Big Country Politics: Abilene bookstore owner discuses concerns of House Bill 1375
BIG COUNTRY, Texas () – In this week's episode of Big Country Politics, Arlene Kasselman, owner of the bookstore Seven and One Books, discussed House Bill 1375 and her concerns.
House Bill 1375 is legislation in Texas aimed at regulating businesses that distribute obscene content.
Censorship concerns rise over Texas bill; Abilene bookstore pushes back
'The thing that caught my attention was the wording on the bill because it actually says, 'anything that is deemed harmful.' But there's not an excavation as in harmful or in bullet points on what this could be. And so when you try to parse out what that means as a bookseller, I'm going, 'Oh, so now it's up for definition,' because it's not just, I think you use the phrase obscene, but I think the language is: is this harmful to a minor?' Kasselman said.
Kasselman mentioned that it's scary that this bill allows people to sue businesses based on what they're selling. She noted that book stores are striving, but their profit margins are small.
'If an independent bookstore like mine gets sued, I can't afford the legal fees. I can't afford the potential payouts, and what we noticed is that, in a few cases with certain bookstores that have come under scrutiny, they've tried to settle out of court. We can't afford that either. A bill like this potentially has the effect that small bookstores will close their doors because they can't afford the lawsuits. And the other option is to try to avoid the lawsuits; we either have to close our doors to minors entering the bookstores, or we would have to card people as they are buying things,' Kasselman said.
Kasselman expressed her concerns about what qualifies as harmful content, particularly in relation to 'obscene content.'
She noted that if a teenager visits a bookstore and their parents discover this, it could potentially lead to a lawsuit. Kasselman also highlighted several important books, including The Diary of Anne Frank, writings by Toni Morrison and Octavia Butler, George Orwell's 1984, and Fahrenheit 451.
'And if a parent deems that it is harmful, we're not talking pornography, I'm a mother, in fact, I'm a Christian mother. And I'm not out there to put things in the hands of children that are developmentally inappropriate or that would be harming them. But, it's this idea that we're going to censure what a book is allowed to carry,' Kasselman shared.
Kasselman sees this issue as a form of censorship and explains how she lived through censorship of books and TV when she lived in South Africa.
'I think if we can depoliticize some of these conversations and make them human again, we are probably more similar than we are different. I think the desire is to protect children, and from a bookseller, we're saying, 'Yes, let's make sure children have access to books and bookstores have similar experiences we had as children,' and we would never have something in the store that is directly harmful to children. We are opening a world to children where they can explore, and families can pick… We're not forcing anybody to buy anything, but as a private business, we have multiple options and can invite people in so they can find their own representation in the bookstore, but we're not forcing anybody to buy something against their will,' Kasselman said.
Seven and One Bookstore provides a diverse selection of books, including bestsellers, essential historical reads, and current titles that reflect shoppers' trending interests. Kasselman describes the content of each book to ensure that customers feel confident in their choices. While she prefers not to inquire about what someone is purchasing, she is always open to discussing the content of the books.
'We are not screening books; going 'oh, that book has got, this book is written for adult romance that adults will purchase.' I'm not going to say 'you shouldn't buy that book.' I'm going to let you pick that because I feel like that's your right as an American to have that kind of choice. But the way we have the store laid out, I don't have young adult books with my adult romance books; they're put in a separate part of the store,' Kasselman said.
Kasselman believes that the vagueness of HB 1375 is problematic and could result in frivolous legal actions.
'What if I have somebody come in who picks a book in my faith section and takes that home? And they have a parent who is not of a faith perspective who feels like everything to do with faith is culty or harmful because they have church hurt? And they may want to sue over that… And then I have another child or young adult who picks up a clean, closed door, which is the term we use when there's nothing sexually explicit in it, a romance book, and takes it home, and that parent doesn't like it, and then they sue? It could be coming from both sides. So what we're saying is, let's have these conversations in bills that specify certain very specific things if you have to have a regulation, or let's have people able to come and make their own decisions in a private business,' said Kasselman.
