Central African Republic rebels found guilty of war crimes by ICC
The charges stem from their roles as senior leaders in a militia known as the anti-Balaka, which engaged in bitter fighting with the mainly Muslim Seleka rebel group in 2013 and 2014. The interreligious violence left thousands dead and displaced hundreds of thousands. Mosques, shops, and homes were looted and destroyed. Anti-Balaka forces attacked localities with Muslim civilians, killing and dislocating many of them,' Presiding Judge Bertram Schmitt said, reading out the verdict in The Hague.
Malick Karomschi, president of the Muslim Organization for Innovation in the Central African Republic, a nongovernmental organization that supports victims of sexual violence, said that he's glad that justice has been served. 'We feared the worst–that they would be acquitted–so the fact that they were found guilty is already a good thing,' Karomschi told The Associated Press.
The pair maintained their innocence during the trial, which opened in 2021. It was the first case at the global court to focus on the violence that erupted after the Seleka seized power in the Central African Republic in 2013. The country has been mired in conflict since rebels forced then President Francois Bozize from office. Anti-Balaka militias fought back, also targeting civilians and sending most of the Muslim residents of the capital Bangui fleeing in fear. The trial of an alleged Seleka commander, Mahamat Said Abdel Kani, is ongoing. Last year, judges at the court unsealed another arrest warrant in the investigation. According to prosecutors, Edmond Beina commanded a group of about 100–400 anti-Balaka fighters responsible for murdering Muslims in early 2014. Separate proceedings against Beina and five others at a specially-created court are slated to begin in the Central African Republic on Friday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Islamabad rejects Zelensky's ‘baseless' allegations of Pakistani nationals' involvement in Ukraine conflict
ISLAMABADA: Pakistan's foreign office on Tuesday rejected 'baseless and unfounded' allegations by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who said this week that his country was fighting 'mercenaries' from various states including China, Pakistan and parts of Africa. After visiting a frontline area in the northeastern Kharkiv region, Zelensky wrote on X on Monday that as per reports from his 'warriors,' mercenaries from China, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Pakistan, and African countries are participating in the war against Ukraine. Zelensky has previously accused Moscow of recruiting Chinese fighters for its war effort against Ukraine, charges Beijing denied, while North Korea has also reportedly provided thousands of its troops in Russia's Kursk region. 'The Government of Pakistan categorically rejects the baseless and unfounded allegations of the involvement of Pakistani nationals in the conflict in Ukraine,' the foreign office said in a statement. 'To date, Pakistan has not been formally approached by the Ukrainian authorities, nor has any verifiable evidence been presented to substantiate such claims.' It said the government will discuss the matter with Ukrainian authorities and seek clarification on Zelensky's statement. 'Pakistan reaffirms its commitment to the peaceful resolution of the Ukraine conflict through dialogue and diplomacy, in accordance with the principles of the UN Charter,' the foreign office concluded. Russia invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, amid protests from Western governments and peace activists worldwide. Thousands have been killed on both sides since the conflict began and rages on, with Washington and other powers calling for an end to the fighting that has dealt setbacks to the global economy and developing countries. Pakistan has repeatedly called for de-escalation and cessation of hostilities between Russia and Ukraine ever since the war began. Pakistan has also welcomed talks between both countries and agreements on prisoner exchanges while raising alarm at the increasing surge in civilian casualties as the war continues. Islamabad has moved closer to Russia in recent months, signing trade and investment agreements with Moscow as it seeks to escape a prolonged economic crisis. Pakistan has avoided criticizing Russia for invading the eastern European country, calling instead for a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Two children among injured in Russia's overnight attack on Kharkiv region: Ukraine
Two children were among several people injured in Russia's largest air attack on the Ukrainian town of Lozova since the war began, the head of the local administration said on Tuesday. 'Critical infrastructure, apartment buildings and private homes have been damaged,' Serhiy Zelenskyy, the head of the city's council, said on the Telegram messaging app. 'Lozova has endured the largest attack since the beginning of the war,' he said, adding several people including two children were wounded in the town in the eastern Ukrainian region of Kharkiv. The scale of the attack on the town, which had a pre-war population of about 55,000, was not immediately clear. Reuters could not independently verify Zelenskyy's report. There was no immediate comment from Russia. Both sides deny targeting civilians in the war that Russia launched with a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The Kharkiv region, which lies near the border with Russia, has been the target of regular Russian drone and missile attacks since the start of the war. Parts of Lozova, a town in the southern parts of the Kharkiv region, were left without power and water supply, Zelenskyy said. 'We will persevere!' he added.
