logo
Big Country Politics: Abilene bookstore owner discuses concerns of House Bill 1375

Big Country Politics: Abilene bookstore owner discuses concerns of House Bill 1375

Yahoo27-04-2025
BIG COUNTRY, Texas () – In this week's episode of Big Country Politics, Arlene Kasselman, owner of the bookstore Seven and One Books, discussed House Bill 1375 and her concerns.
House Bill 1375 is legislation in Texas aimed at regulating businesses that distribute obscene content.
Censorship concerns rise over Texas bill; Abilene bookstore pushes back
'The thing that caught my attention was the wording on the bill because it actually says, 'anything that is deemed harmful.' But there's not an excavation as in harmful or in bullet points on what this could be. And so when you try to parse out what that means as a bookseller, I'm going, 'Oh, so now it's up for definition,' because it's not just, I think you use the phrase obscene, but I think the language is: is this harmful to a minor?' Kasselman said.
Kasselman mentioned that it's scary that this bill allows people to sue businesses based on what they're selling. She noted that book stores are striving, but their profit margins are small.
'If an independent bookstore like mine gets sued, I can't afford the legal fees. I can't afford the potential payouts, and what we noticed is that, in a few cases with certain bookstores that have come under scrutiny, they've tried to settle out of court. We can't afford that either. A bill like this potentially has the effect that small bookstores will close their doors because they can't afford the lawsuits. And the other option is to try to avoid the lawsuits; we either have to close our doors to minors entering the bookstores, or we would have to card people as they are buying things,' Kasselman said.
Kasselman expressed her concerns about what qualifies as harmful content, particularly in relation to 'obscene content.'
She noted that if a teenager visits a bookstore and their parents discover this, it could potentially lead to a lawsuit. Kasselman also highlighted several important books, including The Diary of Anne Frank, writings by Toni Morrison and Octavia Butler, George Orwell's 1984, and Fahrenheit 451.
'And if a parent deems that it is harmful, we're not talking pornography, I'm a mother, in fact, I'm a Christian mother. And I'm not out there to put things in the hands of children that are developmentally inappropriate or that would be harming them. But, it's this idea that we're going to censure what a book is allowed to carry,' Kasselman shared.
Kasselman sees this issue as a form of censorship and explains how she lived through censorship of books and TV when she lived in South Africa.
'I think if we can depoliticize some of these conversations and make them human again, we are probably more similar than we are different. I think the desire is to protect children, and from a bookseller, we're saying, 'Yes, let's make sure children have access to books and bookstores have similar experiences we had as children,' and we would never have something in the store that is directly harmful to children. We are opening a world to children where they can explore, and families can pick… We're not forcing anybody to buy anything, but as a private business, we have multiple options and can invite people in so they can find their own representation in the bookstore, but we're not forcing anybody to buy something against their will,' Kasselman said.
Seven and One Bookstore provides a diverse selection of books, including bestsellers, essential historical reads, and current titles that reflect shoppers' trending interests. Kasselman describes the content of each book to ensure that customers feel confident in their choices. While she prefers not to inquire about what someone is purchasing, she is always open to discussing the content of the books.
'We are not screening books; going 'oh, that book has got, this book is written for adult romance that adults will purchase.' I'm not going to say 'you shouldn't buy that book.' I'm going to let you pick that because I feel like that's your right as an American to have that kind of choice. But the way we have the store laid out, I don't have young adult books with my adult romance books; they're put in a separate part of the store,' Kasselman said.
Kasselman believes that the vagueness of HB 1375 is problematic and could result in frivolous legal actions.
'What if I have somebody come in who picks a book in my faith section and takes that home? And they have a parent who is not of a faith perspective who feels like everything to do with faith is culty or harmful because they have church hurt? And they may want to sue over that… And then I have another child or young adult who picks up a clean, closed door, which is the term we use when there's nothing sexually explicit in it, a romance book, and takes it home, and that parent doesn't like it, and then they sue? It could be coming from both sides. So what we're saying is, let's have these conversations in bills that specify certain very specific things if you have to have a regulation, or let's have people able to come and make their own decisions in a private business,' said Kasselman.
Texas HB 1375 is left pending, and BigCountryHomepage.com will continue to follow this story as it develops.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mr. Trump, leave the Smithsonian alone
Mr. Trump, leave the Smithsonian alone

