'Allez Habs! Allez!': STM to support Montreal's sports teams en français
Montreal's transit agency will be removing the word "Go" from its electronic displays when supporting local sports teams, to comply with Quebec's language laws, and the move is raising eyebrows from even the most ardent defenders of the French language at the National Assembly.
As such, the popular phrase "Go Habs! Go!" will be substituted with its French equivalent " Allez Habs! Allez!"
In a statement, the Société de transport de Montréal (STM) says the decision follows a previous order from the province's language watchdog, the Office québécois de la langue française (OQLF). It's related to a complaint over the use of "Go! CF MTL Go!" in support of the local men's soccer team on bus displays.
Though the word "Go" is a common sports expression, it's an Anglicism.
Ruba Ghazal, the Québec Solidaire co-spokesperson and a self-proclaimed "lover of the French language," said "Go Habs! Go!" is Québécois, during a news conference gathering Quebec's opposition parties Thursday morning.
"I don't think that's what's threatening the French language, the 'Go Habs, Go!'"
She said protecting the language involves rather measures like making sure new immigrants as well as CEOs from large companies learn French.
Catherine Gentilcore, the culture and communications critic for the Parti Québécois (PQ), echoed Ghazal, saying that her party has "bigger" priorities when it comes to the protection of the French language. She cited expanding Bill 101 to junior CEGEPs (junior colleges), improving francization efforts and strengthening culture and language programs in schools.
She said PQ Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon will not be deleting "Go Habs! Go!" from his vocabulary.
"It's a waste of time, waste of money, waste of energy," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
37 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
EMSB joins legal challenge to stop Quebec's school budget cuts
The English Montreal School Board will ask a judge to put a pause on the province's latest round of budget cuts. In a special meeting of the council of commissioners on Monday, the board voted unanimously to join the legal challenge mounted by the Quebec English School Boards Association (QESBA). That challenge will probably be filed in court next week, and would ask a judge for a stay of implementing the 2025-2026 budgetary rules imposed on school boards and school service centres. Announced in June, the province's education ministry imposed $570 million in cuts on schools throughout the province. EMSB chairperson Joe Ortona said that even though the government appeared to correct its course by announcing a new budgetary envelope of $540 million, that is merely a distraction. The new money comes with far too many strings attached, Ortona says, arguing it is impossible for his board to get access to most of that funding. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Ortona explained the cuts amount to roughly $20 million in the board's $450 million annual budget. Part of the reason the cuts are so dramatic is that they bar schools from using any surplus accumulated from previous years to affect this year's budget. 'It is impossible to balance the budget with these cuts that the government is imposing,' Ortona said. He added that if the board were to enact all the imposed cuts, some extracurricular programs would be cancelled, breakfast programs would be scaled back, and children with special needs would get fewer services. 'Parents are worried,' Ortona said. 'Because they don't know where the cuts will be coming from or what will be affected.' Ortona said the board is reaching out to other English-language boards. Since French-language boards have been abolished, he is urging lobby groups like Uni-es pour l'École and others to support the cause. Nearly 160,000 Quebecers have already signed a National Assembly petition opposing the cuts. 'There is strength in numbers,' Ortona said. 'We're actually fighting for all of the students in both the English and French public system, because they're both suffering from these harmful cuts.' He's called on the province to rescind the June cuts altogether, and said the school board intends to argue that the cuts amount to meddling with the English-speaking community's right to control its educational institutions, a constitutional right that was upheld by a court earlier this year. 'The legal argument is that we have a Court of Appeal decision that says that the government can't micromanage how we spend the money,' Ortona said. 'So they have to stop telling us that they're giving us money to be spent only on certain specific projects. ... They're acting illegally, they're acting unconstitutionally, and it's why we're hopeful that the courts will grant the stay, and ultimately the broader legal challenge.' He added that the board has reached out numerous times over the last few weeks to Education Minister Bernard Drainville, but has yet to receive a response. On Monday, The Gazette's calls to Drainville's office were not returned as of the time of publication. This story was originally published August 11, 2025 at 4:28 PM.
