How to turn your any photo into magazine-style portrait using ChatGPT: 3 viral AI prompts that create pure magic
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Why Is Everyone Talking About ChatGPT Portraits?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Step-by-Step: Make Your Own Studio-Like Portrait Using ChatGPT
Sample Prompts to Try:
"Make a bold black-and-white portrait from a top-down angle. Focus on just the face with sharp details. Add soft mist around the edges and a proud expression. Use a deep black background."
"Turn this image into a cinematic portrait. Use side lighting and highlight the texture of the skin. Add a soft rain effect with gentle shadows. Keep everything moody and dramatic."
"Create a high-contrast close-up of the face, as if shot with an 85mm lens. The background should fade into darkness with a faint smoke effect. Make the expression calm and thoughtful."
Tips to Get the Best Results
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Gone are the days when creating a powerful, studio-quality portrait meant hiring a professional photographer or mastering Photoshop. With the latest AI tools inside ChatGPT, you can now transform a regular photo into a dramatic, high-end portrait, just by using the right prompt.Whether you want to give your photo a cinematic black-and-white makeover or create something that looks like it belongs on a magazine cover, all you need is a bit of creativity and three simple steps.AI-generated portraits are quickly becoming the next big trend online. Creators have been experimenting with detailed prompts that produce ultra-realistic images, complete with dramatic lighting, precise camera angles, and even water droplets or fog effects.The results? Photos that look like they came out of a professional studio, without ever picking up a camera.One viral example showed a high-definition, close-up black-and-white image that captured emotion, style, and precision. But this wasn't clicked with a DSLR. It was fully created with AI.To access image generation tools, you'll need to use ChatGPT with image capabilities (available on certain paid plans). Once you're in, you're ready to start creating.Some users start from scratch with a prompt, while others upload an existing photo and ask ChatGPT to transform it. If you want your own face in the portrait, uploading an image is the best way.This is the most important part. The more details you include, the more control you have over how your final portrait looks. Think of it like directing a photoshoot, only with words.Each of these prompts is customisable. Want to add colour, a different expression, or a specific lens type? Just tweak the wording.Use camera terms: Words like '50mm lens,' 'close-up,' or 'cinematic lighting' help the AI understand what style you want.Mention mood or emotion: A 'serious expression' or 'confident look' can change the entire feel of the portrait.Control the background: Whether it's plain black, soft fog, or dramatic lighting, stating it clearly gives you a better result.Aspect ratio matters: Want a square photo or something more portrait-style? Ask for '1:1' or '4:3' ratio in your prompt.You don't need expensive gear or hours of editing to get that powerful, studio-finish portrait. With just the right prompt, ChatGPT can help you create something eye-catching, expressive, and completely unique. It's not just about editing anymore, it's about storytelling through AI.So next time you want a stunning profile picture or a creative project for social media, try it out. You might just surprise yourself with what you can create in minutes!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Skip the AI FOMO, cash in where no one's looking: Bernstein backs old-school payouts and warns AI may be the next dot-com bubble
ChatGPT's role in market surge Live Events Cycles do not last forever Why dividend stocks matter now Utilities quietly hold their own (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Richard Bernstein, Chief Investment Officer at Richard Bernstein Advisors , sees too much heat in the artificial intelligence trade. In a note dated 30 June, he drew a sharp line between today's AI rush and earlier booms that went too far.'Investors seem universally focused on 'AI', which seems eerily similar to the '.com' stocks of the Technology Bubble and the 'tronics' craze of the 1960s,' Bernstein wrote. He added that while AI dominates headlines, 'we see lots of attractive, admittedly boring, dividend-paying themes.'Since OpenAI's ChatGPT appeared in November 2022, the numbers have been hard to ignore. The S&P 500 has gained 54 percent. The Nasdaq 100 has soared 90 percent. Some valuations have pushed back to levels last seen just before the dot-com crash or even the market peak in has made investors pile into anything labelled AI. But Bernstein says that might not be smart money at this stage. He made clear he is not calling the exact top. Still, trends do not run forever.'The best time to invest in something is when it's out of favour — not after a massive rally has occurred,' he laid out how investor moods flip as markets change. Early in a bull run, fear rules. People look for dividends and lower-risk bets. Once they feel bold, they chase high growth stories instead.'At the beginning of a bull market when momentum and beta strategies are by definition most rewarded, investors' fears lead them to emphasise dividends and lower-beta equities,' he said. 