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Mr. Trump, leave the Smithsonian alone

President Trump — who regularly denounces anything he dislikes as 'fake news,' even when it is accurate — is now demanding that Smithsonian Institution museums undergo an overhaul to present a fake version of history that erases America's flaws. This is a dangerous assault on truth, the type of action authoritarian rulers take. It sounds like something out of George Orwell's dystopian novel '1984,' where a totalitarian regime censors the news to distort the present and destroys historical records to rewrite the past to conform to the views of the all-powerful dictator known as Big Brother. Trump, who seems to act as if he wants to be the Big Brother of 2025, has appointed himself America's chief arbiter of what is fit to display in national museums. Like the authoritarian leaders he envies for their unchecked power, Trump has a boundless desire to exercise unchallenged control over every aspect of life in his country. This is why he demands to dictate not just what the Smithsonian displays, but what the news media reports, by filing lawsuits and restricting their access to him; what foreign leaders do, by imposing tariffs on their countries; and what universities teach, by withholding billions of dollars in federal funds. It is also why he has sent National Guard troops into the streets of Washington and Los Angeles to deal with non-existent emergencies, and launched what he calls the largest deportation program in American history against unauthorized immigrants. Republicans who control the House and Senate have disgracefully abdicated their responsibility to act as a check and balance on Trump's power grab. With their complicity, we are now essentially living in an authoritarian democracy — at least until the Democrats control one of those houses. Trump is demanding that the Smithsonian museums present the story of America and the world as he would like to see it, rather than as it really is. The president's version of history portrays the U.S. as exceptional and great. He wants to whitewash flaws such as slavery and discrimination against Black Americans, confiscation of Native American lands in violation of treaty obligations, the unprovoked war against Mexico that conquered what is now the western U.S., the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, the denial of voting rights and other rights to women for much of our history — and more. In an Aug. 12 letter to Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch, administration officials demanded a 'comprehensive internal review' of eight Smithsonian museums by the White House 'to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.' The review will cover current and planned museum exhibits, 'with particular attention to those planned for the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence' in 2026. It will also examine 'websites, educational materials, and digital and social media content to assess tone, historical framing, and alignments with American ideals.' The letter is a follow-up to an executive order Trump issued in March denouncing 'a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our nation's history … as inherently racist, sexist, oppressive, or otherwise irredeemably flawed.' In the order, Trump said Vice President JD Vance would head an effort to 'remove improper ideology' from all Smithsonian museums, research centers and the National Zoo. What is an 'improper ideology'? Apparently, whatever Trump says it is. The administration's letter calls for the museums to submit material documenting what is in their collections and says that, within 120 days, 'museums should begin implementing content corrections where necessary, replacing divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate and constructive descriptions.' We do not need this kind of Orwellian control by political appointees in government to determine how the Smithsonian museums should explain history, science and art. The museums are staffed by nonpartisan, career subject-matter experts. Trump — who demands an end all diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives — has already shown he wants to distort American history by denying the existence of systemic racism and downplaying the injustice of slavery and its legacy. Yet the National Museum of African American History and Culture is focused on telling the story of how racism has oppressed Black Americans, as well as highlighting the many achievements of Black people in government, education, science, business, entertainment, sports and other fields. It is a national treasure that tells a story all Americans should learn. No president should be able to dictate to the African American museum — or any other museum — what it should exhibit. In addition to politicizing what information is presented by some of the finest museums in the world, Trump's interference in the Smithsonian sets a terrible and costly precedent. Will the museums have to spend millions of dollars redesigning their exhibits every time a new president takes office to meet an ideological purity test? I agree with Trump that America is the greatest nation on Earth. I feel blessed to live here. But America is not and never has been perfect. No nation is. The president has an incredibly long list of vital tasks to perform. Overseeing the exhibits at the Smithsonian museums in not one of them. We do not need a curator-in-chief sitting in the Oval Office.