Al Arabiya
4 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Gaza war deepens Israel's internal divisions
As it drags on into its twenty-second month, Israel's war in Gaza has increasingly set friends and families against one another and sharpened existing political and cultural divides. Hostage families and peace activists are urging Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government to secure a ceasefire with Hamas and free the remaining captives abducted during the October 2023 attacks. Right-wing members of Netanyahu's cabinet, meanwhile, see the war as an opportunity to occupy and annex more Palestinian territory, despite mounting international criticism. The debate has fractured Israeli society, strained personal relationships, and eroded national unity at what many consider the country's moment of greatest need during its longest-ever war. 'As the war continues, we become more and more divided,' said Emanuel Yitzchak Levi, a 29-year-old poet, schoolteacher, and peace activist from Israel's religious left who attended a peace meeting in Tel Aviv's Dizengoff Square. 'It's really hard to keep being a friend, or family, a good son, a good brother to someone that's—from your point of view—supporting crimes against humanity,' he told AFP. 'And I think it's also hard for them to support me if they think I betrayed my own country.' As if to underscore the tension, a cyclist stopped to shout 'traitors' at the gathering, accusing activists of playing into Hamas's hands. No flowers Dvir Berko, a 36-year-old IT worker, paused his scooter journey through downtown Tel Aviv to offer a more measured critique of the peace activists' call for a ceasefire. Berko and others accused international bodies of exaggerating the threat of starvation in Gaza. He argued that Israel should withhold aid until the remaining 49 hostages are released. 'The Palestinian people, they're controlled by Hamas. Hamas takes their food. Hamas starts this war, and in every war that happens, bad things are going to happen. You're not going to send the other side flowers,' he said. 'So, if they open a war, they should realize and understand what's going to happen after they open the war.' Voices like Berko's reflect the deepening polarization in Israeli society since Hamas's October 2023 attacks, which left 1,219 people dead, according to Israeli authorities. Independent journalist Meron Rapoport, a former senior editor at the liberal daily Haaretz, told AFP that the divisions had been building long before the war. Hamas's attack initially triggered a wave of unity, but as the war dragged on and Israel's conduct came under international scrutiny, attitudes on the political right and left have hardened. Political motives 'The moment Hamas acted there was a coming together,' Rapoport said. 'Nearly everyone saw it as a just war. 'As the war went on, it has made people come to the conclusion that the central motivations are not military reasons but political ones.' According to a survey conducted between July 24 and 28 by the Institute for National Security Studies, involving 803 Jewish and 151 Arab respondents, Israelis narrowly blamed Hamas for delays in reaching a hostage release deal. Only 24 percent of Israeli Jews said they were distressed or 'very distressed' by the humanitarian situation in Gaza, where, according to UN-mandated reports, 'a famine is unfolding' and civilians are often killed while seeking food. Still, there is public support for the families of hostages. Many of them have accused Netanyahu of prolonging the war to protect his political standing. 'In Israel there's mandatory army service,' said Mika Almog, 50, an author and peace activist with the It's Time Coalition. 'So these soldiers are our children, and they are being sent to die in a false criminal war that is still going on for nothing other than political reasons.' In an open letter published Monday, 550 former top diplomats, military officers, and intelligence chiefs urged US President Donald Trump to tell Netanyahu that the military phase of the war is over and that a hostage deal must now be the priority. 'At first this war was a just war, a defensive war. But when we achieved all military objectives, this war ceased to be a just war,' said Ami Ayalon, former director of the Shin Bet internal security service. The conflict, he warned in an accompanying video, 'is leading the State of Israel to lose its security and identity.' His declaration, shared by the very figures who once prosecuted Israel's wars, echoed the message long carried by peace activists who have often protested against them. 'Awful period' Avi Ofer, a 70-year-old biblical archaeologist and peace campaigner from a kibbutz, wore a yellow ribbon marked with the war's duration—'667' days—at a Tel Aviv rally. 'This is the most awful period in my life,' he said, visibly emotional. 'Yes, Hamas are war criminals. We know what they do. The war was justified at first. At the beginning it was not a genocide.' Few Israelis use the word 'genocide,' but many are aware that the International Court of Justice is considering whether Israel has breached the Genocide Convention in Gaza. While only a minority voice concern over the humanitarian toll, many Israelis worry the war could turn their country into an international pariah—and that their conscripted children may one day be treated as war crimes suspects abroad. Israel and Netanyahu, with US support, have firmly rejected the ICJ case in The Hague.