'In later-cycle periods when dividends and lower beta become more attractive, investors' confidence leads them to risk-taking and momentum investing.'His take? We are no longer early in this cycle. 'We clearly are not at the beginning of a bull market and, as we've previously written, the profits cycle is starting to decelerate,' he where does that leave investors who do not want to get burnt? Bernstein says boring can be smart. He points to dividend stocks, especially in the utilities sector, as ready for a fresh companies pay steady sums to shareholders. Some pocket the money. Many reinvest it back into the stock, which helps their position grow over time.'One of the easiest methods for building wealth has historically been the power of compounding dividends,' Bernstein said. 'Compounding dividends is boring as all get out, but it's been highly successful through time.'People might assume high-flying tech leaves old utility stocks in the dust. Bernstein says that is not quite true.'In fact, compounding dividend income has been so successful, that the Dow Jones Utilities Index's returns have been roughly neck-and-neck with NASDAQ returns since NASDAQ's inception in 1971,' he do not need to pick single stocks to get in. Funds like the SPDR S&P Dividend ETF and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF spread the bets and deliver a mix of steady message is not about ditching technology altogether. It is about seeing the pattern. Big fads rise fast. They fall just as fast when the shine wears off. While the AI hype carries on, he thinks dividends could quietly do the heavy trick, he suggests, is to look where others are not. Sometimes the most boring corner of the market can end up paying the best.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
AI might now be as good as humans at detecting emotion, political leaning, sarcasm in online conversations
When we write something to another person, over email or perhaps on social media, we may not state things directly, but our words may instead convey a latent meaning - an underlying subtext. We also often hope that this meaning will come through to the reader. But what happens if an artificial intelligence (AI) system is at the other end, rather than a person? Can AI, especially conversational AI, understand the latent meaning in our text? And if so, what does this mean for us? Latent content analysis is an area of study concerned with uncovering the deeper meanings, sentiments and subtleties embedded in text. For example, this type of analysis can help us grasp political leanings present in communications that are perhaps not obvious to everyone. Understanding how intense someone's emotions are or whether they're being sarcastic can be crucial in supporting a person's mental health, improving customer service, and even keeping people safe at a national level. These are only some examples. We can imagine benefits in other areas of life, like social science research, policy-making and business. Given how important these tasks are - and how quickly conversational AI is improving - it's essential to explore what these technologies can (and can't) do in this regard. Work on this issue is only just starting. Current work shows that ChatGPT has had limited success in detecting political leanings on news websites. Another study that focused on differences in sarcasm detection between different large language models - the technology behind AI chatbots such as ChatGPT - showed that some are better than others. Finally, a study showed that LLMs can guess the emotional "valence" of words - the inherent positive or negative "feeling" associated with them. Our new study published in Scientific Reports tested whether conversational AI, inclusive of GPT-4 - a relatively recent version of ChatGPT - can read between the lines of human-written texts. The goal was to find out how well LLMs simulate understanding of sentiment, political leaning, emotional intensity and sarcasm - thus encompassing multiple latent meanings in one study. This study evaluated the reliability, consistency and quality of seven LLMs, including GPT-4, Gemini, Llama-3.1-70B and Mixtral 8 x 7B. We found that these LLMs are about as good as humans at analysing sentiment, political leaning, emotional intensity and sarcasm detection. The study involved 33 human subjects and assessed 100 curated items of text. For spotting political leanings, GPT-4 was more consistent than humans. That matters in fields like journalism, political science, or public health, where