Texas HB 1375 is left pending, and BigCountryHomepage.com will continue to follow this story as it develops.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
Grab a drink at a silent book club speakeasy with Detroit bookstore Alcott's Attic
Grab a drink at a silent book club speakeasy with Detroit bookstore Alcott's Attic Independent bookstores are the heartbeats of their communities. They provide culture and community, generate local jobs and sales tax revenue, promote literacy and education, champion and center diverse and new authors, connect readers to books in a personal and authentic way, and actively support the right to read and access to books in their communities. Each week, we profile an independent bookstore, sharing what makes each one special and getting their expert and unique book recommendations. This week we have owner Christina Lefleur of Alcott's Attic in Detroit, Michigan. What's your store's story? Our store started as a bedtime story one night when my son was a toddler who couldn't sleep. He wanted to hear more every night and began telling everyone we met about the bookstore. Enthusiasm and support poured in, and suddenly the story became a reality. Alcott's Attic is an independent, novel model bookstore. Our name is inspired by the attic where Jo wrote plays for the March children to perform in Louisa May Alcott's novel, "Little Women." Based loosely on Alcott's own childhood at Orchard House, the attic was full of long days of creativity and imagination, a place where the outside world ceased to be and stories took hold. Alcott's Attic is mystical worlds and fairy tales, a hot cup of tea on a rainy day, hidden reading nooks, strong female protagonists and the unique magic of curling up between the pages of a good book. What makes your independent bookstore unique? We are a "novel model" bookstore, a creative approach to bookselling that brings greater accessibility and diversity to the industry. This alliance opens the industry to non-traditional booksellers, including single moms like myself who may not have the immediate capital to open a store. We operate primarily as a pop-up with a focus on unique & interesting locations and events. We were exhibitors for TedX Detroit, where we celebrated Banned Books Week with a fair and operated a long-term pop-up storefront in the Fisher Building. We started doing local deliveries in 2020, our first by bike. What's your favorite section in your store? Our banned books section. The right to read is so important. We curate this section to highlight how even some of the most classic and beloved titles have faced challenges, including "The Diary of Anne Frank," "Where the Wild Things Are" and even "Charlotte's Web." If it makes you think, there is someone who doesn't want you to read it. What book do you love to recommend to customers and why? "Hester" by Laurie Albanese, a reimagining of "The Scarlet Letter." Forbidden love, Scottish folklore, witchcraft, neurodiversity and strong women. This book has everything! What book do you think deserves more attention and why? "The Woman They Could Not Silence" by Kate Moore is the story of Elizabeth Packard, set when women had so few rights that their husbands could discard them by committing them. Elizabeth Packard fought back. Many of the rights women have today are due to her efforts. Why is shopping at local, independent bookstores important? Independent bookstores are a third place where connection and community happen. We contribute to the local economy, create jobs and support our communities in so many ways. Bookselling is a skill that provides personalized service and unique recommendations. We also genuinely care about the communities we serve. What are some of your store's events, programs and partnerships? We are located in the historic Fisher Building, known as "Detroit's Largest Art Object." We do a speakeasy silent book club in the art deco style lounges of the Fisher Theatre, which reaches capacity at 60 seats every month. We also try to partner with other historic buildings in Detroit whenever we can. We had a micro bookstore at the Park Shelton last year, which is the building Frida Kahlo lived in when Diego Rivera was painting the Detroit Industry Murals. We have partnerships with Broadway in Detroit, TechTown/Wayne State University, the Detroit Institute of Arts and the Detroit Historical Society. Upcoming events include summer poetry open mic nights, the Nancy Drew Paranormal Society, children's storytime and the Fran Lebowitz speaking tour with the Fisher Theatre this fall.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Dystopia Now! In ‘Orwell: 2 + 2 = 5,' Director Raoul Peck Shows How ‘1984' Author Foresaw Today's Authoritarian Drift — Cannes
'Special military operation.' 'Department of Government Efficiency.' 'Enhanced interrogation techniques.' 'Alternative facts.' We live in a time when governments use lexical distortions to manipulate public opinion – the very thing author George Orwell captured so cogently in his dystopian novel 1984, where the futuristic regime adopts 'Newspeak' and other authoritarian techniques to stamp out independent critical thinking. More from Deadline Raoul Peck's 'Ernest Cole' Shares Cannes' L'Oeil D'or Prize For Best Documentary With 'The Brink Of Dreams' Raoul Peck Directing Documentary 'The Hands That Held The Knives' On Assassination Of Haitian President Jovenel Moise Nu Boyana Exec Launches Next Gen Company Hollywood Influence Studios With Stratosphere-Shot Debut 'Above The End' The time is ripe then to reexamine a writer who, though he died 75 years ago, foresaw how leaders of today would gaslight their own people to impose their will and squash dissent. Oscar-nominated filmmaker Raoul Peck takes on that task in his new documentary Orwell: 2 + 2 = 5, premiering on Saturday at the Cannes Film Festival. 