Council considers ban on garden bonfires
The proposal by Hammersmith and Fulham Council would prevent burning household or garden waste outside, but would not apply to barbecues, domestic fire-pits and indoor wood burning, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
According to Public Health England, deaths from particulate air pollution in Hammersmith and Fulham in 2023 were one per cent above the England average.
A new byelaw can take up to six months to establish, requires a public consultation and the outline of the byelaw must also be approved by the Secretary of State.
Particulate pollution (PM) refers to the mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets suspended in the air that can be either naturally occurring or human-made.
The council must carry out studies of the borough's domestic wood burning emissions and an analysis on the impacts of outdoor fires on public health.
Under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, councils must investigate smoke complaints if it is considered a "statutory nuisance" which can lead to an abatement notice requiring it to stop or be reduced.
However, Hammersmith and Fulham Council says this law is "reactive" - it only applies if someone complains and doesn't ban burning outright, hence their proposed byelaw.
"Outdoor fires and wood burning create harmful particulate matter emissions, for which it is considered there is no safe level," a report by the council said.
"Short term exposure to high particulate matter emissions can cause asthma episodes and play a part in a multitude of other longer-term effects."
The byelaw would have "climate adaptation and resilience benefits" reducing the risk of fires becoming "out of control" in warmer and drier weather, the report added.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk
Hammersmith & Fulham Borough Council
Local Democracy Reporting Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man thanks opticians for picking up rare cancer
A man has thanked his optician for saving his life after spotting he was unknowingly living with a rare type of blood cancer. Robert Campbell went for a routine eye test in January at Flint Optometry, near his home in Wolverhampton, when optometrist Claire Williams became concerned. She noticed a number of haemorrhages at the back of his eyes and he was soon called into New Cross Hospital, where he was told he had lymphoma. Mr Campbell said he had been feeling unwell for a while but multiple blood tests, a colonoscopy and an endoscopy had not detected the cancer, so it was a "shock" to receive the news. "I got a call from a consultant at New Cross saying they wanted to see me now, so I went and he told me I'd got lymphoma," he said. "I am grateful as without Ms Williams picking it up, I don't know where I'd be now, I dread to think." He added that his cancer was now under control after undergoing chemotherapy. Ms Williams said she made an immediate referral to hospital following his eye test. "As I checked the peripheral part of the back of the eyes, I was able to see quite a number of haemorrhages and a third of them were even more unusual and very rarely seen," she said. Peter Rockett, another optometrist at Flint Optometry, said regular eye tests were important as they could detect more than just poor vision. He said: "You can see deep into the body through a convenient window, the pupil. "So it is a great way to assess someone's eye health as well as their general health." Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram. More on this story Single mum graduates despite two chronic illnesses Wolves fan takes on stadium abseil in dad's memory 'Don't let the word cancer get you down' 'I am cancer free thanks to new blood treatment'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sick Gazan children denied life-saving medical care by UK visa delays
When Keir Starmer announced last month that he was 'accelerating' efforts to evacuate sick children from Gaza, there were celebrations among medical charities horrified by the humanitarian crisis. Yet Whitehall bureaucracy means that the first children to be treated by the NHS will not arrive until the start of September, nearly six weeks after the prime minister's pledge. The delay may be fatal, according to Project Pure Hope, the charity that has funded the medical evacuations of the only three children to be granted medical visas for the UK. Omar Din, the charity's co-founder, said: 'Each day of delay is costing children their lives. Needless death. A n entire list of patients that Project Pure Hope has readied could die before the UK finally implements its scheme.' On Saturday, 96 MPs wrote to ministers asking them to give a timeline and adequate funding for the evacuations. The letter, coordinated by Dr Simon Opher, a Labour MP, said they should act "without delay" as the children were at risk of imminent death, the BBC reported. Italy took in 31 children and their families on 13 August last Wednesday, having accepted 17 in June. The United States allowed 11 children in early August. The UK's approach contrasts with the previous government's decision to send a team to Kyiv to evacuate 21 Ukrainian children with cancer to the UK for treatment by the NHS days after the Russian invasion. Delays may lead to medical complications. Doctors in Jordan and Lebanon told The Observer they have been forced to postpone treatment for some children because they are too malnourished to recover from surgery. More than 17,000 children in Gaza have been killed and another 33,000 have been injured, Unicef said last month. Din said some of those deaths were due to a lack of basic medical care in Gaza, since many of its hospitals have been destroyed. He said the charity was 'pleased' that the government had accepted its proposal to bring 30 to 50 children and their families to the UK to be treated by the NHS. 