What would New Zealand recognising Palestinian statehood mean?
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
Explainer
- World leaders are moving toward accepting the idea of Palestinian statehood, but New Zealand has not officially recognised the country. What exactly does recognition mean, and what would it change?
In the past week, a flurry of major nations have agreed to support Palestinian statehood, including
Canada
,
Britain
and
France
, while Australia is reportedly near making a decision.
New Zealand has not yet made that leap, although the government has repeatedly called for an end to violence in Gaza and steps toward a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestine territories.
The Palestinian territories have been embroiled in war since Hamas attacked Israel on 7 October, 2023, killing around 1200 people, mostly civilians. The Israel-Hamas war had since left more than 60,000 Palestinians dead, Gaza's Health Ministry said, and
widespread famine had broken out
as well.
At the moment, Palestine is officially recognised by
147 of the UN's 193 member countries
, not counting ones that announced plans this week.
What exactly is recognising Palestine statehood? Here's the details.
'The world needs to focus' on aid for Gaza, Christopher Luxon has said.
Photo:
RNZ / Mark Papalii
After Britain's announcement this week that it would recognise Palestine by September unless Israel met certain conditions, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon
said New Zealand wouldn't be following its lead
"at this stage".
"Not at this point," Luxon told reporters on Wednesday.
"Obviously, I will be talking with Sir Keir Starmer around his position, which is a conditional statehood."
In response to questions from RNZ, Luxon said New Zealand had long supported the eventual recognition of Palestinian statehood, but that the immediate focus should be on getting aid into Gaza rather than "fragmenting and talking about all sorts of other things that are distractions".
"We need to put the pressure on Israel to get humanitarian assistance unfettered, at scale, at volume, into Gaza," he said.
"You can talk about a whole bunch of other things, but for right now, the world needs to focus."
In Parliament on Wednesday
, Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters said he stood by a statement that "it is a matter of when, not if, New Zealand will recognise Palestine statehood."
"Yes, we steadfastly support the establishment of a Palestinian State and the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. We have done so for decades."
However, when asked if now was the time to recognise Palestine, Peters said, "we do need to see progress on some of the fundamental issues relating to a Palestinian State's legitimacy and viability, including representative governance, commitments to non-violence, regional support and security guarantees for Israel".
"If we recognise the State of Palestine, New Zealand wants to know that what we are recognising is a legitimate, representative, viable political entity."
University of Otago Professor of Politics and International Relations Robert Patman said while the Luxon-led government did support the two-state solution, "it seems reluctant to show leadership".
The government has said New Zealand has limited influence over a conflict on the other side of the world.
"This claim does not sit comfortably with New Zealand government's purported support for an international rules-based order," Patman said.
"Distance from a conflict clearly should not determine whether flagrant violations of international law such as in Gaza are tolerated or condemned."
Former Prime Minister Helen Clark also told RNZ's
Midday Report
on Thursday
that New Zealand was "lagging behind"
by not recognising statehood.
"If New Zealand can't act in these circumstances, when can it act?"
Dozens of protests over the war in Gaza and Palestine's future have been held in New Zealand.
Photo:
RNZ/Mark Papalii
There's been a groundswell of recent announcements from Britain, France and Canada this week announcing proposals to recognise Palestine timed around the UN General Assembly next month.
In 2024, a group of UN experts called on all United Nations member states to recognise the State of Palestine, in order to bring about an immediate ceasefire in Gaza amid the Israel-Gaza war.
Australia
is believed to soon join that group
, with the ABC writing that "Australia will recognise a Palestinian state, it is only a matter of when and how."
"My entire political life, I've said I support two states, the right of Israel to exist within secure borders and the right of Palestinians to have their legitimate aspirations for their own state realised," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.
"That's my objective."
Dozens of other countries
already recognise Palestine
.
Some of these recent announcements come with caveats such as ensuring free and open elections and the disarming of Hamas.
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said it would recognise Palestine in September "unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza" and other conditions.
The UN also held an international conference on the question of Palestine and the implementation of the two-state solution in New York from 28 to 29 July.
Thousands protest at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on 22 August, 2024, demanding an end to the war on Gaza.
Photo:
AFP/ JW Hendricks
Palestine exists in a peculiar quasi-state limbo. There are no internationally agreed upon borders, no globally recognised capital or army.
The conflict between Israel and the Palestinian people dates back centuries. British troops took control of the country from the Ottoman Empire after World War I and ruled it until 1948. The UN proposed partioning Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states, but the plan was rejected.
