to spend a full five percent of gross domestic product on defense, through a combination of 'core defense' and 'defense and security-related investments.' Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister who was selected as NATO's chief civil servant and diplomat last year, said the move was 'required' to make the alliance 'fairer' by ensuring that each member 'contributes their fair share for security' as he echoed a complaint voiced by Trump during his first summit in 2017, when the American leader groused that members' failure to meet a two percent defense spending threshold was 'not fair to the people and taxpayers of the United States.' 'For too long, one ally, the United States carried too much of the burden of that commitment, and that changes today,' Rutte added. The NATO leader then began praising Trump in a section of his remarks that evoked the statements of adulation that are heard at the American leader's cabinet meetings, addressing him first as 'President Trump,' then as 'dear Donald' before saying it was Trump who 'made this change possible.' 'Your leadership on this has already produced $1 trillion in extra spending from European allies since 2016 and the decisions today will produce trillions more for our common defense to make us stronger and fairer by equalizing spending between America and America's allies,' he said. He added that NATO members would also agree to 'further increase defense production' with what he described as 'a huge expansion of our defense industrial base on both sides of the Atlantic,' calling the development 'good for our security' as well as 'good for our economies and good for our jobs.' Rutte's remarks echoed a text message he'd sent to Trump the day before — which the president had captured in a screen grab he then posted to social media — in which he congratulated Trump for 'decisive action' in ordering airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend and hailed him as 'flying into another big success in The Hague' on account of the agreement for NATO members to up their defense spending to five percent of GDP. 'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' he said. When the 32 heads of state and government representing each of the allies met on Wednesday, they agreed to ratify the five percent threshold, writing in a joint declaration that each nation would commit to that minimum expenditure 'annually on core defense requirements as well as defense-and security-related spending by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective obligations.' Of that amount, 3.5 percent of each country's GDP will go to 'resource core defense requirements' with the remaining 1.5 percent allocated for 'critical infrastructure' protection as well as 'civil preparedness and resilience' and strengthening countries' defense industrial bases. Each country will be required to submit annual plans to show 'a credible, incremental path' to reaching the five percent spending threshold, the declaration said. In what appeared to be another carrot aimed at garnering the president's support, the NATO leaders also stated a commitment to 'eliminate defense trade barriers' and 'promote defense industrial cooperation' by leveraging transatlantic partnerships, as well as as an agreement to reaffirm 'enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine ' including 'direct contributions towards Ukraine's defense and its defense industry' that can be counted towards the five percent of GDP require for defense spending. The NATO leaders' agreement to step up their defense spending comes after years of pressure from Trump, including both implicit and explicit threats to the alliance's mutual defense provisions, raising fears that the American leader would either pull the United States out of the alliance entirely or simply refuse to come to another nation's aid in the event of an attack. Former officials who served in Trump's first administration have said that he expressed a desire to exit the United States from the North Atlantic Treaty, which he has long described as something akin to a mafia protection racket or a country club in which member states pay 'dues' in exchange for American military protection. During last year's presidential campaign, Trump went so far as to say that he'd 'encourage' Russia to 'do whatever the hell they want' to a NATO ally if that country were 'delinquent' on defense spending, prompting Rutte's predecessor, Jens Stoltenberg, to state that a suggestion that "allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security." His remarks on the campaign trail were part of a pattern set during his first appearance at a NATO summit in 2017, when he claimed 'many' allies owed 'massive amounts of money from past years and not paying in those past years,' which he continued as recently as Tuesday, when he refused to state whether he would commit the United States to continued support of the mutual defense provision in the NATO treaty that saw America's allies come to her aid after the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington. Asked if he was still committed to Article Five of the North Atlantic Treaty, which states that an attack against one member is considered an attack against all of the organization's 32 member nations while en route to The Netherlands aboard Air Force One, Trump declined to say, telling reporters: 'It depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five. You know that, right?' The president added that he was nonetheless 'committed to being ... friends' with the other members of the alliance because he had 'become friends with many of those leaders' and was 'committed to helping them.' When pressed to explain his comments and given another chance to voice support for mutual defense, he told reporters he was 'committed to saving lives' and 'committed to live and safety' while promising to give his 'exact definition' of Article Five once he arrived in The Hague rather than doing so 'on the back of an airplane.' And as he sat next to Rutte during a brief media availability Wednesday morning, Trump appeared to have found more favorable feelings towards Article Five when he was asked once more about his support for the mutual aid provision. 'We're with them all the way,' he said. Asked to clarify his stance during a later bilateral meeting alongside Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof, Trump replied: 'I stand with it.' 'That's why I'm here. If I didn't stand with it, I wouldn't be here,' he said.