inconsistent judgement can skew findings or miss patterns. GPT-4 also proved capable of picking up on emotional intensity and especially valence. Whether a tweet was composed by someone who was mildly annoyed or deeply outraged, the AI could tell - although, someone still had to confirm if the AI was correct in its assessment. This was because AI tends to downplay emotions. Sarcasm remained a stumbling block both for humans and machines. The study found no clear winner there - hence, using human raters doesn't help much with sarcasm detection. Why does this matter? For one, AI like GPT-4 could dramatically cut the time and cost of analysing large volumes of online content. Social scientists often spend months analysing user-generated text to detect trends. GPT-4, on the other hand, opens the door to faster, more responsive research - especially important during crises, elections or public health emergencies. Journalists and fact-checkers might also benefit. Tools powered by GPT-4 could help flag emotionally charged or politically slanted posts in real time, giving newsrooms a head start. There are still concerns. Transparency, fairness and political leanings in AI remain issues. However, studies like this one suggest that when it comes to understanding language, machines are catching up to us fast - and may soon be valuable teammates rather than mere tools. Although this work doesn't claim conversational AI can replace human raters completely, it does challenge the idea that machines are hopeless at detecting nuance. Our study's findings do raise follow-up questions. If a user asks the same question of AI in multiple ways - perhaps by subtly rewording prompts, changing the order of information, or tweaking the amount of context provided - will the model's underlying judgements and ratings remain consistent? Further research should include a systematic and rigorous analysis of how stable the models' outputs are. Ultimately, understanding and improving consistency is essential for deploying LLMs at scale, especially in high-stakes settings.
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Nithin Kamath on why Zerodha has intentionally held back on enabling AI-driven order placement
Zerodha CEO Nithin Kamath revealed the firm has intentionally avoided AI-driven order placement. Instead, it's focused on backend upgrades to stay relevant in an automated fintech future where brokers risk becoming invisible infrastructure. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Even as fintech companies scramble to add AI features in their broking platforms, Zerodha has intentionally held back from enabling AI-driven order placement, founder and CEO Nithin Kamath said in a tweet on his official X is a deliberate choice the discount brokerage is making as a long-term vision of staying relevant in an industry which is big on automation."...we've intentionally held back on enabling AI-driven order placement," Kamath said, adding that "in a future where everything is automated, trust and infrastructure will be our only real moats".Kamath believes that humanity is at the brink of a massive shift where investing, trading, banking, and payments will increasingly happen through custom AI-powered apps built by users themselves, simply by typing natural language such a future, Kamath sees brokers risking themselves to be reduced to 'pipes' — the invisible infrastructure connecting these AI tools to exchanges and clearing systems.'The only way to stay relevant is to ensure we're the best pipe: fast, efficient, reliable, and invisible when it matters,' Kamath explained in a candid note reflecting on how tools like ChatGPT and Claude are changing the game. Instead of rushing to introduce AI-based trading, Kamath said, highlighting that Zerodha's tech team has focused obsessively on removing backend bottlenecks, making systems faster, scalable, and ready for a future dominated by user-built interfaces."That's why, over the years, K and the tech team have been obsessively making our systems faster, more scalable, and future-ready. Even if these improvements don't immediately change a customer's trading or reporting experience, we've chosen to fix every possible bottleneck today, not later," the tweet further said."Tools like ChatGPT and Claude make it clear this shift isn't an "if" but a "when." It might take a few years or a decade, but it's inevitable. Human advisors will still have a role, mainly to help people stick to what these tools recommend," it said that as of now, he remains unsure as to how things will evolve and Zerodha's approach will be to remain curious, track the trends and act where it is required."As for how things will evolve, the answer is grey. No one knows. Our approach: stay curious, keep track of the trends, and act where it makes sense. For example, we've intentionally held back on enabling AI-driven order placement," the tweet Read: Zerodha's Nithin Kamath on JioBlackRock's stockbroking license: Deep pockets won't help