Jewish leaders in Palestine declared an independent state known as Israel when British rule ended. That declaration sparked war with Arab nation neighbours and hundreds of thousands of Palestinians became refugees. After the 1967 'Six-Day War,' Israel captured much of the Palestinian territories from other Middle Eastern nations.
Israel continues to occupy those territories. In 1988 the State of Palestine was officially declared by the Palestine Liberation Organisation, claiming the territories of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The state of Palestine has been a non-member observer state of the United Nations since 2012.
The two-state solution that has been proposed for years would see an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza, with East Jerusalem as its capital, existing alongside Israel.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government rejects the two-state solution.
It's more of a symbolic step than anything, but it acknowledges Palestinian self-determination and allows the establishment of full diplomatic regulations.
"The big difference with recognising a Palestinian state (as opposed to expressing a willingness to do so sometime in the future) is that it would significantly reduce the scope for diplomatic ambiguity or sitting on the fence," Patman said.
Senior lecturer in law at the University of South Australia Juliette McIntyre
told the ABC recently
that a state has certain defining features under international law.
These features include a permanent population, a determinate territory, an "effective" government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states.
"In some ways, the most important thing is recognition by other states - this enables entering into diplomatic relations, and membership of international organisations," McIntyre said.
The recent announcements by Britain, Canada and others come as coverage of death and famine in Gaza has escalated dramatically.
"Recognising a Palestinian state also conveys an urgent acknowledgement that the current situations in Gaza and the West Bank have been characterised by acts that constitute war crimes and represent an unacceptable failure by the occupying power, Israel, to live up to its legal responsibilities toward the Palestinian population it has under its control," Patman said.
The United Nations would consider Palestine membership if the Security Council did not veto it.
Photo:
UN / Eskinder Debebe
Well, under United Nations rules, it could be.
To become a member of the United Nations, Palestine would submit an application to the Secretary-General and accept member obligations.
The UN Security Council would vote on the admission, but none of the five permanent members - China, France, the UK, Russia and the United States - can vote against it.
If the Security Council recommends admission, it then goes on to the full General Assembly, where a two-thirds majority vote is necessary.
South Sudan is the most recent country to join as a member, in 2011.
The United States has
previously vetoed attempts
to grant Palestine membership.
The US has had long-standing support for a two-state solution, but hasn't gone so far as to support Palestinian statehood. It does recognise the Palestine Liberation Organisation as the representative entity of the Palestinian people and the Palestinian National Authority as the government of the territories.
US President Donald Trump has frequently supported Israel and expressed reservations about
recognising Palestine
, telling reporters that Starmer's plan would "reward Hamas".
"You're rewarding Hamas if you do that. I don't think they should be rewarded."
Trump also
threatened a trade deal with Canada
over their overtures on Palestine.
In a statement this week the US Department of State
called the UN's recent two-state conference a "publicity stunt" and "a slap in the face to the victims of October 7", and said France's announcement was "welcomed by Hamas".
The US could again veto a motion on Palestinian statehood if it comes before the Security Council.
Patman said in his view, "the National-led government may be nervous about offending the Trump administration and by taking incremental steps toward recognition may be seeking to minimise that possibility, especially if it believes Trump may be reconsidering his hitherto staunch support for Netanyahu's stance toward Gaza (and West Bank)."
People walking amidst the destruction of houses and streets in Khan Yunis, located in the southern Gaza Strip.
Photo:
MOHAMED ZAANOUN / AFP
New Zealand
has just signed a joint statement with 14 other countries
expressing a willingness to recognise the State of Palestine as a necessary step towards a two-state solution.
New Zealand also recently joined
24 countries in calling for an end to the war in Gaza
, and criticising what they called the inhumane killing of Palestinians.
New Zealand had announced $37.5 million in humanitarian aid for the conflict, MFAT said. It also recently banned some
Israeli politicians from travel to New Zealand.
Realistically, Palestine statehood and recognition by the UN won't happen overnight. But the declarations are also being seen as an attempt to revive peace talks and end the violence.
"The window for peace through the two-state solution appeared to be locked shut after the collapse of the peace process that started with real hope in the 1990s," the BBC's
international editor Jeremy Bowen noted
.
"Britain's decision to recognise Palestine is a diplomatic crowbar to try to reopen it."
New Zealand is a small player on the global scene, but the escalation of major global powers this week chiming in could make Israel more isolated on the issue.
