logo
Geopolitical tensions, trade wars take big toll on global economic growth

Geopolitical tensions, trade wars take big toll on global economic growth

Hans India3 days ago

The world has been facing a slew of challenges due to geopolitical tensions, trade policy uncertainty after the Trump administration announced reciprocal discounted higher tariffs, the supply chain getting disturbed due to various sanctions, border tensions and need to spend more on defence because of the Russia and Ukraine conflict, Israel-Palestine and Hamas conflict. As a result of these worries many countries are caught in heavy public debt. This is especially regarding nations without having fiscal buffers and those whose revenue is getting consumed by interest burden. This is one of the reasons why the world is suffering from low economic growth, particularly due to less focus on adoption and mitigation measures on climate change that has led to droughts, cloud bursting, floods, thunderstorms and warmer climates. These setbacks areresulting in heavy damage and losses, while rebuilding is a tough option given the lack of substantial aid, grants or debt from developed countries,who, in the first place, are responsible for current climate events due to excess use of fossil fuels and green gas emissions. This is despitethe Paris agreement to bring down temperature below 1.5°c from the pre-industrial level. These must be addressed by way of adequate adoption and mitigation measures.
We are already experiencing extreme heat levels and high warming, which are affecting agriculture, leading to loss of life and adverse impact on environment.
It is very deplorable that today's biggest global challenges are climate change, conflict and humanitarian crises. There is an urgent need for greater global cooperation to address interconnected issues like poverty, inequality and food security. Rising temperatures, extreme weather events and rise in sea levels pose a significant threat to the ecosystem and human populations. Ongoing conflicts and humanitarian crises are causing displacement, suffering and instability. The issues of poverty, hunger, malnutrition, global health crisis, biodiversity loss disrupting ecosystem require greater global cooperation and support to lessen the impact.
There was an understanding that every country should endeavour to achieve 17 the Sustainable Developmental Goals (SDGs) related to removal of hunger good health and well-being, quality education, gender equality, providing clean drinking water, and sanitation, affordable and clean energy, decent work and economic growth, industry, innovation and infrastructure, reduced inequalities, sustainable cities and communities, responsible consumption and production, climate action including environmental protection with adoption and mitigation measures , life below water and on land, peace, justice and strong institutions and partnership are the goals that are to be achieved by 2030.
Following outbreak of Covid-19, achieving the desired goals is behind schedule and in the current situation of low economic growth, lesser focus on climate change measures, high fiscal deficit and high domestic and external debt, lesser fiscal buffers, ongoing wars and tensions are adding to the problems in scaling the 2030 target.
The 2024 Sustainable Development Goals report highlighted that nearly half of the 17 targets are showing minimal or moderate progress, while over a third are stalled or going in the reverse.
According to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres 'As per the annual SDG report card 2024, the world is getting a failing grade.The takeaway is simple - our failure to secure peace, to confront climate change and to boost international finance is undermining development. We must accelerate action towards going about Sustainable Developmental Goals and we don't have a moment to lose.'
Things are getting worse as the geopolitical tensions remain and there are no signs of any impending peace. Moreover, the recent trade and policy uncertainty of Trump administration is also taking a toll on international trade and economic growth.
Globalization and international trade and commerce, international collaboration and cooperation had the desired outcome in terms of growth of crossborder trade, movement of capital, technology, higher growth and global prosperity. There is a fear that globalisation is making way for regionalisation in the current policy of focusing on individual regional development or national self-sufficiency. There is also a fear that the geopolitical tensions and trade wars and policy uncertainty, including restricted emigration, are pushing the world economy into rival blocks. The fear of fragmentation of the world economy even though not much evident should be totally avoided and global cooperation and collaboration need to be continued.
The next COP 30 is being held under the Presidency of Brazil in November. Prior to that climate meetingsare scheduled for June 16 to 26 in Bonn. Brazil has sets a three-point agenda for COP 30: 1. To reinforce multilaterism and climate change regime under UNFCCC; 2. To connect the climate regime to people's lives and 3. To accelerate implementation of the Paris Agreement by stimulating action and structural adjustments across all institutions that can contribute to it.
It is being watched about how much these efforts are yielding the desired outcome amid global uncertainties.
Global leaders must come forward to overcome these challenges and take required measures to reduce the tension and war, conflict and focus on global economic growth and development with equal emphasis on climate change measures. This collective can help bring about prosperity and sustainability for the world as a whole.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US-backed Gaza aid group names evangelical as chairman
US-backed Gaza aid group names evangelical as chairman