'However, the delays establishing a UK scheme for Gazan children are unacceptable and must now proceed at pace and scale,' Din said. 'When a patient arrives with severe acute malnutrition on top of a war-related injury, our first priority is stabilisation, not surgery' Since the Gaza war began on 7 October 2023, EU countries including Spain, Italy, Ireland, Norway and Romania have accepted more than 200 children, mostly with complex medical needs. Most of the 5,000 children needing treatment have been evacuated to other countries in the region, including Egypt, the UAE, Qatar, Lebanon and Jordan. Six children arrived on 6 August at a reconstructive surgery hospital run by MSF, the international medical charity, in the Jordanian capital Amman . Dr Earnest Emetole, deputy clinical director at the hospital, said two of them arrived with 'severe acute malnutrition'. They have been put on a high-protein diet so that they can be stabilised. 'When a patient arrives with severe acute malnutrition on top of a war-related injury, our first priority is stabilisation, not surgery,' he said. 'Malnutrition severely weakens the immune system, causes anaemia, delays wound healing, and can also affect mental health. Operating immediately in such cases carries very high risks, so we focus first on gradually restoring nutritional status.' One of the two malnourished patients who has severe burns requires frequent visits to the operating theatre for dressing changes to prevent infection and protect the wound, a process that is often painful. Once the patient's condition allows, our plastic surgery team will plan a skin graft.' MSF's clinics in Khan Younis and Gaza city are screening more than 1,000 people a week, and there has been 'a marked increase in severe acute malnutrition rates' since the end of June, Emetole said. 'The arrival of these two malnourished patients in Amman reflects the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza and is a direct consequence of the ongoing siege and resulting food deprivation in the Strip.' Project Pure Hope has helped another 30 children from Gaza go to the American University of Beirut hospital, for treatment by a team from the Ghassan Abu Sittah Children's Fund, who have expertise in treating war wounds based on decades of experience of other conflicts. Professor Ghassan Abu-Sittah, a plastic and reconstructive surgeon from London who has worked in conflicts in Gaza, Yemen, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, said it was disappointing that the UK government had not done more to help Gazan children. 'The first you know about the fact that the Spanish are doing it is when you see kids landing in Spain,' he said. 'That's the difference [with the UK]. Do you talk about it for six or seven months or do you just get up and do it?' His team is also not able to treat some children because they are severely malnourished, he said. A government spokesperson said they were 'accelerating plans to evacuate children from Gaza who require urgent medical care, including bringing them to the UK for specialist treatment where that is the best option for their care'. Photograph by Abdallah F.s. Alattar/Anadolu via Getty
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
How to weigh the benefits and risks of disclosing a disability to your employer
Whether you decide to tell your employer about a disability or a long-term health condition is a personal decision. In an ideal world, disclosing this kind of information should be easy – and enable you to access support and accommodations, should you need them. But in reality, it often carries the risk of bias and discrimination. 'I have had long-term mental health issues, autism and ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder),' says Claire Fisher, head of communications and engagement at Inclusion Barnet, an organisation for deaf and disabled people. 'When I tried to advocate for myself in a previous role, the board had no understanding or expertise in reasonable adjustments,' she explains. 'Instead, they reacted by focusing on why I had not previously disclosed my disability. In fact, I had done so but they had failed to document it or provide any follow up support. At the time I'd not understood myself what should have happened.' Read more: How to stay motivated during a long job hunt Legally, nobody has to tell their employer they're disabled, have a health condition or that they are neurodivergent. But if you have an informed and supportive employer, telling them can give them the opportunity to provide support. For many, though, deciding whether to tell an employer about a disability or condition involves weighing up the benefits and risks. So what should you take into consideration before deciding what is best for you – and how can you approach the conversation? Consider your employer's attitude First, do your research on the organisation. 