Four key takeaways from Trump's White House summit on Ukraine
Below are some key points arising from the US president's range of bilateral and multilateral talks with the leaders of Ukraine, Germany, Britain, France, Italy, Finland, the European Union and Nato.
A bilateral meeting between Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Vladimir Putin is something the Russian president has always resisted, urging for a list of preconditions to be met first, but the possibility may now be nearer than ever.
Donald Trump said after the White House talks: 'I called President Putin, and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between President Putin and President Zelenskyy. After that meeting takes place, we will have a Trilat, which would be the two Presidents, plus myself.'
According to German chancellor Friedrich Merz, Putin told Trump in a call during Monday's White House meeting that he was ready to meet Zelenskyy 'within the next two weeks'. For his part, Zelenskyy reiterated on Monday that he was ready for talks with Putin.
Both Merz and the Finnish president, Alexander Stubbs, offered some pointed language on the topic, saying in separate press conferences that it remained to be seen if the Russian president had the 'courage' to go ahead with the meeting. Stubbs said: 'Putin is rarely to be trusted.'
So far, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov has said only that Putin was open to the 'idea' of such direct talks.
Although Trump poured cold water on the importance of a ceasefire, he did offer hope on US involvement in helping guarantee Ukraine's future security. After welcoming Zelenskyy to the White House, he said: 'When it comes to security, there's going to be a lot of help', even if European countries need to be 'a first line of defence'.
Later, Trump said in a post that these guarantees would be 'coordinated' with the US.
On Monday morning, Zelenskyy described security guarantees as 'a key issue, a starting point towards ending the war' and appreciated Trump's indication that the US was ready to be part of that guarantee.
Zelenskyy said those guarantees would be 'formalised in some way in the next week or 10 days', which can prove to be a long time when it comes to diplomacy involving Trump's White House.
The US president's desire for a Nobel peace prize is well known – who can forget the 'Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity' established as part of a peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan this month – and it seemed clearly in his mind during his Oval Office meeting with Zelenskyy.
The 'peacemaker-in-chief' said he had ended six wars since he became president, with his administration claiming to have helped settle the conflicts between Israel and Iran, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, Cambodia and Thailand, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo, and Egypt and Ethiopia. But, as Andrew Roth explains, it is a claim that stretches the realities on the ground.
Trump's approach to foreign crises is peppered with efforts to find a way to establish economic opportunity for US industry, and Ukraine may be no different if a deal is finalised. Zelenskyy has, after all, previously had to negotiate the US president's desire for Ukraine's critical minerals as part of his rivalry with China.
On Monday, Zelenskyy indicated the price of obtaining security guarantees from the US included a pledge to buy $90bn of US weapons, primarily aircraft and air defence systems.
He added that the US would also buy into Ukraine's drone program, an area in which it has made significant strides since Russia's full-scale invasion began. Earlier, the Financial Times reported that the drone deal was worth $50bn.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russia has 'special mechanisms' to supply oil to India, embassy official says
NEW DELHI, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Russia will continue supplying oil to India and the country's President Vladimir Putin will meet India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi by the end of year, a Russian embassy official in India said on Wednesday. Russia has a "very, very special mechanism" to continue oil supplies to India, Roman Babushkin, the charge d'affaires at the Russian embassy in India, told reporters at a press briefing, adding that India's crude oil imports from Russia will remain at the same level. No dates had been finalised for the Putin-Modi meeting yet, he said. The U.S. is set to impose an additional 25% tariff on Indian exports on August 28, citing their imports of Russian oil, which expanded after Western nations sanction Russian supply after its invasion of Ukraine. However, the U.S. has stopped short of imposing similar tariffs on China over its purchases of Russian oil. Last month, the European Union sanctioned Russian-backed Indian refinery Nayara Energy, leading the refiner to cut back processing and companies to curtail their trading with them. Trade between Indian and Russia was expected to grow 10% annually, Evgeniy Griva, Deputy Trade Representative of Russia to India said at the briefing.