'A man that died in January 1950, to be that accurate about what is happening today — you better take a second look and try to learn even more from him,' Peck tells Deadline. For his examination of Orwell and his thought, the director drew upon the writer's personal archives. 'The estate allowed me to have access to everything — to published, unpublished [work], private letters, unpublished manuscripts. And that's something, especially in today's world where buying a chapter of a book costs you a fortune,' Peck says. 'It was a gift to be able to have access to everything. It was the same gift I had with James Baldwin' (focus of Peck's acclaimed film I Am Not Your Negro). Orwell: 2 + 2 = 5 traces the writer's effort to complete 1984 in the late 1940s as tuberculosis took the last vestiges of his health. He was hospitalized regularly as he worked on the manuscript on the Scottish island of Jura in the Inner Hebrides. The film also dials back to experiences much earlier in Orwell's life that formed his humanistic worldview. In private writings – voiced by actor Damian Lewis – Orwell describes growing up with the ideology common to a Briton of his background (he described himself as 'lower upper-middle class'). He was educated at Eton but instead of following the common path of his classmates to Oxford or Cambridge, he joined the British Imperial Service, working as a colonial police officer in Burma (present-day Myanmar). 'The key to who he became was in Burma. He realized he was there as an imperialist,' Peck observes. 'He was there as a European and doing the worst things a human being can do to normal people — not to combatants, not to communists — to normal people, 'Coolies,' farmers. And he did not like himself. He did not like what he was doing, and he was doing it for the Empire. That was the big break. And he never was able to reconcile that. And he knew he had to keep his critical mind always, no matter who's the boss, no matter who is the king, no matter who's the president, he needs to keep his critical mind.' He threw his lot in with working people, chronicling life on the lower economic rungs in Down and Out in Paris and London (1933) and The Road to Wigan Pier (1937). He fought fascism in Spain in the 1930s, documenting his experience in Homage to Catalonia (1938). 'The thing that made him interesting to me beside his books, besides his ideas, was the fact that he lived through those things. He wrote from his experience, his own personal experience, not from any intellectual awareness of anything. Not that I'm against that, but there is a sort of credibility that can only be gained from going through those things yourself,' the filmmaker says. 'And this is something he did very frontally, very decisively, and trying to live among the poor, among the disinherited, because that was important to him to feel before he writes, to understand before he can write and to verify what his instinct was. And by the way, he didn't do it from a superior point of view, but he criticized himself as well. He put himself under his own analysis, and he did that very early on.' Orwell described himself as a democratic socialist, but he abhorred the sort of mind control exerted by ostensibly socialist or communist regimes like the USSR and its satellites. Animal Farm, published in 1945 as the Soviet Union was clamping its pincers on Eastern Europe, and 1948 – published at a time when Stalin had drawn the Iron Curtain between East and West – illustrate the moral depravity of the powerful who exert dominance over the powerless. But, as Peck believes, Orwell has wrongly been interpreted as relevant only to an earlier time of Stalinist totalitarianism. Forcing people to accept that 2 + 2 + 5 (as happens in 1984) – how different is being forcefed the lies of Putin that he unleashed hell on Ukrainian civilians to 'denazify' the country? How different is it from Pres. Trump attempting to rewrite reality by describing the January 6 attack on the U.S. capital as 'a day of love'? Orwell saw, as shown in Peck's documentary, that totalitarian regimes engage in 'continuous alteration of the past.' 'Orwell has been put in a little box as an anti-Stalinist or an anti-Soviet, anti-authoritarian regime,' Peck comments. 'But you hear what he says in the film, authoritarians don't all only happen in faraway countries. It can happen as well in the U.K., in the United States and elsewhere. So, the scope [of the film] was from the get-go very wide. For me, it was not just an anti-Trump or anti-whatever agenda.' Peck was born in Haiti but as a child he and his family fled to the Democratic Republic of the Congo to escape the dictatorial regime of François 'Papa Doc' Duvalier, an authoritarian who enjoyed the support of many successive American governments. That high level hypocrisy – America, the shining beacon of liberty, propping up a dictator – made Peck as acutely sensitive to the abuse of political language as Orwell. 'When Kennedy or Nixon or Johnson, were talking about Haiti, supporting a dictatorship, and the word democracy was in every speech, how could I reconcile that?' he questions. 'You are supporting a guy who has killed thousands and thousands of people, who is keeping his people poor, who is corrupt, where there is torture. So how do you reconcile that? Very early on, I was always suspect of certain words that people were using.' Ultimately, what Orwell was about is asserting the dignity of individuals, especially the downtrodden, against forces of exploitation, be they economic and/or political. He's as relevant to our times as he was to the mid-20th century. 'When you encounter a thinker like Orwell, and you feel, wow, he gets it. He gets what the 'other' is, he has empathy,' Peck says. 'He looks at everybody as a human being, whether you are poor, rich or Burmese or British or a worker in a kitchen in Paris, he sees you first as a human being. And that's very rare. That's very rare.' Best of Deadline 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery Where To Watch All The 'Mission: Impossible' Movies: Streamers With Multiple Films In The Franchise Everything We Know About 'My Life With The Walter Boys' Season 2 So Far