Hindustan Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

US-backed Gaza aid group names evangelical as chairman

* GHF says it has delivered some 7 million meals in Gaza * UN refuses to work with GHF, says aid distribution militarized * Israel accuses Hamas of stealing aid, Hamas denies it UNITED NATIONS, - The U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation on Tuesday named as its executive chairman an American evangelical Christian leader who has publicly backed President Donald Trump's proposal for the United States to take over the Palestinian enclave. The appointment of Rev. Dr. Johnnie Moore, a former evangelical adviser to the White House during Trump's first term in office, came as health officials said at least 27 people died and more than 150 were injured trying to reach a GHF aid site. "GHF is demonstrating that it is possible to move vast quantities of food to people who need it most — safely, efficiently, and effectively," Moore said in the foundation statement. "GHF believes that serving the people of Gaza with dignity and compassion must be the top priority." The GHF began operations one week ago under a distribution model criticized by the United Nations as the militarization of aid. The GHF says so far it has given out seven million meals from so-called secure distribution sites. It uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to get aid into Gaza. The U.N. and aid groups have refused to work with the GHF because they say it is not a neutral operation. U.N. aid chief Tom Fletcher has said it "makes aid conditional on political and military aims" and uses starvation as "a bargaining chip." The appointment of Moore could fuel U.N. concerns, given his support for the controversial proposal Trump floated in February for the U.S. to take over Gaza and develop it economically. After Trump proposed the idea, Moore posted video of Trump's remarks on X and wrote: "The USA will take full responsibility for future of Gaza, giving everyone hope & a future." 'BAD GUYS' The U.N. did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the appointment of Moore, who has accused the U.N. of ignoring "bad guys" stealing aid in Gaza. The U.N. has long-blamed Israel and lawlessness in the enclave for impediments getting aid into Gaza and distributing throughout the war zone. Israel has long accused Hamas of stealing aid, which the group denies. In a reference to the new GHF-led aid model, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last week said Israel was "taking control of food distribution" in Gaza. "The @UN & others should clean up their act & work with America," Moore posted on May 26. "Surely, these old U.S. & E.U.-funded humanitarian orgs won't let people starve in exchange for being 'right' when they know what they have done hasn't worked & has, in fact, made a terrible war worse?" The war in Gaza has raged since 2023 after Hamas militants killed 1,200 people in Israel in an October 7 attack and took some 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies, and Israel responded with a military campaign that has killed over 54,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities. Moore visited Israel about three months after the 2023 Hamas attack and wrote: "Never have I seen such horror." Just a couple of weeks later, he posted a video titled "Come visit beautiful Gaza," which sought to portray Gaza as a tourist destination if it wasn't for Hamas militants. Trump has said Gaza has the potential to be "The Riviera of the Middle East." The United Nations has long endorsed a vision of two states living side by side within secure and recognized borders. Palestinians want a state in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza Strip, all territory captured by Israel in a 1967 war with neighboring Arab states.

‘These acts qualify as terrorism': Leavitt blasts anti-semitic violence across US
‘These acts qualify as terrorism': Leavitt blasts anti-semitic violence across US

Economic Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

‘These acts qualify as terrorism': Leavitt blasts anti-semitic violence across US

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that President Trump considers recent anti-Semitic violence, including the Boulder attack and arson at the Pennsylvania governor's mansion, as domestic terrorism. Leavitt stated the administration has taken historic action to combat anti-Semitic threats and will continue exploring new policy measures. She assured Jewish Americans that the President stands firmly with them and condemns all forms of terrorism and hate. Show more 11:38 02:32 11:48 02:54 04:02 09:02 09:55 03:32 09:16 04:43 02:26 03:08 01:36 12:52 03:31 02:36 05:44 08:06 03:25 11:39 04:45 09:20 08:10 12:03 01:39 01:39

Sulphur-cleaning device in coal plants not necessary: Central scientific committee
Sulphur-cleaning device in coal plants not necessary: Central scientific committee

The Hindu

time44 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Sulphur-cleaning device in coal plants not necessary: Central scientific committee