Vancouver Sun
3 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Why the French are outraged that Perrier filtered its water: 'This really is our Water-gate'
An iconic French brand dating back more than 160 years, Perrier's reputation has been rocked by a scandal. Last year, a joint investigation by Le Monde and Radio France revealed that at least a third of the country's mineral water brands — including Perrier, Contrex, Vittel and Hépar, owned by Nestlé Waters — had been illegally treated. According to the investigation, French President Emmanuel Macron's government knew about the practices and responded by 'quietly' easing the regulations. Here's what you need to know about the Perrier scandal, and why some are calling it France's 'Water-gate.' Discover the best of B.C.'s recipes, restaurants and wine. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of West Coast Table will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. At the heart of the controversy is whether brands such as Perrier can continue to market themselves as 'natural mineral water.' The 2024 Le Monde and Radio France investigation found that bottlers had been using illegal purification techniques for 'spring' and 'natural mineral' water for years, including carbon filters, micro-meshes and ultraviolet light. 'This really is our Water-gate,' Stéphane Mandard, a Le Monde journalist who worked on the investigations, told the BBC . 'It's a combination of industrial fraud and state collusion.' After a six-month inquiry, a French Senate report released in May supported Le Monde and Radio France's findings. 'Despite the fact that this method of disinfection is a fraud against consumers, authorities chose not to pursue legal action following these revelations. They decided not to inform the public of this fraud, not to inform European authorities, and not to inform local authorities who would have had direct oversight,' Alexandre Ouizille, a senator who led the committee on mineral water, said in a press conference. Natural mineral water costs 100 to 400 times more than tap water, and France is one of the world's largest producers, The Guardian reports. Unlike tap water, which is filtered and treated, mineral water can't be altered, according to European regulations. To be labelled 'natural mineral water,' rules prohibit it from being treated in any way that changes its characteristics. Ouizille said that France's agency in charge of fraud control estimated the total amount of the deception to be over 3 billion euros ($4.8 billion). Originating from protected, underground sources, mineral water traditionally didn't require treatment to make it safe to drink. This is no longer the case, experts say. Human activity and extreme weather, such as flooding, are resulting in increased groundwater contamination. In April 2024, Nestlé destroyed two million bottles of Perrier 'as a precautionary measure' because of bacterial contamination in one of its wells in Vergèze, southern France. 'The commercial model of the big producers has worked very well. But it is absolutely not sustainable at a time of global climate change,' hydrologist Emma Haziza told the BBC. 'When you have big brands that feel they have no choice but to treat their water, that means they know there is a problem with the quality.' Following the Le Monde and Radio France investigation, Nestlé Waters admitted using prohibited filters and ultraviolet treatment on mineral waters and paid a fine of 2 million euros ($3.2 million) to avoid legal action. The French Senate inquiry put the issue back in the spotlight. In February, Macron said , 'I am not aware of these things.' Adding that there hadn't been an 'agreement' with Nestlé and that 'there is no collusion with anyone.' However, the Senate report found that the government was involved in concealing Nestlé's prohibited water treatment methods. 'The presidency of the republic had known, at least since 2022, that Nestlé had been cheating for years,' the commission concluded . The findings have further rocked consumer confidence. 'I trust tap water more now,' one French grocery shopper told France 24 . Another said, 'I feel like we've been cheated.' The commission interviewed 120 people in its inquiry, including CEO Laurent Freixe and senior managers at Nestlé, the Swiss food and beverage giant. At a Senate hearing earlier this year, Freixe admitted that Perrier had used prohibited water treatments and that an official hydrologists' report recommended against renewing 'natural mineral water' status at the company's groundwater aquifer between Nîmes and Montpellier in southern France. On July 3, Nestlé said it had removed prohibited filtration devices but has yet to prove that Perrier springs can meet the legal 'natural mineral water' criteria, Le Monde reports. Perrier wells are located in a heavily populated, hot agricultural area that felt the effects of five years of successive droughts, Haziza told the BBC. Though Perrier may be the most prominent bottler to face issues, she expects more to follow. 'We can foresee that what has happened first at Perrier's site will happen to other producers in the years to come. That's why we need to move away from our current model of consumption.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our cookbook and recipe newsletter, Cook This, here .
Montreal Gazette
7 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Opinion: Another Quebec referendum? If so, let's enforce a clear question this time
Op Eds Although a majority of Quebecers might wish otherwise, the Parti Québécois could very well win the Oct. 5, 2026 provincial election, along with a mandate to hold a third referendum on separation. That is a scenario many of us would rather not think about, but we must prepare nonetheless. How? First, changes should be brought to the Quebec Referendum Act so that, if another referendum is indeed held, the question will be crystal clear. We all know the 1980 and 1995 questions were confusing. Does anyone doubt this was intentional? We must not allow it to happen again. There are precedents. The question in the 2014 referendum in Scotland was: 'Should Scotland be an independent country?' For the Brexit consultation in 2016: 'Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?' Closer to home, in Alberta, a group of separatists have submitted the following text: 'Do you agree that the Province of Alberta shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province in Canada?' All those questions are perfectly clear and not slanted in any way. If such an approach is good for the U.K., Scotland and Alberta, why would Quebec separatists be able to impose a convoluted question, so that voters are confused into voting for something they do not really want? Currently, Clause 8 of the Referendum Act gives the governing party the arbitrary power to write the question and vote it by a simple majority in the National Assembly. Therefore, a PQ majority government would be allowed to decide — once again on its own — one of the most important rules of the game. This is neither fair nor democratic. The Act should be amended so that all political parties recognized in the National Assembly must approve the text of the question. The PQ would oppose such a change, but I have no doubt most Quebecers would be in favour, because they are democrats. This is something the Legault government, with its majority in parliament, and certainly the support of the Liberals, can do right away. Amending the Referendum Act is not the only thing federalists can do to prepare. Paul St-Pierre Plamondon seems to be popular among Quebecers in large part because he appears reasonable and rational. The impression is that he does politics differently. In fact, he is arguably the most extreme leader the PQ has ever had. St-Pierre Plamondon believes, sincerely it appears, that independence will magically solve all the problems the province faces. He envisages that an independent Quebec would abandon the Canadian dollar in favour of a Quebec currency. He never talks about an association with the rest of Canada; his project is a radical break, not René Lévesque's sovereignty-association. Consistent with this 'rational' approach, the PQ will publish, in the next few months, a 'blue paper' on separation. Federalists should be ready to respond to each and every argument put forward by this document. Remember that two years ago, the party issued a 'Year One budget' that was lauded by many commentators as a rigorous report. A few months later, three economists and I showed how, in fact, the text grossly underestimates the costs of independence. This is the type of work that must be done, starting now: challenging the separatist agenda at every corner. Many might think that such a strategy is premature, that even if the Péquistes win the election next year, they will face the reality that most Quebecers do not want another referendum. However, the 1995 referendum here and the 2016 Brexit consultation showed that once the referendum ball starts rolling, anything can happen. In other words, waiting is a losing strategy. For those of us who want Quebec and Canada to win, now is not too soon to begin preparing. This story was originally published August 6, 2025 at 6:55 AM.