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Hertfordshire council sells building where Silo and Grantchester filmed
A former council headquarters where TV shows such as Silo and Grantchester were filmed has been put up for sale to "generate funding for front-line services".Although most of Hertfordshire County Council's staff now work in a different building in Stevenage, the authority had previously planned to keep some of its old Hertford campus for political now, the new Liberal Democrat-run administration said that since there was "limited interest" in using County Hall as an employment base, it would market it for residential and commercial hoped this would help it save about £9.7m in running costs, and increase the total value of the potential sale of the site. Earlier in the year, the authority, which was run by the Conservatives at the time, agreed a budget that included savings of £42m for 2025-26. But in May's local elections, the Liberal Democrats took control and formed a minority leader Steve Jarvis promised a 10-point plan to "support those who most need our help and generate funding for front-line services".At a meeting when the sale of the Hertford headquarters was approved, Jarvis said it was "difficult to justify keeping a building of this size and scale for a very limited number of democratic meetings".He added he was "conscious of the fact that every time we have a meeting [in Hertford], we ask staff to travel from Stevenage to a building that has no facilities".As a result, it was decided that a space would be created for council meetings at its Stevenage campus, at a cost of about £800,000, which would be "borrowed in advance". 'Seven upcoming shows' The old building at County Hall is Grade II listed and has regularly been used as a venue for shows and movies including Silo, The Undertow and Grantchester earned the authority £250,000 across 2023 and 2024, and the building is also due to feature in seven productions on platforms including Netflix and cabinet was told the costs of keeping it open were about £1m a year to cover security and utility deputy chief executive officer Scott Crudgington said that while the venue was a popular location for the film and TV sector, "we are not receiving large parts of these Hollywood blockbuster budgets", and the amount was "nowhere near" covering its running costs. Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
West Northamptonshire Council to bring social housing in-house
Social housing in Northampton will be brought back in-house after a number of "failings" were identified in the last couple of Northamptonshire Council's 11,500 homes were managed by Northamptonshire Partnership Homes (NPH).Charlie Hastie, cabinet member for housing, told a meeting on Tuesday: "Transparency, accountability and legal and safe is the overriding driving force of what we've got to do, and it has not been forthcoming [by NPH] in the last year or so."The cabinet voted in favour of bringing it in-house, and it was the first major decision by the Reform UK-led council after the party took control of the authority in the local elections in May. NPH is an arms-length management organisation (ALMO), first established by the now defunct Northampton Borough Council in 2015. It is responsible for repairs and maintenance, housing development and management, including dealing with anti-social behaviour, tenancy support and the Ecton Lane Park traveller council's housing stock included key estates in Kings Heath, Kingsthorpe, and Spring Boroughs in the town. It included high-rise blocks, a range of 1 to 6-bed properties and supported accommodation, 15 community hubs, older persons' accommodation and more than 2,000 year, the then Conservative-controlled West Northamptonshire Council announced it was taking "immediate steps" to address the "performance failings" of NPH. It also confirmed it had referred itself to the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH).The review by the RSH found some council-managed homes failed to meet national safety and quality the concerns in the report was inaccurate data reporting, including overdue fire risk assessments for 180 the local authority confirmed that all outstanding fire safety checks were completed by December 2024 'Safe, responsive and accountable' The cabinet discussed three options for the future management of homes in the group leader Sally Keeble told the cabinet meeting: "There's only one realistic option on the table about bringing it back in-house; however, I don't think that is remotely adequate to deal with the scale and the size of the problems."When you look at this option, there really does need to be a full options appraisal [of all the housing stock in West Northamptonshire]."The Conservative group leader, Dan Lister, said: "These aren't the only three options that have been presented before us, and there are significantly more options that we should be considering."Leader of the Liberal Democrat group, Jonathan Harris, said: "ALMO's an interesting term - arms-length - it feels to me like it's been a very very long arm."Hastie said bringing it in-house was to ensure residents received "the best possible housing service".He added: "One that is safe, responsive, and accountable. By bringing this provision back in-house, we can simplify governance, strengthen compliance, and have greater control over quality while also providing tenants with the best value for money."The cabinet voted unanimously to bring it back in-house. The council will undertake a full consultation in July to hear directly from tenants and leaseholders. Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