A high-powered committee of experts, chaired by Principal Scientific Advisor (PSA) Ajay Sood, has recommended that India do away with a decade-long policy of mandating equipment, called Flu Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) units, in all coal-fired thermal power plants (TPPs), according to documents perused by The Hindu. These FGD units are required to be retro-fitted in TPPs to cut harmful sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions. While 92% of India's 600 TPPs have not yet installed FGD units, the recommendation would exempt about 80% of them from needing to install such equipment. The limited number of vendors capable of installing such equipment in India, the high installation costs, the potential rise in electricity bills, and disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic have been some of the reasons historically cited by the Power Ministry, the overseer of India's TPPs, for plants' inability to adhere to previous deadlines. In theory, the costs of non-compliance could run to crores of rupees in fines, though these have not materialised thanks to deadline extensions. 'FGD not necessary' However, this was the first time that multiple arms of the government congregated to deliberate on whether FGDs were required in the first place. Their verdict draws on three reports by the CSIR-NEERI, the National Institute of Advanced Studies, and the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. The lead scientists of these three institutions – each 'supported' by different arms of the government – were at the meeting on April 23, along with representatives from the Office of the PSA, the Union Power Ministry, and the NITI Ayog. They were all largely unanimous that FGD 'was not necessary.' The guiding principles informing the committee's recommendation are that: SO2 levels in ambient air across the country are around 10-20 micrograms/cubic metre, well below India's air quality norms of 80; Indian coal is low in sulphur; SO2 levels in cities near plants with operational FGD units do not differ significantly from those without these units, and all of these were anyway well below permissible levels. The committee opined that concerns about sulphates – a potential by-product when SO2 emissions reach certain atmospheric levels, thus forming particulate matter (PM) – are unfounded. They cited an analysis of 5,792 PM samples across the country, which found 'low elemental sulphur' content (max 8 micrograms/m3 after outlier removal) which was deemed 'insignificant — for considering PM removal as a benefit of FGD.' FGDs may worsen carbon emissions One argument mentioned in the report was that using FGDs might result in additional carbon dioxide emissions and accentuate global warming. 'Installing FGDs in all TPPs by 2030 will increase the Auxiliary Power Consumption (APC) of the TPPs, thereby adding approximately 69 million tons of CO2 emissions to the atmosphere (2025-30) while reducing SO2 emissions by —17 million tons. Adding more long-lived CO2 emissions while removing short-lived SO2 emissions by installing FGDs indiscriminately in all TPPs in India despite the low Sulphur content of Indian coal will enhance global warming.' On the other hand, given that burning coal is India's primary source of electricity, India's annual SO2 emissions has risen from 4,000 kilotonnes in 2010 to 6,000 kilotonnes in 2022. By comparison, Indonesia, a source of imported coal to India has averaged about 2,000 kt in the same period, according to data from the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), a Helsinki-based think tank. This is when India's emission standards, at 100 micrograms/m3 (thus requiring FGD), is lower than Indonesia's 800. Environment Ministry 'studying' order Those who attended the meeting included the Secretary, Minister of Power and three other senior officials; Secretary, Environment and Forests and two other officials; four officials of the Office of the PSA; representatives of the NITI Ayog, Central Electricity Authority (the power regulator), Central Pollution Control Board, and academicians. A detailed questionnaire to the Power Ministry was unanswered until press time. Tanmay Kumar, Secretary, Environment Ministry, told The Hindu that his Ministry was 'studying' the order. India has 180 coal-fired thermal power plants, each of them with multiple units. The 600 TPPs, depending on their size, age, proximity to densely populous cities, and background pollution levels, were given different timelines by the Environment Ministry to comply with the FGD installation requirements. Deadlines have been shifted three times, with the most recent extension coming on Dec 31, 2024. Major population centres The committee, according to the minutes of the meeting seen by The Hindu, will 'recommend' to the Power and Environment Ministers that only power plants located within a 10-km radius of the National Capital Region and other cities with a million-plus population be required to install FGDs. These are called Category A plants. There are 66 such plants, and only 14 of them have installed FGDs. Currently, all these plants are required to comply by 2027. Plants within a 10-km radius of 'Critically Polluted Cities' or 'Non Attainment Cities', called Category B plants, would be eligible for exemption on a 'case by case' basis, on a joint review by the Central Electricity Authority or Central Pollution Control Board. There are 72 such plants, with only four having installed FGD. These plants currently have a deadline of 2028. The remaining 462 plants all come under Category C, of which 32 have installed FGDs. These plants have been given a 2029 deadline, but the committee has now recommended that Category C plants be exempted completely, along with some units in Categories A and B which were set up at least 20 years ago. 'Will not affect public health' 'The key common point in these studies is that fitment of FGDs in all TPPs in India is not necessary to comply with the NAAQ (National Ambient Air Quality) standards whose compliance is essential to safeguard public health. While all TPPs must comply with the December 2015 stack emission standards for PM pollution and freshwater consumption, the SO2 stack emission standards can be relaxed to ensure that they are in conformance with the NAAQ standards which are notified by CPCB, keeping in mind the human health and other aspects. This way, TPPs may be able to comply with these standards without fitting FGDs. Since the existing NAAQ standards (for ambient SO2) must be complied with, this change will not affect human health in India,' the committee concludes. Currently, State governments or affiliated companies run a majority of the Category A TPPs, whereas private authorities hold the highest share in Categories B and C.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store