
Donald Trump administration sues NYC over sanctuary city policies post officer shooting
The federal lawsuit is the latest in a series of suits brought by the Justice Department targeting state or city policies seen as interfering with immigration enforcement.
'New York City has released thousands of criminals on the streets to commit violent crimes against law-abiding citizens due to sanctuary city policies,' Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a news release. 'If New York City won't stand up for the safety of its citizens, we will.'
The lawsuit — which also names Mayor Eric Adams, Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch and numerous other city officials and departments — targets policies that include barring city law enforcement from honoring civil immigration detainers by holding people in custody past their release date.
Kayla Mamelak Altus, a spokesperson for Adams, said the mayor 'supports the essence' of the city's policies but has urged the City Council 'to reexamine them to ensure we can effectively work with the federal government to make our city safer' when it comes to dealing with 'violent criminals.' She added: 'So far, the Council has refused.'
A representative for the City Council did not immediately return a request for comment.
The suit comes after Trump officials on Monday blamed the city's sanctuary policies for the shooting of a Customs and Border Protection officer in a Manhattan park over the weekend. The officer was off duty and not in uniform at the time.
Authorities have said the two men apprehended in connection with Saturday's robbery-gone-wrong have been arrested a number of times since they entered the country illegally from the Dominican Republic in recent years. One of the men had been released following a 2024 arrest despite an active detainer, according to the lawsuit.
Police say the 42-year-old officer had been sitting with a woman in a park beneath the George Washington Bridge when two men approached on a moped. The officer, who has not been named, drew his service weapon and exchanged gunfire with one of the men. The officer was shot in the face and arm while the suspect was hit in the groin and leg.
The lawsuit says New York City's policies violate the supremacy clause of the Constitution by interfering with the enforcement of federal law. Similar lawsuits have been filed in recent months against New York state; Colorado; Rochester, New York; Los Angeles; and elsewhere.
'New York City has long been at the vanguard of interfering with enforcing this country's immigration laws,' the lawsuit says. 'Its history as a sanctuary city dates back to 1989, and its efforts to thwart federal immigration enforcement have only intensified since.'
It says city policies limiting cooperation and information sharing with federal agents conflict with federal law.
New York Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Donna Lieberman said the city 'has no obligation to redirect its resources to take on federal immigration enforcement, let alone the cruel and lawless deportation campaign the Trump regime is waging.'
'New York City's decades-old, bipartisan sanctuary laws have made our city safer, supported our economy, strengthened our communities, and made it easier for our people to access vital services," Lieberman said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
9 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump's tariff may seem severe, but India not worse-off than nations that signed trade deal: GTRI
Despite US President Trump's proposed tariffs on Indian goods, GTRI suggests India isn't worse off than nations that made trade deals with Washington. These countries conceded significantly, while India refused to compromise on key areas like agriculture. India's tariffs are WTO-compliant, and its relationship with Russia has aided in managing inflation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US President Donald Trump's announcement to impose a 25 per cent tariff and penalty on Indian goods may seem severe but the country is not in a worse position than nations that signed trade deals with Washington, think tank GTRI said on Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said the UK, the EU, Japan, Indonesia, and Vietnam now face elevated tariffs, and in return, have given sweeping concessions --zero tariffs on US farm goods, massive investment pledges, and purchases of American oil, gas, and has made no such concessions, it added."While Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff plus penalty on Indian goods appears harsh, a closer look shows that India is not significantly worse off than countries that did sign deals with the US," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava added that India did not walk away from the deal and it negotiated in good faith but refused to cross its red lines particularly on agriculture, where over 700 million livelihoods are at justification for India's tariffs, trade barriers, and ties with Russia does not stand up to scrutiny, he said, adding that India's tariffs are WTO-compliant, non-tariff barriers are common globally, and discounted Russian oil has helped India manage inflation during global volatility."India is not alone; over 90 countries face similar US pressure. A deal may still emerge, but only on fair terms. For now, India's principled stand has avoided the trap of a one-sided deal -- and that's a success," he added.


Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
From 'savvy' Putin to secondary sanctions: How Trump's relations with Russia have changed
From calling Vladimir V. Putin 'savvy' and 'genius' to issuing secondary charges against India for having relations with Russia, United States President Donald Trump's relationship with the Russian President has taken a big became one of the first nations to experience secondary sanctions from Trump on Wednesday. The US President announced that India would be facing a 25% tariff on its imports to the United States, with an additional penalty for buying energy and arms from Russia. The exact quantum of the penalty is unclear. Changing relationsTrump had once described President Vladimir V. Putin as 'savvy' and 'genius' for invading Ukraine, while bragging about his 'very, very good relationship' with the autocratic Russian leader. Trump appeared ready to distance himself from negotiations altogether and said it would be up to Russia and Ukraine to stop the fighting despite being enthusiastic about cracking a deal in early months of his second-term as a president. With rising frustrations, Trump's latest threat— and shortened timeline for Putin to comply — highlights his growing frustration with the Russian leader. 'I'm not so interested in talking any more,' Trump said on Monday. 'He talks. We have such nice conversations, such respectful and nice conversations, and then people die the following night — with a missile going into a town.' Trump returned to office vowing to quickly end Russia's war in Ukraine, citing his relationship with Putin. Those efforts have failed to materialize, with Moscow only responding with maximalist demands for Ukrainian territory and declining calls for face-to-face talks between Putin and his counterpart, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump initially focused his ire on Zelensky as an obstacle to peace, but in recent weeks has signaled growing impatience with Putin, accusing him of not being sincere about wanting to end the war despite multiple calls and months of phone calls between Trump and Putin, however, have failed to bring progress and Russia has ramped up its missile and drone attacks on Ukraine in recent weeks, hammering civilians in cities — an indication that Moscow has no intention of ending its invasion.'I haven't had any response. It's a shame,' Trump said about the reaction from Moscow to his new deadline. Secondary sanctions on India, others Trump's threat on countries with 'secondary sanctions' for buying oil from Russia is already becoming a reality with India being slapped with a penalty by the US. The Washington and other capitals allied with Ukraine view such oil purchases as a form of tacit support for Russia, helping to bolster its economy and undercut sanctions. Trump said on Tuesday that he would start imposing measures on Russia, such as secondary tariffs of 100% on trading partners, if it did not make progress on ending the war within 10 to 12 days — moving up from an earlier 50-day deadline. The United States also warned China, the largest buyer of Russian oil, that it could face huge tariffs if it kept buying, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told a news conference in US president on July 14 initially announced a 50-day deadline on Russia — which would have fallen on Sept. 2. The new deadline would fall on Aug. 8. 'We're going to put on tariffs and stuff, and I don't know if it's going to affect Russia, because he wants to, obviously, probably keep the war going,' Trump said on extended gains above $69 after Trump reiterated his threat for additional tariffs on Russia. West Texas Intermediate oil posted its biggest jump since June, when Israel carried out airstrikes on Iran. Bullish options on the Brent crude benchmark commanded a premium to bearish options for the first time in two earlier this month said he would impose 100% tariffs on Russia if it did not comply with his calls for a truce. His advisers have cast the penalties as likely taking the form of secondary levies that would hit countries that buy Russian exports such as oil. Washington and other capitals allied with Kyiv view such oil purchases as a form of tacit support for Russia, helping to bolster its economy and undercut Kremlin on Tuesday said it 'took note' of Trump's threat to curtail the deadline but made clear that it was unlikely Putin would change course. Trump has voiced mounting frustration with Putin for refusing to agree to a halt to fighting that could allow for peace talks. The US president returned to office with a pledge to quickly end the war that is now in its fourth year.


Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
25% Import Tariff On Indian Goods: The Art Of The No Deal
The Art Of The No Deal Ajay Srivastava Updated: Jul 30, 2025, 21:26 IST IST That India didn't blink on a trade pact with US is (1) good for core interests like protecting farmers and (2) not as bad as it sounds given what countries that have buckled have had to concede to Trump Months of speculation over the India-US trade deal ended last evening with a blunt announcement from Trump on Truth Social. Starting Aug 1, all Indian goods entering US will face a 25% import tariff, plus an additional penalty. This new tariff regime will apply even to goods already in transit. An apparel item that previously attracted a 12% tariff will now face 12% + 25% + a-yet-to-be-disclosed penalty.