&w=3840&q=100)
Ads for banned products up 24% in FY25; offshore betting dominates: ASCI
Out of these 3,347 ads, 3,081 were from offshore, illegal betting platforms. These 3,081 ads included 318 that pertained to influencers promoting such platforms. On the other hand, 233 ads potentially violated the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act; 21 promoted alcohol brands; and 12 ads promoted unauthorised forex trading apps banned by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).
ASCI has been escalating these ads that are prohibited by law to regulators for appropriate action, it said in its report.
With this, offshore betting and realty sectors emerge as the most violative ones as ads in these segments flagged by consumers rose to 83 per cent in the 2024-25 period. Overall, ASCI looked into 9,599 complaints and scrutinised 7,199 as. In this, 98 per cent of scrutinised ads required some form of modification. The offshore betting segment contributed 43 per cent of cases while the realty sector accounted for 24.9 per cent of cases, ASCI said in a release.
'This year has been one of meaningful collaborations as we expanded our efforts to address critical areas like offshore betting or gambling and real estate violations, which are high-impact violations,' said Manisha Kapoor, chief executive officer (CEO) and secretary general of ASCI, in a statement.
The realty sector was followed by ads in the personal-care segment, contributing 5.7 per cent of cases, healthcare at 5.23 per cent, and food and beverage segment accounting for 4.69 per cent of the cases. Additionally, influencer violations contributed to 14 per cent of the ads processed, the report added.
'The rise in public complaints — and more importantly, how many advertisers chose to quietly comply — says a lot about where trust still lives,' said Partha Sinha, chairman, ASCI.
Out of the 1,015 influencer ads investigated by ASCI, the ones in the illegal betting segment were highest at 31.4 per cent, followed by fashion and lifestyle at 16.2 per cent.
'ASCI's continued efforts have resulted in 83 per cent overall compliance, with TV and print showing near-perfect adherence (of ads) at 98 per cent,' the release said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
Cryptocurrency: America rushes in where India, China fear to tread
Geopolitics has revived the 'crypto wars' of the 1990s, yet today the struggle is continental rather than computational. On one flank stand the United States and much of the West, treating digital tokens as just another volatile asset class to be tamed by markets and tolerated by regulators. On the other side stand China and India, unlikely fellows whose shared suspicion of borderless money has inspired a twin assault on private crypto-currencies. Whether laissez-faire zeal or dirigiste caution proves the surer guide will shape global finance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Beijing fired the latest salvo on May 31, when it imposed a blanket ban on mining, trading and even private ownership of coins such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. The decree capped a decade-long squeeze that began with banking curbs in 2013, hardened into an ICO prohibition in 2017 and outlawed onshore transactions in 2021. Three concerns drove the final kill switch. First, capital flight: analysts reckon more than $50 billion seeped out of China via crypto in 2019-20. Second, financial stability: untamed price swings threaten household savings and could undermine the country's highly leveraged property developers and shadow banks. Third, political control: decentralised ledgers collide with the Communist Party's quest for digital sovereignty and jeopardise the e-CNY, a central-bank token Beijing insists must sit on the throne. New Delhi has not gone so far, yet it has tightened the fiscal tourniquet. Gains on any coin attract a punitive 30 per cent tax and a one-percent tax deducted at source on every trade. The Reserve Bank of India, which once likened Bitcoin to a Ponzi scheme, still campaigns for an outright ban, warning that borderless money could drain rupee sovereignty and turbocharge illicit flows. Across the Pacific the mood is giddier. Roughly one in six American adults already owns some crypto. Wall Street hawks spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds; North America now processes more on-chain value than any other region. Donald Trump, sensing populist resonance, is pouring accelerant on the bonfire. His media firm is floating 'America First' crypto ETFs, seeking a 2.5-billion-dollar Bitcoin treasury and trumpeting the Genius Act, a law that offers legitimacy to dollar-pegged stablecoins. Meanwhile, a meme coin dubbed 'Trump' has vaulted from obscurity to multibillion-dollar heft, with scant disclosure and most of the supply parked in entities the former president ultimately controls. Oversight, like taxes on Mar-a-Lago tips, looks optional. The divergence is rooted in history as much as ideology. The West has few capital controls and long experience of volatile assets; the Global South has spent decades fencing off foreign-exchange reserves. Washington views crypto much as it once viewed biotech or cannabis: speculative, risky, but ultimately containable. Beijing and New Delhi see an escape hatch through which wealth, tax and ultimately sovereignty might vanish. Studies of money laundering reinforce their fears. Forensic firms report that criminals cherish the 'virtually instant' cross-border hop of tokens, and European police agencies warn that professional crypto-launderers now pose a systemic threat. Officials fret that a mere string of private keys could spirit fortunes abroad faster than regulators can draft circulars. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Yet the prize is hardly stable. Bitcoin has crashed by more than 50 per cent five times: from 1,200 dollars to 200 in 2013, from 20,000 to 3,000 in 2018, and from 69,000 to 20,000 in 2022, before roaring past six figures in late 2024. Still, adoption creeps upward. Roughly 560 million people—almost seven per cent of humanity—now hold a sliver of crypto. Millennials dominate in America; in Vietnam and Nigeria grass-roots users are even younger. The genie is out, but it still rides a roller coaster. Proponents trumpet three virtues. Crypto, they say, slashes payment friction, crossing borders in minutes rather than banking days. It extends financial inclusion because a smartphone is cheaper than a branch network. And it offers censorship resistance, letting dissidents raise funds under repressive regimes. Each claim carries a sting. Congestion fees can rival bank wire costs, and proof-of-work remains an energy glutton. Volatile balances can evaporate faster than payday-loan interest, leaving the poorest with no recourse. The same cloak that shields activists also hides ransomware gangs and narco-cartels, frustrating police armed only with subpoenas. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, the stand-off sharpens. China's e-CNY pilots are courting Belt-and-Road creditors; India's digital-rupee sandbox is under way. The United States toys with a central-bank dollar yet seems happier letting private stablecoins bloom so long as they stay green-backed and vaguely regulated. The conflict is no longer merely regulatory; it is philosophical. Must money remain an instrument of the state, or can code and consensus dethrone the decree? Crypto's architecture answers yes; its history of scams answers not yet. The writer is a senior journalist with expertise in defence. Views expressed are personal and do not necessarily reflect those of Firstpost.
