I think we have showed why we are a great team: Shubman Gill
Starting their second innings 311 runs in arrears after England racked up a massive first-innings total, Gill, Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar struck excellent hundreds to bail their team from the brink of defeat and remain in contention to level the five-match series.
'To be able to have that same mindset for 140 overs is very difficult, and that is what differentiates a good team from a great team, and I think we showed that today, that is why we are a great team," Gill told the BCCI TV.
'Zero for two and then the partnership between me and KL bhai, I think that's what ignited the belief that yes, we can achieve this task. Extremely, extremely happy. To be able to get a draw from the position that we were in yesterday is extremely satisfying," he added.
Rahul played a neat 90-run knock and was associated in a partnership of 188 runs with Gill, after which the day belonged to the duo of Jadeja and Washington.
Leading the Test team for the first time, the 25-year-old Gill has been prolific in this series and has already amassed 700 runs with four centuries including a double ton, but picked the one at Old Trafford as his best.
'I think this inning of mine was the most pleasing to me," Gill said.
The job was far from done for India when Gill was dismissed, but Jadeja and Washington batted with immense responsibility and showed character to deny the frustrated English players.
'When Jaddu bhai and Washy were batting, it was not easy. The ball was doing something but the way they both batted, so calmly.. and to be able to get a Test century from there is when you realise how big an achievement it is," Gill lauded his teammates.
For Washington especially, the knock was very special as it was his maiden Test hundred. Needless to say, he was delighted to have scored a hundred when his team needed it the most.
'I think this hundred really means a lot and I'd genuinely love to dedicate this to my family because they've been extremely supportive throughout my time playing cricket right from day one. So, it definitely means a lot, a lot more for them," Washington said.
That he had a seasoned campaigner like Jadeja at the other end benefitted Washington during their undefeated match-saving partnership of 223 runs on Sunday.
'Jaddu bhai really played out those crucial spells, spinners were also getting a lot of purchase. So, we just wanted to focus really hard on watching the ball and it's just really special to have actually drawn this game.
'This draw really means a lot for the whole setup and I'm sure this game is going to give us a lot more confidence," Washington said.
England lead the series 2-1 heading into the final Test in London from Thursday. PTI AH PM AH PM PM
view comments
First Published:
July 28, 2025, 14:45 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
3 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Gill silences critics with runs, results
When Shubman Gill was announced as the new skipper of the Indian team for the England series, questions were instantly raised if the prince's ascension to the throne was premature. He's just 25 years old and his performances previously in SENA (South Africa, England, New Zealand, Australia) countries weren't encouraging. Shouldn't he be given more time to find his feet while a senior like KL Rahul, Jasprit Bumrah or Rishabh Pant could have done the job? Won't the weight of captaining a transitional Indian team in a punishing place like England, where the visitors have won a Test series just thrice, weigh him down? Will the physical and emotional toil of leading in a gruelling five-match series affect his batting — he averaged 36.57 before this series — which is still a work in progress? Well, the soft-spoken but hard-nosed Gill has answered most of those questions in emphatic fashion, indicating he's one of those who can thrive personally in leadership roles. Firstly, the batting where Gill has smashed some long-standing records and is on course to obliterate a few more when he takes strike in the final Test at The Oval starting July 31. Prior to the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, the Punjabi didn't have a single century in SENA countries — he hasn't played a Test yet in New Zealand. In fact, out of his five tons before landing here, all had come in the subcontinent — four in India and one in Bangladesh.
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
BCCI medical team tells Jasprit Bumrah not to play fifth Test against England, replacement confirmed: Report
Despite being 1-2 down and the enticing prospect of levelling the series by winning the fifth and final Test at The Oval, knocking at the doors, the BCCI medical has reportedly taken the tough call of resting Jasprit Bumrah from the Oval Test. According to an ESPNCricinfo report, Bumrah, the World's No.1-ranked bowler, will not play in the fifth Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy to protect his back, keeping the long-term prospects in mind. A fit-again Akash Deep is set to replace Bumrah in India's XI. India's Jasprit Bumrah(PTI) Even before the start of the series, the Indian team management, led by head coach Gautam Gambhir and Bumrah himself, had announced that he would be available for only three of the five Tests as his body would not allow more than that. The last time Bumrah tried to put his body on the line in Australia, he ended up aggravating his back injury, which could potentially shorten his career. Despite all this, there were murmurs of Bumrah giving it one final rip at the Oval to help India square the series. After all, he hasn't bowled since the morning of Day 4 of the fourth Test in Manchester. But as it turned out, the combination of just a three-day break, a likely lifeless Oval pitch and workload management prompted India not to risk Bumrah. This comes hours after batting coach Sitanshu Kotak did not rule out Jasprit Bumrah's participation in the series decider. "Bumrah is fit now, according to his load. He has bowled one inning in the last match. So that obviously the head coach, our physio and captain will have a discussion and decide. There has been no discussion," Kotak said two days before the game. At Old Trafford, Gambhir had also confirmed that all his pacers were fit, meaning that Arshdeep Singh and Akash Deep have recovered from injuries. Bumrah, India's highest wicket-taker in the series so far, bowled 33 overs – his most in an innings – in Manchester. This came after he had bowled his heart out at Leeds and Lord's. Who will replace Bumrah? What about Siraj? Akash Deep, who missed the fourth Test due to a groin injury, is set to return to the XI after regaining his full fitness. Akash Deep was India's hero with the ball in Edgbaston, where he picked up 10 wickets. Arshdeep Singh is also set to get his Test cap. He will replace Anshul Kamboj while Mohammed Siraj is all but certain to play his fifth Test in a row.