"After making such declarations, it will be more difficult for the likes of Britain, Germany and Australia to continue to provide military and intelligence assistance to a Netanyahu government that is using such military force to deny the possibility of a Palestinian state and the outcome of a two-state solution," Patman said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Labelling rules ease for genetically-modified food made without new DNA added, amid reform
Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard. (File photo) Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver The appetite for food made with the use of gene technologies will be tested in New Zealand, amid ongoing regulatory reform and an easing of food labelling requirements. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) approved updated definitions for genetically-modified (GM) food in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code in June for review, following public consultation. In late July, Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard and his Australian counterparts decided to adopt them. Food produced using new breeding techniques, including gene editing, will not need to be labelled as "GM" on the food label, if novel or new DNA was not introduced in the process. Simultaneously, the government was considering a new regulatory regime for gene technologies used outside the laboratory, after it attracted 15,000 submissions during select committee earlier this year. Minister Andrew Hoggard told RNZ last week, there was some vocal opposition to FSANZ's P1055 proposal during public consultation from those who "don't believe in [genetic engineering]." "There was still some vocal opposition, so that was taken onboard. Obviously, there was support from a lot of industry and scientific groups," he said. Andrew Hoggard said producers could still choose to disclose gene technologies to label it as such. (File photo) Photo: 123RF Hoggard said in removing the requirement, producers could still choose to disclose gene technologies used throughout production on the label. "There's nothing stopping anyone who is producing food that doesn't have any new breeding technologies to label it as such. We're not outlawing that people don't have to put these labels on." He said it came down to consumer's choice. "So if the organic sector, for example, doesn't want to allow these new breeding techniques in their production, then people who also think they don't want to consume food that's had new breeding techniques used in them, then they can just buy organic and know that 'okay, that hasn't been used'. "If this is something you're not worried about, then just go ahead shopping as normal," he said. "If it is something you are concerned about, producers who will be using the old methodologies will still be able to highlight on the packaging that, 'hey, we don't use the X, Y and Z' or 'we don't do this or that'. And you just need to go and look for that food." Hoggard said to the best of his knowledge, no health issues had been raised from the consumption of GMO products, like soya bean for example. Meanwhile, GE-Free New Zealand spokesperson Jon Carapiet said the eased labelling requirements took informed choices away from the consumer. GE-Free New Zealand spokesperson Jon Carapiet. Photo: RNZ "It's really fundamentally unethical to take away the ordinary consumer's choice in the supermarkets," Carapiet said. "It's all about trust, and to say 'we're not gonna even trust you to make your own decisions anymore'... is really wrong." He said the assertion that shoppers concerned about GM food would simply buy organic food instead was "disingenuous". "The average consumer certainly can't afford to go and buy organics on everyday basis. I wish they could, but they can't," he said. "So to say all the ordinary people of New Zealand don't deserve the right to choose, I think that's very wrong." Carapiet said supermarkets could ask their suppliers to disclose the use of gene technologies throughout production to ensure transparency and to inform shoppers about the product they were buying. "I think that in the coming months, if this does go ahead, companies will have to go above and beyond the food authority standards. "If the food authority FSANZ says 'no you can have GM crops and GE foods unlabelled in the supermarket', then it's going to be for the supermarkets to voluntarily label it." In a written statement, a Foodstuffs spokesperson said it took food safety "very seriously" and complied fully with the Australia and New Zealand Food Standards Code, including all labelling requirements. "Customers have the right to know what's in the food they're buying," they said. "As part of our supplier agreements, we require partners to disclose country of origin information, and any environmental or social claims must be accurate and substantiated." They said the same approach applied to food made using gene technologies, including GM ingredients. "Any changes to regulation in this space will be carefully reviewed, and we'll continue to ensure our labelling provides customers with accurate and transparent information, so they can make informed choices." A Woolworths New Zealand spokesperson said it will make sure its retail items complied with labelling rules. "If the labelling rules in New Zealand change then we would ensure all products comply with labelling requirements," they said. A government report on the Gene Technology Bill was expected on August 22. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Israel's PM vows to expand military operations to occupy all of Gaza