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Primary school pupils in white working-class regions ‘among worst performing'
Primary school pupils in white working-class regions are among the worst performing in the country, a report has suggested. The Institute for Government (IfG) think tank said disadvantaged white pupils in England have 'particularly poor educational outcomes' compared to their peers. In a report published on Wednesday, it found that councils in the bottom fifth for performance of disadvantaged pupils were 'disproportionately likely' to have large shares of pupils from white working-class backgrounds. Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, last week sounded the alarm over the 'national disgrace' of under-performance among the demographic. She warned that 'far too many' white working-class children were failing to get the exam results they needed to move on in life and risked being 'written off' by society. Pupils across England, Wales and Northern Ireland will receive their GCSE results on Thursday, a week after A-level results were handed out. This year's cohort were mostly aged 11 when schools were first closed during the Covid pandemic. The IfG report analysed pupil performance at Key Stage 2 – when children are around the same age, in their final year of primary school. It claimed that educational inequalities across England have 'grown wider and more pronounced' since the pandemic, with only 10 local authorities recording the same or better attainment levels last year than before the first Covid lockdown. Disparities have grown especially among the poorest children, in part because they were less likely to have access to laptops or quiet office spaces during the pandemic, the think tank said. It meant fewer than half of disadvantaged pupils – or around 46 per cent – met the expected standards in reading, writing and maths for Year Six last year. The results were particularly stark among regions with high rates of white working-class children, with only 41 per cent meeting the required standards for 11-year-olds last year. It included areas such as Knowsley and Blackpool, while almost all of the top performing regions in Key Stage 2 attainment were in London. Along with pupils from mixed white or black Caribbean backgrounds, white working-class children were the only pupils with attainment rates lower than the national average last year, the IfG said. By contrast, close to half of disadvantaged children from mixed backgrounds met that benchmark, with the figure rising to nearly 60 per cent for both disadvantaged black pupils and disadvantaged Asian pupils. The IfG cited previous research by the Commons education committee, which suggested that white British children's performance may be particularly vulnerable to disadvantage. It said this was because they were more clustered in rural or coastal areas with 'lower funding ... higher teacher vacancies, longer travel times and worse digital infrastructure'. The think tank suggested tackling high absence rates would help to improve performance among disadvantaged pupils. The Telegraph revealed last week that the Government was preparing a series of interventions to address low attainment measures among certain demographics in a white paper to be unveiled in the autumn. Measures being considered by ministers include plans to expand an AI-powered attendance tool, showing schools how they fare against those with similar demographic make-ups. The Department for Education currently publishes data showing school absence levels among minority ethnic groups, but is understood to be alarmed at figures for white working-class pupils.
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Britain 'will send troops to defend Ukraine's skies and ports under security deal' - as Putin launches new attacks and NATO chiefs prepare to meet in Washington
Britain is ready to send troops to help defend Ukraine's skies and ports, but will not deploy them to the front line near Russia, the head of the armed forces will tell the US today. Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, chief of the defence staff, is taking part in NATO talks as military leaders from across the alliance gather to discuss what support can be offered to Kyiv. Thirty chiefs of staff are involved in the discussions, which are expected to shape what a future security deal for Ukraine could look like. Although Radakin is set to make clear that the UK will commit troops for logistical help and training, he will insist that he will not place British forces directly in harm's way. The focus will be on protecting Ukrainian airspace and ports rather than risking combat with Russian soldiers. Britain has not been involved in a major combat operation since the Afghanistan war ended in 2014. More recent missions have focused on training, protection and peacekeeping. Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin launched new savage attacks on Ukrainians overnight, casting doubts on his commitment to seek a peace deal. The terror strike was on Okhtyrka, some 28 miles from the border, where 13 homes were hit. Earlier, it was believed that as many as 30,000 troops had been talked about, but that number has been scaled back following concerns in Europe. NATO military heads are set to meet to iron out details of the security guarantees that EU leaders say are essential before any peace deal is made in the Ukraine war According to The Guardian, one official in the know said: 'Wednesday is a really important moment. 'Nothing happens in Washington without the president giving the green light, so Trump giving his support to security guarantees on Monday kickstarted a lot of activity.' The meeting today comes at a critical point where NATO chiefs are working out what security guarantees can be put in place for Ukraine, a step many in Europe see as vital to making any peace deal with Moscow possible. US president Donald Trump already signalled his backing during his meeting with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders on Monday. However, he has also said there will be no American troops involved in active combat in war-weary Ukraine. The recent attacks on Ukraine, which officials say were 'directed against the civilian population', will underscore the importance of security guarantees for the country. In the Odesa region, Russian strikes hit a Triton oil depot and port infrastructure in Izmail. A fire train was battling to extinguish the blaze after involving ballistic missiles and Shahed drones. In the Kherson region, the Russians wounded a woman pensioner,70, in an artillery strike on Bilozerka village. The strikes come after many critics have been left wondering what the security guarantees may be. Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, indicated that it may be based on the principle of Article 5, where an attack on one ally must be seen as an attack on all. Downing Street confirmed that Starmer hosted a call with more than 30 world leaders on Tuesday morning to update them on what had been discussed in Washington. Britain is expected to use today's session to underline to Washington what it is willing to do if a peace deal is signed. Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy told reporters on Tuesday that he expected agreements to be ready soon, saying he believed they would be finalised in the next 'week or 10 days.' Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy told reporters on Tuesday that he expected agreements to be ready soon Despite the optimism, there is growing doubt over how Moscow will respond - Vladimir Putin has long made it clear that he sees NATO's expansion into Ukraine as a direct threat. Russia has repeatedly warned that it does not want Ukraine to ever join the alliance, calling such a move unacceptable. Some European analysts believe Putin is unlikely to accept even a limited NATO deployment inside Ukraine, and that the ideas of security guarantees is just a way of putting him under more pressure. Hours ahead of their meeting on Monday, Trump told Zelensky that there would be 'no going into NATO by Ukraine' as part of a deal for peace.