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
Opinion - Trump's new DEI: Drama, exaggeration and incoherence
President Trump's war against diversity, equity and inclusion is reverberating throughout nearly every sector, igniting a civil rights pushback. But his executive orders ending DEI cannot halt the historic pace of national racial diversity. According to the Census Bureau, the 'white only' share of the population is now 58.4 percent. Non-Hispanic whites are projected to fall below 50 percent by 2045. So the 'D' in DEI represents America's destiny. Although contentious race-based policy debates will continue, diversity is the new America and must be embraced. The DEI acronym, along with tariffs, ranks among Trump's most frequent utterances. But due to overuse and clouded meaning, change is afoot to rename DEI, starting with the 'Office of Belonging' at the renowned Mayo Clinic. Therefore, I propose changing DEI to mean 'drama, exaggeration and incoherence,' reflecting Trump's unique communication and governing style. 'Drama' captures the daily, head-splitting, inescapable second Trump term. Every day is Trump Day, as Americans are surrounded by media and compelled to tune in. The president's insatiable desire to consolidate power, combined with his unconventional need to create drama, leads to constant breaking news that affects every citizen's life to some degree. Such intentional 'drama by design' could be perceived as a subtle form of domination. Through daily headlines — regardless of whether the news is good or bad, since bad news is spun, justified or rationalized as good — Trump keeps himself prominently on your screen. He 'wins the day' by overshadowing or blotting out others. His need to be on your screen evokes George Orwell's classic dystopian novel '1984,' written long before screen viewing became a daily ritual. In '1984,' a totalitarian state dominates and controls its people through pervasive surveillance via their 'telescreen.' Maintaining a constant screen presence is 'Big Brother,' the all-powerful leader who is always watching and enforcing ideological purity throughout the land. Remarkably, Trump maintains a communication advantage over the fictional Big Brother. He holds a 65 percent stake in Trump Media and Technology Group, which operates Truth Social, his primary communication platform, with a market capitalization of $5 billion. Thus, a drama-loving president who owns and controls his main media dissemination vehicle is rationalized as 'Trump being Trump.' Through Truth Social — an Orwellian sounding name — Trump crafts his version of 'truth.' He generates non-stop drama, attacks America's premier institutions, denigrates his enemies, spews factually incorrect statements, picks fights with celebrities and, most egregiously, conducts official presidential business with no filters or guardrails. How long will Americans tolerate the pace of Trump's move-fast-and-break-things presidency? What most affects presidential job approval ratings are the prices for food, gas, cars, homes and consumer goods. Rising costs and shortages driven by uncertainty due to Trump's tariffs, further complicated by this week's anti-tariff court ruling, and then blocked on appeal, suggest he could 'pay' in the midterms. More damaging is that Trump had promised to combat inflation, the key reason he won in 2024. The president, well aware of this problem, has instituted an ongoing operational plan to prevent Republicans from losing the House of Representatives. Trump also believes (with good reason) that a Democratic victory could trigger his third impeachment. Therefore, cue the 2026 election drama along with nonstop judicial drama. Exaggeration is Trump's default mode of communication. Since facts are often inconvenient, it's easier to use exaggerated words or phrases to enhance a narrative. Nearly every day, on any issue, Trump straddles the line between embellishment and outright lies, known in Trump-speak as 'alternative facts.' His flair for stretching the truth is baked into his always great, best-ever, big, beautiful persona. Although Trump continuously exaggerates his past, present and future achievements — most notably falsely claiming victory in the 2020 election — he occasionally faces the consequences of his exaggerations. After repeatedly saying, 'I will end the Ukraine-Russia war in 24 hours,' he now claims he was only speaking 'in jest.' Continuously fact-checking Trump's exaggerations is a thankless task, and why much of what he says goes unchecked and repeated as fact in Trump-friendly media, on X and Truth Social. Incoherence is Trump's enemy. His 79th birthday, coming in June, will bring more comparisons to former President Joe Biden's diminished mental state. And Trump is exhibiting increasingly bewildering behavior. At all hours, he is always on the attack, often posting bizarre Truth Social videos and tweets unbefitting of a president. Trump's Memorial Day 'scum' remarks and meandering West Point 'trophy wife' address, along with his usual 'weave' of rambling speech patterns bordering on gibberish, explains why the White House is purging its website of official transcripts. This action evokes another detail from '1984,' in which embarrassing documents are disappeared 'down the memory hole.' This new version of DEI represents our president governing through drama, exaggeration and incoherence, brazenly consolidating power with a 'dare you to stop me' attitude. That invites the question of what the presidency will look like after Trump. Do Americans prefer an all-powerful chief executive who enriches himself and tries to rule with fear and an iron fist? If so, Donald Trump Jr. could be our next president. Myra Adams is an opinion writer who served on the creative team of two Republican presidential campaigns in 2004 and 2008. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