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Underbowled and underwhelming: the curious case of India's fourth seamer
India is at sixes and sevens when it comes to properly utilising its fourth seam bowler. Of the 672.1 overs bowled by the visitors against England in the four Tests so far, the fourth pacer has delivered just 55 overs. It is not a secret that the current Indian team is big on having as many all-rounders as possible in the playing XI. The fourth seamer has also been selected bearing in mind the player's batting prowess and that's why Shardul Thakur (first and fourth Tests) and Nitish Kumar (second and third Tests) got the nod. Ideally, the captain should have confidence in the fourth pacer's abilities to keep things tight and provide the strike bowlers a breather. But the number of overs given to the 'fourth man' suggests otherwise. It is not as if India did not require the services of its back-up pacer in the series, given that England has batted for more than 80 overs in five of its seven innings so far. After the second day's play at Old Trafford, Shardul was given the unenviable task of explaining why he was not getting to bowl more. 'Usually, the captain takes the call. The player doesn't have much of a say. If we talk about the first Test, he said there was no chance of bowling, and I said okay. As far as this match is concerned, the way the game has progressed, I could have been given two more overs. But there is a lot of time left in the game. Hopefully, I'll get more bowling,' Shardul had said. And the next day's proceedings started with him bowling the first over! However, that proved to be a false dawn as skipper Shubman Gill employed him just for one over and change ends for Mohammed Siraj and Jasprit Bumrah. Shardul also did not help his case as he had leaked 35 runs in his five overs the previous day. Even with the injury concerns for lead pacers Bumrah and Siraj during the game, Shardul sent down only 11 of the 157.1 overs India bowled in the fourth Test. Intentional Bowling coach Morne Morkel did not shy away from revealing that India relying more on the top speedsters was intentional. 'A bit of a tough fit when you have four seamers... when you're going at five runs an over, I think as a captain, you want to bring the strike bowlers back to try and take the wickets. Unfortunately, it happened for Shardul in the first Test as well,' Morkel said after the third day's play in Manchester. England's marathon first innings had not finished by then and India had to bowl another 22.1 overs to dismiss the hosts. The workload for the fourth pacer on day four of the fourth Test: zero (no overs). Don't put all your eggs in one basket is timeless wisdom; yet, it was almost as if India was happy to pin all its hopes on the main pacers running through the England batting line-up. There's a chance it may work, as it did when Akash Deep and Siraj took 17 of the 20 English wickets to bowl India to a famous victory in the Edgbaston Test. But such a performance should be treated as an outlier and not the norm. As Morkel briefly touched upon during the press conference, the fourth seamer's high economy-rate would have made it difficult for the skipper to depend on the option heavily. The Indian think-tank should have presumed that the Bazballing English batters would target the weak link before turning their attention to the others. Either India was okay with the fourth seamer bowling less, or it was caught blindsided by the Englishmen's aggressive approach to the back-up pacer. Neither option reflected well on the team's decision-making. The Lord's Test was the one occasion where England batted conservatively, and this showed in Nitish's figures. His tally of 17 overs in the first innings of the third Test remains the most by an Indian fourth pacer in the series. Nitish's economy rates in that match (3.64 and 4) read better compared to what the Englishmen plundered off him and Shardul in the series. But to hope that England will use that strategy in every match is not smart thinking. A major part of winning a Test and being a champion side is to have the ability to take 20 wickets consistently. And India will have to be brave in its selection and stop prioritising safety-net runs from the fourth seamer. 'What is coming through for everyone, despite India's heroism with the bat, is that the selections have been quite poor. We saw what Shardul was capable of in the first Test. Despite that, he was picked again. And we saw the repeat of that inclination to have a bowler who can bat a bit. I think that thought has to be dumped,' Sanjay Manjrekar told ESPNcricinfo after the fourth day of the Old Trafford Test. Instead of looking for more runs from its lower-order, what India needs is a crafty bowler who can add depth and variety to the attack. K.L. Rahul, Gill, Washington Sundar, and Ravindra Jadeja's tenacious show in the second innings to earn a memorable draw at Old Trafford has been proof enough that the batting is in good shape and hands. 'It has been hard to understand why India looks to get players who have two skills rather than just go for quality. Kuldeep Yadav not playing so far tells you the approach of this Indian team management. They say that India needs 20 wickets, but it's going to be difficult to convince me, because if that was the case, Kuldeep would have played by now,' Manjrekar added. 'Kuldeep as fourth seamer' Ahead of the fourth Test, former India off-spinner R. Ashwin had suggested that India play left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep 'in the role of the fourth seamer.' As weird as it may sound, there is some merit to the idea. Kuldeep's inclusion would have given another potent weapon for Gill to turn to. It also would have been a safe bet that Kuldeep would bowl more than the 11 overs Shardul did at Old Trafford. 'You should look at Kuldeep as the fourth seamer and play him according to that role. He could come in handy in the second innings and towards the fag end of England's batting. Kuldeep could be a handful even on day one. He can definitely play the role of the fourth seamer,' said Ashwin on his YouTube channel. As Gill's men approach the fifth Test, there are two big questions: will Kuldeep be the 'fourth seamer' and whether the visitors can square the series at The Oval? The answers are just around the corner.