'What do existing employees say, how do they talk about health, disability, long-term conditions?' says Fisher. Have a look on the company's website and social media accounts to see if there is any mention of inclusivity. You could also look at reviews left by current or former employees on sites like Glassdoor, which can provide an insight into an organisation's culture. Think about your needs It can help to consider your wants, needs or requirements before disclosing personal information about yourself. For example, if workplace adjustments like working from home or an adapted desk are non-negotiables, telling your employer may be the right move. Equally, it may be important to you to be able to speak openly about yourself – which is a valid reason. Consider the pros and cons Some positives of disclosure include legal protections from discrimination, the chance to discuss health-related needs, support from management and access to accommodations. 'Often, a few simple adjustments can make a world of difference to both the employee and the employer – everyone wins,' says Fisher. However, it's common for a disability disclosure to lead to negative attitudes – both intentional and unintentional. Studies show that telling an employer can lead to accusations of 'faking' it, as well as stigmatisation and bullying. According to a 2025 survey by the TUC, half of disabled workers reported being bullied or harassed in the past year, with experiences ranging from exclusion from activities to verbal and physical threats. 'Employers may make assumptions about what you can and cannot do based on misinformed knowledge of your condition or impairment,' adds Fisher. 'Awareness of others mistakenly feeling like they need to tread on egg shells around you or protect you from certain duties can be patronising.' Know your legal rights It's essential to know your legal rights so that you can spot discrimination in the first place and decide if and how you want to address it. 'If an employee does not disclose a disability to their employer, it cannot generally be held that they discriminated against the employee because of it,' says Kate Palmer, employment services director at Peninsula. 'If they were to bring a claim of disability discrimination, it would fail.' Read more: How to give your job applications a 'human touch' in the AI era However, Palmer explains that if an employer could reasonably have known about a disability – for example, seeing an employee use a walking aid – they have 'constructive knowledge' and can be liable for any unfair treatment. 'Employers have a legal duty to make reasonable adjustments for employees with a disability,' says Palmer. 'Where this does not happen, the employee is entitled to make a claim to an employment tribunal. It's important, therefore, for employers to discuss with their employees any adjustments that may help and, where these are reasonable, to make them.' Choose the right time Disclosing may help you access accommodations, but choosing the right time is important. Whether you talk about your condition in a job interview is your choice, but it can lead to discrimination. 'Employers should not ask job applicants any questions about their health or medical history until after a job offer has been made and accepted, except in specific circumstances permitted by the law,' says Palmer. If a candidate discloses a medical condition after accepting a job offer, employers must ensure they make reasonable adjustments to remove any barriers to work caused by a disability. Focus on your skills If or when you do disclose, focus on your skills, experience and expertise – and how these align with the company's goals and values. 'Be clear about what reasonable adjustments you need, if you know,' says Fisher. 'It would be impossible for any employer, even if they had other staff with the same condition or impairment as you, to know exactly what you need to succeed in the role. You might not fully know yet yourself. If you can go in with possible solutions and an open mind to work together with your employer you can usually work something out.' Read more: What to expect from a maternity discrimination employment tribunal Deciding whether to disclose a disability at work is rarely simple. It's a balance between protecting your privacy and ensuring you have the support you need to thrive. By weighing the culture of your workplace, understanding your legal rights and thinking about your personal needs, you can make a choice that feels right for you. Ultimately, the responsibility for creating inclusive workplaces lies with employers – but until that's the norm, only you know what the right decision is. Read more: How to speak to your boss about miscarriage How to stay motivated during a long job hunt Does mental health first aid work?Sign in to access your portfolio