Witkoff told hostage families in Tel Aviv that his proposal for a temporary ceasefire and the return of about half of 20 living Israeli hostages still held by Hamas in Gaza 'doesn't work and we've tried everything'. Trump, Witkoff said, 'now believes that everybody should come home at once. No piecemeal deals.' He said the Administration was formulating a new 'all or nothing' plan. Both sides have rejected elements of the Witkoff proposal that has been on the table. The State Department declined to comment. Details of the Administration's new approach - or the extent to which it is related to Netanyahu's new military plans - remain unclear, according to diplomats and hostage families who have been briefed by United States officials. Officials in Qatar and Egypt, which along with the US have been mediating talks between Israel and Hamas almost since the nearly two-year-old conflict began, said they were not aware of any new US ceasefire deal. While right-wing members of Netanyahu's Government have long supported a complete takeover of Gaza, senior security officials have repeatedly insisted that Israel has achieved its military objectives of eliminating Hamas' ability to govern Gaza or launch military offensives, according to Israeli media accounts. The IDF says it already controls more than 75% of Gaza, a densely populated territory of 365sq km. The United Nations has said that only 12% of Gaza is outside the Israeli militarised zone or areas not affected by IDF evacuation orders. The majority of Gaza's 2.2 million people now live in tent encampments in the southern part of the enclave. The IDF mostly has refrained from operating where Israeli intelligence indicates that hostages are being held. Hostage families and many Israeli security officials long have said that a negotiated agreement is the only way to bring the majority of the captives home. 'Netanyahu has decided to occupy the Gaza Strip, meaning that military operations will also take place in areas where hostages are being held,' said a person familiar with the prime minister's decisions who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Hostages freed from captivity have said in interviews with Israeli news media that their captors were under orders to kill them if they thought Israeli troops were approaching. Einav Zangauker, whose son Matan is still held hostage in Gaza, wrote on X: '667 days that the hostages are enduring a Holocaust in the tunnels, and instead of reaching a full agreement to end the war - a feasible one - Netanyahu is preparing an operation that will turn the living hostages into bodies and make the fallen disappear.' Videos released by Hamas late last week of two hostages showed them extremely emaciated. 'You see your child dying before your eyes and you can't do anything,' Ofir Braslavski, whose son Rom Braslavski was shown in one video, told the Associated Press. Some family members who met Witkoff in Tel Aviv said they thought the new plan he outlined in broad strokes was the best chance to lead to the release of all the hostages and an end to the war. 'This Administration inherited this phased framework,' which led to two temporary ceasefires and the release of more than 200 hostages under the Biden Administration, 'and were convinced by the Israeli Government that this was the best option for getting to a deal,' said Ruby Chen, the father of 19-year-old American Israeli Itay Chen, who was abducted by Hamas during its October 7, 2023, attack in southern Israel that sparked the war. 'But this Administration has taken six months and realised it's not a plan that they can execute, and they decided to shift and come up with a plan that has a better probability of success,' Chen told the Washington Post. The Israeli official said that 'the Prime Minister is pushing for the release of the hostages while pursuing a military resolution, combined with the delivery of humanitarian aid to areas outside the combat zones and, to the extent possible, to areas not under Hamas control'. Hamas' release of the videos of skeletal hostages came as international outrage has grown over images of emaciated Gazan children amid what the United Nations has said are near-famine conditions. Israel has restricted delivery of humanitarian assistance by international groups, instead supporting the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which runs four distribution sites in southern Gaza. Hundreds of Gazans have been killed as they pass close to IDF positions to reach the GHF sites, which are guarded by US security contractors. A number of Arab and European countries, joined today by Canada, have air-dropped food into Gaza. Jordan, which has also sent aid by road, today condemned what it called 'the deliberate obstruction' of convoys by Israeli settlers as the trucks travel through the West Bank en route to Gaza. 'This is not the first time such violations have occurred,' Jordanian government spokesman Mohammad al-Momani said, according to the official Jordan News Agency. Aside from the settler attacks, he said, Israel has placed severe restrictions on the number of trucks allowed to cross daily and has imposed convoluted approval processes, chaotic border inspections and newly added customs fees.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon speaks to media in Papua New Guinea
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is speaking to media during a visit to Papua New Guinea. Luxon was warmly welcomed by Papua New Guinea's prime minister James Marape during his visit to celebrate 50 years of diplomatic ties. Marape thanked New Zealand for its support, as one of the eight countries to diplomatically support Papua New Guinea - a former Australian territory - before it declared independence. Luxon in turn talked of Papua New Guinea's great potential for growth, saying while Australia and New Zealand would both continue to support that growth it would be driven by businesses and community leveraging "great cultural and resource wealth". Papua New Guinea's economy is forecast to grow 4.7 percent in 2025, and trade with New Zealand has grown to more than $70 million by value in the March quarter, with aluminium the top export to the country.