New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Digital arrest: Retired RBI employee duped of Rs 49 lakh in Hyderabad
HYDERABAD: An 80-year-old retired Reserve Bank of India (RBI) employee lost Rs 49 lakh in a digital arrest fraud after fraudsters posed as officers of the Mumbai crime police. According to his complaint, on August 6, he received a call where the caller claimed that an Anti-Money Laundering (AML) case had been filed against him in the Mumbai High Court and that an arrest warrant had been issued. He was then connected to individuals identifying themselves as Inspector Sandeep Rao from the Mumbai Cyber Crime Department and Inspector Officer Vijay Khanna, IPS. The accused asked him to share his Aadhaar card, after which they alleged his ID was linked to an international money laundering case. They cited the example of Naresh Goel, arrested in 2023 with 247 cases of money laundering, and claimed that his Aadhaar details were found in similar suspicious transactions. The victim received two documents via WhatsApp — an acknowledgement letter from the Financial Department, Mumbai Crime Branch and CBI, and an arrest order on Directorate of Enforcement letterhead carrying his details. The accused told him his bank accounts needed to be verified and could be frozen. Under pressure, he was coerced into transferring money to what was claimed to be an RBI AML Department account for verification. Following their instructions through internet banking, he ended up transferring a total of Rs 49 lakh. Based on his complaint, a case has been registered.
Mint
7 hours ago
- Mint
SBI raises home loan interest rates: Here's what HDFC Bank, PNB, ICICI Bank and others levy
SBI home loan: India's biggest lender, State Bank of India, has revised its interest rates for home loans and home-related loans effective 1 August 2025. This rate revision comes after the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) decided to keep its key benchmark interest rates (repo rates) unchanged at 5.55% in the August 2025 Monetary Policy announcement. The interest rate for a regular home loan (term loan) currently stands at 7.50% to 8.70%, according to revised data. SBI has raised the upper interest rate band by 25 basis points to 8.70%, compared to 8.45% earlier, according to a report by the Economic Times. However, the lower limit of the home loan rates has remained unchanged. As SBI hikes interest rates, let's take a look at what other banks offer — HDFC Bank offers home loans at interest rates starting from 7.90% p.a. This rate applies to home loans, balance transfer loans, house renovation loans, and home extension loans. ICICI Bank promises its customers home loans at fixed and floating interest rates for an amount ₹ 5 crore, starting at 7.70%. The bank offers home loans to customers with different interest rates for salaried and self-employed individuals. The standard home loan interest rates currently stands at 8.75%-9.40% for salaried individuals up to a loan of ₹ 35 lakh and 8.75%-9.55% for self-employed individuals. For home loans in the range of ₹ 35 lakhs to ₹ 75 lakhs, interest rates are levied in the range of 8.75%-9.55% for salaried and 8.75%-9.70% for self-employed customers. Home loans over ₹ 75 lakhs incur an interest rate ranging from 8.75% to 9.65%, 8.75% to 9.80% for salaried and self-employed, respectively. The current home loan interest rate at Kotak Mahindra Bank starts at 7.99% per annum. For existing customers switching from a floating rate to a fixed rate, the interest will be 12% per annum. Bank Baroda offers home loans at interest rates ranging from 7.45% to 9.20% for both salaried and non-salaried individuals. Notably, the interest rate will depend on loan limit and the CIBIL score of the applicants. Additionally, a risk premium of 0.05% will be levied for customers who do not obtain credit insurance cover. The bank levies an interest rate on home loans starting at 7.45%. PNB offers home loans at varying interest rates based on the loan amount, CIBIL score and tenure. Canara Bank provides home loans at an interest rate in the range of 7.40% to 10.25 %. Any increase in the home loan interest rate will raise the borrowing costs for those taking a term loan at the higher interest rates. Based on the customer's credit profile or credit score, a higher interest rate would mean a slightly increased EMI. This increase will also impact the repayment burden by raising the interest amount.