Backlash After Trump Removes Labor Stats Official
Backlash After Trump Removes Labor Stats Official

Buzz Feed

time04-08-2025

  • Buzz Feed

Backlash After Trump Removes Labor Stats Official

On Friday, after the Bureau of Labor Statistics released a report showing weak July hiring numbers and significant downward revisions to job growth for the last two months; Donald Trump responded by firing its chief. In a few posts on Truth Social, Trump said the report's numbers were "RIGGED" to make him look bad and suggested, without evidence, that they were "manipulated for political purposes." He ordered the removal of Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, who was confirmed with bipartisan support in 2024. Despite Trump's claims, according to reporting by the New York Times, most experts, including economists and current and former agency staff members, do not believe there has been evidence of political interference in the labor data. Voices from across the political spectrum have begun speaking out. In a post on X following the news, Senator Bernie Sanders warned about the precedent of a president firing officials simply for producing data that doesn't align with their preferences. "No. Mr. President. In America, you do not fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics for releasing a jobs report that you don't like. That's what authoritarians do," Sen. Sanders wrote. "We need serious economists in these positions, not hacks who will only tell you what you want to hear." Former transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg echoed the concern: "The President sees a bad jobs report, and responds by getting rid of the person in charge of the statistics. This is how America becomes a third-rate country." Even William Beach, Trump's own former appointee and McEntarfer's predecessor at BLS, condemned the move. "The totally groundless firing of Dr. Erika McEntarfer, my successor as Commissioner of Labor Statistics at BLS, sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau," he wrote on X. His full statement with Friends of BLS, a group chaired by former BLS commissioners, calls on Congress to intervene. Across social media, users seem to be voicing similar criticisms. "So what happens when the next Jobs Report is bad?" one person asked. "Either report it and get fired, or lie to the public and say it's good? Look at the precedent Trump is setting." Some compared the move to Soviet-era leadership. "also, this is very Soviet, except that Stalin then arrested and executed the statisticians," @anneapplebaum, a journalist and historian on communism, wrote on X. "He fires anyone who brings him bad news. This is what dictators do," The Lincoln Project said in a viral tweet. "What in the dictatorship," another added. After clips of Trump asking a reporter, "Why should anyone trust the numbers?" and calling the report "phony" went viral on X, many started comparing the moment to George Orwell's infamous dystopian novel, 1984. (In case you're unfamiliar, the novel follows a totalitarian party who controls every aspect of life, including rewriting history and statistics to align with the party's goals.) growing concerns about trust in future government reports, White House economic advisers have since defended Trump's firing. And it doesn't appear that Trump is letting up, continuing his Truth Social tirades about the jobs report into Monday. He said he plans to name a new BLS commissioner within the next few days. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments.

‘1984' Hasn't Changed, but America Has
‘1984' Hasn't Changed, but America Has

New York Times

time27-07-2025

  • New York Times

‘1984' Hasn't Changed, but America Has

I traced a copy of George Orwell's '1984' to the library of the social sciences department at Warsaw University, a literary treasure trove heavy with the scent of dust and old paper, and so jammed with shelves that in places the only way to move around was sideways. For months I had been searching for this particular volume, a book that had played, in my view, a small but significant role in winning the Cold War. There are myriad reasons the Eastern Bloc collapsed in 1989. The economic stagnation of the East and the war in Afghanistan are two of the most commonly cited. But literature also played its part, thanks to a long-running U.S. operation conducted by the Central Intelligence Agency that covertly moved millions of books through the Iron Curtain in a bid to undermine Communist Party censorship. While it is hard to quantify the program's effect in absolute terms, its history offers valuable lessons for today, not least since some of the very same titles and authors the C.I.A. sent East during the Cold War — including '1984'— are now deemed objectionable by a network of conservative groups across the United States. First published in English in 1949, Orwell's novel describes the dystopian world of Oceania, a totalitarian state where the protagonist, Winston Smith, works in a huge government department called the Ministry of Truth. The ministry is ironically named: Its role is not to safeguard the truth but to destroy it, to edit history to fit the present needs of the party and its leader, Big Brother, since, as the slogan runs, 'Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.' In the real Soviet system, every country had its equivalent of the Ministry of Truth, modeled on the Moscow template. In Poland, the largest Eastern European nation outside the Soviet Union, this censorship and propaganda apparatus was called the Main Office for the Control of Presentations and Public Performances, and its headquarters occupied most of a city block in downtown Warsaw. From art to advertising, television to theater, the Main Office reached into all aspects of Polish life. It had employees in every TV and radio station, every film studio and every publishing house. Every typewriter in Poland had to be registered, access to every photocopier was restricted, and a permit was needed even to buy a ream of paper. Books that did not conform to the censor's rules were pulped. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store